Big prize for 1 participant in a signature campaign?

[BRODIN]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

[1714887332]

1714887332

[1714887332]

1714887332

[Cryptrx]

I doubt these are some of the scenarios where bounty allocation is slashed due to project not wanting huge amount in the nads of few persons. In this case, the allocation will be slashed its not possible to have just a participant in a signature campaign.

[rdewilde]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

First i don't think it's possible to have just a participant in one campaign be it signature or others. Secondly in most campaigns, there is a rule which states that if the number of participants in a particular campaign isn't much, that campaign allocation will be slashed and added to other campaigns probably to the one with much participants. On the other hand, there might be a case scenario whereby the participants in a particular campaign will be capped so as to ensure the participants gets a reasonable payouts.

[Furious 7]

in similar cases if participants are few then the allocation for the campaign is usually reduced, so participants do not get a token with a large amount. The manager will not let this happen.

[salty]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

From my experience, the bounty manager can decide what is the best option and the final decision is up to his discretion. If the single bounty hunter is eligible to take all reward on the signature campaign then why not?

Guys we are talking about some fiction.Have you seen at least 1 project that would pay 1 user the entire pool?In any case, the pool will be cut. This is first. Secondly, the number of participants in the subscription company indicates that this company is not successful and most likely the received tokens can be safely dumped into the trash)

[djkyno]

It is almost impossible to have a signature bounty with just one participant, especially if the project is valuable. But assuming this happened, the bounty manager (or the team) will decide to reduce the allocated tokens for signature bounty and pay this participant a lot less than the initial signature pool.

[jossiel]

Ask your manager, if there's a rule from their original post that says 'they have the rights and reserve to change rules or so' that will depend on his decision.

If he finds okay with sending all that reward to the one and only signature campaign participant then be grateful. But if it's his decision together with the devs to just give a portion then respect their decision.

[Bountyhonter]

It's not possible for a campaign to have just one participant not even scam projects can have one participant and if the amount of participants in a campaign is small the bounty manager's usually cut the allocation and add it to other campaigns.

[pixie85]

It shouldn't be like that because 1 person can only do so much work for the company. It doesn't matter if he's the only one doing it he can only get them a given amount of views and that amount is priced accordingly.

Why should it be priced tenfold if he doesn't do a job of 10 people? It's not his achievement that nobody else wants to do it.

[poornamelessme]

If a bounty only has one participant, typically that bounty would close early and nothing given out... and project cancelled. Where it can work is when a bounty has a small number of participants (let's say a dozen or so), enough for the project to continue yet those participating get a decent number of coins.

Of course with situations like that it also means the project probably isn't so popular, so the odds of getting anything worth much is pretty rare.

[mr_random]

I have never seen such case in the bounty campaigns, the bounty pool is divided to equal parts and it is distributed to all participants which can't be less than 50(some bounty managers put such rule on the first lines of general bounty campaign). The bounty earnings are the passive income, I don't like the idea of turning bounty hunting something can be done seriously. 1 participant can earn up to the allowed amounts of the token, in another situation he can dump the tokens right after the end of the bounty campaign.

It's not possible for a campaign to have just one participant not even scam projects can have one participant and if the amount of participants in a campaign is small the bounty manager's usually cut the allocation and add it to other campaigns.

There is a fixed token bounty pool for each campaign in the bounty. If bounty manager distributes the tokens from one part to another part it should be agreed with the marketing team before taking such a deal in my opinion.

[tanjiran]

in similar cases if participants are few then the allocation for the campaign is usually reduced, so participants do not get a token with a large amount. The manager will not let this happen.

Right, usually this is what happens. If there are only a few participants, if the project is successful, the price is good, usually if the distribution for the bounty has not been done then there will be a new policy, I don't know, maybe it's not fair, but the fact is so and "they" will argue that the developer and the team have the right to change the rules. Irony.

[JeffBrad12]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Yes that's true if the campaign based on the stakes allocation and there was a chance for that single participants to take all of the rewards (if the developer don't mind to change its decision to distribute all of the rewards to that participant too)
The only other reason if that participant can't get all of the rewards is the developer is changing the rules and put a cap to the how much maximum coin that can be received by any participants.
I have seen some campaigns that distributed a huge token to a few participants only.

[Gab20]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I have never seen this happened and if it does, I believe the team will want to cut down the pool. If they do not do that, the fellow will dump the tokens and it will affect the price on an exchange, which perhaps they might not recover from.
You should also know that from reality, such cannot happen.

[herurist]

I don't think that will happen and the signature will be stopped because it does not meet the requirements. If the signature is complete and only 1 participant, the prize will be deducted.

[chanler]

~snip~ if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) ~snip~

It is impossible for a good project having a single participant only on their signature campaign. I doubt so much in this case, I strongly believe that it should be a scam project. Why only a single participant on the project? It is a big question. However, if it is true. I guess the bounty manager will cut the allocation.

[rodel caling]

I doubt these are some of the scenarios where bounty allocation is slashed due to project not wanting huge amount in the nads of few persons. In this case, the allocation will be slashed its not possible to have just a participant in a signature campaign.

Yeah is too much impossible signature campaign only one participant to join, if this scenario are beocme true the participant of that campaign is very bless he get quick millionaire.

I don't think that will happen and the signature will be stopped because it does not meet the requirements. If the signature is complete and only 1 participant, the prize will be deducted.

That is correct mate even the small prohect there have a lot of particiapant want to join amd apply, specially if the manager of the signature is reputable and popular.

[bgaf]

In my opinion, if that happened on a campaign then the Manager will probably put some discretion on its announcement that if certain participants didn't reached their target for participants then the rewards will be deducted. Actually its quite unfair for that single if his the only participant then it will be reduced due to none joiners of that campaign. Well, the Manager must give him at least a bonus for being faitful 

[NoirSuccubus]

In my opinion, if something like this happens, the bounty manager will reduce payments to this participant and distribute tokens to other campaigns. I saw something like this when in the subscription campaign of one project there were only 5 participants.

[ansarose1]

As what have many says, first it is not possible to have only one participant on a signature campaign. However if this was so, i think it is still not possible for a single participant to solo the rewards allocated on signature vampaign, it will be decided by the manager to reduce the rewards to get by only single participant.

[GGmith]

I doubt with such a project, that usually projects that have high expectations are always many participants, but if it is really a legitimate project and a good project manager at least a prize will be given to the participant. but the manager will not give everything, at least half of the total number of signature prizes.

[upyem2k]

Some projects in such scenarios peg their reward to a token worth of certain among. The person will only the highest possible reward in line with the bounty rule. I am on a campaign that claims that their payments is paid in number of stakes acquired with reward fixed on a stake as $0.1. That means if you happen to be the only one, you will just get reward for stakes you have acquired.

[Bagani]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I havent experienced this kind of scenario but mostly bounty manager or the team cuts the bounty allocation for certain campaign if they don't have needed participants. But it depends on the team or the bounty manager's decision if they will cut it or give the whole bounty allocation to that one lucky person.

[Ghenjer]

I want to know about the project that you said, can you provide a link to the project, so we can all know the truth? I personally have just heard this because what is meant by the OP is one participant, and if 5-10 participants I have personally seen it and prizes are distributed equally to the participants. if one participant I think that's impossible

[DonFacundo]

It will reduce the payment if only one bounty hunter participate in signature campaign. I'm sure the team don't want to give all rewards for one person because he can dump the token for sure.

[r32godzilla]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Yes, this probably should happen if bounty participant earn all stakes in the campaign.
But, I have an experience that it may not be so. For example Ellcrys didn´t want to distribute all allocated rewards to only 10 participants. So in the most cases they will reduce the number of rewards, if there are only few participants.

[shoreno]

i already joined several campaigns and i already see alot of campaigns or thier rules rather but i never seen anything like that ( the one that you mentioned on the op )  instead what is more common is that  the rewards are already divided per user depending on thier rank  and depending on the work that they have done  but i think there is no such thing that one user or few more user can divide the total allocations for the campaign because the unsused funds will always be returned by the manager to its rightful owner  .

[Botnake]

Everything is based on rules, if the rule completely says it is, then the team has no choice but to award the reward to a single signature campaign participants. However, I have never witness this kind of scenario in the past, good projects usually attracts a lot of bounty participants especially the signature campaign where there's less participants to divide a good portion of the total allocation.

[Samboo]

I do not think only a participant and a few participants can get all bounty pool allocated under Signature. They may provide any excuses in that case. They may reduce bounty pool by some percent in that case. They may refer some portion of bounty pool under Signature to other campaigns like telegram, facebook, twitter.

[Galley]

Usually, in the rules of participation of a bounty company, the condition for changing the awards depending on the number of participants is announced, or at least any possible change is announced. And one member of a subscription company is generally an out of the ordinary event. In good companies, this does not happen.

[dirgayeah]

In common case, the allocation already setup if the participant are less from the target. Mostly they are reduce it 50%. Very rare to find project which is paid the participant fully.

[Stanlo]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I don't think so,even some bounty projects that have too low participants promoting the projects always end up distributing half of the max bounty allocation,Gowithmi did the same thing too

[Ss4sukE]

It's quite strange, because as far as I know a good project has many participants, but if the project only has 1 participant, I doubt that. if the likelihood of the project succeeding automatically the person is very lucky to get a lot of tokens, but the problem is the team will not allow that to happen, at least at the end of the campaign there will be a cut in the allocation of prizes.

[Novatech8]

In my opinion, if that happened on a campaign then the Manager will probably put some discretion on its announcement that if certain participants didn't reached their target for participants then the rewards will be deducted. Actually its quite unfair for that single if his the only participant then it will be reduced due to none joiners of that campaign. Well, the Manager must give him at least a bonus for being faitful 

Only a very bad bounty project will have one bounty hunter promoting the project,even scam and fake bounties are been promoted by multiple bounty hunters but having one bounty hunter doing all the job is still zero for the project so it doesn't make sense to pay all the bounty rewards to a single bounty hunter

[mersal]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

As per the stakes calculation yes,the one participant needs to be give all the bounty allocation on the other hand chances of that project to attain the soft cap  value with only one person advertising it is merely zero so he won't be give anything if it failed to reach the soft cap value.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Some campaign have specific requirements before a type of bounty will be eligible for distribution. If you observe the terms and conditions you will notice something like e.g If the campaign doesn't get enough participants or doesn't meet their minimum limit of accepted participants, a particular percentage of the bounty allocation will be removed etc. And the most common terms which is "The manager has the right to stop/adjust the campaign at any given time".

Therefore, before the signature campaigns even come to an ends, it would be stopped by the campaign manager and most time, fund will be moved to other categories like Twitter or Facebook campaigns. No manager will operating a signature campaign with just 1 member so technically the scenario you highlighted above isn't possible.

[ivaf]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

In this case, it is useless to speculate what will happen. The decision will be made by the project team. Of course, in a good way, they should give everything to the one (sole) participant. But any other decision can be made. In the bounty, nothing depends on the participant; the organizer can change any rule at any time.

[10c]

I do not think that this is possible. most likely campaign managers will reduce reward and set some kind of fix token limit per person

[mendra_2009]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Of course not, the allocation definitely will be reduced maybe into around 90% from the total allocation amount. If they paying only 1 bounty participants with full allocation amount they definitely loss. Because they like giving blind salary to the 1 bounty participant and they got nothing.
1 signature participants is very less to make an awareness in this forum

[ajaymukund]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

That will never happen. because when they put out a pool for a campaign, they need a minimum of 50 to 100 participants. If that goal is not met, they will reduce the number of tokens to be fairer for other bounty hunters.

[coin-investor]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

The bounty manager or the developer can change the rules anytime, as stated in their rules, there's a possibility that they might slash or deduct the allocation and transfer it to other campaigns, so far I have not read any campaign that has only one signature participants I doubt if the project will succeed with only limited promotion.

Bounty manager do not want one single participant to accumulate big amount,

[cahbagus555]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

It could be that the developer team or the bounty manager will change the allocation for the signature if there is only 1 participant. For the developer team or investor, it is very dangerous if the participant holds the entire allocation because it can affect prices in the market

[Oyarebu]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

From my experience, the bounty manager can decide what is the best option and the final decision is up to his discretion. If the single bounty hunter is eligible to take all reward on the signature campaign then why not? Who decides which part of the bounty allocation will be distributed to the single or multiple bounty hunters?

Personally i don't think the bounty manager has the sole power to make such decision because, many of these campaigns have their own rules which must be adhere to before bounty rewards can be distributed. The minimal numbers of.participants that is required for the campaign, sometimes when the numbers are not meant the campaign will be close, there will be no distribution. In addition, the team project hold these tokens or coins till the end of the campaign before distribution.

[ajaymukund]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Fixed pool ready projects are good projects, they are very interested in effective marketing and if the signature campaign has only 1 person, they will cancel that campaign and put tokens into other campaigns.
because the UBC project (Ubcoin market) has previously sent the entire pool token to the signature for exactly 20 participants.
and that caused the token's price to suddenly drop and now the value of the business only hovers at $ 343k.

[xOdiumNostrumx]

Yep, I have witnessed similar situations before, not this extreme one, where there is only one participant, but there have been less than 10. And naturally, the campaign manager did deduct the original allocation, but the sig participants were still paid a lot regardless that deduction.

[killerfrost]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I think it is difficult for it to happen. If the project is good and successful, it will attract a lot of participants. Or if there is only 1 participant, I think that project will cut the budget

[Saisher]

Yep, I have witnessed similar situations before, not this extreme one, where there is only one participant, but there have been less than 10. And naturally, the campaign manager did deduct the original allocation, but the sig participants were still paid a lot regardless that deduction.

The project is not good if it is not attracting participants if there is only one participant then it's not attractive for bounty hunter, I have not seen crowdfunding that only got one participant, bounty hunters will always look for a good project and leave their current campaign.
and if happens that there is only one participant, they can decide to deduct the prize.

[Onuohakk]

Ask your manager, if there's a rule from their original post that says 'they have the rights and reserve to change rules or so' that will depend on his decision.

If he finds okay with sending all that reward to the one and only signature campaign participant then be grateful. But if it's his decision together with the devs to just give a portion then respect their decision.

What will be the rule then? That he's the only one on the list of signature campaign. Remember there is amount of tokens allocated to signature participants, which can't be changed at the end. It's absolutely wrong to be given a portion

[erikalui]

Such projects are just closed as they don't have enough participants and sometimes the participant gets few tokens as a reward while mostly they get nothing for promoting the campaign.

Yep, I have witnessed similar situations before, not this extreme one, where there is only one participant, but there have been less than 10. And naturally, the campaign manager did deduct the original allocation, but the sig participants were still paid a lot regardless that deduction.

Surprising as the project did not even attract 10 participants so them even being paid is good. Most projects just give a very less reward or nothing in most cases. Earlier big projects give participants joining on the last day as well the same amount of tokens as one is paid for the whole week/whole project.

[soramon]

Well i think the bounty manager will change the rules and maybe the prize pool for signature will cut because of lack of participant or another factor. But i never see a project with less than 5 participants on signature campaign.

[kynaz]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

If the project has only one participant in the signature campaign, then that project is definitely a bad project and the participants do not need to spend too much time working with them. Most signature campaigns always have at least 50 participants and if there's a larger number then that's definitely a project that you should be more interested in because that project can help you earn a lot of money. I personally only participate in clear projects and always check before joining

[o.ogurlu]

In my opinion, that participant should have all the reward. But I think that in such a case, the bounty manager and the team members will reduce the amount of the reward. And I don't think they're going to give such a high reward to a single participant.

[Metall303]

Of course, this will not happen. The creators of the project will not allow this. if a large number of tokens fall into the hands of one user, this is very dangerous for the stability of the price of the coin itself.

[bloodyvio]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I think it depends on their developers choice, they may worry and change their option with giving that participant only 5% or less from the total token allocations.
Just imagine if they give it all(2m tokens) and then that participant sells it all, wouldn't it totally affect the price? 

[SaidNurs]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I think if a project only has 1 participant, the ratio is 1 to 100. The reason is there are so many prize hunters in the crypto world, plus if the project is interesting, logical, and will end up successful. I assume not only 1 participant.

If that happens, all 1 prize will be obtained by the participant, according to the agreement and rules on the project that was followed.

[suhadi88]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

This participant will get all the tokens that have been promised. However, we return to the rules made and the Bounty manager's policy will determine. But in my opinion, it is very funny because the participants there is only one and that I have never met.

But if that happens, let alone the project is not fake and successful. It will make a lot of money and he is very lucky.

[Xphenosis]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

The managers will surely change its allocation since the participants are that low, if by managers discretion or the participant itself is well versed on the forum and can get enough traffic then it could be.

[pinkpanther03]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

In regardless to your question, most of the bounty campaign now has the rules of they can change it without any reason, and sometimes they also have that below 100 participants the allocation would be lessen to 25% only, something like that. In short, if there is no rules like this to the bounty campaign all allocation for that campaign is possible to be given to one participants only, and if they hit the hard cap as well.

[Golftech]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

This participant will get all the tokens that have been promised. However, we return to the rules made and the Bounty manager's policy will determine. But in my opinion, it is very funny because the participants there is only one and that I have never met.

But if that happens, let alone the project is not fake and successful. It will make a lot of money and he is very lucky.

Some bounty managers also declares that if ever the bounty participants will not  met the numbers of participants that they needed they will adjust the stake rewards, though just incase that things happened like that and there's no changing in rules, that particular bounty hunter will be so lucky to receive the entire rewards.

Not sure if there's already things that happened , maybe in some instance there's few lucky hunters who shared big stakes but not alone entirely.

[Weng simok]

Very rarely if a signature campaign is only attended by one participant, but even if that happens I think the bounty manager will adopt the best policy whether payments will be made according to the signature fund allocation or the bounty manager will only pay half of the funds allocated for bounty for these participants, but I think if there is a signature campaign with only One participant, I'm sure the bounty manager will cancel / stop the signature campaign and allocate funds for other campaigns such as content, social media or translation.

[prehisto]

It depends on the team and bounty manager, in some cases - yes, they will pay all the tokens to you.
In other cases they will reduce the pay and say that is because you are the only one there.

The best way would be to ask bounty manager this question.

[fortunecrypto]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

That would make that signature participant a whale instantly, but I doubt if bounty manager will give everything to that one participant, it's unlikely and unheard of in the bounty community, the manager can change the rules anytime, this is their privilege, like all the others are saying they will deduct and put all the other to other campaigns for equal distribution.

[confreslamp]

Actually, in a lot of campaigns there is a participation limit. So if there are less than 100 participants in the signature campaign, reward will be reduced by 50 percent or something like that. In 99 percent of cases, project will reduce the reward.

[aemma]

If this should happen, I don't think the team will even be happy paying the full reward as they will think they didn't achieve enough in the campaign. However, let's assume it occurs, the first thing the bounty manager will do is to reduce the allocation of that campaign, then secondly checking the other campaigns with huge participants and increasing the allocation. In some cases, the allocation might be reduced and the token kept without being re-allocated to other campaigns.
I have never seen such, but should it happen, the bounty manager will do justice to it.

[K4C]

This is one of those questions where the answer is not black and white, the decision lies entirely with the team, some teams will pay out the allocation to that individual and some teams would cancel the campaign entirely and refuse to pay anything, while some would just reduce the reward given to the individual, each case is unique and I have seen campaigns where a single individual got aid 92% o the whole signature allocation.

[[btc]YSG]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I don't think that will be the case, It is like more than one participant will be active for the campaign, but If only one participant is the only accepted user, No bounty will pay that much to just one person, they are likely going to reduce the allocation. Some bounty always state this from the begining of the campaign that if there are less than a certain number of particpant the allocation will be reduced.

[gundala]

It's really fortunate if it really does come true. In fact, if the project promises and has the opportunity to be successful, there will definitely be quite a large number of participants, at least in the tens of participants at least. Although not an effective indicator, the number of participants can be a measure of the level of project success.
There may be new rules if there is only one participant, the allocation may be reduced.

[nanaimogold]

If this should happen, I don't think the team will even be happy paying the full reward as they will think they didn't achieve enough in the campaign. However, let's assume it occurs, the first thing the bounty manager will do is to reduce the allocation of that campaign, then secondly checking the other campaigns with huge participants and increasing the allocation. In some cases, the allocation might be reduced and the token kept without being re-allocated to other campaigns.
I have never seen such, but should it happen, the bounty manager will do justice to it.

I don't the possibility of that happening. The probability is 0.01 because really, no sensible team will be happy to pay the whole tokens allocated to signature bounty campaign worth $25000 to one participant. It is not logical

[Kemarit]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

If they are going their own campaign rule then it's possible that the one signature campaign participant can get all the stakes. However, when the project or at least the bounty manager see that I'm pretty sure that one participant won't enjoy all the stakes. He could be given more tokens but not the whole allocated token as it doesn't make sense for the project to do that. They hire signature campaigns to post in this community to have maximum exposure, but if only one is doing it, then they're getting the short end of the stick.

[maxreish]

Only one participant in signature campaign is not possible. I can not imagined that a bounty project will gonna accept only one participant because they have to promote their projects by hiring many participants. Anyway, if the scenario is like this: one participant earned huge stakes and will have a part of 2,000,000 tokens he/she will receive it no matter what if the project itself is not a scam one. But they will be very happy if they will distribute it fairly without complaints of participants.

[awik p]

If this should happen, I don't think the team will even be happy paying the full reward as they will think they didn't achieve enough in the campaign. However, let's assume it occurs, the first thing the bounty manager will do is to reduce the allocation of that campaign, then secondly checking the other campaigns with huge participants and increasing the allocation. In some cases, the allocation might be reduced and the token kept without being re-allocated to other campaigns.
I have never seen such, but should it happen, the bounty manager will do justice to it.

I don't the possibility of that happening. The probability is 0.01 because really, no sensible team will be happy to pay the whole tokens allocated to signature bounty campaign worth $25000 to one participant. It is not logical

the purpose of a prize campaign is to promote a project, the more it promotes, the better. but if only 1 participant promotes and the project is successful, I think the team will review it, because logically the promotion of the signature is less effective but the project is successful, and it is possible that the team will cut the number of tokens obtained, although still getting a big nominal

[TopT3ns]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Usually not, from what i already see, usually bounty manager will decrease bounty reward depends on how many participants. Or maybe change allocation of the reward and distribute to another campaign. So, it wouldn't make us get 100% of signature bounty allocation. Or at least it is what i already see. Never see someone get 100% of allocation although he is only participant.

[CryptoBry]

I participated in some signature bounty campaigns before where the participants never reached more than a hundred and I thought I will have a lot of tokens later but alas the program decided to reduce the allocated number of tokens for the signature and they can just do that easily since they are the decision makers for the whole thing. Of course, it would be impossible to just have a single signature campaign participant even before when bounty hunting was not yet so popular today even bad projects can get the attention of many members of this forum and we are left vying for the allocated tokens like bread crumbs.

[mika11]

They will get everything if only one participant.

[masterrex]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Thats not going to happen most bounty campaigns today are setting a new norms even the campaign was already finish still they can change the rules without any valid reasons! so how is that possible that only one signature campaign participation will garnered all the tokens thats totally impossible and it will never happen today or in the future! mostly the rules stated that it was automatically slashed the token poll if the desired participation was not reach. the worser is those tokens will paid in 6 months -1 year. thats why i didnt join those shady campaigns. the promising projects are paid weekly or monthly thats how they shown their honesty kudos to those team that paid Weekly or monthly.

[DarkDays]

If there is only one participant, then the project must be so utterly trash that everybody else knew to steer clear. In this case, handing out the entire sum to a single participant likely doesn't matter, since the project will never hit an exchange or achieve any semblance of success in any case. However, in the rare event that a great project is successfully monopolized by a single person, then I believe they should get the entire allocation unless there is some specific rule preventing such an event.

[darth_cryptorider]

First, there is no way, that the signature will have only one participant.  Second, the project never  will allow having so many coins in  hands of one man

[letyouearn]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Bounty managers often specify some other rules to prevent such scenarios. For example - bounty pool will remain the same if there is at least 50 participants. If less - bounty pool will be decreased.

[||bit]

Normally it's based on the signature campaign.Some paying huge and some pay less then a expected.The difference is very simple,the campaign which pay you huge,will be run for the short period.The campaign which pays you less,will run for the longer period.Now the choice is yours to choose the campaign.The amount which you earn should be moved to trading,to multiple the money which you had received.

[fosco333]

Most bounty campaigns i know, does not give the payment for only 1 participant.
Usually they have some rules in the beginning of the campaign, they have right to change the reward.
Participating in bounty is about the rules, we must read carefully before joining.

[airdropan]

in that case it think bounty manager will decrease the reward or on bad case it will cancel the signature campaign
if the total amount of pool send to 1 participant it going to dump whenever the coin hit market for sure

[djselery]

Even the scam projects have many participants in their signature bounties, so there is no way to find a signature campaign nowadays with just one participant. But if this happened for some reasons, the bounty managers will reduce the pool allocated for this campaign, without any doubt.

[South Park]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

The scenario that you are describing is not very realistic, a project that still got the necessary funding, it did not scammed their investors and yet it got almost no promotion from bounty hunters, however believe it or not I saw a project long time ago that followed a very similar pattern and the developers were honest enough to distribute all the tokens to just a few bounty hunters, and in my opinion that is the correct thing to do if they tried to change the rules after the fact they will be no better than scammers in my mind.

[callyf]

Hello it is depend upon the company how much fund raise from investor there is very very big amount company pay you can't expect but for that you need to check properly

[aji567]

if the bounty participant follows the rules and gets the full stake only by him, then the token is entirely his own. it's almost impossible if the bounty signature participant is only 1 or 2 people. definitely more than that.

[Perfect35]

The amount of tokens can either be small or huge, but I do not think that should be the maim concern of an astute bounty hunter, rather, it should be about the quality of the project. As a matter of fact, bounty campaigns are not really looking profitable. So if you see just one participant on a project, don't even bother yourself, it means the project is not good.

[Korkorjkk]

I don't think any bounty will allocate such huge amount of tokens to only one participant. I know bounties who reduce the token allocation by half if they don't get the required number of people to join the bounty. The signature bounty is to create awareness about a campaign and I don't think only one participant can do all that.

[Lanatsa]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Possible but with very low chances. Why? They wont consider on giving out the entire allocation for a single participant since they do know the potential or dumping with their coins on initial listing.They will surely adjust it according to their likes and it would really be a miracle if the project owners/team will consider out on giving all those allocation without any questions but so far i haven't seen such scenario after all these years been here on crypto space specially with bounties.Lastly, its hard to believe a specific bounty program do only have single participant because anytime hunter can see what project is good and not.

[sieemma]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

This does not usually happen and in case it happens, the BM actually solves this by the phrase they used "We reserve the right to change rules at any time" I, personally, do not like this phrase but they can change the bounty pool in the case which participants for the bounty isn't that encouraging. This helps them to organize another promotion system.
Others also do state it that if members aren't up to a certain number, the pool will be changed. The fact is that no one is going to give the whole pool to one person, there will be change in terms by all means.

[Sharon121212]

It's not to the project gains if the continue on a bounty with only one participant I have not yet seen such bounty, the only real action is for them to postponed the bounty or end it totally. One participant will not get them as much publicity as they need.
Like other comments they can re-brand the bounty itself to  align with the number of participants

[leowonderful]

I would be highly suspicious of whatever project you're looking at if there's only one bounty campaign participant, as most of them around here have hundreds of participants by the time they're finished. As for whether or not that one person's going to receive all of the rewards allotted for the signature campaign, it likely varies by campaign but I imagine one participant's not going to get it all. Ideally the rest of it is kept for other promotional activities or is potentially burned so it can't be used in the future.

[Shallow]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Signature campaign is one of the most sort for, so I doubt if it is possible to have just a participant. Also, owing to how video or YouTube campaign is, it is difficult to see just a participant. What am pointing out is that, it is not possible for a single participant to be in a campaign; even if it should occur then the allocation for that campaign will be reduced and moved to other campaigns the manager deem fit or send the token back to the pool. I believe the manager always know the right thing to do in this case.

[Rikotin]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Since you are questioning a project that has one participant (1) I think you need to check the signature that I am using, why? because in the campaign that I followed only I was a participant in it. I believe they are a legitimate project, team transparency is also real and their concept is very good. I am sure the project that I participated in will produce good results.

[Ben Shedly]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

All right. However, I have never observed such situations. The less people participate in the subscription campaign, the less stacks will be earned and the more tokens will be paid per stack. So the more you can earn. So do not let anyone in those bounty campaigns where you participate)

[Jocuserious]

I think its not possible one participant will receive bounty total signature pool because you can see before everyone bounty if we got a good project then lot of people joining in signature. Basically my bitcointalk life I can't see one people joining signature and he/she received bounty signature full pool.

[yazher]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I have heard of les than 20 participants but a single participant on a single project is next to impossible. but I saw some manager that too strict when choosing a participant when I checked their spreadsheets they only got a few participants on their signature campaign. if this was the case then it is possible.

[tranduong123]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I think this case will never happen, It is very unlikely that only one person will participate in the signature campaign, and if it happens, BM cannot let one person receive a prize too big, Bm can be converted to a fixed payout form,

[Ccscopst]

be careful with a project scenario like that, it's clearly a red warning for you. according to common sense if a good project certainly has many participants. but if the project you mean has 1 participant, I doubt it.

[aioc]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

If they only attract 1 participants I doubt if the campaign is worth promoting at all, signature bounty hunters are always on the look for the best campaign and will leave a campaign right away, if they see a good one, but even if there is one participant I don't think they will send all that 2 million, they always have the option to change the rules and the allocation, so I believe they will practice that.

[HK88]

I just heard this time there is a project that only has one participant, isn't a project that has many participants also not necessarily successful? especially if the project only has 1 participant? I will not say that this project is a scam or all tokens will be distributed to 1 participant. what I will ask is whether the project you are referring to is still running?

[Davian144]

be careful with a project scenario like that, it's clearly a red warning for you. according to common sense if a good project certainly has many participants. but if the project you mean has 1 participant, I doubt it.

That's right, because everyone is after a good project, there is no way for prize hunters to leave or pass a project that has proven to be good, and I also doubt that the project participants are just one person.

[sana54210]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

That can never be the case and it would be impossible for them to have one participant because it would not have much effect on them, if through I participant, they expect that at least 100 persons will be drawn to the project, and their target is 10,000, which means they need about 1000 participants, so why would they give just one participant all the money when the person as only delivered just one person.

Everything has clause, and I am sure that they would have policy guarding against that. I don’t think they will pay the 1 participant the money involved, the moment they have one participant, they would have channeled it into other source of advertising and even probably stop the campaign of signature. I have never even come across just one person signature campaign.

[Ghenjer]

If this is the case, it will be very clear that the allocations given will be reduced because the participant's reasons are very minimal, because of course there are various reasons to pay for everything because the developer certainly doesn't want to give most of the tokens to just one person, but if an honest team certainly have to pay for it all because of existing regulations and if the rules are violated it has damaged existing rules or existing agreements.

that's true, but the problem is I also don't believe that the developer will give all token to that participant. according to common sense if the developer gives it all in automatically the participant will sell it immediately when it receives, and then a dump occurs. this is what I think is impossible if the developer shares all tokens for 1 participant.

[boranes]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Only in theory. Campaigns will always have more than just one participant and reward allocation will drop if there are few participants.

according to common sense if the developer gives it all in automatically the participant will sell it immediately when it receives, and then a dump occurs.

The same event will occur with many bounty participants, in this case one participant will sell everything and in case with many bounty participants everyone will sell, final result should be the same.

[Ss4sukE]

a good project always has a lot of participants involved in it, if a project has only one participant I think it's not a good project, yes but this is just my speculation and I think everyone who is here also has the same thought. my suggestion is better to look for other projects that have at least a lot of participants, but I don't say this as a guarantee, I mean much better than projects that only have 1 participant.

[robelneo]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

That would make that participant whale and they won't allow that since they have an option to change the rules so unfortunately, I doubt if they will honor that they might transfer it to other bounties with many participants, and my take is the project is not that good, bounty hunters are very quick to leave a project for another project that what they think has a better chance to get in the market.

[forexandcryptoauditor]

It depends on projects and bounty manager I think.
I have seen projects where only three participants were there and at the end they shared entire allocated tokens(lottery   ).
I have also seen projects where there are very less participants, rewards were reduced to great extent mentioning not raising the funds as expected.
Now a days, I am seeing projects mentioning the rewards criteria based on the participants. In one project it was the condition that if there are less than 100 participants join, rewards will be reduce to half of what is allocated.

[irixo10]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Although this can hardly be true, but let's assume it is. In this case, this is why there is need for good managers, if this should happen the manager will most likely reduce the allocation for that Campaign and channel it to other campaigns with huge participants. Also, most times, at the discretion of the team, the manager might reduce the allocation then send it back to the team, because the team might not be happy paying huge for a campaign they didn't achieve much results from. I have seen most campaigns where one of the rules indicates that, if a certain number of users or participants aren't achieved, the team or the manager will take appropriate actions.

[Kezacky]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Although this can hardly be true, but let's assume it is. In this case, this is why there is need for good managers, if this should happen the manager will most likely reduce the allocation for that Campaign and channel it to other campaigns with huge participants. Also, most times, at the discretion of the team, the manager might reduce the allocation then send it back to the team, because the team might not be happy paying huge for a campaign they didn't achieve much results from. I have seen most campaigns where one of the rules indicates that, if a certain number of users or participants aren't achieved, the team or the manager will take appropriate actions.

and that's true I don't think the manager will ever send all tokens to one participant, even though the manager is responsible. at least if the project is successful, the team will automatically reduce the allocation of prizes to single participants. To be honest, I just heard about this, as long as I'm in the crypto industry I haven't seen a project that only has one participant in the signature campaign.

[meanwords]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

In your fantasy world yes, but if we are talking about the reality here, he/she will not. The most scenario that is likely to happen would be the project would just cancel that particular bounty because there's no participants joining. Even if the project is a scam one, they are not that stupid to let one person to just take all the rewards for him/herself.

[jessyj48]

If only one bounty hunter promotes a project then it won't make a difference because the reason developers want bounty hunters to help promote projects is to create better awareness for the project, if you are the only one on the spreadsheet you might get nothing in return

[dimonstration]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Projects owner or admins will not make it happen . Some projects in Bounty Threads already requires number of participants if that number is not reached some amount of it will be transfer to other allocation like in social media. Its also impossible that a legit project will only get 1 participant seeing the number of users in this forum its definitely not gonna happen in any good project. There might only be few participants if that project requires some installing or registration in other software to be able to join or to acquire the wallet needed to participate but I doubt only one will try it.

[tenakha]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

In your fantasy world yes, but if we are talking about the reality here, he/she will not. The most scenario that is likely to happen would be the project would just cancel that particular bounty because there's no participants joining. Even if the project is a scam one, they are not that stupid to let one person to just take all the rewards for him/herself.

I totally agree with you. If the project is good, there will not be 1 person on the whole list, or if it is bad, you can not rely them about reward. Even the BM himself does it for less money. For one person only? Even if there is more reward than developers expect, they do not give it. Also if you look at the rules, they have the authority to change the rules if needed. "They do not feed anyone easy."

[Vaculin]

If only one bounty hunter promotes a project then it won't make a difference because the reason developers want bounty hunters to help promote projects is to create better awareness for the project, if you are the only one on the spreadsheet you might get nothing in return

Exactly and you are not contributing to the project even if it will be successful and I don't think the team would not see that.
You might be getting paid but you can't expect to get the original reward that was promise, it's understandable I guess, just to play it fair on both sides.

[Cheesus]

No, it's impossible to give all tokens to one participant. Because it is not helpful for any project. That one guy can dump or manipulate the token price if he gets all the tokens from the signature campaign. Bounty manager will send tokens by 2% or 5% highest. Though I don't think a good project can have only one signature participant.

[ImSuparmin]

The big prize for one participant in the signature campaign depends on the bounty that we follow and also depends on the rank we already have, the higher the rank we have, the greater the prize we will get.

[gurunanakji777]

I don't think only 1 participant is there in the signature campaign whereas a project is successful. If such a scenario happens I believe it all depends on bounty manager whether to pay signature campaign coins to 1 participant or can change the rule to pay the coins due to only 1 participant in the signature campaign.

[ImSuparmin]

in my opinion will not get the sum of all tokens (signatures), because a project can be called successful if a lot of projects that follow the bounties, if there is 1 person who follows the bounty, maybe I think that it is a scam bounty.

[Seghokendil]

as far as I know a good project always has many participants who join in it but if the project has only one participant I think the project is one of the bad projects.

[lienfaye]

in my opinion will not get the sum of all tokens (signatures), because a project can be called successful if a lot of projects that follow the bounties, if there is 1 person who follows the bounty, maybe I think that it is a scam bounty.

Accepting 1 participant to advertise the project is really unlikely and will not going to happen in reality. We know the more participants, the more people to spread awareness and bring investors so the team would not choose to get 1 person only.

And if ever this case happened, I think the team will reduce the allocation for the campaign so its just a too good to be true offer.

[skarais]

as far as I know a good project always has many participants who join in it but if the project has only one participant I think the project is one of the bad projects.

Of course the small number of campaign participants without restrictions from managers is one indication that there is a lack of potential in the project. Even if they succeed, the allocation will be reduced proportionally and maybe some managers have warned about it at first.
Sometimes, projects that have many participants but managers or teams can still cut the allocation of payments for certain reasons.

[Ailmand]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

It all still falls on the team if there are only few participants if they will continue the campaign or if they will cut the fund of a certain campaign or move some of it in a campaign which has a lot of participants. It is not justifiable if your the owner of the projrct to hmgive that huge amount of bounty to only one participant since the signature exposure is only minimal.

[Drai]

I have never seen a campaign where just one person participated in the signature campaign but if such a campaign were to exist, it would depend on the team, the team would decide if they are willing to give the whole allocation to a single person or if they would reduce it to give any amount of their choice, this is why some bounties specify minimum amount of members needed in the campaign from the beginning so it wouldn't be an issue later incase the minimum number wasn't met.

[Ultimist]

No, no project will give the entire pool to just one participant. Most likely it will simply be distributed to other companies that are more profitable.

[kevinzxz]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

if the team is very fair, then I believe it can happen (all allocations are allocated to only one person), but as long as I follow the signature bounty campaign, I have never seen participation below 10 people (at least only around 15-20 people), so I'm sure it will be difficult to happen (people who follow the signature bounty campaign are only 1 participant).

[smyslov]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

That's a big failure for a signature, he can only attract 1 campaigner out of thousands of members here, I don't think there's a campaign here that only attract one member, one of the reason could be that, the campaign has a bad reports and not projected to be a good project, but I doubt if all the allocations will go to to one member alone, that is making him a whales right away.
The bounty manager will allocate some of the stakes to other campaign that has a lot of participants, I have not yet encountereds one such campaign, even if the project has bad reports.

[cotton ball]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Did you remember if only one participated at signature campaign bounty will brings success for bounty campaign? I always check with signature spreadsheet campaign with how many participants first and looking what their level bitcointalk account, if there many higher level bitcointalk account I will joined signature campaign but if participants one member I not interested with this signature campaign.

[Pearls Before Swine]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant

That scenario is never going to happen and has never happened in the past, so this theoretical scenario is ridiculous. 

If only 1 participant signed up for a bounty or signature campaign, there must have been something seriously wrong with the project to begin with, because usually there are more signups than spots in the campaign.  Never, ever has there been just one person entitled to the percentage of stakes promised to the participants.  I would *assume* that if such a case ever did exist that the one person would get what was promised, but I doubt they would in reality.

How many times have you seen bounty hunters get less than what they expected?  Judging by the number of scam accusation threads against project devs, it's a common occurence.  So I would imagine even if there wasn't the ridiculously low number of a single bounty hunter in a campaign, if say there were only 10 bounty hunters signed up, that bounty wouldn't distribute the stakes fairly.  They would probably just back out and screw anyone who signed up.  That's the unfortunate reality, but that's probably what would happen.

[DabsPoorVersion]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Did you remember if only one participated at signature campaign bounty will brings success for bounty campaign? I always check with signature spreadsheet campaign with how many participants first and looking what their level bitcointalk account, if there many higher level bitcointalk account I will joined signature campaign but if participants one member I not interested with this signature campaign.

I think there is no such thing happened before.
So we really don't know if the project will actually give the whole bounty pool for that one participant in signature.
Most of the time, it is true that if a certain project has few participants, then it is most like be avoided by other bounty hunters.

[horrifiedx1]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Did you remember if only one participated at signature campaign bounty will brings success for bounty campaign? I always check with signature spreadsheet campaign with how many participants first and looking what their level bitcointalk account, if there many higher level bitcointalk account I will joined signature campaign but if participants one member I not interested with this signature campaign.

I think there is no such thing happened before.
So we really don't know if the project will actually give the whole bounty pool for that one participant in signature.
Most of the time, it is true that if a certain project has few participants, then it is most like be avoided by other bounty hunters.

I think it is at the discretion of the project team. it could be a prize deducted in number. because if given all to one person it will be very large and from one participant I think it does not contribute greatly in promoting the project.

[boltz]

I think in a scenario like you said , with 1 participant in signature campaign they will simply close the signature campaign leave the other ones running. If there are limited spots since beginning like 30 and they all get full and in the 1st week none of them gets the job done , you still won't get shares from everyone.

Basically , if only 1 participant get signed-up into the signature campaign they won't run it unless they is something shady and that one member is a part of the team project and that should be flag as scammed of bounty pool funds.

[silversurfer1958]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

A legit project, the bounty manager will know how to avoid this problem. such as 1 week = 20 stakes, they will attach a note that is "or 1 week = 20 tokens".
And for fraud projects, only a few people participating in the bounty campaign, you probably know the results.

[elisabetheva]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

What you asked I have experienced too and I did not receive the amount of what was said when their rules were made. I once protested by telegram but my telegram was blocked, many reasons would be said by them to seek justification and finally we could not win the alibi. in order to avoid us not getting anything, there is no other way we accept.

[pandanaran]

First, I just heard that the project only has 1 participant involved in it (signature). I think if it really exists, the opportunity for one participant is very small and it is also impossible if the team will give all token allocations to only one participant.

[angrybirdy]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Did you remember if only one participated at signature campaign bounty will brings success for bounty campaign? I always check with signature spreadsheet campaign with how many participants first and looking what their level bitcointalk account, if there many higher level bitcointalk account I will joined signature campaign but if participants one member I not interested with this signature campaign.

I think there is no such thing happened before.
So we really don't know if the project will actually give the whole bounty pool for that one participant in signature.
Most of the time, it is true that if a certain project has few participants, then it is most like be avoided by other bounty hunters.

I think it is at the discretion of the project team. it could be a prize deducted in number. because if given all to one person it will be very large and from one participant I think it does not contribute greatly in promoting the project.

If it will happen, it will lead to an unexpected event, if happen that the project become successful and the whole bounty pool will go to one user and dump it in the market, it will lead a chaos to the project. Considering that one user to hold a huge number of coin, it is actually unimaginable to happen and easily let by the project to happen.

[Eugenar]

In my experience, this kind of scenario is not yet happening in the bounty history, there might be some bounties that do consider paying small number of signature participants, but we should consider that bounties that have a potential do really need the support of the people, and for them to succeed, they need hunters. It is quite impossible that a project can succeed with just one bounty hunter for signature campaign. Thus, we can say it is impossible for a single bounty participant to have a fortune in gaining profit without the help of other bounty hunters for the project to succeed.

[Coroline]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

depending on the policy of the project itself whether you want to change the decision or stick to the first policy even some do not pay the reason the project sales are not achieved all that can happen

[zeze18]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I think yes because it's allocated as they promised, and it's divided for how many participants.
But i think if only 1 signature participants the project won't be famous to many people and the project maybe will not funded well, so the tokens would be worthless at the and of the campaign.
And oftenly projects with many bounty participants is more worth to join because the token price will be more valuable because it's promoted by many people

[Rampagoe004]

Usually for a project where only one person has a signature, the project is definitely not good because the promotion that occurs is very small so that later it will have an impact on the price of very cheap coins, although for these participants the funds will be received to the maximum but the price is very low, and there also some projects that cut allocation funds for some reason even though only one participant.

[kaneki007]

Since i joined several signature campaigns i have never seen only one participant, if the duration of the campaign is long time there will definitely be a join because in this forum there are thousands of members who can register a signature campaign at any time

[watergold]

A signature campaign with 1 participant does not exist and I have never seen it, if that is true then I think the allocation will not be all for 1 participant might get 1% of the allocation funds, and usually if the campaign does not meet the minimum requirements will be canceled.

[akmal1984]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

This is actually quite the opposite. Because in my opinion it is impossible for a project to succeed, but their signature campaign is only followed by one person. Logically why for successful projects are not interested by the participants If this really happens,
For the prize, I think it depends on the bounty manager or the project, whether they will continue to give as initial allocation or they will change it. Because they can change it.

[Novatech8]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

A single bounty hunter promoting a bounty project is not capable to drive the attention needed for a project so even if they managed to raise fund i bet you will not receive the total pool allocation, that will be way too much payment for a single bounty hunter

[lolgato1]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

It doesn't matter how many tokens they receive, but how much they are worth.
But I have seen many times that bounty managers reduced number of tokens when there were only few participants.

[SaShiRaJaVu]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Basically they are allocating these tokens to advertise their product and if they are not able to fulfill those do not expect the entire funds to be spent to a single person , just using your common sense is the best way to go about things rather than having these kind of doubts and the doubt i have right now is whether you have seen any project with a single participant even in airdrop or bounty and if you came across will you be participating in those  .

[Kemangi]

in short a good project always has many participants joining but if the project has only one participant indicates that the project has a bad image and a red flag for you. You should reconsider before joining such a project.

[ATSgrowth]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Basically they are allocating these tokens to advertise their product and if they are not able to fulfill those do not expect the entire funds to be spent to a single person , just using your common sense is the best way to go about things rather than having these kind of doubts and the doubt i have right now is whether you have seen any project with a single participant even in airdrop or bounty and if you came across will you be participating in those  .

If there is only one participant that means that this campaign is a waste of time for you because look how many participants have good campaigns like Cryptotalk  .  People are not stupid, they do research before they join a campaign. Because if you participate 3 months for nothing, then you become angry.

[tinyteapot]

Signature campaign with only one participant is not common better to say that it have not existed before.

If such happens, the bounty organizer will surely reduce the reward and pays the only user using his/her current forum membership rank, there are some campaign that often add it to their terms and conditions that they will reduce the reward  by 50% if certain number of participants are not meant.

[Maturnuwun]

previously I had never seen a project that only had 1 participant and but if there were 2 participants I had seen it, precisely here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5172477.0
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pZF_llXvwoYSYiDJcS2JlFIXhmGdrTWtUMa146B92gA/edit#gid=1230192616

the project ran for 3 months and only had 2 participants in the signature campaign.
As far as I know, if the project team is really responsible and fair. maybe you are still being paid, but not all token allocations are just for you, at least there is a reduction in that allocation.

[trauchot]

It happens in different ways, but I have never seen that only 1 person participated in the signature bounty, I saw when there were 3 people maximum, and in the end these 3 people got their tokens, because I talked with one person who participated in that signature company, and so of course it all depends from the bounty manager and of course from the company that made the bounty, they will decide whether to pay a huge amount of tokens to one person or not.

[aomakun]

It happens in different ways, but I have never seen that only 1 person participated in the signature bounty, I saw when there were 3 people maximum, and in the end these 3 people got their tokens, because I talked with one person who participated in that signature company, and so of course it all depends from the bounty manager and of course from the company that made the bounty, they will decide whether to pay a huge amount of tokens to one person or not.

but I have never seen a signature campaign followed by just one person. I think if the bounty project is devoid of followers the promotion is not running optimally, but if there is then the manager must make payments professionally.

[Fappanu]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

The ICO campaign will not succeed if only one person will support it. So it is impossible to do this, nor does it happen that the campaign manager will issue 2,000,000 tokens as it is a huge amount of money. And this may affect the future of the token because it can collapse when this bounty hunter starts selling the token.

[CarnagexD]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Actually, it depends on the team or to the campaign manager if they going to distribute all token to the one participant. I see some bounty campaign that has only one participant in their signature campaign and I guess the manager will not distribute all allocation for the signature campaign and I guess the rest of the token that allocated to that campaign will be returned to the team. It is totally good if they willing to give all allocated token to the one person who joins in their campaign. Lastly, the decision of the allocated token will still depend on the tear or on the bounty manager.

[noninum]

Actually, it depends on the team or to the campaign manager if they going to distribute all token to the one participant. I see some bounty campaign that has only one participant in their signature campaign and I guess the manager will not distribute all allocation for the signature campaign and I guess the rest of the token that allocated to that campaign will be returned to the team. It is totally good if they willing to give all allocated token to the one person who joins in their campaign. Lastly, the decision of the allocated token will still depend on the tear or on the bounty manager.

A project is very rarely able to succeed if only promoted by a participant, I have never seen a bounty campaign that was only filled by a participant. But if that happens I think the team will not give it completely, they will cut the allocation of the token.

[biddicoin]

it seems impossible, if there is any good bounty, there will be demand for that bounty too

so, many people scramble to join the bounty and make reward given proportionally

as long as i followed bounty, such a thing has never happened

[Aabcde]

During my time in the world of bounties, bounties that were only attended by one person were absent, especially in signatures. If this happens, the bounty manager must have anticipated by making a rule at the beginning that if one part of the bounty does not meet the number of participants, the distribution of the results will be distributed to other parts. Because the purpose of the bounty is to promote the project as much as possible with a large number of people as well.

[poldanmig]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

The rules of each bounty manager are different. for example if the campaign does not reach the minimum people who join the average will be less than the initial number they set. and in my opinion right now for that to happen there is likely to be a new policy. how could that person get such a large allocation?

[Genemind]

It would be too impossible to have one bounty participant for a certain project. One participant wouldn't be able to endorse and promote a project alone. The developers and or the bounty manager would not allow that as well. The purpose of the bounty campaign is to promote a project. There are also rules to follow and there will surely be lots of participants who will be joining if the project has good potential.

[Wapfika]

It would be too impossible to have one bounty participant for a certain project. One participant wouldn't be able to endorse and promote a project alone. The developers and or the bounty manager would not allow that as well. The purpose of the bounty campaign is to promote a project. There are also rules to follow and there will surely be lots of participants who will be joining if the project has good potential.

If ever only 1 join then it can be a scam project so no payment for that one person even he do all the tasks needed,  or the project may not be successful as no promoter can influence them. Bounty managers may also put rules of min participants and if didn't reach it will be divided to allocate in other bounty type. But it's really impossible to happen thou.

[Anonylz]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I don't think they will hand over the entire price to a single participant, rather they will come up an excuse that less participants and reduce the allocation, remember the team and bm reserves the right to make changes of the campaign rule anytime, so this is going to be one changes they will be making no doubt.

[HabiebRiziq]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

If we suppose there is a signature campaign with only 1 person participating in it, I think the project cannot run and what happens is that the project will fail because the promotion is only done by one person, of course many investors are of the opinion that the project is not good. But in reality, I never saw that there was a signature campaign with only 1 person participating.

[jajorforce]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

There will be made regulations for equal distribution when in some campaigns has low participate. Like rewards will recalculate for where many number of participants. Although for more problem same kind now fixed rewards is for all campaign hunters

[Landak]

It can be possible happen. but I'm sure the rules or allocations will change when the bounty is finished with various reasons (usually the allocation will be reduced). it's better not to be too happy first when that really happens lol

[Dangki01021991]

The awards for this signature campaign are very convincing. Participants will receive a lot of tokens. This is really great is not it?

[fuer44]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

for example there is only one participant, there are rules, right? for example accounts with certain levels starting from jr. member to legendary, there is a calculation each for stake every week. So, even though the total prize allocation will be 2,000,000 tokens, only one participant will still be given prizes according to the account calculation and also the stake that is earned every week based on the rules of the bounty. if possible the project is successful and there is a bonus so the rest of the tokens are given everything, it is the right of the team. The point is that each participant will receive a reward according to the account and stake they get.

[m0Ray]

In principle, you think correctly. This usually happens but I have never seen such a number of participants. Just do not forget that the project team can always change the rules of the bounty company. And plus one person will not be able to benefit for the ICO and as a result the project will not be able to collect the soft cap.

[gwaposakon]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

Normally the allocated stakes would be divided to participants which would mean more coins for them. But in reality, bounty managers re-proportionate the rewards to smaller portion and add the remaining to other bounty campaigns which are joined by many participants. I have experience joining a signature campaign which only a few joined and the manager decreased the total rewards and added it to their social media campaign which has many participants.

[Kunotcoin]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

No way that's not true or even going to happen since before the campaign was started they already arrange that if the cap for the participants was not reached automatically reduce the pool, that's the common practice or in the other they just cancel that campaign for the reason of lacking of participants.

[btcdie]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I think it depends on who the manager is. if the manager has a good reputation, be honest and be paid according to the allocation. by the way it's impossible for me to have 1 bounty project and only 1 person who participated in the signature campaign. at least, so far I have ever met 10 people participating. Especially the real project, certainly many who participated in the bounty.

[tambok]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

I think it depends on who the manager is. if the manager has a good reputation, be honest and be paid according to the allocation. by the way it's impossible for me to have 1 bounty project and only 1 person who participated in the signature campaign. at least, so far I have ever met 10 people participating. Especially the real project, certainly many who participated in the bounty.

If he is the only participant, then, it is his lucky day for having the whole stake for that certain bounty, and it is not his fault, and he earned what he has worked for, and if the token's value is good, then its a life changing for him, he choose to stay despite that no one is believing in that project and doesn't want to earn its signature, so it his reward for believing. Well, for bounty manager, I do hope that he won't add himself and cheat.

[Gotumoot]

No campaign will provide 2,000,000 million worth of altcoin to just one person. And no campaign will be successful if only one person joins the bounty.
First of all 2 million is great especially if the total coin supply is low.
Secondly it can lower the price of an altcoin. Because this token holder can dump a large amount of his reward.

[desticy]

See the spreadsheet company signatures for the project Sessia. Due to the fact that many bounty hunters left the company, the rest received quite a large reward, for example,
when compared with their YouTube company or others. Therefore, this is completely possible, and quite logical. The Sessia is not the only precedent of this in the bounty market.

[gabbie2010]

They just have to slash the token payable to a single participant in a signature campaign of course the management knows the limitation and implication of paying a whole lot to one person, if he decides to dump the token after listing in an exchange its going to cause a likely dump in the price of the token thus a set back to the success of the project, however I doubt it if we can have a participant in any signature campaign in this forum considering the huge numbers of forum members.

[lumeire]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

If we see the ethics then it should be allocated to only one individual. But in real life scenario this will never happen as if the ICO or project is a real deal then people will definitely join in to promote that project and in other case where the project sounds fishy then only no one will join the bounty campaign so it would either be a big loss for that person or it will eb a shared bounty amongst many individuals.

[Shasha80]

I don't think it is possible for a signature campaign to run with one participant, so they will definitely wait for someone else
sign up for a new signature campaign to begin. As long as it doesn't meet the number of participants the signature campaign
wants it might not start. If indeed the prizes offered are large it is not possible to register only one person. Even if there are
projects that are still running with one participant, the projects might be scam.

[pandanaran]

In principle, you think correctly. This usually happens but I have never seen such a number of participants. Just do not forget that the project team can always change the rules of the bounty company. And plus one person will not be able to benefit for the ICO and as a result the project will not be able to collect the soft cap.

yes, I also think that it is impossible for the project to only have one participant in the signature campaign, for example there is, I think the team will not continue the project (minimal participants / scammed projects), good projects always have many participants. so the OP can redefine about such a project, in my opinion it includes the criteria of a fraud project.

[lienfaye]

I don't think it is possible for a signature campaign to run with one participant, so they will definitely wait for someone else
sign up for a new signature campaign to begin. As long as it doesn't meet the number of participants the signature campaign
wants it might not start. If indeed the prizes offered are large it is not possible to register only one person. Even if there are
projects that are still running with one participant, the projects might be scam.

This is not possible as we know most projects prefer to have many participants (depends on their budget) to advertise the project and spread awareness to crypto community. If ever there's a weird project who will only accept one participant, I think after the duration of the advertisement they will reduce the allocation for the sig campaign since they only hire 1 participant.

[TheGreatPython]

It happens in different ways, but I have never seen that only 1 person participated in the signature bounty, I saw when there were 3 people maximum, and in the end these 3 people got their tokens, because I talked with one person who participated in that signature company, and so of course it all depends from the bounty manager and of course from the company that made the bounty, they will decide whether to pay a huge amount of tokens to one person or not.

but I have never seen a signature campaign followed by just one person. I think if the bounty project is devoid of followers the promotion is not running optimally, but if there is then the manager must make payments professionally.

It will never be possible because the project will not even raise any capital for them to be able to meet up, if there are no people to promote them, surely it will be very impossible to raise the marketcap and at the end they will even close the project which will make that one single hunter to lose its time and expectation. When it comes to campaign, I have never seen any project that has less than 20 campaign managers.

The only thing is that if the number of participants does not exceed that 20, they will have upper hand in able to have more but not everything because there are still some criteria that they will use to make payment too such as the number of people they have on their social media handle as usual, so op should erase that.

[Palider]

These events are unrealistic and I think that in reality they will not provide the entire bounty pool for just one participant. Because it has a huge impact on the price of the coin when it is listed on the market. It also depends on the supply of the coin so if the supply is low it is certain that the price of the coin will fall and this may cause the project to destroy.

[magicrypto]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

It depends from bounty manager, if there will be a small ammount of participants, bounty campaign can be cancelled or invalidated. If project is successful there are will be a lot of bounty hunter, so dont worry about that

[Maslate]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

It depends from bounty manager, if there will be a small ammount of participants, bounty campaign can be cancelled or invalidated. If project is successful there are will be a lot of bounty hunter, so dont worry about that

Yes. The signature campaign might be cancelled if there is only one participant but if there are few participants that will still promote the project, it's up to the manager if the campaign will still go on. The allocation budget will definitely be reduced enough for them to divide once the campaign has ended.

[ahyadinnn]

it seems like if there is only 1 participant, I think he will cancel for the bounty campaign because I have never seen one campaign participant. There must have been hundreds who followed what else could succeed their project could reach thousands of people who participated in that bounty

[karanggatak]

I don't think such a thing can happen. I also have never seen a signature campaign project that only has one participant. and if there are fewer signatories to the campaign, the budget allocation will usually be reduced and transferred to other campaigns that have more participants. so the tokens we get are not many. the manager will manage the distribution of tokens properly.

[lepbagong]

for example: prize allocation for a campaign (signature) is around 2,000,000 tokens and if the project only has 1 participant in the campaign (signature) and when the project has been completed or not scammed, is it true that the participant will get the sum of all tokens (signatures)?
or maybe not at all,  for other reasons?

The likelihood that there will be only one participant is very small, there must be other participants. In my experience, there were only 26 participants who took part, but only 3 were received until the end. hoping that the existing allocations should be divided into three realities not happening like that, I tried to protest but they said because the number of participants did not reach the minimum, as well as many reasons not listed in the rules.
and immediately send the token amount according to their wishes, we have received the token. better than not accepting tokens.