organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
February 21, 2014, 07:03:44 AM |
|
Simple truth - you mustn't on-topic in off-topic thread.
FTFY
|
|
|
|
rohnearner
|
|
February 21, 2014, 07:07:02 AM |
|
Sorry, that's off-topic for this thread.
It's the off topic section. Which is why something that is on-topic (ie being off-topic) is, for this thread, off-topic and therefore on-topic. Which is, of course, off-topic. Sorry I don't make the rules. I just interpret them. simply wtf i just read..? i hope i'm on topic[ie being off topic] , because i don't think my comment is off topic(ie being on topic)
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
February 21, 2014, 07:37:54 AM |
|
Sorry, that's off-topic for this thread.
It's the off topic section. Which is why something that is on-topic (ie being off-topic) is, for this thread, off-topic and therefore on-topic. Which is, of course, off-topic. Sorry I don't make the rules. I just interpret them. simply wtf i just read..? i hope i'm on topic[ie being off topic] , because i don't think my comment is off topic(ie being on topic) I'll help. Your comment is about my comment, which is an on-topic comment. For this "off-topic thread" that is off-topic, since this thread is about things that are "off-topic" only. So your comment is fine, or at least it would be if "off-topic" wasn't by definition "on-topic" in this thread, making it "off-topic" and not suitable. I hope I have been able to clarify the situation somewhat.
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
February 21, 2014, 02:53:07 PM |
|
Speaking of Black Arrow, did you see my scammer thread on their ass?
Which thread? Link please.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
huarei
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
February 23, 2014, 09:28:21 AM |
|
hmp very nice
|
|
|
|
zigmas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
February 23, 2014, 09:39:47 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
AurihanGB
|
|
February 23, 2014, 11:34:23 AM |
|
Yes or not
|
|
|
|
AurihanGB
|
|
February 23, 2014, 11:58:41 AM |
|
Yes, yes.
|
|
|
|
fattypig
|
|
February 23, 2014, 02:21:31 PM |
|
woot, its a yes
|
|
|
|
bitgeek
|
|
February 23, 2014, 04:11:26 PM |
|
woot, its a yes
If yes is on topic then I have to say NO.
|
|
|
|
Booboo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
February 23, 2014, 04:27:24 PM |
|
But total total, huh?
|
|
|
|
Hazir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
★Nitrogensports.eu★
|
|
February 23, 2014, 05:30:21 PM |
|
There will be always someone who breaks the rules and post on topic in off topic thread
|
|
|
|
Minbyan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
February 23, 2014, 06:36:23 PM |
|
woooo yes, woooo no
|
|
|
|
MakeBelieve
|
|
February 23, 2014, 11:19:32 PM |
|
I eat bacon because it tastes like bacon.
|
On a mission to make Bitcointalk.org Marketplace a safer place to Buy/Sell/Trade
|
|
|
Sheldor333
|
|
February 23, 2014, 11:38:54 PM |
|
We had a guy come in who was being foreclosed on. For a house in California. That he didn't own, didn't live in, in fact - he'd never been to California. The guy just had the same name as the California homeowner, and the bank was like 'Alright, that matches up! Serve him the papers, Johnny!' You'd think this could be cleared up by a friendly phone call, but the bank totally DNGAF. They wanted this guy to show up at the hearing IN CALIFORNIA and prove he wasn't the guy. No idea how it ended up (The guy just came in for a consultation, don't think he retained as that wasn't really our field) but we've had other clients in the same situation with foreclosure judgments for property they didn't own, that was owned by some person in the same area with a similar name. Not too many, but the banks seriously did not do any detailed research for a time when everything was foreclosing. It was a huge mess. Like, people owning two properties, one in FC and the other current - the bank would lock them out of the current home. The bank would FC on the house but forget to notify the HOA, and two years down the road the former homeowner gets sued for non-payment of HOA fees...that the bank was responsible for when they took over ownership. Banks confirming they got the suggestion of bankruptcy (which will stop a foreclosure) and then just having the foreclosure sale anyway. I am so glad I'm not dealing with that anymore.
|
|
|
|
MakeBelieve
|
|
February 23, 2014, 11:39:56 PM |
|
We had a guy come in who was being foreclosed on. For a house in California. That he didn't own, didn't live in, in fact - he'd never been to California. The guy just had the same name as the California homeowner, and the bank was like 'Alright, that matches up! Serve him the papers, Johnny!' You'd think this could be cleared up by a friendly phone call, but the bank totally DNGAF. They wanted this guy to show up at the hearing IN CALIFORNIA and prove he wasn't the guy. No idea how it ended up (The guy just came in for a consultation, don't think he retained as that wasn't really our field) but we've had other clients in the same situation with foreclosure judgments for property they didn't own, that was owned by some person in the same area with a similar name. Not too many, but the banks seriously did not do any detailed research for a time when everything was foreclosing. It was a huge mess. Like, people owning two properties, one in FC and the other current - the bank would lock them out of the current home. The bank would FC on the house but forget to notify the HOA, and two years down the road the former homeowner gets sued for non-payment of HOA fees...that the bank was responsible for when they took over ownership. Banks confirming they got the suggestion of bankruptcy (which will stop a foreclosure) and then just having the foreclosure sale anyway. I am so glad I'm not dealing with that anymore.
I haven't read this so I can't post a on topic response becuse I'm not allowed to said PG.
|
On a mission to make Bitcointalk.org Marketplace a safer place to Buy/Sell/Trade
|
|
|
sawani
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
February 24, 2014, 02:13:25 AM |
|
We had a guy come in who was being foreclosed on. For a house in California. That he didn't own, didn't live in, in fact - he'd never been to California. The guy just had the same name as the California homeowner, and the bank was like 'Alright, that matches up! Serve him the papers, Johnny!' You'd think this could be cleared up by a friendly phone call, but the bank totally DNGAF. They wanted this guy to show up at the hearing IN CALIFORNIA and prove he wasn't the guy. No idea how it ended up (The guy just came in for a consultation, don't think he retained as that wasn't really our field) but we've had other clients in the same situation with foreclosure judgments for property they didn't own, that was owned by some person in the same area with a similar name. Not too many, but the banks seriously did not do any detailed research for a time when everything was foreclosing. It was a huge mess. Like, people owning two properties, one in FC and the other current - the bank would lock them out of the current home. The bank would FC on the house but forget to notify the HOA, and two years down the road the former homeowner gets sued for non-payment of HOA fees...that the bank was responsible for when they took over ownership. Banks confirming they got the suggestion of bankruptcy (which will stop a foreclosure) and then just having the foreclosure sale anyway. I am so glad I'm not dealing with that anymore.
I haven't read this so I can't post a on topic response becuse I'm not allowed to said PG.
|
|
|
|
zigmas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
February 24, 2014, 02:38:42 AM |
|
The site is very fun
|
|
|
|
apsvinet
|
|
February 24, 2014, 02:43:45 AM |
|
The site is very fun What's up with the forum bots lately? You see at least 3-4 per thread with their 2 word responses to a quote, extremely generic all the time.
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
February 24, 2014, 03:48:02 AM |
|
The site is very fun What's up with the forum bots lately? You see at least 3-4 per thread with their 2 word responses to a quote, extremely generic all the time. Or four word responses. woooo yes, woooo no
I don't think they're bots, though. More likely fifteen year old kids.
|
|
|
|
|