theyoungmillionaire
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 375
Merit: 1021
Just in case no one loves you, I love you 3000.
|
 |
June 23, 2019, 07:15:43 PM |
|
A link to Twitter is not a link to the source.
Loooooooooool. That's too creepy, for honest. I've seen it on Twitter so i used link to Twitter. Everybody can see that it's not my quote and where i took it from Strange, you're not the one Xal0lex is talking about. Or you just forgot to used your other alt to reply? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
Xal0lex
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2450
Merit: 2448
|
|
June 23, 2019, 07:21:52 PM
Last edit: June 23, 2019, 07:53:20 PM by Xal0lex |
|
A link to Twitter is not a link to the source.
Loooooooooool. That's too creepy, for honest. I've seen it on Twitter so i used link to Twitter. Everybody can see that it's not my quote and where i took it from I was referring to a specific link in this comment. This is a link to the profile, not the tweet where the text was taken. It's like giving a link not to your comment, but to your profile. Loooooooooool. That's too creepy, for honest.
I've seen it on Twitter so i used link to Twitter. Everybody can see that it's not my quote and where i took it from
|
|
|
|
deisik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3444
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
|
|
June 23, 2019, 07:36:23 PM
Last edit: June 23, 2019, 08:38:29 PM by deisik |
|
It sees pretty clear to me in principle: <…> 25. Ban evasion (using or creating accounts while one of your accounts is banned) is not allowed. <…>
The concept is clear Got it Strange, you're not the one Xal0lex is talking about. Or you just forgot to used your other alt to reply?
Unlikely but still possible Not trying to defend anyone here, but it is not about that link specifically as it is grammatically and semantically about any link in general ("A link to Twitter is not a link to the source"), so it is correct to speak of "my link" or "my quote" without making an implicit reference to the banned poster (what you seem to point out), with a bit of sarcasm in mind. Native speakers may want to weigh in here, though |
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
June 23, 2019, 08:12:00 PM |
|
Strange, you're not the one Xal0lex is talking about. Or you just forgot to used your other alt to reply?
I'm quite certain it's just an example / rhetorical figure. |
|
|
|
|
|
DIKUL
|
|
June 24, 2019, 05:42:15 AM |
|
Technically, this is not a rock-solid proof
Apart from having an alternate account (which is not a violation of forum rules anyway), this dude might have been framed (even if it was). How do you really know that MrDongyy is actually MrFreeRoMan other than by seeing someone linking to his Facebook and Twitter accounts? Disclaimer, I'm in no way affiliated or otherwise associated with either of these forum members. Just come to think that people should be more responsible and stop witch-hunting (finding instances of plagiarism is not witch-hunting, just in case)
This user not only used the same social networks, but even the same ETH address: I don't get any token in my account! Or, if I have an unverified account, don't get them?  #Proof of Authentication
1.) Bitcointalk username: MrDongyy
2.) Telegram username: @MrDongyy
3.) ETH wallet address : 0x06Dc0CBF44EED256C5975210095be703504a4541
4.) Join Twitter/Facebook Campaign
|
|
|
|
johhnyUA
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1834
Crypto for the Crypto Throne!
|
|
June 24, 2019, 07:51:06 AM
Last edit: June 24, 2019, 08:03:24 AM by johhnyUA |
|
A link to Twitter is not a link to the source.
Loooooooooool. That's too creepy, for honest. I've seen it on Twitter so i used link to Twitter. Everybody can see that it's not my quote and where i took it from Strange, you're not the one Xal0lex is talking about. Or you just forgot to used your other alt to reply? Nah, it was just an example and not the perfectly composed sentence. Another russian-to-english linguistic differences. I'm quite certain it's just an example / rhetorical figure.
Yep It's like giving a link not to your comment, but to your profile.
Day after day we are closer and closer to rename @Bitcointalk@ to @Gulagtalk@. |
|
|
|
TheBeardedBaby
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 3134
₿uy / $ell
|
|
June 24, 2019, 08:07:22 AM |
|
How many got banned til now since the start of this thread? Maybe LoyceV can update the OP with some current stats? Just checked the Alt section patrol and I was surprised to see just a few posts.. It's been difficult to follow all those stat threads, they are so many now  |
|
|
|
LoyceV (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3304
Merit: 16620
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
|
June 24, 2019, 08:57:32 AM
Last edit: August 15, 2019, 04:53:48 PM by LoyceV |
|
How many got banned til now since the start of this thread? I started saving daily copies of modlog on January 3 this year. Modlog shows data from the week before, so this graph shows the daily running total for the previous week:  |
|
|
|
asche
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1489
I forgot more than you will ever know.
|
|
June 24, 2019, 09:15:09 AM |
|
Looks like the correlation between nukes and autoban gets to an ATH!
Would this mean the backlog of high ranked plagiarizing users has been purged?
|
|
|
|
|
deisik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3444
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
|
|
June 24, 2019, 09:24:06 AM |
|
Technically, this is not a rock-solid proof
Apart from having an alternate account (which is not a violation of forum rules anyway), this dude might have been framed (even if it was). How do you really know that MrDongyy is actually MrFreeRoMan other than by seeing someone linking to his Facebook and Twitter accounts? Disclaimer, I'm in no way affiliated or otherwise associated with either of these forum members. Just come to think that people should be more responsible and stop witch-hunting (finding instances of plagiarism is not witch-hunting, just in case)
This user not only used the same social networks, but even the same ETH address Okay, let's assume it is the same person And so what, given the alt account was active 3 months ago (i.e. likely before the ban), so it is not being used for ban evasion? Is having a second account now an aggravating circumstance, I don't get it (unless account farming is involved, of course)? Or should it get banned too? The forum rules are clear that alt accounts shouldn't be used for ban evasion, but they say nothing about banning all known alt accounts of a user along with the offending account. I think banning the offending account will suffice unless other accounts are used for ban evasion (which is not the case with respect to MrDongyy). So why the witch hunt? |
|
|
|
malevolent
can into space
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3472
Merit: 1721
|
|
June 24, 2019, 03:34:38 PM |
|
The point of a ban is that the banned user stops posting for the duration of the ban. If they're allowed to post under an alt account, how is that different from allowing them to post under a newly created account? Either way they're ban evading.
|
Signature space available for rent.
|
|
|
deisik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3444
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
|
|
June 24, 2019, 04:00:45 PM |
|
The point of a ban is that the banned user stops posting for the duration of the ban. If they're allowed to post under an alt account, how is that different from allowing them to post under a newly created account? Either way they're ban evading That's not exactly my point (if you are explaining to me) Regardless, I think there might be a use case (emphasis on might be) where banning (or locking) a specific account (as opposed to banning a user) is justified while posting under a known alt account would not be considered ban evasion. For example, if it becomes known that an account has been taken over by a hacker, it is appropriate to ban this account only, right? I guess there might be other such cases (again, emphasis on might be) |
|
|
|
malevolent
can into space
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3472
Merit: 1721
|
|
June 24, 2019, 05:12:30 PM |
|
In such a case only the hacker's account should be banned and the rightful owner could prove ownership to regain it (or use an alt, whatever).
|
Signature space available for rent.
|
|
|
|
rhomelmabini
|
|
June 28, 2019, 08:21:49 AM |
|
I checked my account and did not find spam and plagiarism! Be so kind as to explain the reason for blocking
I synchronized my wallet, now it will work 24/7 . Sent PM .
I don't know if that's the one that triggers your ban because most of your post are in Russian and just for bounties so might be on those Russian post as well I guess. By replying here you violated another rule "ban evasion", you should have created a thread about your ban here in Meta. |
|
|
|
|
numanoid
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1148
|
|
July 08, 2019, 03:16:48 AM |
|
@LoyceV, could you do list of ban from 2 weeks ago? Thanks
Bump |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
