Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors?

[Argoo]

It is possible for early investors but they should put a limit on numbers of early investors. This is just a marketing strategy of the campaign team and it is fair enough for those who trusted their project first. Example: First 5 investors gets the 40% then the next batch should get 30% and so on.

Yes, limiting early investors to the amount that would determine the percentage of the bonus would be logical. True, as always, there could be too much abuse on the part of the ICO team. After all, investors will not know what account they have addressed.
As for the bonus of 40 percent for early investors, then, in my opinion, this percentage is too large. It contributes to the desire of these investors to quickly immediately sell discounted tokens after they are listed on the exchange and get a good guaranteed profit.

[Jocuserious]

Yes of course 40% bonus to more much because the real powerful project never give lot of bonus So every low quality project will give you more bonus like 30%-40% over 60% lol.
Actually some bonus will depend on their project and value so you can avoid those projects where have huge bonus offer .

[sorrros]

Big bonuses are only good for attracting investors, but we see that many tokens become worthless after listing so even 40% bonus will not help you to cover losses.
Forget about bonueses, deals, referral programs, everything is a marketing strategy, it is not a fundament.

[Anonylz]

Big bonuses are only good for attracting investors, but we see that many tokens become worthless after listing so even 40% bonus will not help you to cover losses.
Forget about bonueses, deals, referral programs, everything is a marketing strategy, it is not a fundament.

And such bonus also have a negative impact on project when the listing on exchange has occurred, i think as a result of this constant dump on price because of this huge bonus the team have to come up with new ideas how to compensate early adopters other than given them too many tokens that they will end up dumping once the token hit the exchange, 40% is way too high, there won't be any value at the end, 5% - 10% is enough bonus to offer, if the project is good enough then investors will be willing to hold.

[o.ogurlu]

For early investment, i don't think 40% is a huge bonus rate. And in early investment, some projects gave bonuses close to 100%. As a result, investing early in a project is risky. And in this case, investors need to make enough profit to cover the risk which they take for investment.

[flagpara]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

40 percent isn't huge bonus for early investor. As one post 2500 percent bonus for very early investor. I think early investor or bounty Hunter couldn't dump market. Any investor wouldn't sell their whole token during 100-200 percent negative. Whale amount of token can sell Dev when price is dump.

[Adriano2010]

Depends how many coins are total and how many coins are given when initial sell occur, but it not might be so much because the price is not so high when is listed on exchanges but is risky to invest now on new projects because don't know which one to choose.

[Natalim]

It's huge IMO because if they will dump that would affect the project, giving 40% bonus without limitation on the supply they will sell is a desperate move to collect funds and that would mean risk to the future of the project. Let's say for example,.. when the coin will start trading and the price dump like 20%, small investors already panic but those who got a bonus of 40% can still dump at a profit of 20%.

[fauzan Ichsan]

Big bonuses are only good for attracting investors, but we see that many tokens become worthless after listing so even 40% bonus will not help you to cover losses.
Forget about bonueses, deals, referral programs, everything is a marketing strategy, it is not a fundament.

And such bonus also have a negative impact on project when the listing on exchange has occurred, i think as a result of this constant dump on price because of this huge bonus the team have to come up with new ideas how to compensate early adopters other than given them too many tokens that they will end up dumping once the token hit the exchange, 40% is way too high, there won't be any value at the end, 5% - 10% is enough bonus to offer, if the project is good enough then investors will be willing to hold.

right, predictable at the beginning, after the token listing on the exchange then the token will immediately be discarded and difficult to crawl up. this method is a bidding method to get a lot of investors, so that after the investors are gathered they are not able to maintain the project let alone develop it

[arnoldrimmer]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

I don't think it's that much cos to me I see the early investors as those who have trust and belief in a project that they don't know what the end result might be so the 40% isn't much

[BartS]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

The fact of the matter is that from 1% to 10% is allocated to the bounty, depending on the project, and early investors get the opportunity to buy tokens with a 40% discount, and sometimes more. And so, when the moment comes when the token or coin comes out on the exchanges, the first who sells them are the early investors and various funds. And as you rightly noted, only bounty participants are accused of falling prices. This is not fair, and I have already written about this many times. It is very bad that in this way admins of crypto projects deceive their ordinary users and ordinary investors.

This happens  because bounty hunters are easy targets, many of them are not liked by other forum members and we know that the majority of them are not participating in a bounty campaign because they believe in the project.

They are participating in the project because they want to get a monetary compensation so it is very easy to attack them, especially for the developers since once they have accomplished their function they can treat them as if they were not one of the most important reasons the project was a success at all.

[gwaposakon]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

I think it depends on the potential of the project being invested. I have joined an ICO before which offers an additional 60% from your investment but never got returns from my investment because the project never took off. Ironically, my investment in a crypto project that just gave 25% bonus gives me multiple returns. The potential of the team and the project I think is more important.

[yulionoo]

yes, I agree with most opinions that say the 40% bonus for the initial investor is too much. if the development team promises to promise investors a bonus that is too high it will adversely affect the development of the project. most investors will sell tokens after tokens have entered the exchange and if many sell, the value of tokens will go down. if this situation continues then the token will eventually become shitcoin.

[patz22]

It may or it may not, that would depend on the team who handles the project cause of course, if they got the right timing on this market for sure, 40% bonus is not that bad! Unless, they have a roadmap for only short term if you know what I mean, but still you need to consider the market condition.

[kaneki007]

For early investment, i don't think 40% is a huge bonus rate. And in early investment, some projects gave bonuses close to 100%. As a result, investing early in a project is risky. And in this case, investors need to make enough profit to cover the risk which they take for investment.

I have never seen a project that gives a bonus of almost 100%, and maybe some investors will be suspicious why a project easily gives a huge bonus. I only see bonuses given to early investors of only 70% or less.

[bittick]

For early investment, i don't think 40% is a huge bonus rate. And in early investment, some projects gave bonuses close to 100%. As a result, investing early in a project is risky. And in this case, investors need to make enough profit to cover the risk which they take for investment.

I have never seen a project that gives a bonus of almost 100%, and maybe some investors will be suspicious why a project easily gives a huge bonus. I only see bonuses given to early investors of only 70% or less.

You can do a little effort to googling it in the internet and i guess you can find so many altcoins are offering up to 100% bonus for the early investors which was scam projects.
So many scam projects were offering such discount and it's easy to search that.

[Starfranko]

I don't think any amount of money is too much for early investors provided no body in their bid to cash out their money went against the rules of engagement.

[Crypto5060]

It's a lot even tho it makes the risk of investing more appealing and this is the main reason why tokens dump once it's listed on an exchange. The bogus bonuses which investors treat as free money make dem sell below ICO price since they are still in profit.

[Google+]

if there are projects that provide that much bonus at the beginning of the offer then it will certainly worsen the condition of the price when it enters the exchange place the price will fall because many will sell it at cheap prices, better bonuses for early investors should not be that much, above 20% already very high, investors also understand that when you get a lot of bonuses in the beginning, the price won't be expensive.

[BartS]

It may or it may not, that would depend on the team who handles the project cause of course, if they got the right timing on this market for sure, 40% bonus is not that bad! Unless, they have a roadmap for only short term if you know what I mean, but still you need to consider the market condition.

40% as a bonus is simply too much, to begin with I will be very suspicious of a coin that gave such a high bonus, it is obvious that the developers of such a coins are only interested in selling all their coins and they are giving those bonuses to encourage people to buy immediately.

But think about it if you were one of those persons that received the bonus, if I was them I will sell my coins immediately before the price crashes and I can obtain 40% in profits without having to lift a finger.