Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors?

[gabbie2010]

Yes, 40% for the early investors is a lot and I think that the maximum bonus for the early investors will be at 20% only. Giving too much bonus for the early investors or the investors in an ICO is a dangerous move because that means that you are giving the pioneer investors a chance to really mess up the price of your coin because they got more supplies and they can easily manipulate the market.

To avoid such problems, projects can simply freeze the coins of early investors. everything is very simple. investors get a profit - projects are insured against the dump

Its better not to give out such an outrageous bonus than to freeze those coins this act will discourage potential investors of new ICOs who might be discouraged and be very skeptical in investing in that project.
Wooing investors with such a huge bonus is inimical to the growth of such project thus its quite obvious that the early investor will be the major culprit who will hurriedly dump their coins so as to make some quick profit to the detriment of the overall road map of that project it baffles me when a dumped coin is blamed on bounty hunters who received a small percentage or proportion of the whole ICO.

[plast555]

Yes, 40% for the early investors is a lot and I think that the maximum bonus for the early investors will be at 20% only. Giving too much bonus for the early investors or the investors in an ICO is a dangerous move because that means that you are giving the pioneer investors a chance to really mess up the price of your coin because they got more supplies and they can easily manipulate the market.

I vouch for every sentence you say. In fact, this rate should not exceed 10%. Giving a bonus of 40% means creating a whale with your own hands. These whales can influence the price as they wish, ie they can dump or pump the price of the coin at any time and make a continuous profit from it.

Therefore, if the project really trusts its product, it should distribute its supply to as many people as possible and avoid whale risk.

[TrevorS]

The larger the proportion of early investors with a 40% bonus, the greater their estimated impact on the coin's market position after listing may be. You need to understand that any investor is primarily interested in profits, and blaming them for selling their stake at a bargain price to them is at least not reasonable. But as practice shows, most often early investors do not have such a large allocation.

[santiPOGI]

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

Even 10 percent is capable to make the price crash once listed in the market.
But that is not the point of the team, they dont care on giving more discount to investors.
What they want is to reach the softcap just to be successful and continue the project.
there are so many problem now in the ICO and they want to be successful aS many project can't get the success due to many scam issue.

[Neo.op]

I do believe that it is really high, when other investors see that early seeder have got %40 bonus, they may think of not investing in it anymore as they have lost the chance of getting that bonus and it is a thread to dump the value of that asset. Giving maybe %20 bonus is decent as for me, it is acceptable.

[X-ray]

Yes, 40% for the early investors is a lot and I think that the maximum bonus for the early investors will be at 20% only. Giving too much bonus for the early investors or the investors in an ICO is a dangerous move because that means that you are giving the pioneer investors a chance to really mess up the price of your coin because they got more supplies and they can easily manipulate the market.

To avoid such problems, projects can simply freeze the coins of early investors. everything is very simple. investors get a profit - projects are insured against the dump

There's still a pyschological affection due the the massive price discount. It's not that if you freeze the investors' coin allocation temporarilty it will resolve itself, there are so many factors out there that are the result of such massive price discount and one of them is pyschological. People will think that the coin worth even less just because it has too much supply to be distributed and the initial price cut down by the discount will be the market price once it got listed.
Also if the coin is underhyped and having low demands, it might even further drive the price down due to that perception. if the whole purpose of giving away that much discount is to reach the cap, it's to be expected that the project will be doomed once the funds is running out. You can't just giving away something like coin as if it's nothing while people gain it by buying it by entrusting the developers and the project.

[J1mb0]

In my opinion it depends on the project. If it is a good project then 40% for early investors will not be too much, but if it is a bad project, even if 0% is for early investors, they will fail.

[akirasendo17]

I think the issue here is not how many percentages is given the early investors or a bonis the issue here is that after ico's
and after they are release in the exchange holders tend to dump all coins they have and makes a lot of negativity In the exchange
and to the coin itself, I think 5-10% is good that makes holder think twice about their holdings, imagine the effect coins will be valuable and can be very hard for them to dispose

[comchien]

Yes, it is too big that when the money is up to 40% for early investors, the project must have a way to lock the bonuses in the long term to reduce the sell-off situation on the exchange to limit too. discount process.

[Kezacky]

I think so too, with a 40% bonus offer for initial investors too big, at least 20% -25% is a reasonable bonus. if the bonus they offer is around 40% -50% I think this will affect the price of the token when listing on the initial exchange. dumper will occur if the investor discards the token.

[TanakabZX]

40 percent on discount sales of any token or coin is way too much and this will result in earlier dump by the early investors, some few projects are still alive today even after the high discount price on their tokens but they end up suffering in value on exchange, projects with low discount price have low risks to dumping but the call is yours to make

[TGD]

It will depend on the project and ICO result. It's also varies on how they will implement the bonus. If the project requires a minimum which still seems expensive then a bonus of 40 or half the price is definitely fine. If they will put a short time to avail the bonus then it might be reasonable. It just a marketing on how the investors will get the bait of the project. It's still a win win strategy. Still before investing know the project use and product so even it goes in exchanges it will not be easily dump as well identify why they give too high bonus, they're ICO amount might be too high to impossible reach to succeed in their ICO.

[mr_random]

If the bonus amount is dumped to the late investors, this amount can be diminished in various ways. Investors are not going to hold all tokens for the future and they will want to realize some of the profits one day. Hurting the project is possible if the investors dump the tokens without caring about the vision of the project and the future of the project becomes unclear for them.

[cutesgirl]

40% bonus for investor on pre sale I think is enough because they want to buy at the first time ICO or EIO open for the public, they have to get special bonus with first time buying an ICO coin without have effect for listing coin with higher or lower price, I will get 40% bonus on pre sale but for the great ICO investment.

[judeafante]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

That's to much it's a sure invitation to dump the coin when it hit the market because investors will always try to recover their investment and that 40% may get half of their initial investment, giving that huge amount of bonus will give bad impressions to the project, 10% is ok for bonus and beyond that is like an invitation for a dump when it hit the market.

[Arsenyo]

I think it is too much for early investors, it's seems like project is unconfident in its success. But blaming investors for the massive dump is stupid because almost every ICO and IEO frozen their investor tokens for approximately 2 years.

[Krabby]

Not too much. 40% is the appropriate bonus for people who support the project for a long time. As you know, in the long run, the prices of altcoins collapse

[tungaqhd]

Not too much. 40% is the appropriate bonus for people who support the project for a long time. As you know, in the long run, the prices of altcoins collapse

Indeed, with the early support of these investors, projects that reward them with such a reward are appropriate, even if it adds a few percent more, it is not a big deal because as you said, in the long run, no one knows what will happen to the project, it could be a reward or a risk, the bonus created by the project only helps people feel fair, which is also a way to attract investors. But one very clear problem is that the bonuses are bigger, very few people risk venturing to invest in such projects, the risk is usually quite large

[Redemption59]

project managers and their advisory board will keep making this mistake over and over and still not realize its their mistake of giving out 40% discount to investors that mostly leads to dump of their tokens but instead they are always happy to blame bounty hunters for dumping upon listing forgetting the early huge bonus they gave to investors. To me, 40% is too huge and should be reduced drastically.

[Zeke_23]

Not too much. 40% is the appropriate bonus for people who support the project for a long time. As you know, in the long run, the prices of altcoins collapse

Indeed, with the early support of these investors, projects that reward them with such a reward are appropriate, even if it adds a few percent more, it is not a big deal because as you said, in the long run, no one knows what will happen to the project, it could be a reward or a risk, the bonus created by the project only helps people feel fair, which is also a way to attract investors. But one very clear problem is that the bonuses are bigger, very few people risk venturing to invest in such projects, the risk is usually quite large

This is too much, we all know that those coins that are not gonna sell until the end of the project will be burn, it means the supply of the coin will be shorten or decreased. It looks like it does not affect but it is really too much when an altcoin will finally make it to the market.