Why blame people for your failure?

[10c]

The obvious answer is that many project fail because of lack of practical implementation. When these project listed they are under vishal scrutiny of many expert and when they dont meet the vital points big investoinvestor start dumping soon. The real solution is make the project as close to reality as possible. Dont give too much hype in start and focus on all possible result 

Now 90 percent of projects have no real use and I believe that all these projects will die. those projects that really think about applying very little

[Dacosta Osei-Tutu]

That is the hard truth mate. Projects' team are being deluded that their coins get dumped because of bounty hunters but that is not the case. There are some  coins which are already listed even before the bounty and they are already dumped.

[Mianae]

Fingers will always be pointed even in the real world we keep blaming others for our misfortune not accepting responsibility for what happens to us. Projects dump because it lacks utility not the fault of bounty hunters.

[BlueStackz]

The easiest is to blame bounty hunters for dumping instead of admitting that the project has no working product with real use case and active development.

If the project are good and worth to hold, i think the will ignore the price. Many factors why investor or hunters dump their token and market condition is one of the reason. Beside that, the project itself is important to gain investor trust to hold, if worth to hold for long term, i am believe holder will not sell it at cheap price

People dumping the projects are also not to be blamed, whether it was dumped by an investors or bounty hunter, all investors cannot dump their token all at once on the company of they really have a very good working team that they believe in so much and most especially a working product, which is all that matters.

Most of these ICO projects tend to also toe the line of payment system, wherein we have a lot of them already competing in the market, you cannot all be have same product for the few investors that are currently in circulation, so most investors will only hold on to the project they strongly believe will still exist in future. If these projects really need a solution to the dumping of prices, they need a promising product with a new concept.

[powerman24]

When the token prices crashes after listing it is easiest to blame the hunters for it rather then admit that the project has no working produce or a proper use case or that they entered the market without being ready for it etc.

[BennyK]

It is a decentralized and a free market hence there is no point in blame anyone for one's failure since there no one holds authoritative power or control over the investment of an investor. This is why investors are frequently urged to learn and study about the coin or project with which they intend to invest in before proceeding.

[Robotbitcoin22]

It is a decentralized and a free market hence there is no point in blame anyone for one's failure since there no one holds authoritative power or control over the investment of an investor. This is why investors are frequently urged to learn and study about the coin or project with which they intend to invest in before proceeding.

all must understand the risks they will get regarding this investment. no need to blame but themselves must indeed learn every thing in the cryptocurrency because here is very high risk in terms of existing investments

[andika2018]

The easiest is to blame bounty hunters for dumping instead of admitting that the project has no working product with real use case and active development.

If the project are good and worth to hold, i think the will ignore the price. Many factors why investor or hunters dump their token and market condition is one of the reason. Beside that, the project itself is important to gain investor trust to hold, if worth to hold for long term, i am believe holder will not sell it at cheap price

People dumping the projects are also not to be blamed, whether it was dumped by an investors or bounty hunter, all investors cannot dump their token all at once on the company of they really have a very good working team that they believe in so much and most especially a working product, which is all that matters.

Most of these ICO projects tend to also toe the line of payment system, wherein we have a lot of them already competing in the market, you cannot all be have same product for the few investors that are currently in circulation, so most investors will only hold on to the project they strongly believe will still exist in future. If these projects really need a solution to the dumping of prices, they need a promising product with a new concept.

I am agree that there is too many duplicate project in market. Perhaps its because developers team just want to take benefits from new investor or perhaps developers team want to build something better but not nothing has been proven.

[Bitze]

I come across different posts and allegations that bounty hunters are dumpers and they make projects lose it value upon exchange listing. But from my experience with bounties most projects don't offer bounty allocation of more than 5% of the total token sold. So how will 5% dump have a huge effect on the remaining 95% price. And what about projects that don't have bounties but still dump hard on the exchange, is it bounty hunters too?
The bitter truth is that most projects dump because of the ridiculous number of bonuses the team have offered during the tokensale and pre-sale period. Imagine giving investors 70% bonus for their investments, they can decide to sell everything off and be happy with the 70% profit.

i completely agree with you! these are always simple excuses when the dump comes or before. but the price always needs a certain time to solidify

[eagle10]

I come across different posts and allegations that bounty hunters are dumpers and they make projects lose it value upon exchange listing. But from my experience with bounties most projects don't offer bounty allocation of more than 5% of the total token sold. So how will 5% dump have a huge effect on the remaining 95% price. And what about projects that don't have bounties but still dump hard on the exchange, is it bounty hunters too?
The bitter truth is that most projects dump because of the ridiculous number of bonuses the team have offered during the tokensale and pre-sale period. Imagine giving investors 70% bonus for their investments, they can decide to sell everything off and be happy with the 70% profit.

You can't blame bounty hunters for dumping coins. It is their earnings from the task they have done. The coins the bounty hunters earned is their right to do to get their money. The coins the bounty hunters is holding is only a portion of the total coins. It is just very small to affect the price. So don't blame the bounty hunters there are other factors affecting the price and volume in the market.

[Chinsmokers]

As a Bounty hunters also I`m disappointed that I am not paid for the years in some projects and I never blame the other bounty hunters for these consequences. The bounty rewards are delayed by a team that they had  promises.

[Natalim]

As a Bounty hunters also I`m disappointed that I am not paid for the years in some projects and I never blame the other bounty hunters for these consequences. The bounty rewards are delayed by a team that they had  promises.

It's really happening especially if they don't want their project to dump or if they are just simply here to scam.
Projects that we think were legit at the start could turn into scam after the ICO is over, that's rampant so we should accept the reality
but still continue to participate in bounty hoping we will be able to work with a legit project that gives decent reward.

[bitgolden]

I come across different posts and allegations that bounty hunters are dumpers and they make projects lose it value upon exchange listing. But from my experience with bounties most projects don't offer bounty allocation of more than 5% of the total token sold. So how will 5% dump have a huge effect on the remaining 95% price. And what about projects that don't have bounties but still dump hard on the exchange, is it bounty hunters too?
The bitter truth is that most projects dump because of the ridiculous number of bonuses the team have offered during the tokensale and pre-sale period. Imagine giving investors 70% bonus for their investments, they can decide to sell everything off and be happy with the 70% profit.

Thank you mate for really making them understand that we bounty hunters are not their problems here, I really wonder why they would just wake up and get the idea from, if they are at calculating or thinking straight, we shouldn’t be the one telling a whole full project team that promises to deliver quality project this.

The reason you stated here is one of the things I strongly believe that is setting back, before ICO, how many IPO projects have they seen failed? Highest an IPO project can even offer is 10% at stretch which STO has followed the line too, and that is why they will continue to be sustained, so they really need to stop using outrageous bonuses to entice investors.

[bitcon]

It's simply human nature. Always looking for whom to hinge a blame on particularly when it's about failure or missing opportunities. It's common in the crypto industry where one's actions often times lead to a lot of regrets. In essence, you control your actions and as such should man up and accept resulting consequences. I have seen people blame others for maybe, selling a token/coin too early only to find it appreciating the next moment. Also, people blame others for holding coins only to watch them crash heavily. We must all learn to accept our mistakes, only by doing this can we truly learn from them and shaping our futures accordingly.

Not all people blame others. I know many guys, who think it was their fault when they failed. I think both sides are wrong. If you are a realist, you can estimate all mistakes and try not to do them again.

[Mealea]

Private investors are the most ridiculous dumpers I have ever seen yet they tend to blame bounty hunters for a dump in the price of a coin.

[Estehmanis]

right, I agree with you, the bounty hunter can't always get the bounty results and then sell it, but it's also held, my security always holds bounty tokens, even the project can't develop without campaign members in my opinion

[Golftech]

Private investors are the most ridiculous dumpers I have ever seen yet they tend to blame bounty hunters for a dump in the price of a coin.

Private investors which also can be some part of the team who overbought the tokens and wait for the exchange listing then sell it out for sucking higher
rewards, bounty hunters is just a small part of the system, allocated funds is really small for them to create mass panic.

[bering]

Indeed the devs were know the situations when bounty hunter sold their tokens it will more likely to dump and that's why tokens allocation for bounty hunter mostly only less than 10% from total supply but besides that there was plenty of reasons why the particular projects won't last long but unfortunately bounty hunter always be blamed here because mostly they will immediatelly sold their tokens assets after getting paid

[niisarearning]

Even one more horrible truth is these people I mean ico owners are holding token or coin in their alt account they start to dump these alt tokens once huge hype created. There is lots of types ico scams we witnessed in 2018

[beliomir]

From my own experience I will say that hunters hold a token and believe in projects more than investors. Investors bought tokens and sell everything in a short time