Bounty Managers and Shit projects

[TopTort777]

Bounty managers take money for managing the bounty campaigns, at the end they really do not care about the legitimacy of the promoted project. Only managers that managing more campaigns care more about the quality because they want to make a brand, that would bring a trust for future bounty campaigns.

True and the last few months I've seen bounty managers like this very much, but now they have started to disappear because most bounty managers who have a mindset like this already get tags and flags from DT members, the problem is the fate of participants who participated in some project that handled by scam bounty manager they only work for free and don't get a reward.

Maybe participants just dont know how to check flags and tags? Or they were not taught how reputation work and they should pay attention to it?

It amazes me that people join campaigns under management of a BM, that was tagged for cheating or promoting scam. What are in these people heads when they join? Last 5 campaigns turned scam, but this time it definitely gonna be a successful campaign.

[1715244854]

1715244854

[1715244854]

1715244854

[Entei]

In everyday thinking what matters is money in the managers' pockets but this cannot be generalized. There are great managers who only accept serious and valuable projects to work with and we can analyze your personal portfolio and study your performance history. This should be essential when entering a campaign, analyzing the project and the manager.

[Tomcolor]

All qualified bounty managers want to give a good bounty gift for everyone hunter so any manager won't promote scam project. It can be seen that more projects have been set up for clearing documents but after a while they also scam. Anyway I'll always try to work from my own search to a better bounty.

[Anyobsss]

All qualified bounty managers want to give a good bounty gift for everyone hunter so any manager won't promote scam project. It can be seen that more projects have been set up for clearing documents but after a while they also scam. Anyway I'll always try to work from my own search to a better bounty.

It will affect their reputation if they will promote scam, so great bounty managers really carefully chooses project to manage but still there will always be someone who just want money and will not even bother to research thoroughly if the project is good.

Also, It's also a job for bounty hunters to do their own research before they join a campaign. They will be more profitable if they will developed a skill where they can tell if the project will succeed.

[Pompa]

Bounty Managers have their responsibility to there corresponding projects to be end successfully wih5 the help of their members too. I wonder why some of the project left by the bounty managers, sometimes i have encountered those situation.

[Mame89]

I don't count how many bounty projects I have participated in since the ICO trend, some managers are fair and there are those who are not at all responsible with the participants who have been willing to risk their resources and also their time and the remnants of those memories are a lot junk coins that are still stored in the wallet today.

[Shasha80]

It is true we must do research that in order to determine good projects, but not all bounty hunters have the ability to analyze projects well.
Especially for newbies who often choose wrong projects. Bounty Managers should not arbitrarily choose projects, so I think Bounty Managers
should check first whether the projects are feasible or not to be promoted. So bounty hunters won't waste time promoting shit projects.

[Kehindem]

though as matter of fact, dont has vast knowledge yet, but the one i have, many bounty manager are paid with the token of the project of the project they manage, go the fact from the project i just participated in, the bounty manager is talking to hunter as regards to distribution and talking about the value of the project, and making it know that, he will be paid with the project token, i think addition punishment no payment, or no full payment, in the case were certain percentage is paid in stable coin

[BitcoinPanther]

It is true we must do research that in order to determine good projects, but not all bounty hunters have the ability to analyze projects well.
Especially for newbies who often choose wrong projects. Bounty Managers should not arbitrarily choose projects, so I think Bounty Managers
should check first whether the projects are feasible or not to be promoted. So bounty hunters won't waste time promoting shit projects.

Aside from the bounty hunter doing the research and analysis, bounty manager should feel responsible on selecting bounty projects.  They are the first line of investigation when they accept and close a deal from a project that wanted a bounty campaign.  I believe bounty manager should be held responsible if ever  a bounty campaign turned scam.

[Serco]

All qualified bounty managers want to give a good bounty gift for everyone hunter so any manager won't promote scam project. It can be seen that more projects have been set up for clearing documents but after a while they also scam. Anyway I'll always try to work from my own search to a better bounty.

they always do the best for theirself and also bounty hunter. they will strictly filter campaign that come to them, but everthing is not in their hand. everything could be legit or scamm depend on developers team itself. i many time saw good project in early , but in the middle they change their mind to cancel bounty campaign. in this case we could not blame bounty manager.

[bigcash2011]

It's no more news that many of us would have had some horrible experiences participating in some resources wasting projects. However, my opinion is that, do bounty managers just accept hook line and sinker to manage bounty campaigns for any project without taking some time to look at the prospects of such project?  

I think there should be some experienced members of this forum apart from moderators (because moderators' works might be too enormous) that should be in charge of reviewing projects before bounty managers are allowed to create bounty and/or announcement threads for such projects.  If this can be done effectively, I think the advent of these unworthy projects can be mitigated.

To wrap it up, a bounty manager once told me when I called his attention to some unrealistic plans of the project he was managing, he said he is not concerned about the success of the project, once he gets his weekly payment from the team. I want to know if there are some levels of punishment for bounty managers that manage unworthy projects apart from negative trust?

Sometimes we can easily see low quality projects being promoted by bounty managers for few bucks.
This greed is toxic and such managers will lose hunters so greed will not give you longterm business.
So stay with only quality projects and learn to say NO to low quality projects for the sake of this community and crypto market as a whole.

[sulendra12]

Bounty managers take money for managing the bounty campaigns, at the end they really do not care about the legitimacy of the promoted project.

They have stated in the bounty thread that they are not responsible to any losses you can get by joining these campaigns because they act as a campaign manager only. Although, it could affect their trust quality on their accounts. Would rather to be a legit person and try everything on board you know.

Only managers that managing more campaigns care more about the quality because they want to make a brand, that would bring a trust for future bounty campaigns.

This also means they can accept whatever the fuck projects they want as long as it gives them big money.

[iged_war]

It is true we must do research that in order to determine good projects, but not all bounty hunters have the ability to analyze projects well.
Especially for newbies who often choose wrong projects. Bounty Managers should not arbitrarily choose projects, so I think Bounty Managers
should check first whether the projects are feasible or not to be promoted. So bounty hunters won't waste time promoting shit projects.

Aside from the bounty hunter doing the research and analysis, bounty manager should feel responsible on selecting bounty projects.  They are the first line of investigation when they accept and close a deal from a project that wanted a bounty campaign.  I believe bounty manager should be held responsible if ever  a bounty campaign turned scam.

some of bounty hunter really care about bounty campaign quality and take less campaign offer that come to them. and when any campaign turned to scamm, it mean their filtered not strict yet. look at bounty detective , they managed alot campaign but most of them have no value at all. although its not scam but they didnt work well in analize campaign.

[oscarftw]

Bounty managers take money for managing the bounty campaigns, at the end they really do not care about the legitimacy of the promoted project. Only managers that managing more campaigns care more about the quality because they want to make a brand, that would bring a trust for future bounty campaigns.

Actually bounty managers are in a hard situation, just visit the "PayAccept" campaign. Admin shut down the telegram group for his payment. PayAccept doesn't look like a legitimate campaign to me. As Op's explanation, how could we punish these scam projects? We are here searching for legitimate projects and moderators are here to help us.

[ruli stylon]

The bounty manager is forced to take the bounty job for himself, not knowing it was a failed or successful project. What the bounty manager thinks about is the pay he received.

Not thinking about the fate of the bounty participants who have worked according to the rules applied by the project.

In my opinion, this should not be allowed because it can harm the bounty participants and their work is in vain.

[Primo17]

Yes. They are some porjects that good at start and end with scam. An some bounty managers  don't mind  about the project, they are just doing their work, paid and go. But since we're here in this business in years, It's our job to do research carefully  about the project before joining the campaign.

[tippytoes]

Yes. They are some porjects that good at start and end with scam. An some bounty managers  don't mind  about the project, they are just doing their work, paid and go. But since we're here in this business in years, It's our job to do research carefully  about the project before joining the campaign.

But do you know that a lot of this alt bounty managers were also rekt by these campaigns? I believe a lot of them were not paid as well. So as you can observed, most of them already stopped their services because their effort were also wasted by these crap projects. As a participant, you should know how to assess the project, if it is real or not, or just wasting your time.

I do commend those BMs that only accept btc or eth paying campaigns. That means, their participants are definitely getting paid at the end of each week. And most of them are reputable BMs.

[Nellayar]

It is true we must do research that in order to determine good projects, but not all bounty hunters have the ability to analyze projects well.
Especially for newbies who often choose wrong projects. Bounty Managers should not arbitrarily choose projects, so I think Bounty Managers
should check first whether the projects are feasible or not to be promoted. So bounty hunters won't waste time promoting shit projects.

Aside from the bounty hunter doing the research and analysis, bounty manager should feel responsible on selecting bounty projects.  They are the first line of investigation when they accept and close a deal from a project that wanted a bounty campaign.  I believe bounty manager should be held responsible if ever  a bounty campaign turned scam.

However, they just being blind when the campaign turned into scam. Many bounty managers even before who are washing their hands right after the project becomes scam. I don`t know when will the system of bounty campaigns will change. It is really a disappointment to all of us here that no bounty campaigns nowadays are paying enough to the hunters. If there, it is the weekly campaigns which paid in btc. Only few managers I have seen who are concerned in their bounty hunters, most of good and efficient managers have gone already.

I hope someday, bounty campaigns will become good as what it was before. But I think it will never happen again.

[Jackl87]

If a bountymanager just accepts every bounty of every shitcoin that is offered to him he will lose his good reputation pretty soon and no one wants to join his bounty anymore.
People in this forum are pretty vocal when they were in a bad bounty that didn't pay or wasn't manage well or never made it to a exchange and so on.
There are some bounty managers here in this forum who are well known for their quality campaigns i am pretty sure they only accept really solid altcoin projects or bounty that pay in btc or stablecoin.

[lienfaye]

If a bountymanager just accepts every bounty of every shitcoin that is offered to him he will lose his good reputation pretty soon and no one wants to join his bounty anymore.

Indeed, it can affect their reputation negatively as a bounty manager here. If this happens then bounty hunters wont trust anymore the future project that he will manage.

There are some bounty managers here in this forum who are well known for their quality campaigns i am pretty sure they only accept really solid altcoin projects or bounty that pay in btc or stablecoin.

Thats right most of them only manage good campaign and has concern to the participants. Thats why sometimes a reputable bounty manager is an indication of a legit project thus I only follow their projects.