Bounty Managers and Shit projects

[whyrqa]

It's no more news that many of us would have had some horrible experiences participating in some resources wasting projects. However, my opinion is that, do bounty managers just accept hook line and sinker to manage bounty campaigns for any project without taking some time to look at the prospects of such project?  

I think there should be some experienced members of this forum apart from moderators (because moderators' works might be too enormous) that should be in charge of reviewing projects before bounty managers are allowed to create bounty and/or announcement threads for such projects.  If this can be done effectively, I think the advent of these unworthy projects can be mitigated.

To wrap it up, a bounty manager once told me when I called his attention to some unrealistic plans of the project he was managing, he said he is not concerned about the success of the project, once he gets his weekly payment from the team. I want to know if there are some levels of punishment for bounty managers that manage unworthy projects apart from negative trust?

There is no real punishment here. This is a virtual world forum. Redtrust is one of the most severe punishments and blows for bounty managers. With Redtrust people can see their reputation, and rarely will anyone who participates in the campaign he manages.  In addition, forums can prohibit members from participating with Redtrust managers.

Undoubtedly, you need to rely on yourself too, and not just on the ratings of bounty managers, and at the same time personally radiate accessible information about the bounty companies. And of course, I would like to know who and how and By what criteria evaluates the Bounty of the company, and determines its status as a fraudster or not. This is not so easy to do.

[1715174135]

1715174135

[1715174135]

1715174135

[1715174135]

1715174135

[1715174135]

1715174135

[Psynthax]

not all managers do such a thing, some see or review the project first before accepting the project and many refuse if he thinks the project is unfit to be promoted, come on don't equate all managers unilaterally.

Could agree, there are some reckless manager indeed that doesn't care the prospect of their project and how it's gonna be post promotion phase but some managers also actually doing quite good by selectively choosing a project that's promising and will not just brought us dissapointment in the future.

[Pomogator]

There are a lot of new projects. Unable to follow everyone. For each project, it will be necessary to make a separate report, which takes a very long time. It's pointless. You must learn to identify bad projects yourself.

[Furious 7]

not all managers do such a thing, some see or review the project first before accepting the project and many refuse if he thinks the project is unfit to be promoted, come on don't equate all managers unilaterally.

Well, not all managers like that, we know that there are many managers who are professional in conducting their reviews before the bounty is launched, so I don't agree if many people say that the manager is blamed because there is no connection, they only manage the project for promotion.

[Santri]

yes some bounty managers don't care about the projects they manage because they only think about the money they get every week (BTC, ETH or USD). for that we need to choose a bounty manager who has a lot of experience in managing a number of successful projects but besides that we also make it a habit to research ourselves, so not only dependence on the bounty manager

[Rowenta]

It's no more news that many of us would have had some horrible experiences participating in some resources wasting projects. However, my opinion is that, do bounty managers just accept hook line and sinker to manage bounty campaigns for any project without taking some time to look at the prospects of such project?  

I think there should be some experienced members of this forum apart from moderators (because moderators' works might be too enormous) that should be in charge of reviewing projects before bounty managers are allowed to create bounty and/or announcement threads for such projects.  If this can be done effectively, I think the advent of these unworthy projects can be mitigated.

To wrap it up, a bounty manager once told me when I called his attention to some unrealistic plans of the project he was managing, he said he is not concerned about the success of the project, once he gets his weekly payment from the team. I want to know if there are some levels of punishment for bounty managers that manage unworthy projects apart from negative trust?

If a bounty manager becomes popular for introducing only bad projects the bounty manager will surely get bad rating and no good reputation left, reputation of a bounty manager is very important, before wasting your time on any bounty campaign find answers how capable the bounty manager is..

[Divinespark]

not all managers do such a thing, some see or review the project first before accepting the project and many refuse if he thinks the project is unfit to be promoted, come on don't equate all managers unilaterally.

Well, not all managers like that, we know that there are many managers who are professional in conducting their reviews before the bounty is launched, so I don't agree if many people say that the manager is blamed because there is no connection, they only manage the project for promotion.

There are not too many good managers like you said in this forum. Most of them only care about their money and are willing to manage scam projects, I've seen a lot of people like that. BTW I only see Bubbalex as the best manager at this forum

[Majharul Saiif]

It's no more news that many of us would have had some horrible experiences participating in some resources wasting projects. However, my opinion is that, do bounty managers just accept hook line and sinker to manage bounty campaigns for any project without taking some time to look at the prospects of such project?  

I think there should be some experienced members of this forum apart from moderators (because moderators' works might be too enormous) that should be in charge of reviewing projects before bounty managers are allowed to create bounty and/or announcement threads for such projects.  If this can be done effectively, I think the advent of these unworthy projects can be mitigated.

To wrap it up, a bounty manager once told me when I called his attention to some unrealistic plans of the project he was managing, he said he is not concerned about the success of the project, once he gets his weekly payment from the team. I want to know if there are some levels of punishment for bounty managers that manage unworthy projects apart from negative trust?

Yes, trust is needed. Not everyone is doing such things. Every manager need not to accept all the projects, some people will take the advantages and ultimately hunters will not be paid for shitty projects. So its better to research before doing anything. Though its all about the decision by hunters to take the risk and participate as well.

[Teraboy]

There are a lot of new projects. Unable to follow everyone. For each project, it will be necessary to make a separate report, which takes a very long time. It's pointless. You must learn to identify bad projects yourself.

It's about which managers can do the best beside the participants itself who have been doing some research to choose which is the right project to be promoted by the hunters.
It's not about the learn to identify a bad project but the managers must also do a deep research to the project too.

[princesspoppy]

As long as some bounty managers can get paid with reliable coins in the market (particularly btc) doing their jobs in promoting, they will take the project even though it doesn't look good and legit at the very start. But that doesn't mean that all bounty managers are like that, there are still some bounty managers that research thoroughly about the project before accepting and handling it. It is because their reputation matters to them. With that, we can somehow feel comfortable joining their projects because we know that that project can be legit. But still, it's not that 100% guaranteed because some projects still run away and don't pay bounty hunters when greediness hit them, no matter how good their project are, but we can't blame the bounty manager about that anymore.

[xiboothrezi]

~~ But still, it's not that 100% guaranteed because some projects still run away and don't pay bounty hunters when greediness hit them, no matter how good their project are, but we can't blame the bounty manager about that anymore.

That's the drama that happened lately. projects that were initially very potential could end up being scams because the development team made changes that hurt the bounty hunter. Bounty managers who are outside the management of dev can not do anything. So we have to tolerate each other, the bounty campaign ecosystem has changed a lot and there are so many risks.

[kayvie]

~~ But still, it's not that 100% guaranteed because some projects still run away and don't pay bounty hunters when greediness hit them, no matter how good their project are, but we can't blame the bounty manager about that anymore.

That's the drama that happened lately. projects that were initially very potential could end up being scams because the development team made changes that hurt the bounty hunter. Bounty managers who are outside the management of dev can not do anything. So we have to tolerate each other, the bounty campaign ecosystem has changed a lot and there are so many risks.

Actually, it is already happening even before. Projects that has a high potential end up being a scam because they already get enough money for themselves. Even bounty managers are being affected because their reputation is on the line, even if they work hard to manage the project, they can't do anything because they are not part of the team.

[imstillthebest]

~~ But still, it's not that 100% guaranteed because some projects still run away and don't pay bounty hunters when greediness hit them, no matter how good their project are, but we can't blame the bounty manager about that anymore.

That's the drama that happened lately. projects that were initially very potential could end up being scams because the development team made changes that hurt the bounty hunter. Bounty managers who are outside the management of dev can not do anything. So we have to tolerate each other, the bounty campaign ecosystem has changed a lot and there are so many risks.

Actually, it is already happening even before. Projects that has a high potential end up being a scam because they already get enough money for themselves. Even bounty managers are being affected because their reputation is on the line, even if they work hard to manage the project, they can't do anything because they are not part of the team.

really ? so why not support projects that does not come up with good potentials  . can we agree with this new plan ? let see if this makes a difference from the usual plan that we do  .  managers and hunters on the other hand were already part of them  or considered part of it as soon as they both agree to start working on the project  . managers and hunters risk thier reputation at all times everytime they start working on a project   , so if you dont want that to happen you must think twice before you join  .

[Genemind]

Some managers review bounties before accepting a job. But, take note that is is not just a manager's sole responsibility to review a project, it is also a bounty participant's job to do their own research. Even if a manager reviews a project it doesn't guarantee that it will be successful, profitable, or will even pay by the end of the project, not unless the bou ty fund is escrowed.

[Little Mouse]

Some managers review bounties before accepting a job. But, take note that is is not just a manager's sole responsibility to review a project, it is also a bounty participant's job to do their own research. Even if a manager reviews a project it doesn't guarantee that it will be successful, profitable, or will even pay by the end of the project, not unless the bou ty fund is escrowed.

You are right. Most of the bounty managers who think about having a good portfolio here, always do enough research before launching a project to be sure that they are not working with a scam project. But some of the scams are so well planned that no one can detect. As a result, bounty mamagers launch them. If participants also do some research, I think it can be detected. Hunters should know where they are spending their times and are that worthy.

[ILScoin]

Bounty managers are not being paid in shitty tokens, so they are more less concerned about the success of all projects that comes to their way in listing them on their bounty board, you will notice that bounty that are giving rewards in btc or eth tends to have less amount allocated as compared to other shitty projects allocating more than $500k or more of their shit token

[BigBos]

The bounty manager has no power regarding a project. however, the thing that they need to do is control all the things related to the bounty. however, they are the people closest to the developer. some bounty managers have their own rules and guarantee payment for bounty hunters, but some don't. however, if you want something that has a risk that is not so big, then choose a bounty manager who already has a big trust.

[JeffBrad12]

That's why there is also a punishments on the side of bounty managers if they manage to hold a bounty that are scam. I think good and trusted managers are choosing a good project to be able to maintain their good reputation as a to trusted bounty manager.

Most of the time that's the case, but some also just finding leftover project left just to fill in their portfolio as a bounty manager, but so far I written down some of the most reliable manager on my list and I guess that's enough to solve all the problem regarding this.
It's just we need to be more selective not only to the project but the manager of it aswell, the manager could play an important role whether the project is smooth or not.

[Midy]

Before promoting the prize, the campaign manager first does the research because the pesky project will ruin their careers, so I think the prize manager has anticipated it before it happens even though the project ends in a scam.

[carlisle1]

It's no more news that many of us would have had some horrible experiences participating in some resources wasting projects. However, my opinion is that, do bounty managers just accept hook line and sinker to manage bounty campaigns for any project without taking some time to look at the prospects of such project?  

manager has their own prerogatives in accepting project so don't ask as if this is general,there are managers who chooses not to accept bounty if they found something not good.

I think there should be some experienced members of this forum apart from moderators (because moderators' works might be too enormous) that should be in charge of reviewing projects before bounty managers are allowed to create bounty and/or announcement threads for such projects.  If this can be done effectively, I think the advent of these unworthy projects can be mitigated.

so you wanted someone to look after your stupidity?joining bounty is your choice so if you don't want to get scammed then better not to join any of them,because you are not paying people here just to find legit bounty for you fool.

To wrap it up, a bounty manager once told me when I called his attention to some unrealistic plans of the project he was managing, he said he is not concerned about the success of the project, once he gets his weekly payment from the team. I want to know if there are some levels of punishment for bounty managers that manage unworthy projects apart from negative trust?

for me?the one who must be punished are the BOUNTY HUNTERS that participating in scam projects because they are the one who's promoting the scams.