So some shill "account made in jan 14" had a post on how to spot ponzi's/hyip. Well in all his greatness he decided to start reviewing ponzi's and listing the "Not scam" ones and locking the pinned thread. Well it is my pleasure to say his ponzi ass trickery is unpinned and he cried his way off the forum
![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif)
Thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=520086.0Without a doubt you are the biggest fucking moron I have ever seen on any internet forum.
First of all I was not a 'shill account'. I came to BCT as an investor, miner and slowly gravitated to the gambling forum. My history of posts showed that my intention was not to be pro-anything. I then found my way to HYIP sites and didn't care for what I saw - mostly scammers posing as legit investors. I felt people needed to be warned and this comes across CLEARLY in my article. You cannot say it defends such sites, and you cannot say it blasts them either. It presents information to look out for, and allows the reader to decide if it's a safe investment. The closing remarks particularly let people know that these sites are shady.
Secondly yes I did decide to review Ponzi's because you, mem and RGBkey began to flood the forums with your pathetic 'scam' posts. Without even waiting for someone to play the site or review it, you immediately assumed they were a scam. Perhaps 99% of thee sites are scams and the owners just want to make off with the money. However maybe there is that 1% chance the site is going to pay out as promised and, if all parties are aware of the risks, they should be able to play such a game.
Thirdly, I did not list the "not scam" ones. I listed one single site (singular, not plural). In the span of 10 minutes I saw at least two other posts in the forum about the same Ponzi site I'd just added with a positive review. Receiving one email with a positive review and blockchain would have been fine, but to see two other people in the next 10 minutes also claim they had good investments was a bit suspicious. I then REMOVED the listing and as you can see it has nothing in it to do with chain Ponzi sites because I've not received any more positive or negative feedback on them.
So this Ponzi ass trickery you speak about is really nothing more than your own stupidity and inability to comprehend. However you ARE the same tool who floods other people's posts with
SCAMSCAMSCAM over and over without gathering any facts.
Other members of this forum have read my article and many of them have sent messages of support thanking me for being unbiased. If I were going all out promoting HYIP sites and Ponzi sites, perhaps you could call me a shill but anyone with a grade 6 reading level could clearly understand I was aiming for neutrality. And that shows...it's always showed, it showed even when I began to review Ponzi sites.
The problem is you are so determined to see what you want to see, you don't give any of those site operators a chance. However because you whiners complained to the mods about my introducing Ponzi sites into a NEUTRAL article, I decided that there was no purpose in trying to educate people with you fucking idiots continuing to flood the forums.
And that would explain why the article was locked - it's something a 10 year old child could comprehend. The fact that it is unlocked doesn't change anything. The information is still as valid as it was, and anyone coming into this forum for the first time will be able to gather the facts and come away knowing what risks to watch for.
Should they happen upon your post above though, I think that they will agree your comments were really unfounded.
I'm sorry that you are a fucking moron and could not grasp that concept. I wouldn't say I cried my way off the forum, I simply felt that it was pointless further trying to create something positive for the community with your behavior.
Think about it... what is more positive? Running around like a little girl screaming SCAMMMMMY in large red font for every site you disagree with, downvoting people's trust levels because you don't agree with them - or allowing someone to sit down and write an article specifically detailing what makes these sites so risky and the level of deceit that they use.
You clearly didn't have any issue with that did you? No. It was ONLY when I introduced chain ponzis into the mix that you began to froth at the mouth and cry like a child. Evidentally one of us is mature, the other is not.
I'll leave it at that. And I do have another account that I use from work (completely different IP) for my trading and other activity on here which I felt would probably come in handy should this day come.
Really dude, you know as well as I do that you were way off with your allegations - but I will let my article speak for itself. The rest of the community can add onto it or flood it with the low IQ shit that only your mind is capable of.
Either way I am done maintaining it....