Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors?

[Jadesola]

As far as am concern, i don't see any reason why a project should give 40% discount for IEO or ICO for an early investors, this will surely not help the price of a coin at listing. If a project is solid, the discount should not be more than 20%.

[iv4n]

It`s not a problem in bonus, problem comes if early investors decide to dump their coins right after listing. Investors don`t like someone to tell them what they can do or not with their money and coins, but there should be some rule that will restrain early investors from making this quick schemes for making money while project and small investors suffer later.
But it`s the business world, there are winners and losers, I think we can`t do nothing about this matter. Early investors have some benefits and that will stay like that forever.

[kevinzxz]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

of course the token bonus of 40% is very large, because in my opinion the maximum bonus received by investors should only be 10% -15% or a maximum of 20% and if investors get a bonus of 40%, then I think the opportunity to make coin prices go down very far can happen and to make the price of the coin increase again is very difficult (although there is a possibility it can happen), because most people also see the total supply of the coin, so if the bonus given by the project exceeds 40% then most people will not invest in the coin, because the opportunity for coin prices to increase is very small.

[tokoorochan]

As far as am concern, i don't see any reason why a project should give 40% discount for IEO or ICO for an early investors, this will surely not help the price of a coin at listing. If a project is solid, the discount should not be more than 20%.

40% for early investors i think its too big and sounds not fair for other investors.if developers team didn't lock the bonus , market usually blamed bounty hunter as an actors that caused price dumped in market.but in IEO we will not see this again , only small discount that will given there.so dont worry price will dumped if we participate in IEO.

[funcryptoco]

Yes, high bonus is very bad, it cause the price collapse. always i stay away from coins with high bonus , no bonus  or very low bonus  is better for the price

[robelneo]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

A good project does not even have to give that kind of bonus, or they should not give a bonus at all, the main attraction for investors to invest is the project itself, this should be where the selling point start and not on the bonus, it only invites dumping.

[ruski]

Yes, 40% (or higher) is too much as a bonus, and that the reason the token price falls down after the end of the ICO, since so many early investors dump their tokens for the lowest rates. Devs are generally blaming bounty hunters for dumping, but in fact, the real dumpers are the early investors who purchased the tokens with huge bonuses.

[Peterdav]

I think 40% bonus is too high and i have seen many project when initial token offering they give bonuses more than 70%. Highest bonus will make token price dump after token listed on exchange, don't blame bounty hunter because alocation for bounty is small around 2% - 5%.

[Specimen]

it doesn't make sense if the blame is bounty hunter because bounty hunter only gets very few tokens unlike investors and teams especially because investors have received tokens in advance so there is a possibility that investors will also sell unless the investor hasn't received tokens then because of course it is bounty hunter
but despite that I don't think it is too much because the investors' contribution is very large towards the sustainability of a project so they deserve to get such a big bonus and they also have the right to do anything about their coins as well as the bounty hunter

[||bit]

I don't think no-one should pay %40 less for the same thing just because they are paying earlier.

I mean, people are buying these for investment and think about you are buying gold for 1400$ yet some other people bought it for 1000$. Is this fair?

[AlfNobel]

40% bonus is good for investor but it's bad for token/coin price.

[spydee1522]

This is really the most annoying part of it all where early investors are given 40% bonus and upon listing, they go straight and dump the tokens. Most project managers have not realized this which is a big mistake to give early investors such bonus and later blame bounty hunters for dumping whereby only few allocation was given for the bounty campaign. To me, 40% bonus to investors is too much.

[jagaban]

I don't think no-one should pay %40 less for the same thing just because they are paying earlier.

I mean, people are buying these for investment and think about you are buying gold for 1400$ yet some other people bought it for 1000$. Is this fair?

Reeks of a project that is only interested in selling tokens and not thinking about the success of the project itself. 40% is too much to give out as bonuses to investors but because they are trying to lure investors in, they give out all these juicy bonuses. Upon listing on an exchange, the investors get to realize that they have been fooled as the price of the token tanks due to other investors dumping their tokens.

[crenfrosck]

Definitely not. Just imagine being in their position when they are willing to basically ”sponsor” a bunch of people with an idea while they have not raised a lot of money so far. In addition, those tokens are most likely going to be locked up for a certain period of time (even after being listed) and those people are usually not responsible for a sudden drop of price. Showing them some gratitude with a bonus is reasonable, if you ask me.

[LogitechMouse]

I don't say it is too much because that is their "marketing strategy".

Maybe some are saying it is too much but that is one of the benefits of an early investor and at the same time, this helps the project to attract more investors. As an investor, it will be good for you because you can get a huge bonus upon buying their token but as it gets listed it will simply make the price of the coin to go lower immediately.

[distr@yopmail.com]

we can see different marketing strategies for each developer. including the awarding of investment bonuses, it is only an attempt to get early investors who really trust them from the start. because getting investors in the beginning is really difficult. 40% bonus is quite good and worth the initial investment. some even give more than that.

[BitTraderCute]

we can see different marketing strategies for each developer. including the awarding of investment bonuses, it is only an attempt to get early investors who really trust them from the start. because getting investors in the beginning is really difficult. 40% bonus is quite good and worth the initial investment. some even give more than that.

i have different opinion about big bonuses for early sale investors.developers team trying to attrack investors and collect as much as money they can.with this ways i am worry if they will have exit scam strategy someday.they just focus on collecting money without thinking well about the effect from big bonuses.we have to becarefull with projects like this.

[mamahdedeh]

we can see different marketing strategies for each developer. including the awarding of investment bonuses, it is only an attempt to get early investors who really trust them from the start. because getting investors in the beginning is really difficult. 40% bonus is quite good and worth the initial investment. some even give more than that.

i have different opinion about big bonuses for early sale investors.developers team trying to attrack investors and collect as much as money they can.with this ways i am worry if they will have exit scam strategy someday.they just focus on collecting money without thinking well about the effect from big bonuses.we have to becarefull with projects like this.

logically, with a large bonus, the project team focuses on fundraising. because a good project will sell expensive coins based on white papper that ensures that the project is quality, so be careful with this way of promotion. it could be that you are a victim of project fraud. it happened a lot in 2018, where many projects were fraudulent, so investors lost money

[aditasetia123]

we can see different marketing strategies for each developer. including the awarding of investment bonuses, it is only an attempt to get early investors who really trust them from the start. because getting investors in the beginning is really difficult. 40% bonus is quite good and worth the initial investment. some even give more than that.

i have different opinion about big bonuses for early sale investors.developers team trying to attrack investors and collect as much as money they can.with this ways i am worry if they will have exit scam strategy someday.they just focus on collecting money without thinking well about the effect from big bonuses.we have to becarefull with projects like this.

logically, with a large bonus, the project team focuses on fundraising. because a good project will sell expensive coins based on white papper that ensures that the project is quality, so be careful with this way of promotion. it could be that you are a victim of project fraud. it happened a lot in 2018, where many projects were fraudulent, so investors lost money

building good projects actually didn't need huge money.if we see in several IEO on several reputable exchanges their goals only below $5millions.but due this quality and no bonuses investors become interested to joined.there is small possibility that investors will dumped their token that bought in expensive price.bonuses not always good for projects , it could be sharp knife that will attack itself.

[TelolettOm]

I think 40% bonus is too high and i have seen many project when initial token offering they give bonuses more than 70%. Highest bonus will make token price dump after token listed on exchange, don't blame bounty hunter because alocation for bounty is small around 2% - 5%.

Bonuses of more than 10% are actually quite risky for the cryptocurrency ecosystem and this should be a consideration for many projects that are indeed quite dangerous when they are listed in the market where they can get a price reduction that can occur quite large