Did we actually really land on moon?

[Spendulus]

<<garbage deleted>>

Space is gay and fake, we didn't go to the moon and, Epstein didn't kill himself.

If the "we" is "you and people that think like you" then I agree, your "we" didn't go to the Moon.

But in the real world the possibility that we didn't go to the Moon is zero, and the possibility that Epstein killed himself is non zero, maybe one in a trillion chance.

[notbatman]

Epstein didn't kill himself and walking on the moon are mutually exclusive events.

[BADecker]

Epstein didn't kill himself and walking on the moon are mutually exclusive events.

https://i.imgur.com/QzoJ2rB.png

So you think Epstein is out there walking on the moon, eh?

Do they serve you good meals in the funny farm?

[notbatman]

^^^

[styca]

I'm conflicted now. I'm 100% certain that we did land on the moon, but the signature of Richard Nixon does have a tendency to throw doubt on any argument 

[Spendulus]

I'm conflicted now. I'm 100% certain that we did land on the moon, but the signature of Richard Nixon does have a tendency to throw doubt on any argument 

Well, if we didn't land on the Moon, how did he get there to sign it?

[ðºÞæ]

The best part is the "Moon Buggy".
On a mission where weight is a major issue some crazy heavy electric vehicle to be used only once for some wheel spin's.
Why 3 vehicles and not reuse the first?
Maybe tax money could have been better spend with some real scientific research instead of the juvenile antics.

[BADecker]

Epstein didn't kill himself and walking on the moon are mutually exclusive events.

https://i.imgur.com/QzoJ2rB.png

So you think Epstein is out there walking on the moon, eh?

Do they serve you good meals in the funny farm?

^^^

So, now you think that Epstein left a plaque on the moon while he was walking there.

You didn't answer about how good the meals are in your funny farm. Do they have LSD in them?

[bananacue]

Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976.

I'm not saying we didn't, I'm just saying that it's not really a question that can be debunked like other theories which says Earth is flat.

I also thought that technology back then isn't more develope to support the landing on the moon. I mean it is possible as of today but at that time I think its impossible

[Rikafip]

I also thought that technology back then isn't more develope to support the landing on the moon. I mean it is possible as of today but at that time I think its impossible

How much you actually know about technology back then, to think that it is impossible?

I am sure that you had no idea that for example ISS use Intel 386 processors. And now go check when that one has been developed.

[BADecker]

I also thought that technology back then isn't more develope to support the landing on the moon. I mean it is possible as of today but at that time I think its impossible

Accidentally successful... landing on the moon. Not impossible.

[Spendulus]

Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976.

I'm not saying we didn't, I'm just saying that it's not really a question that can be debunked like other theories which says Earth is flat.

I also thought that technology back then isn't more develope to support the landing on the moon. I mean it is possible as of today but at that time I think its impossible

Prove it.

[ðºÞæ]

.............

............... And now go check when that one has been developed.

A little CPU/ microcomputer history

[BADecker]

.............

............... And now go check when that one has been developed.

A little CPU/ microcomputer history

If I don't understand what all this stuff means, what are the results of this calc? What are you really saying?

[WHTP]

All the evidence points to the fact that we did. For example Russia and other countries having the capability to know while it was going on whether we did or not. It's really not something you can hide and thus pretend that you did.

There is no doubt that the launching of the Saturn rockets could not be hidden, and in space they could be tracked by radar.  Ultimately the proof is the >800 lbs of rocks and dirt that was brought back. Microscopic examination shows it cannot have been produced on the Earth. Also there are the reflectors left at the landing sites.

They'll just say that Russia was in it to, along with all the other governments in the world. Or that they're just telling you those are moon rocks, but they select who can study them. Or that the reflectors were put there by robots sent there.

[BADecker]

All the evidence points to the fact that we did. For example Russia and other countries having the capability to know while it was going on whether we did or not. It's really not something you can hide and thus pretend that you did.

There is no doubt that the launching of the Saturn rockets could not be hidden, and in space they could be tracked by radar.  Ultimately the proof is the >800 lbs of rocks and dirt that was brought back. Microscopic examination shows it cannot have been produced on the Earth. Also there are the reflectors left at the landing sites.

They'll just say that Russia was in it to, along with all the other governments in the world. Or that they're just telling you those are moon rocks, but they select who can study them. Or that the reflectors were put there by robots sent there.

Right! Let's get the people on the stand under oath or affirmation, to answer the questions against shrewd interrogators... with the death penalty if they lie.

[Spendulus]

.............

............... And now go check when that one has been developed.

A little CPU/ microcomputer history
..

Why do you think someone would need a computer to go to the Moon? For what exact purposes?

Please be specific.

[notbatman]

^^^ How else would you render the lunar surface? Without a computer you'd have to use 1960's movie special effects. NASA destroyed that technology and they claim it would be a painful process to build it back again.

[Spendulus]

^^^ How else would you render the lunar surface? Without a computer you'd have to use 1960's movie special effects. NASA destroyed that technology and they claim it would be a painful process to build it back again.

The way they did it was to go to the moon to film going to the moon, since that was the easiest and cheapest way to fake going to the moon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6MOnehCOUw

[BADecker]

^^^ How else would you render the lunar surface? Without a computer you'd have to use 1960's movie special effects. NASA destroyed that technology and they claim it would be a painful process to build it back again.

The way they did it was to go to the moon to film going to the moon, since that was the easiest and cheapest way to fake going to the moon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6MOnehCOUw

Besides, who keeps their 1969 computers? I got rid of my 1977 Tandy a long time ago. It didn't even have asuch a thing as a hard drive. Why keep it.

Is Batty is simply living in the past, or what?