Big prize for 1 participant in a signature campaign?

[prehisto]

It depends on the team and bounty manager, in some cases - yes, they will pay all the tokens to you.
In other cases they will reduce the pay and say that is because you are the only one there.

The best way would be to ask bounty manager this question.

[1714877769]

1714877769

[fortunecrypto]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

That would make that signature participant a whale instantly, but I doubt if bounty manager will give everything to that one participant, it's unlikely and unheard of in the bounty community, the manager can change the rules anytime, this is their privilege, like all the others are saying they will deduct and put all the other to other campaigns for equal distribution.

[confreslamp]

Actually, in a lot of campaigns there is a participation limit. So if there are less than 100 participants in the signature campaign, reward will be reduced by 50 percent or something like that. In 99 percent of cases, project will reduce the reward.

[aemma]

If this should happen, I don't think the team will even be happy paying the full reward as they will think they didn't achieve enough in the campaign. However, let's assume it occurs, the first thing the bounty manager will do is to reduce the allocation of that campaign, then secondly checking the other campaigns with huge participants and increasing the allocation. In some cases, the allocation might be reduced and the token kept without being re-allocated to other campaigns.
I have never seen such, but should it happen, the bounty manager will do justice to it.

[K4C]

This is one of those questions where the answer is not black and white, the decision lies entirely with the team, some teams will pay out the allocation to that individual and some teams would cancel the campaign entirely and refuse to pay anything, while some would just reduce the reward given to the individual, each case is unique and I have seen campaigns where a single individual got aid 92% o the whole signature allocation.

[[btc]YSG]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I don't think that will be the case, It is like more than one participant will be active for the campaign, but If only one participant is the only accepted user, No bounty will pay that much to just one person, they are likely going to reduce the allocation. Some bounty always state this from the begining of the campaign that if there are less than a certain number of particpant the allocation will be reduced.

[gundala]

It's really fortunate if it really does come true. In fact, if the project promises and has the opportunity to be successful, there will definitely be quite a large number of participants, at least in the tens of participants at least. Although not an effective indicator, the number of participants can be a measure of the level of project success.
There may be new rules if there is only one participant, the allocation may be reduced.

[nanaimogold]

If this should happen, I don't think the team will even be happy paying the full reward as they will think they didn't achieve enough in the campaign. However, let's assume it occurs, the first thing the bounty manager will do is to reduce the allocation of that campaign, then secondly checking the other campaigns with huge participants and increasing the allocation. In some cases, the allocation might be reduced and the token kept without being re-allocated to other campaigns.
I have never seen such, but should it happen, the bounty manager will do justice to it.

I don't the possibility of that happening. The probability is 0.01 because really, no sensible team will be happy to pay the whole tokens allocated to signature bounty campaign worth $25000 to one participant. It is not logical

[Kemarit]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

If they are going their own campaign rule then it's possible that the one signature campaign participant can get all the stakes. However, when the project or at least the bounty manager see that I'm pretty sure that one participant won't enjoy all the stakes. He could be given more tokens but not the whole allocated token as it doesn't make sense for the project to do that. They hire signature campaigns to post in this community to have maximum exposure, but if only one is doing it, then they're getting the short end of the stick.

[maxreish]

Only one participant in signature campaign is not possible. I can not imagined that a bounty project will gonna accept only one participant because they have to promote their projects by hiring many participants. Anyway, if the scenario is like this: one participant earned huge stakes and will have a part of 2,000,000 tokens he/she will receive it no matter what if the project itself is not a scam one. But they will be very happy if they will distribute it fairly without complaints of participants.

[awik p]

If this should happen, I don't think the team will even be happy paying the full reward as they will think they didn't achieve enough in the campaign. However, let's assume it occurs, the first thing the bounty manager will do is to reduce the allocation of that campaign, then secondly checking the other campaigns with huge participants and increasing the allocation. In some cases, the allocation might be reduced and the token kept without being re-allocated to other campaigns.
I have never seen such, but should it happen, the bounty manager will do justice to it.

I don't the possibility of that happening. The probability is 0.01 because really, no sensible team will be happy to pay the whole tokens allocated to signature bounty campaign worth $25000 to one participant. It is not logical

the purpose of a prize campaign is to promote a project, the more it promotes, the better. but if only 1 participant promotes and the project is successful, I think the team will review it, because logically the promotion of the signature is less effective but the project is successful, and it is possible that the team will cut the number of tokens obtained, although still getting a big nominal

[TopT3ns]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Usually not, from what i already see, usually bounty manager will decrease bounty reward depends on how many participants. Or maybe change allocation of the reward and distribute to another campaign. So, it wouldn't make us get 100% of signature bounty allocation. Or at least it is what i already see. Never see someone get 100% of allocation although he is only participant.

[CryptoBry]

I participated in some signature bounty campaigns before where the participants never reached more than a hundred and I thought I will have a lot of tokens later but alas the program decided to reduce the allocated number of tokens for the signature and they can just do that easily since they are the decision makers for the whole thing. Of course, it would be impossible to just have a single signature campaign participant even before when bounty hunting was not yet so popular today even bad projects can get the attention of many members of this forum and we are left vying for the allocated tokens like bread crumbs.

[mika11]

They will get everything if only one participant.

[masterrex]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Thats not going to happen most bounty campaigns today are setting a new norms even the campaign was already finish still they can change the rules without any valid reasons! so how is that possible that only one signature campaign participation will garnered all the tokens thats totally impossible and it will never happen today or in the future! mostly the rules stated that it was automatically slashed the token poll if the desired participation was not reach. the worser is those tokens will paid in 6 months -1 year. thats why i didnt join those shady campaigns. the promising projects are paid weekly or monthly thats how they shown their honesty kudos to those team that paid Weekly or monthly.

[DarkDays]

If there is only one participant, then the project must be so utterly trash that everybody else knew to steer clear. In this case, handing out the entire sum to a single participant likely doesn't matter, since the project will never hit an exchange or achieve any semblance of success in any case. However, in the rare event that a great project is successfully monopolized by a single person, then I believe they should get the entire allocation unless there is some specific rule preventing such an event.

[darth_cryptorider]

First, there is no way, that the signature will have only one participant.  Second, the project never  will allow having so many coins in  hands of one man

[letyouearn]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Bounty managers often specify some other rules to prevent such scenarios. For example - bounty pool will remain the same if there is at least 50 participants. If less - bounty pool will be decreased.

[||bit]

Normally it's based on the signature campaign.Some paying huge and some pay less then a expected.The difference is very simple,the campaign which pay you huge,will be run for the short period.The campaign which pays you less,will run for the longer period.Now the choice is yours to choose the campaign.The amount which you earn should be moved to trading,to multiple the money which you had received.

[fosco333]

Most bounty campaigns i know, does not give the payment for only 1 participant.
Usually they have some rules in the beginning of the campaign, they have right to change the reward.
Participating in bounty is about the rules, we must read carefully before joining.