Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2016, 06:45:46 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Totally Off-Topic!  (Read 98924 times)
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 07:03:35 AM
 #781

Speaking of Black Arrow, did you see my scammer thread on their ass?
1481395546
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481395546

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481395546
Reply with quote  #2

1481395546
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481395546
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481395546

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481395546
Reply with quote  #2

1481395546
Report to moderator
1481395546
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481395546

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481395546
Reply with quote  #2

1481395546
Report to moderator
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2014, 07:03:44 AM
 #782

Simple truth - you mustn't on-topic in off-topic thread.

FTFY

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
rohnearner
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350

REAL-EYES || REAL-IZE || REAL-LIES||


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2014, 07:07:02 AM
 #783

Sorry, that's off-topic for this thread.
It's the off topic section.

Which is why something that is on-topic (ie being off-topic) is, for this thread, off-topic and therefore on-topic. Which is, of course, off-topic.

Sorry I don't make the rules. I just interpret them.

simply wtf i just read..? i hope i'm on topic[ie being off topic] , because i don't think my comment is off topic(ie being on topic)

organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2014, 07:37:54 AM
 #784

Sorry, that's off-topic for this thread.
It's the off topic section.

Which is why something that is on-topic (ie being off-topic) is, for this thread, off-topic and therefore on-topic. Which is, of course, off-topic.

Sorry I don't make the rules. I just interpret them.

simply wtf i just read..? i hope i'm on topic[ie being off topic] , because i don't think my comment is off topic(ie being on topic)

I'll help.

Your comment is about my comment, which is an on-topic comment.

For this "off-topic thread" that is off-topic, since this thread is about things that are "off-topic" only. So your comment is fine, or at least it would be if "off-topic" wasn't by definition "on-topic" in this thread, making it "off-topic" and not suitable.

I hope I have been able to clarify the situation somewhat.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
Lauda
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330


Ninja Cat


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 02:53:07 PM
 #785

Speaking of Black Arrow, did you see my scammer thread on their ass?
Which thread? Link please.


             ▄████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▄
            ██                          ▄▄▄▄▄▄                           ██
           ██  ██████                ▄██████████▄     ████████████████████▀
          ██  ████████             ▄████▀   ▀████▄    ████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
         ██  ████  ████           ████▀       ▀██▀    ████
        ██  ████    ████        ▄███▀                 ████

       ██  ████      ████       ███▀                  ████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
      ██  ████        ████      ███                   ██████████████
     ██  ████          ████     ███▄                  ████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

    ██  ████████████████████    ▀████                 ████
   ██  ██████████████████████    ▀████▄        ▄██▄   ████

  ██  ████                ████     ▀████▄   ▄████▀    ████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██  ████                  ████      ▀██████████▀     ████████████████████▄
  ██                                    ▀▀▀▀▀▀                           ██
   ▀█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀

║║
║║
║║
huarei
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 09:28:21 AM
 #786

hmp very nice  Smiley
zigmas
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 09:39:47 AM
 #787

yes oh no ...... oh yes  Grin  Grin  Grin
AurihanGB
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 11:34:23 AM
 #788

Yes or not
AurihanGB
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 11:58:41 AM
 #789

Yes, yes.  Cheesy
fattypig
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224



View Profile WWW
February 23, 2014, 02:21:31 PM
 #790

woot, its a yes

bitgeek
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462



View Profile
February 23, 2014, 04:11:26 PM
 #791

woot, its a yes
If yes is on topic then I have to say NO.


███████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████

.

.

.

Online.BTC.Bingo

.

.

.*500%.CASH.BACK.+.INSTANT.BONUS
..PROGRESSIVE.JACKPOT
..NO-DOWNLOAD.CLIENT
.

.

.

EPIC.FUN.
Booboo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 04:27:24 PM
 #792

But total total, huh?
Hazir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036


Illusion is the first of all pleasures.


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 05:30:21 PM
 #793

There will be always someone who breaks the rules and post on topic in off topic thread Sad
Minbyan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 06:36:23 PM
 #794

woooo yes, woooo no
MakeBelieve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 11:19:32 PM
 #795

I eat bacon because it tastes like bacon.

On a mission to make Bitcointalk.org Marketplace a safer place to Buy/Sell/Trade
Sheldor333
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 11:38:54 PM
 #796

We had a guy come in who was being foreclosed on. For a house in California. That he didn't own, didn't live in, in fact - he'd never been to California. The guy just had the same name as the California homeowner, and the bank was like 'Alright, that matches up! Serve him the papers, Johnny!'
You'd think this could be cleared up by a friendly phone call, but the bank totally DNGAF. They wanted this guy to show up at the hearing IN CALIFORNIA and prove he wasn't the guy. No idea how it ended up (The guy just came in for a consultation, don't think he retained as that wasn't really our field) but we've had other clients in the same situation with foreclosure judgments for property they didn't own, that was owned by some person in the same area with a similar name. Not too many, but the banks seriously did not do any detailed research for a time when everything was foreclosing. It was a huge mess.
Like, people owning two properties, one in FC and the other current - the bank would lock them out of the current home. The bank would FC on the house but forget to notify the HOA, and two years down the road the former homeowner gets sued for non-payment of HOA fees...that the bank was responsible for when they took over ownership. Banks confirming they got the suggestion of bankruptcy (which will stop a foreclosure) and then just having the foreclosure sale anyway. I am so glad I'm not dealing with that anymore.

MakeBelieve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 11:39:56 PM
 #797

We had a guy come in who was being foreclosed on. For a house in California. That he didn't own, didn't live in, in fact - he'd never been to California. The guy just had the same name as the California homeowner, and the bank was like 'Alright, that matches up! Serve him the papers, Johnny!'
You'd think this could be cleared up by a friendly phone call, but the bank totally DNGAF. They wanted this guy to show up at the hearing IN CALIFORNIA and prove he wasn't the guy. No idea how it ended up (The guy just came in for a consultation, don't think he retained as that wasn't really our field) but we've had other clients in the same situation with foreclosure judgments for property they didn't own, that was owned by some person in the same area with a similar name. Not too many, but the banks seriously did not do any detailed research for a time when everything was foreclosing. It was a huge mess.
Like, people owning two properties, one in FC and the other current - the bank would lock them out of the current home. The bank would FC on the house but forget to notify the HOA, and two years down the road the former homeowner gets sued for non-payment of HOA fees...that the bank was responsible for when they took over ownership. Banks confirming they got the suggestion of bankruptcy (which will stop a foreclosure) and then just having the foreclosure sale anyway. I am so glad I'm not dealing with that anymore.

I haven't read this so I can't post a on topic response becuse I'm not allowed to said PG.

On a mission to make Bitcointalk.org Marketplace a safer place to Buy/Sell/Trade
sawani
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 02:13:25 AM
 #798

We had a guy come in who was being foreclosed on. For a house in California. That he didn't own, didn't live in, in fact - he'd never been to California. The guy just had the same name as the California homeowner, and the bank was like 'Alright, that matches up! Serve him the papers, Johnny!'
You'd think this could be cleared up by a friendly phone call, but the bank totally DNGAF. They wanted this guy to show up at the hearing IN CALIFORNIA and prove he wasn't the guy. No idea how it ended up (The guy just came in for a consultation, don't think he retained as that wasn't really our field) but we've had other clients in the same situation with foreclosure judgments for property they didn't own, that was owned by some person in the same area with a similar name. Not too many, but the banks seriously did not do any detailed research for a time when everything was foreclosing. It was a huge mess.
Like, people owning two properties, one in FC and the other current - the bank would lock them out of the current home. The bank would FC on the house but forget to notify the HOA, and two years down the road the former homeowner gets sued for non-payment of HOA fees...that the bank was responsible for when they took over ownership. Banks confirming they got the suggestion of bankruptcy (which will stop a foreclosure) and then just having the foreclosure sale anyway. I am so glad I'm not dealing with that anymore.

I haven't read this so I can't post a on topic response becuse I'm not allowed to said PG.
Roll Eyes
zigmas
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 02:38:42 AM
 #799

The site is very fun  Grin
apsvinet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 02:43:45 AM
 #800

The site is very fun  Grin
What's up with the forum bots lately? You see at least 3-4 per thread with their 2 word responses to a quote, extremely generic all the time.

   ∎               GAWMiners The Hashlet World's first digital cloud miner!
∎∎∎   No pool fees Instant activation Never obsolete Always profitable
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!