Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors?

[Torps1]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

[1715546992]

1715546992

[playboy654]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

yes it is very high amount of bonus for any kind of investment and it is not realistic value but project team keep these kind of discounts for the yearly investor to lure more investors to their project which make more money for them not to the investors. No good project team will decide or set this much discount level so better to ignore that project to be invested.

[altscaner]

I think it's quite big and this could be the reason why the price at the beginning of the listing fell, but in some cases there are also ico and ieo who distribute bonuses a few months after their tokens are listed on the exchange but the price is still dumping and in my opinion this depends on their project not a bonus factor

[wanted sliter]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

40% was too little in this market.
100% or more would be good.
In this type of market, you could lose 50% after 1 night. So 100% after 1 night is the number we can dream of.
But...high interest comes with high risk too.
Just buy some top coins from now and wait, 1 year later. Might be more than 40% you could get...or may not

[coinswebid]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

some project will give more than 40% mate,, i think its normal for early,
because early investors is the first people's who believe with the project
but in my opinion the bonus should given with locked up period, so the early investors will not dump their bonus

[pishite]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

It is possible that because of this percentage, it is possible that the token will fall. But here a lot depends on the team, which should prescribe in the smart contract that you can not spend all of them at once, but only every month to sell some part, the only way to keep the price.

[Corer]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

To me 40% is extra too much for early investors not minding that they actually have that trust and belief in the project and so the early investors title but to me it's way too much and should be looked into cos that's one of the major reasons when price fall after listing

[rosezionjohn]

It depends on which side you are on. If you are looking at it from a hunter's pov, it may be too much. If you are looking at it from an investor's point of view, that is just normal in business. Early supporters deserves all the perks they can get as long as those bonuses is not detrimental to the project itself.

[poornamelessme]

That's kind of a normal bonus, but at the same time expect an initial dump of some sort. It's human nature, free money basically.

25% or so may be less likely to dump, but in this market who knows... sometimes I think a 5% bonus would lead to massive dumping.

[Javi_Anibarro]

There is no too much in bonus for early Investors because the majority of people who participated in its first sale will need to hold their asset at least 6 months or even longer than that. they are the backbone of the project because of their money the team could run their project and making a progress day by day. What is too much is giving the Investors the bonus for 40% and leaving them alone with their token while the team runs away with their money.

[DarkDays]

40% bonus probably isn't capably of crashing the token price. After all, with most prominent IEOs and ICOs investors are actually trying to receive more than double their initial investment amount.

This means that even if they sell at double their original investment price, people who receive 40% less tokens will still be in roughly 60% profits.

I think when you see an ICO that is offering massively higher bonuses for early investors, then you should be worried, e.g. something like 200% bonus is an indicator of an almost guaranteed dump.

[FontSeli]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

It seems to me that everything depends on the project. If the project and its development team show that they will be able to realize their ideas and create a cool product, then in this case there will be many who want to invest in it and there is no need to make a big discount for early investors.
If the project is bad, then only huge discounts for early investors can at least encourage someone to invest in it.

In general, discounts for early investors are normal, because they carry increased risks compared to other investors.

[tycsols]

I am against big discounts and bonuses to early or big investors and i support one sale price throughout the crowdsale because giving such bonuses gives unfair advantage to these people who can easily dump the market whenever they want so i do not support the idea of bonuses.

[carter34]

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

We can't really stop the profit that a bounty hunter makes from the sale of his tokens for instance, that is his labour, sweat and knowledge at work.
Also, I don't think it should make a good project crash finally, it can cause a temporary drop and afterwards, a rise will resume.

[Kemarit]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

Nah, I don't think that 40% bonus for early investors is too big. And why would it be capable of crashing the token price? Is the project expecting a massive dump from the early investors? That's why they are called investors, then put money and expect more money in return. Besides, this is a free market, everyone can do whatever they want as long as it is legal. And I think blaming bounty hunters and investors for the massive dump has been discuss many times here in this community, so stay blaming and pointing fingers.

[stigmacryptonight]

40% bonus is very much.
Just imagine, if you invest and get a bonus of 40% it is certainly very profitable. This is one of the reasons why prices tend according to the first time, because people already get a big bonus from the purchase. With that they use this situation to sell for the main purpose of profit.
It's not wrong that investors actually do that, because the project gives all of this. So in the future never blame the bounty hunter when the value of a token has decreased.

[Bananington]

In my opinion, 40% is extremely high for bonus. Imagine if early investors for private sale buy up to 30% of total supply, that means they get huge loads of the coin/token as bonus which doesn't tell well about the tokenomics. This can be curtailed with very long vesting period which can be released in batches anyway. A good project doesn't necessarily need to give out huge bonuses to lure in investors, this is just my take.

[stfN2128]

40% bonus is a way to high, yes. i mean, sure early investors should benefit for their risk, but if they get a bonus of 40%, no one should wonder why the price of a new coin / token dumps so much... everyone which get a high bonus will sell very fast, 40% + is not that bad..

[pixie85]

It's a lot but even if it was 30% it also could crash the price. The crash depends on the project itself not the distributed coins. In extreme cases if you distributed almost all of it the probability of a crash would be higher but in lower numbers 20-50 it's always the coin's fault.

 You can distribute 40% of a good coin and not see a crash but you can distribute 30% of a bad coin and it will crash

[Azuliand]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

I think 40% now very much , now almost all ieo on the stock exchanges , and such bonuses actually do not , as the hype is very large and bonuses actually do not need