|
DStrange (OP)
|
 |
May 20, 2014, 03:44:32 PM |
|
Thank you so much. I updated twitter pics with your new once and now it looks super cool  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin software, network, and concept is called "Bitcoin" with a capitalized "B". Bitcoin currency units are called "bitcoins" with a lowercase "b" -- this is often abbreviated BTC.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
giveBTCpls
|
|
May 20, 2014, 04:51:42 PM |
|
The only way to save this coin is to relaunch with a fair start for everyone. Of course, that won't happen because you're heavily vested.
The relaunch is here! Monero. No, once a fork forever is a fork  You are forgeting Litecoin is a fork of Bitcoin. Bytecoin will always have the stigma of one of the dodgiest launches ever. Just like Quark, the "super fast mining" stigma will bite its ass forever, no matter what they do. The fact you have to have an act of faith and thing there is some huge community on the deep web and it's not just a small comunity of people and the devs holding is laughable at best. Plus Monero has already improved everything Bytecoin tried to do in 2 years. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wanesst
|
|
May 20, 2014, 05:04:00 PM |
|
We need an Italian and a French translation!
Reward is 350,000 BCN! |
|
|
|
romerun
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1001
Bitcoin is new, makes sense to hodl.
|
|
May 20, 2014, 05:19:49 PM |
|
why there seems to have one address per wallet, is there a command to gen new ones ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
DStrange (OP)
|
|
May 20, 2014, 05:24:59 PM |
|
why there seems to have one address per wallet, is there a command to gen new ones ?
Now it's really one address per wallet. So to generate new address you have to generate new wallet and there is no other way to do it  |
|
|
|
TooDumbForBitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 20, 2014, 05:26:59 PM |
|
Somebody on Polo trollbox says the 80% premined BCN were destroyed. Verify anyone?
|
|
|
|
|
BoscoMurray
|
|
May 20, 2014, 05:31:11 PM |
|
Somebody on Polo trollbox says the 80% premined BCN were destroyed. Verify anyone?
haha, no. they are still in the blockchain. Look for yourself |
|
|
|
|
tjkurtisss
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
|
May 20, 2014, 05:41:27 PM |
|
Can somebody recommend big pools for mining BCN? I still hesitate whether to use big or small pools..  |
Donations welcome: 6d36246a-fc42-493f-afef-46936974c2bf
|
|
|
|
Xdragon
|
|
May 20, 2014, 05:44:15 PM |
|
Can somebody recommend big pools for mining BCN? I still hesitate whether to use big or small pools.. minergate.com best pool |
|
|
|
|
JJKirsch
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
|
|
May 20, 2014, 05:47:27 PM |
|
Can somebody recommend big pools for mining BCN? I still hesitate whether to use big or small pools.. minergate.com best pool agree, really good one, I use it. |
Donations please - 7df55268-8d44-4dec-a085-d4488eff87f1
|
|
|
werrindor
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
May 20, 2014, 05:50:51 PM |
|
Can somebody recommend big pools for mining BCN? I still hesitate whether to use big or small pools.. Try for yourself mining in big and small pools. I prefer mining in small ones, so minergate is a bit big for me. |
|
|
|
|
SherdonIke
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 0
|
|
May 20, 2014, 05:54:27 PM |
|
I mine on core i7 at minergate, not much profit, but better smth, than nothing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gaba
|
|
May 20, 2014, 05:59:26 PM |
|
Somebody on Polo trollbox says the 80% premined BCN were destroyed. Verify anyone?
Nice try. This keeps getting worse every day. 80% premined!! Even 5% is to much. Problem is even bigger because BCN is true anonymity coin. |
LWWE6dtTUXuaq36KTCne5XqMQHfhfwpadC
|
|
|
GreekBitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
getmonero.org
|
|
May 20, 2014, 06:04:35 PM |
|
Somebody on Polo trollbox says the 80% premined BCN were destroyed. Verify anyone?
80% of the coins have already been mined. Coin is allegedly being mined for 2 years but there is no announcement anywhere on the internet, clearnet or not, not even any news before i think march or april. You decide.P.S. 2 years with devs not building a gui, a open source pool or exchange. And simpleminer was reported to be intentionally slow. All of those MRO made in a month just saying... |
|
|
|
|
|
Vilchaco
|
|
May 20, 2014, 06:20:33 PM |
|
Im tired of people saying... Its premine!! Its a scam!!
If u dont like it, easy, dont mine it! U have MRO, FCN, and other alternatives!
In 72 pages, almost 50 are arguing about premine...
PS: Im not mining BCN, I mined it 2 months ago and holding them. Now mining MRO...
|
|
|
|
|
k!lowatts
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
May 20, 2014, 06:21:55 PM |
|
so bytecoin is a clone of MRO? or MRO a clone of byte?
|
e5iS8ibLHqEX3HagxcS3DrZxyvkhUoUcfN - Energycoin
DJgywHCTvQ4Auo3MJrP3pYdCbzftU4T3kk - Mastiffcoin
|
|
|
|
Vilchaco
|
|
May 20, 2014, 06:23:54 PM |
|
so bytecoin is a clone of MRO? or MRO a clone of byte?
MRO is a fork of BCN |
|
|
|
|
Monkeyseemonkeydo
Member
Offline
Activity: 246
Merit: 10
|
|
May 20, 2014, 06:44:24 PM |
|
Concerning how useful this tech is, is there any chance it will be adopted into Bitcoin?
If not the core, how about a side chain?
Putting it in the Bitcoin chain itself is a hard-sell because there is a serious scalability downsize (all the cryptographically strong anonymity techniques break pruning), among other pedestrian reasons. A side-chain using it seems virtually certain to me, limited more by the deployment of sidechain tech than anything else... even more so than the ZeroCash anonymity design simply because the ring signature approach is so simple by comparison. But it's all a guess at this stage. Technology progress in Bitcoin is slow— for good reason— and now with the prospect that altcoin pumpers may we well funded to try to disrupt that progress… well, it'll be sad if what kills cryptocurrency isn't competition from traditional financial instruments or authorities but just poisonous behavior between competing systems. :-/ It will be sad indeed. But I tend to hope for the best, competition is a strong instrument and may (or may not) push the tech centuries ahead, including cryptocurrencies. I don't know about the "good reason" behind the Bitcoin slow progress. It stuck pretty much where it all began - low anonymity, ASIC problem etc. Popularity is the only thing that keeps Bitcoin afloat. I bet that if some people took some CN ideas and started to populate it in some super accessible (for masses) way - it would become (eventually, yes) more popular than BTC. Anywho. For now we're just stuck with BTC monarchy and it's sad.  Indeed, competition would have an influence on tech progress in cryptos and IMO BTC 'monarchy' will turn into another form of rule |
|
|
|
|
|
