Hoax is a hoax

[notbatman]

The globe fails a distance to the horizon test with a wide margin or error using the modern super-zoom lens; with a Nikon P900 I can prove my point conclusively, a test anybody can replicate.

You need Photoshop to replicate the big blue balls NASA gives you. They're not a space agency, they're a propaganda agency!

The Earth is flat by default, it's a falsifiable theory that the earth curves just beyond the limit of human eyesight. The globe is truly the king of hoaxes.

[Balthazar]

Now I understand why the jews created photoshop. Jews needed it to maintain support for fake globe. It's all about global control. I feel myself enlightened in my sadness by a better understanding of flat earth theory.

Meanwhile, I believe it's somehow connected with margarine production rates as well.

[notbatman]

^^^ No, flat earth is not a theory, flat earth is the default!

The falsifiable theory [the globe] is that the earth's surface curves at a point just beyond the limit of human eyesight.

[BADecker]

^^^ That's the reason why GE can be proven and FE can't. LOL!

 

[DaftAjax]

@notbatman

If you're willing, I ask you to do a simple "test", an "experiment" if you may.

If it so happens that you went to the beach, time this exactly when the sun is setting.
Step 1: lie down, well, more likely in a "flanking" position and face where the sun is.
Step 2: wait until you can't see the sun in your current position.
Step 3: quickly stand up or stand in a chair.
Step 4: mindblown, surprised!, YOU CAN SEE THE GODDAMN SUN AGAIN!

Why you'd ask? Because it's a globe, and not flat.
You can search for a better explanation, but oh, I think "science" is a hoax for you, so no point in doing that.

[notbatman]

@notbatman

If you're willing, I ask you to do a simple "test", an "experiment" if you may.

If it so happens that you went to the beach, time this exactly when the sun is setting.
Step 1: lie down, well, more likely in a "flanking" position and face where the sun is.
Step 2: wait until you can't see the sun in your current position.
Step 3: quickly stand up or stand in a chair.
Step 4: mindblown, surprised!, YOU CAN SEE THE GODDAMN SUN AGAIN!

Why you'd ask? Because it's a globe, and not flat.
You can search for a better explanation, but oh, I think "science" is a hoax for you, so no point in doing that.

So you're just going to ignore the fact the globe fails a distance to the horizon test with a wide margin of error? This is a test anybody with a super-zoom camera can perform (weather permitting i.e. no superior mirages on hot days) and confirm.

Here's one (of many) example of the globe failing a distance to the horizon test: https://youtu.be/6hqzqmY9ny8

As for your example [viewing the sunset twice] it completely disregards how optics works. Remember this is a hoax and you're being deceived by a group of highly educated magicians; the globe is their stage.

When you stand up it increases the observers angle of attack thus increasing the distance to the observers vanishing point (horizon line). An object, the sun in this case has its apparent size increased so that it's within the observers angular resolution limit^† thus can be observed [again].

Proof of this effect also known as foreshortening is as simple as checking that a pool cue is straight. When you hold the cue at the correct angle the entire length is visible but, its apparent size is compressed thus exaggerating any deformations.



"science"



^{† reference:
Yanoff, Myron; Duker, Jay S. (2009). Ophthalmology 3rd Edition. MOSBY Elsevier. p. 54. ISBN 978-0444511416.}

[BADecker]

@notbatman

If you're willing, I ask you to do a simple "test", an "experiment" if you may.

If it so happens that you went to the beach, time this exactly when the sun is setting.
Step 1: lie down, well, more likely in a "flanking" position and face where the sun is.
Step 2: wait until you can't see the sun in your current position.
Step 3: quickly stand up or stand in a chair.
Step 4: mindblown, surprised!, YOU CAN SEE THE GODDAMN SUN AGAIN!

Why you'd ask? Because it's a globe, and not flat.
You can search for a better explanation, but oh, I think "science" is a hoax for you, so no point in doing that.

So you're just going to ignore the fact the globe fails a distance to the horizon test with a wide margin of error? This is a test anybody with a super-zoom camera can perform (weather permitting i.e. no superior mirages on hot days) and confirm.

Here's one (of many) example of the globe failing a distance to the horizon test: https://youtu.be/6hqzqmY9ny8

As for your example [viewing the sunset twice] it completely disregards how optics works. Remember this is a hoax and you're being deceived by a group of highly educated magicians; the globe is their stage.

When you stand up it increases the observers angle of attack thus increasing the distance to the observers vanishing point (horizon line). An object, the sun in this case has its apparent size increased so that it's within the observers angular resolution limit^† thus can be observed [again].

Proof of this effect also known as foreshortening is as simple as checking that a pool cue is straight. When you hold the cue at the correct angle the entire length is visible but, its apparent size is compressed thus exaggerating any deformations.



"science"



^{† reference:
Yanoff, Myron; Duker, Jay S. (2009). Ophthalmology 3rd Edition. MOSBY Elsevier. p. 54. ISBN 978-0444511416.}

You can prove what is right and real. And then you can see your mistake. The next step is to axcknowledge your mistake.

Many people have done all kinds of FE experiments. Others have proven Earth is a globe. The GE people have better proof.

Have you made it to the seeing-your-mistake stage, yet? Or are you continuing to muddle around in ignorance.

[notbatman]

People often ask "if the earth is flat then where's the edge, why hasn't anybody fallen off?".

The answer leads us to another hoax: the continent of Antarctica and the south pole. The earth is like a circular lake with islands in the middle, Antarctica is a wall of ice that forms the shore. Above the wall there's a plateau for some distance and then a ring of the highest mountains in the world, beyond that is the firmament of heaven.

Here's the edge:


Don't fall off, that water is ice cold and you wont survive long!

[Spendulus]

People often ask "if the earth is flat then where's the edge, why hasn't anybody fallen off?".

The answer leads us to another hoax: the continent of Antarctica and the south pole. The earth is like a circular lake with islands in the middle, Antarctica is a wall of ice that forms the shore. Above the wall there's a plateau for some distance and then a ring of the highest mountains in the world, beyond that is the firmament of heaven.

Here's the edge:


Don't fall off, that water is ice cold and you wont survive long!

Islands in the middle?

[notbatman]

^^^ Well if I stated the islands were all close to the shore that would be a pretty shitty analogy; the continents are in the middle.

Antarctic link:

  https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/olimbos



"It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:" -- Isaiah 40:22, KJV

[DaftAjax]

<....>
"It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:" -- Isaiah 40:22, KJV

Well I guess this guy believes that we're living in Asgard.

But your argument of how optics works is bullish. I'm not talking about using a fancy camera--use your eyes instead. I know cameras are meant to work like how eyes work, but then again, standing up to see the object (sun) again after vanishing from your point of view from a lower position only proves that the "horizon" is not a straight line. If it's really flat, no matter how low or high my position would be, even if I stand up it will not appear again.

[BADecker]

^^^ Well if I stated the islands were all close to the shore that would be a pretty shitty analogy; the continents are in the middle.

Antarctic link:

  https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/olimbos

https://i.imgur.com/D8OggYR.jpg

"It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:" -- Isaiah 40:22, KJV

The great majority of evidences you use are plays that play on the minds of ignorant, simple people. The few things that you use that have real science behind them have been debunked.

[notbatman]

@DaftAjax my source is a ophthalmology textbook.

Atheism is a hoax.

[styca]

Atheism is a hoax.

How do you keep this going? Thread after thread, year after year. I disagree with everything you post, and I have no idea whether you believe any of it yourself, but your endurance is certainly impressive.

[alexkamillakroy]

This thread's title is pure gold 

[styca]

-snip-

NotBatman is a hoax. NotBatman - you claim to be Bruce Wayne, but I have uncovered your origins. I have proof that you are actually a dangerous cave-dwelling bat-god from Mexico. You are not a mild-mannered billionaire crime-fighter from Gotham City, you are actually the Mesoamerican deity Camazotz.

I am willing to accept evidence to the contrary, if any exists.

[styca]

Furthermore, you have an additional secret identity as a city in Turkey. You are currently 4°C, and mostly sunny.

[BADecker]

Atheism is a hoax.

How do you keep this going? Thread after thread, year after year. I disagree with everything you post, and I have no idea whether you believe any of it yourself, but your endurance is certainly impressive.

He made a bunch of money off Bitcoin, and doesn't have anything else to do other than sit around and spoof people, and then to mock them when he can't answer logic in a logical way.

[notbatman]

@BADecker go hang yourself with a length of rusty piano wire!

I invested every penny I had at the time (2013) in bitcoin mining hardware from a company called BLACK ARROW, they kept my money without delivering the miners. In the years afterwards I never held any significant amount of crypto during Bitcoin's epic rise, always finding myself flat broke and spending any alt-coins I mined with the few low-end GPUs I have on cost-of-living shit.

The punchline here is that BLACK ARROW was named after a UK space program of the same name and the miner, was named after the satellite they calmed to launch, the "Prospero X-3".



There are no satellites in space, outer space is a hoax.

[BADecker]

@BADecker go hang yourself with a length of rusty piano wire!

I invested every penny I had at the time (2013) in bitcoin mining hardware from a company called BLACK ARROW, they kept my money without delivering the miners. In the years afterwards I never held any significant amount of crypto during Bitcoin's epic rise, always finding myself flat broke and spending any alt-coins I mined with the few low-end GPUs I have on cost-of-living shit.

The punchline here is that BLACK ARROW was named after a UK space program of the same name and the miner, was named after the satellite they calmed to launch, the "Prospero X-3".



There are no satellites in space, outer space is a hoax.

The Bitcointalk forum has become very popular. Even ISS people take a break now and again. I can visualize them sitting up there chuckling to themselves about your inner space.