[ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Satoshi Vision - Unmoderated Thread

[nutildah]

Why should anyone spend more time to explain what Bitcoin really is if you dont see the sense

The guy who thinks BSV is Bitcoin is going to explain what Bitcoin "really is"? LOL.

What I see is that you think nonsense is sense. The only thing you've ever managed to demonstrate is that you are capable of regurgitating Craig and Calvin's bullshit talking points into low IQ, underdeveloped bird feed responses.

I give up

That's a real shame. Probably best to head on over to MetaNet with all the like-minded people who "get it."

[hv_]

Good reading about Metanet

https://medium.com/@_unwriter/the-metanet-starts-84f255a65782

[BitcoinFX]

For the lolz ...

CoinGeek London - Live Stream Day 1

- https://youtu.be/e5nyQmaq4k4

Oops, sorry Wright link ... ^^

- https://youtu.be/mm7WR_Qi9VE

 

BSV is NOT Bitcoin and CSW is NOT Satoshi.

EDIT:

Highlights, so far ...

- Steve Shadders thinks putting pictures of Guinea pig's on the BSV blockchain is 'unfcukening' Bitcoin and is 'Satoshi Vision' - WTF lol

- Announces a another Hard Fork, 'Chronicle', because 'Genesis' wasn't so 'set in stone' - rofl

- Tells people to stop running BSV nodes if they are not making any money - facepalm

[CryptoSans]

Thought that there would be more BSV fanbois on this thread, guess more and more people are offloading their bags and dropping the pretence that CSW is Satoshi.

[ooom]

Stupid Bitcoin copy forks are only defragmentation of crypto community. But as a stock split it was profitable for everyone involved. No innovation and no real development in these forks is what it is. As all talent is innovating on Bitcoin original repository.

[Last of the V8s]

[Last of the V8s]

https://twitter.com/CourierBonded/status/1241944745208762368?s=20
p00rM3m0rY
@CourierBonded
😜
Breaking:
😜
 $BSV being **trolled hard** "on-chain"

Unknown Miner/s collecting block rewards without recording any weather data or paid tweets

Has more hash power than your entire BSV country!

I smell an emergency fork in the oven, or a court case lol
🤣
🤣
🤣

😝
😝
😝

[Phinnaeus Gage]

https://twitter.com/CourierBonded/status/1241944745208762368?s=20
p00rM3m0rY
@CourierBonded
😜
Breaking:
😜
 $BSV being **trolled hard** "on-chain"

Unknown Miner/s collecting block rewards without recording any weather data or paid tweets

Has more hash power than your entire BSV country!

I smell an emergency fork in the oven, or a court case lol
🤣
🤣
🤣

😝
😝
😝

[hv_]

There is no spam

There is no anonymous

There is only economics in BitCoin

Miners are there for profit

They ve to work honest - or get removed


Have fun - trolling is so cheap - still

[Phinnaeus Gage]

There is no spam

There is no anonymous

There is only economics in BitCoin

Miners are there for profit

They ve to work honest - or get removed


Have fun - trolling is so cheap - still

[hv_]

There is no spam

There is no anonymous

There is only economics in BitCoin

Miners are there for profit

They ve to work honest - or get removed


Have fun - trolling is so cheap - still

Profit. Big blocks - big profit.

This is the long term future. Not short term trolling


https://mobile.twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1242457151911665669

This guy is getting it

[Dabs]

That's Calvin Ayre. He's never gotten it. He's probably lost it. Of course, he's got majority of the mining hash power in BSV.

[hv_]

Fud from coretrolls

Debunked here

https://coingeek.com/miner-id-and-debunking-the-51-attack/

[Phinnaeus Gage]

Fud from coretrolls

Debunked here

https://coingeek.com/miner-id-and-debunking-the-51-attack/

I hope this article can serve as the final debunking of this ‘threat’ to Bitcoin.

Wait, what?

[hv_]

Fud from coretrolls

Debunked here

https://coingeek.com/miner-id-and-debunking-the-51-attack/

I hope this article can serve as the final debunking of this ‘threat’ to Bitcoin.

Wait, what?

BitCoin was always a threat - even to bitcoiners

What is anti-fragile ?

BitCoin is - > it doesn't like middle men - incl protocol-devs / core communities and social media trolls

The original protocol is the strongest DNA

its just working fine - with big blocks

If some devs wanna change that - some others will lock it down - and scale better

[contraband]

By its ranking, I see people still think there is blood left in this scam.

I dont see SV gaining greater ROI than any of the top ten from here on out.

How long can the "but were the real bitcoin" scam last?

[Cryptotourist]

Got a bunch of posts deleted in the other thread.
Could not let this one go:

Do you get paid in BSV for your efforts?
Honest question.

CSW is very generous
Honest answer

Not exactly what I asked, but it will do, thanks.

Carry on, as you were:

https://i.imgur.com/IEVM6r9.gif

[seven.71]

Got a bunch of posts deleted in the other thread.
Could not let this one go:

Do you get paid in BSV for your efforts?
Honest question.

CSW is very generous
Honest answer

Not exactly what I asked, but it will do, thanks.

Carry on, as you were:

https://i.imgur.com/IEVM6r9.gif

thanks for displaying their ignorance that has been removed from this thread, I look at this like I want to laugh evilly because of that

[hv_]

Self moderation removed? And lots of others with that? Meh

Btc needs hard protection... now it needs patent protection from Twitter boss, or what?

[BitcoinFX]

Some posts which have today been 'deleted' from various 'Bitcoin SV' moderated threads ...



Caveat emptor "buyer beware" BSV is NOT original Bitcoin. Bitcoin is BTC: https://bitcoin.org


A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

And please notice, the still anonymous developer of bitcoin is what made people really love it, who cares if we know your developer?

90% of BTC transactions - is SCAM

You are wrong, people just don't have alternatives, love has nothing to do with

BSV - is real reliable & transparent alternative against BTC monopoly. Open your eyes, chum

bannnnn

Yes 'ban' these charlatans ... BSV is NOT Bitcoin and CSW has categorically failed to produce any valid cryptographically assured evidence to date.

Is this your twitter account 'Bitcoin SV' ? I appears twitter thinks someone has been 'impersonating' the real Bitcoin (BTC) ...

Which would seem to be the case here ...

"Lulz."



- https://twitter.com/bennd77/status/1303660034971381760

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

If BSV is better then why CSW is trying so hard to prove he is satoshi Nakamoto?

Let me tell you something. If CSW is not Satoshi, let Satoshi show up and declare about it.
Until then, Craig has the right to all claims

Craig claimed in court he owned a bunch of addresses ... turns out he does not own them and someone else in fact does ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5250960.0

The real satoshi would simply never say this ...

"Interviewer: "Hey Craig, how do you explain the 145 addressed that signed "Craig is a fraud" last week ?"

Craig: " No message was signed, you can't sign anonymously - you have to have an identity to sign....key don't count..I gotta go...be" 😂😂😂 "
https://twitter.com/BitcoinMemeHub/status/1268366834287312897

Source: REIMAGINE 2020 - Craig S. Wright - World Riots, Hard Work, Quantum Computing and more
- https://youtu.be/PHBrodzl5qY?t=5105

...

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signature

"A digital signature is a mathematical scheme for verifying the authenticity of digital messages or documents. A valid digital signature, where the prerequisites are satisfied, gives a recipient very strong reason to believe that the message was created by a known sender (authentication), and that the message was not altered in transit (integrity).

Digital signatures are a standard element of most cryptographic protocol suites, and are commonly used for software distribution, financial transactions, contract management software, and in other cases where it is important to detect forgery or tampering..."

...

Back to the OP ... 145 addresses were signed and the messages are 100% verifiable on the blockchain.

These are addresses that Craig Wright told the court he owned / mined, in the 4th revision of the Tulip Trust, which is supposedly inaccessible.  

Valid Bitcoin messages can clearly be signed anonymously and no you don't have to have an identity for the message to be validated.

Moreover, the message does in fact contain an identity i.e. the anonymous address does NOT belong to Craig Wright.

The addresses could belong to anybody, but it categorically does not belong to Craig Wright.

Anyone who still thinks that 'Craig is Satoshi', based on this single piece of evidence alone, is a complete and utterly misguided fool.

Care to explain this one? Plus all his other lies ...

- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1280422503974928384

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5250960.msg54747021#msg54747021

 

Bitcoin = BTC

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Pretty sure that's not how it works.  Otherwise, if John Lennon doesn't turn up to prove otherwise, then I'm John Lennon.  Please give me decades of backdated Beatles royalties because no one can prove I'm not John Lennon.  

Lennon is dead, stupid
Satoshi is not dead

Do you feel the difference?

Craig Wright is a fraud. Do you know the difference? - SWIM

Satoshi is 'ded'. [citation needed]
I'm 99.9% certain Nakamoto is alive ...

...

Not *Satire*
Danger Mouse - 99 Problems (2004) *NSFW*
- https://youtu.be/kxW6e1jgt5Q

 

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

After segwit BTC is not Bitcoin anymore! This is not Original Bitcoin!

Irony, You sign message Bitcoin segwit address.

Code:

...snip...

And wrong format, don't have signature, Read here before sign message: Sign message format

most of payments are carried out in this currency

Nothing

This is how one actually signs and verifies a message in original Bitcoin (BTC) ...

Re: Project Anastasia: Bitcoiners Against Identity Theft [re: Craig Wright scam]

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Project Anastasia: Bitcoiners Against Identity Theft

Craig Wright is an identity thief who has taken the name Satoshi Nakamoto - prove me wrong!

My Old Wallet Address: 1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp created 15/02/2010 15:20

Why can't Craig Wright do this? 

Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.,

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

Not Your Private Keys, Not Your Bitcoin.

Don't trust, verify.

Signed by BitcoinFX - bitcointalk.org - January 6th, 2020
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp
G7/SRVNoiHQp0/hWWFBiKACp1OJfvytLudcp855eptMnZyvrGKymAdB98yrrHtV9H+jQvgpcmfcF1011bVUQHRI=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

- https://brainwalletx.github.io/#verify?vrAddr=1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp&vrMsg=Project%20Anastasia%3A%20Bitcoiners%20Against%20Identity%20Theft%0A%0ACraig%20Wright%20is%20an%20identity%20thief%20who%20has%20taken%20the%20name%20Satoshi%20Nakamoto%20-%20prove%20me%20wrong!%0A%0AMy%20Old%20Wallet%20Address%3A%201JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp%20created%2015%2F02%2F2010%2015%3A20%0A%0AWhy%20can't%20Craig%20Wright%20do%20this%3F%20%0A%0AVerifying%20my%20(old)%20zero%20balance%20wallet%20address%20for%20blockchain%20research%20etc.%2C%0A%0A-%20https%3A%2F%2Fbitcointalk.org%2Findex.php%3Ftopic%3D4630066.0%0A%0ANot%20Your%20Private%20Keys%2C%20Not%20Your%20Bitcoin.%0A%0ADon't%20trust%2C%20verify.%0A%0ASigned%20by%20BitcoinFX%20-%20bitcointalk.org%20-%20January%206th%2C%202020&vrSig=G7%2FSRVNoiHQp0%2FhWWFBiKACp1OJfvytLudcp855eptMnZyvrGKymAdB98yrrHtV9H%2BjQvgpcmfcF1011bVUQHRI%3D

- https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp

...

Whilst the identity theft of princess Anastasia is an excellent analogy, I have long thought that the 'Tichborne case' also provides a very fitting example to describe the actions of CSW ...

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tichborne_case  a.k.a "The Tichborne Claimant"

"... the man who lost himself still walks in history, with no other name than that which the common voice of his day accorded him: the Claimant ..."

...

...snip...

Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi.

Look at all this comprehensive research into his lies ...

The #faketoshi fraud timeline ...
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/mylegacykit.html
- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/jimmy007forsure.html

Satoshi ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.0

Furthermore, BSV is NOT Original Bitcoin. It is a fork of a fork (a copy of a copy) as described in the BSV license here:

- https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv/blob/master/LICENSE

Quote: "... The Bitcoin SV blockchains are defined,
for purposes of this license, as the Bitcoin blockchain containing block height #556767
with the hash "000000000000000001d956714215d96ffc00e0afda4cd0a96c96f8d802b1662b" ..."

Comprende ?

Caveat emptor "buyer beware" BSV is NOT original Bitcoin. Bitcoin is BTC: https://bitcoin.org