Did we actually really land on moon?

[Spendulus]

^^^ Yes all governments are subverted by organized crime and are in collusion. Secrecy is maintained through compartmentalization, "need to know", blackmail and murder. Only folks at the top know the truth, everybody else is a useful idiot.

"it's a big club and you ain't in it" -- George Carlin

<<< nonsense imagery deleted >>>

How many billions of people are in your version of the conspiracy?

[1714823448]

1714823448

[1714823448]

1714823448

[1714823448]

1714823448

[TimeBits]

^^^ Yes all governments are subverted by organized crime and are in collusion. Secrecy is maintained through compartmentalization, "need to know", blackmail and murder. Only folks at the top know the truth, everybody else is a useful idiot.

"it's a big club and you ain't in it" -- George Carlin

<<< nonsense imagery deleted >>>

How many billions of people are in your version of the conspiracy?

Anyone who produces fiat, and makes their people work for it
So all of the U.N LEADERS and all of the central bankers.

[notbatman]

@spendy,
   
   You're nothing but a clown with scripted arguments. A useful idiot isn't "in on it" yet works towards the goals of those few at the top that are.

Keyword: "few".

[Spendulus]

@spendy,
   
   You're nothing but a clown with scripted arguments. A useful idiot isn't "in on it" yet works towards the goals of those few at the top that are.

Keyword: "few".

It's odd how you won't answer questions.

How many people are in this conspiracy?

How can a person fly from USA to China via the N Pole?

Why is 3 dimensional trig ACCURATE for targeting howitzers and ship guns?

How can we reflect laser off devices left by Apollo?

How can rocks brought back from the moon show millions of microscopic craters?

[notbatman]

^^^ How many people are knowingly involved in this criminal conspiracy? HOW THE FUCK WOULD I KNOW YOU SACK OF SHIT!

Flying to China doesn't prove anything other than you're a fucking commy, firing vertically using a chart that has the word curvature in it doesn't prove the surface of the Earth curves, there's no proof there's a reflector on the Moon and, manufactured evidence of Moon rocks doesn't prove anything but fraud.

My proof the Earth's surface doesn't curve using the angular resolution limit of the human eye trumps all of your bullshit.

[Spendulus]

<<< word salad deleted>>>

Please just answer some of the questions that you have been trying to avoid by posting various pictures.

[BADecker]

<<< word salad deleted>>>

Please just answer some of the questions that you have been trying to avoid by posting various pictures.

Part of his religion is to not recognize that his religion is a religion. This is the best way for him to evangelize and convert people to his religion. Maybe there isn't any OTHER way in his case.

[Spendulus]

....manufactured evidence of Moon rocks doesn't prove anything but fraud.....

Hmmm.....

How do the Evil Ones create millions of microscopic craters on rocks they claim were from the lunar surface?

They would need some way to get dust going at 20-50,000 feet per second in a vacuum chamber...

These Evil Ones truly have some great powers.

[sirazimuth]

Has batty the delusional FE moon hoax clown troll told you to "get in an oven" or "go rope yourself" yet?
That seems to be his MO when he has no intelligent rebuttal (always) or can't come up with a nonsensical word salad or some retarded meme.

[notbatman]

^^^ What's the appropriate response when someone is knowingly or unknowing engaging in a criminal conspiracy against you?

All governments without exception are completely and utterly subverted by organized crime and will actively support anybody who promotes this fraud. This being the case my only response is to tell you clowns to put on your oversized cement overshoes and go jump in lake.

[BADecker]

^^^ And your talk and my talk show that we are, too. So, we can switch a bit. You can stop telling lies, and I can stop condemning you for something that you are causing yourself to be condemned for, by your lies.

[Spendulus]

^^^ What's the appropriate response when someone is knowingly or unknowing engaging in a criminal conspiracy against you?

All governments without exception are completely and utterly subverted by organized crime and will actively support anybody who promotes this fraud. This being the case my only response is to tell you clowns to put on your oversized cement overshoes and go jump in lake.

Interesting, but I don't see it as related to proving we went to the moon or did not go to the moon. I'm not seeing the conspiracy theory as helping out here, because many of the questions are factual.

Let's recap my list of questions:


How many people are in this conspiracy? Does the conspiracy expand infinitely as additional questions are asked?

How can we reflect laser off devices left by Apollo?

How can rocks brought back from the moon show millions of microscopic craters?

[BADecker]

How can rocks brought back from the moon show millions of microscopic craters?

Lunatic surface rocks and sands are available on many places of earth as well.

Google electric universe or electric cosmos. It's done by natural electric plasma etching.

[Spendulus]

How can rocks brought back from the moon show millions of microscopic craters?

Lunatic surface rocks and sands are available on many places of earth as well.

Google electric universe or electric cosmos. It's done by natural electric plasma etching.

No, there are no processes that can produce such a surface in an atmosphere such as Earth has.

[Cryptotourist]

This being the case my only response is to tell you clowns to put on your oversized cement overshoes and go jump in lake.

I'm sorry Batty, but if they put on their oversized cement overshoes, how the fuck will they go - and fucking jump in a lake?

One thing is for sure.
Something is fishy.

[BADecker]

This being the case my only response is to tell you clowns to put on your oversized cement overshoes and go jump in lake.

I'm sorry Batty, but if they put on their oversized cement overshoes, how the fuck will they go - and fucking jump in a lake?

One thing is for sure.
Something is fishy.

Yabut. If they walk on their hands for a while, think of the great biceps.

 

[Rikafip]

Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976.

I'm not saying we didn't, I'm just saying that it's not really a question that can be debunked like other theories which says Earth is flat.

Burden of proof in on the one who claims something, and as u said there is a lot of evodence that we landed on moon, while those that claim we didnt, have no evidence.

[BADecker]

Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976.

I'm not saying we didn't, I'm just saying that it's not really a question that can be debunked like other theories which says Earth is flat.

Burden of proof in on the one who claims something, and as u said there is a lot of evodence that we landed on moon, while those that claim we didnt, have no evidence.

But that doesn't really work. Here's why.

Almost all the people don't know how to understand the proof enough to use it to prove anything. So, they have to take the word of those that DO know how to understand the proof. This means that we are right back to the original point... who to believe when they say they understand the proof.

[sirazimuth]

.... put on your oversized cement overshoes and go jump in lake.

About time you came up with a new one. The oven/rope thing was getting really old dude....
Now don't forget your meds, and have a nice day.

snip <meaningless drivel>

Oh FFS!!
It figures this nutjob shows up right when I'm dealing with another....

[Rikafip]

Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976.

I'm not saying we didn't, I'm just saying that it's not really a question that can be debunked like other theories which says Earth is flat.

Burden of proof in on the one who claims something, and as u said there is a lot of evodence that we landed on moon, while those that claim we didnt, have no evidence.

But that doesn't really work. Here's why.

Almost all the people don't know how to understand the proof enough to use it to prove anything. So, they have to take the word of those that DO know how to understand the proof. This means that we are right back to the original point... who to believe when they say they understand the proof.

Let me ask you this: do you really think that SSSR wouldnt "expose" this  conspiracy if they had any proof that moon landing was fake?

Right up until moon landing SSSR was ahead of US, and if first competitor( and favourite to win the race at the time) didnt try or could  to debunk all this, and that tells you everything you have to know about it.