Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors?

[tsaroz]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

Large bonus system are one of the reason for price crash of a token on listing. There's no way to justify a more than 10% bonus for some users buying a few months ahead of others. If there are large bonuses on the early pre-sale, no one would be interested in buying them in ICOs. And the estimation made by the team would fall short and is one of the reason why ICOs don't reach their hardcap.

[Denongels]

In my opinion is very large and without a bonus, maybe investors will not be interested it's just that most of the distribution of this kind of bonus has a certain token lockup and also has its own distribution system so this will prevent investors from selling their tokens when the exchange is released only a few do exist which does not enforce this and could be the cause of the price of the token down as a result.

[letyouearn]

It depends on many other factors. Such bonuses are just a part of the promotion strategy. The team should have some global plan that leads their coin to success. If they are doing well, such bonus will do no harm imho.

[Kwansimaa]

40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price. why give investors such huge bonus or discount and upon listing they just go there and dump without losing anything because they had it for free. I think it is time project managers consider all these and stop their blaming games on bounty hunters who have really worked in promoting their project for dumping upon listing.

[Kasabus]

40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price. why give investors such huge bonus or discount and upon listing they just go there and dump without losing anything because they had it for free. I think it is time project managers consider all these and stop their blaming games on bounty hunters who have really worked in promoting their project for dumping upon listing.

Investors hold a huge number of tokens more than enough with the bounty hunters which are more likely to blame rather than to blame bounty hunters in the cause of price dumps. It is the obligations and the role of a project owner to think for the possible result and to think how they could sustain its market price rather than giving a 40% bonus to early investors just to attract them but ended nothing to there ends.

[SistaFista]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

I think 40% is not too much, beside it must be have locked period for those early investors in first place.
Some token sale have several stages. The different of the price sometime bigger than 2x between seed investors and last stage of public sale.
So i think 40% is still ok, as long their tokens are locked in some period.

[Weng simok]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

I think 40% is not too much, beside it must be have locked period for those early investors in first place.
Some token sale have several stages. The different of the price sometime bigger than 2x between seed investors and last stage of public sale.
So i think 40% is still ok, as long their tokens are locked in some period.

We can see now only a handful of ICO projects lock their tokens when the project ends and consequently when tokens are listed on the market the token prices continue to dump and this is caused by the sale of tokens by token holders on a large scale so this has a negative impact on movement the price of the token and added with a fairly large bonus given during the ICO.

[nerlial]

All free token will always affect the price of the token in the market. And it does not matter where these tokens come from (bonus, bounty, airdrop).

[Mrcharles]

One of the reasons why the price of tokens tend to dump after listing is due to the percentage of bonus which is given to investors. In most cases, investors are willing to dump their bonuses Inorder to take some profit and this contributes to the low prices after listing.

[fzatni]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

the bonus is too big, it seems like they just enrich themselves not thinking about investor profits. In my opinion a good project will not give a bonus that big. As a crypto investor it is better to leave if there are projects giving bonuses above 10% better to reduce the risk of loss than to pursue profit greedily. Always blame the bounty hunter when the list market and prices go down for a long time even though they did it themselves

[wendiar19]

I think it's too much and also very dangerous because it can cause a large supply in the market later, I think 5% - 10% will be better. And because crypto does not have regulations a lot of project  that utilize newbie investors to invest in their projects with large bonus prizes.

[Alttraders]

In my own opinion, not all of them are caused by prize hunters and investors, but the project itself has no development in the market so prices continue to decline over time.

[shadowduck]

In my own opinion, not all of them are caused by prize hunters and investors, but the project itself has no development in the market so prices continue to decline over time.

Good projects are also dropping prices and this means that this is due to the usual manipulations. major players buy cheap

[sarmrakib]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

I think you have to come out with a great project after having that you will need to have a great planned .A good project never throw much bonus at the initial moment .So don't need to throw huge bonus and make some restriction after ending the sell and before listing to hols the price .I think the full process need a good strategic plan that's how the project coin or token price will not fall down hugely at the initial moment of the market.

[laptrang01041993]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

I do not think so

[pelumi20]

I feel that a bonus of 40% for early investors is way too much. That's 40% profit already before the token even got listed. The investor can decide to sell everything off immediately the token lists on the exchange.
Imagine someone that invested $10k at early stage and got a 40% bonus that means he already have $14k without any work, he can just take his profit and leave.

[GREENch]

The problem of falling token prices certainly does not depend on the bounty hunters, since the percentage that is allocated to the bounty is "a drop in the bucket." As for the early investors, with the right marketing strategy, everything will be ok. The most important thing is that the final product meets the requirements of the market.

[furball64]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

In order to qualitatively answer your question, you need to know how much time will pass between the date when early investors paid their money and the date when they will receive project coins and will be able to sell them. It is also important when ordinary investors get their coins. If the terms are more than six months, then I would say that 40% of the profit for this is not enough.

[Korkorjkk]

It could be. I don't like the fact that the blame biuty hunters for the dump of price of tokens because they have only a small percentage. It is the investors that hold a chunk of the tokens and the higher bonuses contributes to the dump in prices. I suggest the highest bonus should be 20%.

[zero714309]

Its just normal but we find some project will lock up that bonus for a long. By the way this lock up usually we find at many project at this time. Some case also lock bounty hunter token with long periode. Maybe they have strategy but if the project not good enough the price will still dumped.