Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors?

[ralle14]

40% was too little in this market.
100% or more would be good.
In this type of market, you could lose 50% after 1 night. So 100% after 1 night is the number we can dream of.
But...high interest comes with high risk too.
Just buy some top coins from now and wait, 1 year later. Might be more than 40% you could get...or may not

100% bonus is not good for a token long term it's only going to kill their token quickly if that's their way of distributing tokens from an ICO.

Giving out 40% bonus for investors imo is a lot already if there would be more bonus the starting price of these tokens (if they're listed) could be less than 50% within a few hours.

[Denton]

Yes, 40 % percent is quite a lot for investors. But still I believe that if the team is serious about keeping the price of their coin, they should make sure that the price of their coin doesnt fall.

[Bountyhonter]

40% is way too high and may lead to the project crashing if the project isn't very strong.

[xiboothrezi]

It depends. The bonus percentage must have been carefully estimated by the sales team. Giving lots of bonuses to attract investors is one of the tricks to form a network, on the other hand, bonuses that are too many give a problem to the formation of prices because it is likely to be a dump. The solution that can be done is to provide a maximum limit for each investment for each investor.

[furball64]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

The discount should be reasonable and not more than 20%, otherwise early investors can sell all their coins immediately after listing, make money on it and leave. All other investors will be at a loss.

[smyslov]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

Yes, it is, it's very high that it will motivate investors to dump the coin for a profit, this is one of the problems with the project, they do not want their coin to get a dump in the market, when in fact they are the one encouraging it by giving a very high bonus percentage, it only be 20%.

[chocopapaya]

Nowadays, prices crashing after the ICO or IEO is more about project health and development instead of dumping.
In fact, I would say that the vast majority of these new coins crash because there is no trading volume.
There aren't any buyers or sellers.
In that case, the price will quickly fall and never recover since a baseline was never established to begin with.
Also, with no demand or utility for the coin, you can expect it to never rise.

As far as the 40% discount goes, that is just bad tokenomics.
Highly inflated or deflated prices are never sustainable.
If there such a huge discount, then I would stay away from the project.

[jossiel]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

This has been an issue for a long time and it's true that most of the bounty hunters were blamed whenever a token (that has bounty) gets listed to an exchange. And AFAIK, the devs came up with a solution and made some sort of lock in period to avoid this blaming incident for bounty hunters.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

It's a promo and it's part of the sale so whether 40% or more than that, it depends on how much the devs are aiming to reach.

[taufik123]

40% bonus in my opinion is too much, and if it does provide a bonus of that size there will be a short time limit and some requirements. 40% bonus will damage the market price when first listing on the exchange. so it's not just prize hunters who can damage the market, even investors will damage the market if they just want to profit even if a little. Investors usually have the right to sell the coins they buy in advance.

[Rubick99]

I think 40% bonus is too much, it can dump the price after listed on exchange. Maybe it can be indicate that project is scam. The team should decrease the bonus and give the limit of buying their token to minimize dumping and people who interest with that project can buy the token as well.

[faadhilah]

With the initial bonus reaching 40%, I think it's a very big bonus. And I think investors can have a very large Token. And they I think are able to control the market. This, of course, makes it alert for investors who have fewer tokens. Price may be a sharp decline.

[Meysa_richa]

Yes, 40% is a lot of value.  And that will have a huge impact later when tokens or altcoins are released on the market, those who have large token bonuses can sell them at cheap prices which can create a dump price.  10% -15% is enough as a bonus for investors.

[glendall]

it's very little, and appropriate for early investors, because not everyone can trust in a new project,
and this cannot be blamed on early investors or bounty hunters,
if the price falls too deep, the CEO or team should already have a plan for a buyback.

[Miklight88]

The rate in which market crash now is just out of hands as many aim to not be left out in the bag holder , this is more reason most token crash after listing and more so the bonus investors are not met to be given token for particular time as they can always sell in any discount to just make a profit but in bounty hunter they are never in most cases get their reward on time as many project to pay until market stabilize.

[ancafe]

40% bonus is indeed very big for investors, especially if the bonus is given when holding pre ICO, where the price of the token is very cheap. sometimes, developers try to attract investors by using a fairly large bonus. of course, this will have an impact on the price of the token later. Well, however, it's too big for a bonus, and will most likely have an impact on the token price going forward.

[leader2704]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

Yes, it is true. But a good project should set up a good plan in any cases. Why dont you think that the fall in price is also because team dumped their tokens. If the price dump after listing and never come back, it is definitely a money-grab project.

[DoraNile]

projects with ridiculously presale discounts always put a quick end to their projects and they put the blames on bounty hunters,imagine buying token with 40% off and aftet the token get listed on exchange early investors will quicky dump because with the 40% off discount price they have already make huge profits,this kind of offers is way too much for new projects,it kills business faster

[fzatni]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

the bonus is too high in my opinion, sometimes that makes the price destroyed after the list market, the project itself that gives a bonus is too high, maybe it's one of the market strategies, but it is very detrimental when the price in the market is destroyed, surely the bounty hunters are only given  3%-5% allocation for thousands of participants, stories like that often occur. To attract investors, don't use excessive bonuses, it's better to promote product benefits, innovations or ideas that will be more classy in attracting investors

[maydna]

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

40% will be a big percentage for the early investors, and they can dump the price of the token besides of the bounty hunters. The investor can get their money's back and of course, they can also get the profit too. Perhaps, 40% bonus could attract the investor to come to the project so they will invest their money because they will get another free token from some money.

But before the project gives the 40% bonus to the investor, the team will analyze what will happen to their token at the market, so they can prevent if their token getting dump so hard. But that depends on the team project itself on how much percentage they will give to the early investors because they want to make their early investors satisfied with the project.

[Torps1]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

some project will give more than 40% mate,, i think its normal for early,
because early investors is the first people's who believe with the project
but in my opinion the bonus should given with locked up period, so the early investors will not dump their bonus

If locking the token bonus will solve the problem of price crashes, then that is fine. But not many team are innovative enough to lock up such tokens.