Whilst I do agree with this, my cat sense is almost as certain if not more certain than it was with the hacked VIP account case. How many people were protesting me going after him? Was I right in the end? I strongly condemn the actions and statements of many individuals involved in this thread.
Your uncanny cat sense has done much good, but it is not in itself
evidence as the basis for me to make up my own mind; and your admittedly incisive past performance is no
guarantee that you are right
in this particular case, where the case against PN7 looks quite blurry to me.
OK... But what if PrimeNumber7 is not Quickseller?
Then I would be mistaken with my negative, would apologize and remove it. Errāre catum est.
Well, to reach that point, we need to examine the case carefully—and most preferably, give a fair hearing to whatever PrimeNumber7 may have to say for himself. That last bit requires actually persuading him that he will
get a fair hearing—which I will give him, and I am actively urging others
including you to do, too. The grumpy kitty speaking dog Latin is
not helpful on that particular point.
However, have you considered what if he is Quickseller and it ends up another case which could have trivially been prevented?
Does not logically answer the question,
what if he is not Quickseller?If we had a scoreboard on likely hood of someone being mr. Snowflake/Quicksie then this PN7 user would nearly maximize the score without even involving himself in reputation discussion (precisely because he would be expose himself even more quickly).
As I have said repeatedly, avoiding this discussion is
also what an innocent person would probably do unless we show him that he will not be shooting himself in the foot by speaking up. Sigh.
Did you also get tainted by this new-wave of apologist pretend-liberals around here (
pretend, exactly because of these double-standards)?
If you think that real, non-pretend liberalism itself is about anything but
arbitrary whimsical non-standards that please the emotions of overgrown children, then it is you who may want to get a blood test/rootkit scan for liberal memes. That malware is infectious.
After so much back and forth, I think it’s clear, at least, where people stand on this—well, except for the star of the show.
PrimeNumber7, if you can tell us something useful for clearing this up, please don’t let the grumpy kitty scare you off. Hey, you might also get grumpy after years of having had every possible type of b.s. thrown at you by pathological liars. I don’t think her argument is helpful here; sorry. But it is also not helpful for you to avoid the discussion (much though I agree that silence is not evidence
either way). Help yourself.