Big prize for 1 participant in a signature campaign?

[watergold]

A signature campaign with 1 participant does not exist and I have never seen it, if that is true then I think the allocation will not be all for 1 participant might get 1% of the allocation funds, and usually if the campaign does not meet the minimum requirements will be canceled.

[1714877118]

1714877118

[akmal1984]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

This is actually quite the opposite. Because in my opinion it is impossible for a project to succeed, but their signature campaign is only followed by one person. Logically why for successful projects are not interested by the participants If this really happens,
For the prize, I think it depends on the bounty manager or the project, whether they will continue to give as initial allocation or they will change it. Because they can change it.

[Novatech8]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

A single bounty hunter promoting a bounty project is not capable to drive the attention needed for a project so even if they managed to raise fund i bet you will not receive the total pool allocation, that will be way too much payment for a single bounty hunter

[lolgato1]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

It doesn't matter how many tokens they receive, but how much they are worth.
But I have seen many times that bounty managers reduced number of tokens when there were only few participants.

[SaShiRaJaVu]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Basically they are allocating these tokens to advertise their product and if they are not able to fulfill those do not expect the entire funds to be spent to a single person , just using your common sense is the best way to go about things rather than having these kind of doubts and the doubt i have right now is whether you have seen any project with a single participant even in airdrop or bounty and if you came across will you be participating in those  .

[Kemangi]

in short a good project always has many participants joining but if the project has only one participant indicates that the project has a bad image and a red flag for you. You should reconsider before joining such a project.

[ATSgrowth]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Basically they are allocating these tokens to advertise their product and if they are not able to fulfill those do not expect the entire funds to be spent to a single person , just using your common sense is the best way to go about things rather than having these kind of doubts and the doubt i have right now is whether you have seen any project with a single participant even in airdrop or bounty and if you came across will you be participating in those  .

If there is only one participant that means that this campaign is a waste of time for you because look how many participants have good campaigns like Cryptotalk  .  People are not stupid, they do research before they join a campaign. Because if you participate 3 months for nothing, then you become angry.

[tinyteapot]

Signature campaign with only one participant is not common better to say that it have not existed before.

If such happens, the bounty organizer will surely reduce the reward and pays the only user using his/her current forum membership rank, there are some campaign that often add it to their terms and conditions that they will reduce the reward  by 50% if certain number of participants are not meant.

[Maturnuwun]

previously I had never seen a project that only had 1 participant and but if there were 2 participants I had seen it, precisely here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5172477.0
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pZF_llXvwoYSYiDJcS2JlFIXhmGdrTWtUMa146B92gA/edit#gid=1230192616

the project ran for 3 months and only had 2 participants in the signature campaign.
As far as I know, if the project team is really responsible and fair. maybe you are still being paid, but not all token allocations are just for you, at least there is a reduction in that allocation.

[trauchot]

It happens in different ways, but I have never seen that only 1 person participated in the signature bounty, I saw when there were 3 people maximum, and in the end these 3 people got their tokens, because I talked with one person who participated in that signature company, and so of course it all depends from the bounty manager and of course from the company that made the bounty, they will decide whether to pay a huge amount of tokens to one person or not.

[aomakun]

It happens in different ways, but I have never seen that only 1 person participated in the signature bounty, I saw when there were 3 people maximum, and in the end these 3 people got their tokens, because I talked with one person who participated in that signature company, and so of course it all depends from the bounty manager and of course from the company that made the bounty, they will decide whether to pay a huge amount of tokens to one person or not.

but I have never seen a signature campaign followed by just one person. I think if the bounty project is devoid of followers the promotion is not running optimally, but if there is then the manager must make payments professionally.

[Fappanu]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

The ICO campaign will not succeed if only one person will support it. So it is impossible to do this, nor does it happen that the campaign manager will issue 2,000,000 tokens as it is a huge amount of money. And this may affect the future of the token because it can collapse when this bounty hunter starts selling the token.

[CarnagexD]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Actually, it depends on the team or to the campaign manager if they going to distribute all token to the one participant. I see some bounty campaign that has only one participant in their signature campaign and I guess the manager will not distribute all allocation for the signature campaign and I guess the rest of the token that allocated to that campaign will be returned to the team. It is totally good if they willing to give all allocated token to the one person who joins in their campaign. Lastly, the decision of the allocated token will still depend on the tear or on the bounty manager.

[noninum]

Actually, it depends on the team or to the campaign manager if they going to distribute all token to the one participant. I see some bounty campaign that has only one participant in their signature campaign and I guess the manager will not distribute all allocation for the signature campaign and I guess the rest of the token that allocated to that campaign will be returned to the team. It is totally good if they willing to give all allocated token to the one person who joins in their campaign. Lastly, the decision of the allocated token will still depend on the tear or on the bounty manager.

A project is very rarely able to succeed if only promoted by a participant, I have never seen a bounty campaign that was only filled by a participant. But if that happens I think the team will not give it completely, they will cut the allocation of the token.

[biddicoin]

it seems impossible, if there is any good bounty, there will be demand for that bounty too

so, many people scramble to join the bounty and make reward given proportionally

as long as i followed bounty, such a thing has never happened

[Aabcde]

During my time in the world of bounties, bounties that were only attended by one person were absent, especially in signatures. If this happens, the bounty manager must have anticipated by making a rule at the beginning that if one part of the bounty does not meet the number of participants, the distribution of the results will be distributed to other parts. Because the purpose of the bounty is to promote the project as much as possible with a large number of people as well.

[poldanmig]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

The rules of each bounty manager are different. for example if the campaign does not reach the minimum people who join the average will be less than the initial number they set. and in my opinion right now for that to happen there is likely to be a new policy. how could that person get such a large allocation?

[Genemind]

It would be too impossible to have one bounty participant for a certain project. One participant wouldn't be able to endorse and promote a project alone. The developers and or the bounty manager would not allow that as well. The purpose of the bounty campaign is to promote a project. There are also rules to follow and there will surely be lots of participants who will be joining if the project has good potential.

[Wapfika]

It would be too impossible to have one bounty participant for a certain project. One participant wouldn't be able to endorse and promote a project alone. The developers and or the bounty manager would not allow that as well. The purpose of the bounty campaign is to promote a project. There are also rules to follow and there will surely be lots of participants who will be joining if the project has good potential.

If ever only 1 join then it can be a scam project so no payment for that one person even he do all the tasks needed,  or the project may not be successful as no promoter can influence them. Bounty managers may also put rules of min participants and if didn't reach it will be divided to allocate in other bounty type. But it's really impossible to happen thou.

[Anonylz]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I don't think they will hand over the entire price to a single participant, rather they will come up an excuse that less participants and reduce the allocation, remember the team and bm reserves the right to make changes of the campaign rule anytime, so this is going to be one changes they will be making no doubt.