Bounties with limitations pays higher rewards

[Fuhre]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS

this is true, if the prize allocation is calculated as "stake", then the total prize allocation will be divided according to the income of each participant. but many gifts in quantity are not necessarily good quality. because sometimes I meet big prizes with coins that don't sell well in the market, sometimes the prizes are few but the value is very high.

[1714851375]

1714851375

[1714851375]

1714851375

[1714851375]

1714851375

[1714851375]

1714851375

[Huntler1993]

Yeah since it help to regulate the number of participant by setting the excluding criteria clear, but not always since most at times the success of the project is tied to it exchange price.

[mickey_miner]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS

The limitations can be done in two ways:

1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.

Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign

2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.

Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.

The second method is definitely not effective, many can buy fake subscribers to their blogs

[Astvile]

In my experience not all bounty with that kind of rules payed good for me,yeah most of them did pay but doesnt seem enough imagining how many months you worked with them.Earning through bounty right now is just by luck compared to last 2017 icos where icos are so good and every bounty pays good

[Kencha77]

Not all bounties with limitations pays higher. Reasons why is:
1. Some bounties pays you already the exact tokens you will receive and not through stakes.
2. Some bounties have low total bounty given to all of its participants.
3. This would be the last, not most bounties are paying or successful in their sale.

[strunberg]

Not all bounties with limitations pays higher. Reasons why is:
1. Some bounties pays you already the exact tokens you will receive and not through stakes.
2. Some bounties have low total bounty given to all of its participants.
3. This would be the last, not most bounties are paying or successful in their sale.

limitation participants will give higher reward to supporter if they using stakes based on reward calculation with high allocation ofcourse.and if using points you mentioned above there is no significant amount there.

[libert19]

Completely agree, I am doing veil bounty right now managed by bountycloud, they have strict standards on quality, here genuine hunters are rewarded well.

[kastara]

Each mass is given in accordance with the reward's allocation and in each given campaign when the bounty is accomplished then the bounty participants in the batasin so that it can launch any distribution at all.

[n0ne]

Completely agree, I am doing veil bounty right now managed by bountycloud, they have strict standards on quality, here genuine hunters are rewarded well.

Good campaign, but more the limitations the participants number will be the only limit. Apart from the same there won't be any big changes, this is a kind of creating demand. I've participated in such campaigns and very few numbers were worth it when I received my rewards while remaining were the same as other bounties.

[Little Mouse]

Completely agree, I am doing veil bounty right now managed by bountycloud, they have strict standards on quality, here genuine hunters are rewarded well.

Veil is a good one however, I am not agreed they are promoting in a positive way, they should include as much people as possible to let the world know about their project. Limiting the participation isn't helpful for the project.

[Claude46]

Bounties with limitations only pays you with a higher rewards only if the project was projected into a higher market demands. If the project was good then it has a chance for you to get paid on a higher rewards.

[steveabrahams]

Yes, bounty with limitations usually pays high rewards than the bounty that no limit. Why? Because if there is no limit the participants will be so many. Take an example for social media bounty, the participants can reach over 5k people and the only allocation for social media bounty usually low. That's why people only can earn some bucks or even under 1 dollar per person.

[Aldrinx00]

I think most bounties don't do it this way because more participants means more exposure of the project. Your suggestions are good but i think if a certain bounty doesn't limit the participants to increase each and everyone's rewards then at least increase the bounty allocation to make it fair.

[shesheboy]

I think most bounties don't do it this way because more participants means more exposure of the project.

It depends on the bounty manager . some manager prefer quality over quantity which means they will limit the participants to a high profiled users or user that only writes high quality post but this isnt really effective for the exposure of the project  .

 i witnessed a campaign like this before and all if them have failed , right now the campaign that holds alot of participants are the ones that became succesful and still on this game  .

[PuertoLibre]

I think most bounties don't do it this way because more participants means more exposure of the project.

It depends on the bounty manager . some manager prefer quality over quantity which means they will limit the participants to a high profiled users or user that only writes high quality post but this isnt really effective for the exposure of the project  .

 i witnessed a campaign like this before and all if them have failed , right now the campaign that holds alot of participants are the ones that became succesful and still on this game  .

From my experience generalization fails sooner or later. Expecting higher bounty rewards on the projects which attracted more bounty hunters is not the right strategy for grabbing cheap bounty tokens. Bounty managers usually look for high-rank forum accounts in order to increase awareness.

[lyks15]

I think this is a good idea. To make every bounty campaign more symmetrical from posting to distribution of token. This is less obstruction and delayed when there is no too much of participant and they only accept for the limit or right number of quota. Hope there is some strategy that all bounty can do tobmake every campaign orderly.

[zeze18]

Yeah you're right.
But it's all about the quality of the product itself, if no investors buys it the price of the coins will be nothing and we just will be holding a crap tokens

[Enzo05]

Not all that has limitations for its participants have huge rewards. One reason it's limited because they do not want participants to have or to get small rewards. Let say the only budget for it is $10000 then they probably set like limitations for each campaign so it will be somehow profitable for its supporters.

[ApocalypseNow]

ICOs wants to extend their reach farther and limiting participants in social media bounties won't help them to attract many investors. I know that as a bounty hunter, you want to get higher rewards but there are other campaigns that you can take advantage where having less participants like translations, community, and video campaign.

[xvids]

It all depends on the value of the rewards.
No matter how many rewards or how huge you get it would always comes down to the price.
So even if you receive plenty of token it wouldn't matter if the value is zero .
Besides they open up a bounty program because they want to be promoted by as many as possible so why would they limit the participants?