Did we actually really land on moon?

[BADecker]

^^^ The major point against the U.S.S.R. not speaking out is, U.S.S.R. leaders of that day did whatever they wanted for reasons that were often unknown.

The U.S.S.R. people had little strength back then. Whatever they said didn't amount to a hill of beans.

This means that all we heard from the U.S.S.R. leaders is what they wanted us to hear. And nobody knows if they wanted us to hear what they truly knew.

[akram143]

^^^ The major point against the U.S.S.R. not speaking out is, U.S.S.R. leaders of that day did whatever they wanted for reasons that were often unknown.

The U.S.S.R. people had little strength back then. Whatever they said didn't amount to a hill of beans.

This means that all we heard from the U.S.S.R. leaders is what they wanted us to hear. And nobody knows if they wanted us to hear what they truly knew.

But why they didn't peak against USA who were formerly the enemy country of USSR!

Still USA convincing people that if they didn't land on moon then Russia might found out them.

[BADecker]

^^^ The major point against the U.S.S.R. not speaking out is, U.S.S.R. leaders of that day did whatever they wanted for reasons that were often unknown.

The U.S.S.R. people had little strength back then. Whatever they said didn't amount to a hill of beans.

This means that all we heard from the U.S.S.R. leaders is what they wanted us to hear. And nobody knows if they wanted us to hear what they truly knew.

But why they didn't peak against USA who were formerly the enemy country of USSR!

Still USA convincing people that if they didn't land on moon then Russia might found out them.

You hit the nail on the head. Why did the U.S.S.R. do this or that or any of it? We won't know until we can fit ourselves into the shoes of both, the U.S.S.R. leaders, and the leaders of other countries. If we didn't go to the moon, we still don't know the reasons others didn't tell us that we didn't go.

I'm about as certain as you can get that we went to the moon. But I didn't go, and I don't really have any other frame of reference than historical records and logic. So, I couldn't get up in court and swear to it one way or the other.

[Spendulus]

^^^ The major point against the U.S.S.R. not speaking out is, U.S.S.R. leaders of that day did whatever they wanted for reasons that were often unknown.

The U.S.S.R. people had little strength back then. Whatever they said didn't amount to a hill of beans.

This means that all we heard from the U.S.S.R. leaders is what they wanted us to hear. And nobody knows if they wanted us to hear what they truly knew.

But why they didn't peak against USA who were formerly the enemy country of USSR!

Still USA convincing people that if they didn't land on moon then Russia might found out them.

You hit the nail on the head. Why did the U.S.S.R. do this or that or any of it? We won't know until we can fit ourselves into the shoes of both, the U.S.S.R. leaders, and the leaders of other countries. If we didn't go to the moon, we still don't know the reasons others didn't tell us that we didn't go.

I'm about as certain as you can get that we went to the moon. But I didn't go, and I don't really have any other frame of reference than historical records and logic. So, I couldn't get up in court and swear to it one way or the other.

Your defense is ignorance. Ignorance is bliss.

[NewBet]

I don't know if we landed on the moon or not but there is certainly it's technology today and they're also with the technology at that time to recreate the moon landing video exactly how it looked broadcast on television. using Hollywood studios or government studios, they would have been able to recreate the event with the technology of the day... So we can say for sure if they landed on the moon, unless we were involved in that intelligence operation.

[Spendulus]

... So we can say for sure if they landed on the moon, unless we were involved in that intelligence operation.

Certainly you can.

All you have to do is know some geology, and look at moon rocks under a microscope.

[iv4n]

Ok, let`s forget all conspiracy theories, let`s focus on just one question. How the hell is possible that man landed on moon in 1969, and never again after that? Is it possible that technology in 1969 was more advanced then now? How can that be possible? Can someone explain me how the hell you can compare `69 and now?
I`m sure that man never landed on moon! But I think we should congratulate the Americans on one of the greatest tricks ever performed, it`s not easy to do that! To organize all that people to do all that and trick entire world! They did it, well done! How huge that trick is shows that people still discuss it, after 50 years!

[Rikafip]

Ok, let`s forget all conspiracy theories, let`s focus on just one question. How the hell is possible that man landed on moon in 1969, and never again after that? Is it possible that technology in 1969 was more advanced then now? How can that be possible? Can someone explain me how the hell you can compare `69 and now?
I`m sure that man never landed on moon! But I think we should congratulate the Americans on one of the greatest tricks ever performed, it`s not easy to do that! To organize all that people to do all that and trick entire world! They did it, well done! How huge that trick is shows that people still discuss it, after 50 years!

What are you talking about, NASA successfully managed to land man on the moon 6 times, and overall 12 astronauts walked on the surface of the Moon.

1.Apollo 11, 1969
2.Apollo 12, 1969
3.Apollo 14, 1971
4.Apollo 15, 1971
5.Apollo 16, 1972
6.Apollo 17, 1972


Just to add,  "How can that be possible?" is a common logical fallacy known as Argument from Incredulity , and it is very popular among those that don't believe Moon landing ever happened.

[Battareus]

Ok, let`s forget all conspiracy theories, let`s focus on just one question. How the hell is possible that man landed on moon in 1969, and never again after that? Is it possible that technology in 1969 was more advanced then now? How can that be possible? Can someone explain me how the hell you can compare `69 and now?
I`m sure that man never landed on moon! But I think we should congratulate the Americans on one of the greatest tricks ever performed, it`s not easy to do that! To organize all that people to do all that and trick entire world! They did it, well done! How huge that trick is shows that people still discuss it, after 50 years!

What are you talking about, NASA successfully managed to land man on the moon 6 times, and overall 12 astronauts walked on the surface of the Moon.

1.Apollo 11, 1969
2.Apollo 12, 1969
3.Apollo 14, 1971
4.Apollo 15, 1971
5.Apollo 16, 1972
6.Apollo 17, 1972


Just to add,  "How can that be possible?" is a common logical fallacy known as Argument from Incredulity , and it is very popular among those that don't believe Moon landing ever happened.

How do you beleive this goofy missions? Have you ever tried to think critically and not perceive everything that the offitial media say for the truth?

[johhnyUA]

I think the most convincing proof of the Moon landing came from the former Soviet government.
No one from the U.S.S.R. has ever claimed the U.S.A. astronauts didn't land on the Moon.

The most convincing proof came from ordinary logic and physic.

They sent their signals on radio wave range, so anyone can check if something is really on the Moon or not. I heard version, that americans have sent radio transmitter to the Moon with recorded voices and other. But this theory is also bullshit, because if such would happen, americans wouldn't sent 6 (!!!) mission to the Moon. Why not?

Now because of logic AND math.
For example, probability to fail mission (rocket with transmitter explode or wouldn't land succesfull on the Moon or enything else) is just 20 % (all we know that reptilians from Nibiru which helps americans are good in technology of lie and illusion). So, probability of succesfull mission is 80 %.

But, if we try to send transmitter second time, result sum of positive probabilyty for fisrst and second launch will be like 80 % * 80 % (in Probability theory "AND" == multiplication of probabilities. It sounds like "do not fail first launch AND second")

So, 80 % * 80 % = 64 %. As you see, much less than if you will do it only one time. So, let's count it for 6 probabilities:
"Do not fail first AND second AND third AND fourth AND fifth AND sixth launches" == 0.8 * 0.8 * 0.8 * 0.8 * 0.8 * 0.8 and it will be just 26 % to not fail ALL laucnhes.

From math and ordinary logic we will understand that it's not adequate to fake the same thing 6 times. One would be enough. 

[Spendulus]

"... their delusion is that strong."

If you believe they landed men on the Moon in a cardboard box wrapped in foil and streamed it live on TV in 1969, men who then proceeded to call president Dick "I'm not a crook" Nixon for a live interview, then I'm afraid your delusion is much, much, much stronger.

KYS faggot.

This video is generally not realistic to believe!!

Okay, I'll bite.

That video does not AT ALL look like a flag "waving in the breeze."

it is swinging like a pendulum from the top down, and the horizontal waves in the cloth do not move at all. Exactly like one would expect for a flag mounted in a vacuum.

[Rikafip]

"... their delusion is that strong."

If you believe they landed men on the Moon in a cardboard box wrapped in foil and streamed it live on TV in 1969, men who then proceeded to call president Dick "I'm not a crook" Nixon for a live interview, then I'm afraid your delusion is much, much, much stronger.

KYS faggot.

This video is generally not realistic to believe!!

Okay, I'll bite.

That video does not AT ALL look like a flag "waving in the breeze."

it is swinging like a pendulum from the top down, and the horizontal waves in the cloth do not move at all. Exactly like one would expect for a flag mounted in a vacuum.

This "flag proof" has been debunked long time ago, and yet people still use it.. like that guy who wrote yesterday that there was only 1 moon landing, he didn't even know about other 5. Amount of ignorance is unbelievable, and yet they like to think about themselves as "critical thinkers"

Those that are wondering how flag could move in vacuum should check Newton's laws of motion.

If physics is too hard, you can also check Mythbusters Moon Hoax Flag Flapping Video.

[beej]

That flag thing sure does seem suspicious, there are a lot of contents in the net
that debate the whole moon landing thing. Whenever topics on familiar grounds
arise just like this, I can't help to think about aliens, area 51 and ufos, they come
into the picture. This moon landing debate has been going on for years, I find it
intriguing yet with an awe undecided feeling whether I believe it or not. Unsettling
but still fascinating to dwell upon.

[Spendulus]

I was always interested in how realistic this story is. Was  traveling to the moon possible with those technologies?

One thing discussions "Was the Moon landing a hoax" 100% proves is the very low understanding of science of many people today.

[Battareus]

Bart Sibrel introduce own book about fake Apollo missions:
https://youtu.be/MJ3CXLi73Sc

[Rikafip]

Bart Sibrel introduce own book about fake Apollo missions:
https://youtu.be/MJ3CXLi73Sc

Haha Bart Sibrel, conspiracy theorist clown  that harassed Buzz Aldrin, got in his face , called him coward and liar, and in return got punched in the face  
That is probably highlight of his "career".


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_YM9cCtwz4

[Battareus]

Bart Sibrel introduce own book about fake Apollo missions:
https://youtu.be/MJ3CXLi73Sc

Haha Bart Sibrel, conspiracy theorist clown  that harassed Buzz Aldrin, got in his face , called him coward and liar, and in return got punched in the face  
That is probably highlight of his "career".


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_YM9cCtwz4

Yes, this is of course comedy (no), I haven’t seen anything funny here. Buzz did not want to swear on the bible like many other of his colleagues, but this is definitely not funny.
I feel sorry if you think that aggression (punch in face) is something funny.

[Rikafip]

Bart Sibrel introduce own book about fake Apollo missions:
https://youtu.be/MJ3CXLi73Sc

Haha Bart Sibrel, conspiracy theorist clown  that harassed Buzz Aldrin, got in his face , called him coward and liar, and in return got punched in the face  
That is probably highlight of his "career".


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_YM9cCtwz4

I feel sorry if you think that aggression (punch in face) is something funny.

If you harass someone on the street, get into his face and call him liar and coward, expect to get punched in the face.
Buzz Aldrin reacted as any man would in that situation. First he tried to avoid the conflict, he kept moving away, but attacker was persistent and in the end got what he deserved.

After all, Aldrin was not charged for attack, witnesses confirmed that  Sibrel harassed and provoked him.

[Moonmanmun]

There is video footage that you cant deny.
Weird question

[Spendulus]

Apollo 11 Flight Plan.

https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11fltpln_final_reformat.pdf

Apollo 15 Mission Report.

https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/ap15mr.pdf

Apollo 17 Photographic Archive

https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/images17.html

Apollo is literally one of the most detailed, documented things in history.