Listing kills a coin?

[Nivelir]

A huge number of people are trying to bring the truth. Today, you need to try to raise the reputation of the project only after that you need to really try to place the tokens so that prices do not fall.

[tendenc]

This is something I get dig in most each the ICOs that I get entranced role so far-away. It is actually frustrative to look humans deal their coins under the ICO cost later coins get been catalogued. Besides, this is not information in crypto on the other hand so the degree at which coins loosen their measure equitable later cataloguing these times is so deficient. In a perfect world, any ICO sharers are capable to hoard many coins so equitable later cataloguing, the littlest cost they fix, they are yet forming sufficiency cash. This is what I anticipate accounting representing the globule in altcoin measure later hit change. I anticipate these ico should invent a have in mind of safeguarding their item measures close to piquant in these purchase backbone organizations, move their coins backbone at cheaper cost and next deal it at the ICO cost.

[Andthis]

dumped harder always happens when the currency is basic catalogued on change, we furthermore cannot keep off it and the affair we buoy achieve is deal it at a minimal cost or under ico cost. we buoy furthermore mastery it, on the other hand the danger is as well big, as the cost of strikes buoy keep to move ahead consume and not value it.

[Fredomago]

Reputation is a very subtle entity. I think that the addition of tokens should be only in the case when the project really has very big opportunities for the future and is already provided with real products.

When the project already gained enough fundings to establish so after listing it the value will stand against the dumping of those early holders and bounty Hunters, without any usage and no community supports nothing will happen and eventually it will die naturally.

[nikola22]

I think its not the listing but it looks like if the tokens are listed on cheap Exchanges,one reason is the rush sell of tokens because of token holders.sometimes bounty hunters are the responsible for it but i think investors also has responsible for this because they also rush sell tokens omce they look at good price.

noone will sell the tokens if they see the great future of the project. so if people sell tokens it means the project is worth nothing.

[karma_project]

The price of most coins goes down after listing. But I think that the price of high-quality coins increases several months after listing. We must find these coins and invest in them.

[boazsalosa]

The price of most coins goes down after listing. But I think that the price of high-quality coins increases several months after listing. We must find these coins and invest in them.

Yes right they let the price go down after being registered and will grow after people sell it, so it's good to invest there, but the coin is still there if you search it.

[coinbitrade]

The price of most coins goes down after listing. But I think that the price of high-quality coins increases several months after listing. We must find these coins and invest in them.

It is difficult to do this, now it is generally unclear what can rise with the time, as for me now to invest in ICO is like a casino.

[AjithBtc]

The price of most coins goes down after listing. But I think that the price of high-quality coins increases several months after listing. We must find these coins and invest in them.

It is difficult to do this, now it is generally unclear what can rise with the time, as for me now to invest in ICO is like a casino.

Investing on every ico doesn't look similar like a casino. Potential ico's can be separated away from the entire list of ico's to the market. Listing increases the growth of the respective ico, but the complication or the ICO value gets affected when investors dump the distributed tokens once it get listed to the exchanges. To avoid immediate price dumping there are more steps taken prior to listing.

[ofKJVb]

As a principle, later database on the change, the cost of strikes drop-offs, various try to deal, largely charitableness crusade sharers. I anticipate it's not value distressing almost this, whether the propose is favourable, so the cost desire finally get

[Butpow]

This has been the example because recent Feb this yr, on the other hand break and consecrate a minute of considering representing the humans that get adorned ETH into the selling and get seen the measure of their assets slag close to 40 or 50% at database. It is a discredit representing premium nimrod I cohere on the other hand you are just disbursing age and not cash. The times of fast ICO advantages are a away memory at the minute.

[Centur]

It is usual affair representing generosity huntsman. Nearly of liberality huntsman desire add the equivalent chat as you as nearly each specie cost globule and consume later the coins administered and on change database. So, the charitableness huntsman moment and speculative almost it. The big cost a definite currency is usually on ICO or on item vending.

[climatev]

This is largely current later existence catalogued in the switch cost drop-offs. Most Ico's these times when their tokenish catalogued in the change is always dumped. So this is furthermore extremely significant to recognise the propose program whether they get a purchase backbone programme where they desire aid the jotter to upthrow the cost.

[JuliaJi]

if project is good and smart - listing never kill it, because team will support the project and people will be interested to buy this coins

[guidewein]

As a munificence huntsman I anticipate that the cost of a currency has indeed fallen when a ico is above as various investors and premium orion mastery their coins and they dumped it aloof goes over marketing coins so you buoy deal it at a big cost.

[Xalata]

Too bad for your loss but i don't think listing actually kills a coin but if the cryptocurrency listed has no product or an effective ecosystem that would cause a demand of the cryptocurrency then you can be sure its price would sink. Take a look at BNB coin, do you think it was bad to list such a coin? No, it all depends on how the team puts things in place.

[Aldrinx00]

Yes most coins/altcoins that had been listed on exchanges are x10 lower compare to the ICO price, i think because some bounty hunters are selling it for cheap price for a quick bucks. I really don't know why maybe because we are in a bear market and people wants to buy at a low price.

[zikzag]

Just projects that enter the market do not have a finished product. And without a finished product, the token will cost nothing.

[heni_april]

Just projects that enter the market do not have a finished product. And without a finished product, the token will cost nothing.

What do you mean  "the token will cost nothing? " there is no problem of the existence of the product and cost. I think that the existence of a product then helped coin could thrive and rise, if the product is accepted and get a positive response from the market.

[benjamin11]

Its not necessarily has always been the case. Listing in an exchange is very important in an ICO because its the only way you can earn from it. Its also pretty normal for the price to drop after listing because most people are not actually into new coin immediately but give it time and the price will improve. Also the current market condition also affects the listing value of a certain coin. The project itself is also important whether it has potential users or not.