Good ICO vs Bad ICO

[CoinThinker]

as a newbie I don't suggest you join in any ICO because even some good ICOs turn out bad after listing like sushiswap , Only very geek and professional guys could tell that, You can follow some of them on twitter , I am following @mandyb on twitter and he is not bad.

[1715131017]

1715131017

[1715131017]

1715131017

[StyleForceOne]

as a newbie I don't suggest you join in any ICO because even some good ICOs turn out bad after listing like sushiswap , Only very geek and professional guys could tell that, You can follow some of them on twitter , I am following @mandyb on twitter and he is not bad.

Can't disagree on this one. I also like to check crypto birb from time to time, to see if there is anything interesting.
But overall - yeah, you don't want to invest in something as complicated as fresh new ICO, because its too risky, almost gambling like.

[lienfaye]

A good project is a project that is already listed on the exchange or coins can be traded on the exchange. but that doesn't mean this is a guarantee, it's just that I say it is much better than a new project which is sometimes difficult to develop in the market and doesn't even have further price developments.

Indeed. Its better to invest in a coin that is already listed in a good exchange rather than a new coins that is not proven anything yet.
Nevertheless investing has always risk thus manage your expectation and make sure to know what you're getting into.

[kenelmark]

as a newbie I don't suggest you join in any ICO because even some good ICOs turn out bad after listing like sushiswap , Only very geek and professional guys could tell that, You can follow some of them on twitter , I am following @mandyb on twitter and he is not bad.

Yes, but basically everyone who is a professional also comes from a newbie, so following in the footsteps of those who are already professional is good, but learning to understand yourself is also needed, because those who are professionals have also been wrong or deceived, both in seeing and in understand it.

[rajakulam]

There are many ways to see a good ICO, one of which is by looking at the bounty manager who has a high reputation who manages the project and we can also see how many seniors in this forum participated in it.

[noorammak]

Considering an ICO project and bounty program has many factors to evaluate. My first observation is the bounty pool of the project and its website.
On the website, you can learn about the technology used, what the project will serve in the future, who the team of the project is and what capabilities they have, most importantly, their large community. how. I often visit their social media sites and see what they say about the project.
My above standards are often based on feelings and experiences. To a novice, they may seem difficult to reach.

[Xxmodded]

Success from bounty campaign have worth value for an ICO project joining, if you participated with good ICO you have guarantee for success joining bounty campaign but you should checking who is bounty campaign manager, how trust the bounty campaign manager for joining his campaign. I got many ICO success by listing with many exchange and have good price after listing but with scammer bounty campaign manager distributing delay for long term until participants forget with their campaign manager, right now just few bounty campaign have success with higher price and last week I got good bounty injective campaign.

[Gvent]

It's tought to find out the good one unless you learn about crypto industry first. Sometimes Unique roadmap, photos of team members, well written white paper can goes wrong, this is because scammer are Intelligent enough in this field also. My suggestion is, don't be too hurry to investment when you are newbie in this industry.try to gain some knowledge, then feel free to invest your fund anywhere you want.

now there is no problem to correctly write white paper
over the years, so many specialists have accumulated on the crypto market that for money they will make you any document
 website, social media accounts and whatever
that is why it is so easy for scammers to deceive ordinary users

[Zeronic]

There are so many criteria of a good ICO. A good ICO will have a good reputation, their project is listed and their coins can be exchanged on the market. You can join their telegram too, check is the management well-organized or not.

[ryap12]

I use a lot of methods to research ico, before researching further I will look at the Whitepaper first, then I will check the team on the project, then partnerships and advisors. if all are legit, I will check how active the social media and telegram groups are.

Good filtering there I also use the same method. I even try checking the smart contract and its creator and see and identify if the owner is legit or just some airdrop guy. Most fake projects immediately sells their tokens or coins offering airdrops for ETHs. Some tries to fool by saying they are already listed but on decentralized exchanges which does not need any requirements and verification. I do participate in airdrops and mostly got disappointed since most are just there for decorations.

[Reatim]

I use a lot of methods to research ico, before researching further I will look at the Whitepaper first, then I will check the team on the project, then partnerships and advisors. if all are legit, I will check how active the social media and telegram groups are.

Good filtering there I also use the same method. I even try checking the smart contract and its creator and see and identify if the owner is legit or just some airdrop guy. Most fake projects immediately sells their tokens or coins offering airdrops for ETHs. Some tries to fool by saying they are already listed but on decentralized exchanges which does not need any requirements and verification. I do participate in airdrops and mostly got disappointed since most are just there for decorations.

Social media and telegram groups are not enough to check how the team is and if they are legit because nowadays?
scammers are paying people to shill for them in all social media platforms,they even use Bot or any tools that may look them legit.
So if this is one of your tool to check the projects legitimacy?then better think twice.
those ratings usually comes from paid accounts that needed
to say good things just to lure investors.

[husencoe]

There are many ways to choose a bounty that has a chance of success, one of which is by looking at the bounty manager who maintains his reputation, so that many projects he manages are successful but now you can follow projects whose coins have been recorded in a market

[irixo10]

For Newbie How check Which bounty program is good or which one is Scammed and i have heard that many good ICO still not launching there coins

Many good ICO? I have not seen any let alone many, nowadays people no longer care about ICO, it is now IEO here and there, and funny enough IEO is gradually trading the path of ICO. Just like in the case of ICO, they way you research about them, is closely related to that of IEO just that, in IEO, the exchange the token sale will take place on really matters.
So advicing based on IEO, I would say first research about the team, the level of their competence, what they have achieved over the years and if their experience is in relation to what they are building. This is very important, because a team with financial expertise can't work perfectly in a sport project. Also, you have check their community and how active it is, and this goes beyond telegram to twitter and so on. A team that can't adequately update their community at the early stage of the project might find it hard doing so after token sale.
Lastly, their partners and the exchange the token sale will take place on is also important.
Thus, after checking the project and it looks good, then there is every tendency the bounty will look good as well.

[Police Indo]

A good Ico is one that can successfully list on the Exchange thus indicating that the project can thrive because it is valuable. simply like that. because ICO aims to present new coins means that the newer the coins, the more perfect they should be.so choose an Ico bounty with a good project seen from the coins, management and team.

[Maslate]

Indeed, sometimes it is a bit difficult to find the right project according to expectations, but at least you do need to find out on several well-known channels on Telegram that usually discuss a project, experts can usually judge if a project will be mostly successful.

but sometimes some people who come to several groups only try to promote the projects they support. maybe some of them are part of the project team and trying to get new investors. Didn't you also read that such situations occur on several forums?

That's normal, we just have to be vigilant on what we are doing as there are scammers in the crypto space, actually there's many of them that's why the risk is really high when investing here, and we are talking about ICO which was already obsolete.

[Smitty Werben Man Jensen]

I say this because this is my experience, the first to distinguish a good ICO or not is from the community, social media, and of course their team,
but now ICO is no longer as popular as it used to be, what is now popular is the Defi ICO and IEO,
if you are to follow the ICO, then you must be seach in Defi project.

[onecall123]

I say this because this is my experience, the first to distinguish a good ICO or not is from the community, social media, and of course their team,
but now ICO is no longer as popular as it used to be, what is now popular is the Defi ICO and IEO,
if you are to follow the ICO, then you must be seach in Defi project.

Yup, that's reasonable enough i guess. It's high time when the terms comes in front of us, to be right or not to be on the right track to make investment on any project. ICO things become old now and people are becoming increasingly reluctant to be productive for this situation as most things in IEO proceed by exchanges.

[max6575]

with more on work as evaluating release from developer, pupils to gains with confidence as referring decision to put of funds and expecting with distinct of limit and collects of returns of profit as the involvement ith the startup project.

[copoyes]

You can see who handles the bounty management, whether the track record is good and the minimum scam bounty handled, because usually the problem is when the bounty is over
Usually there is a debate or throwing between the bounty manager and the owner of the ICO project when the tokens are distributed, for the beginning it is difficult to know whether they are good or not, right in the middle we can see from the news and social media whether the ICO project team is active or not, and We can investigate whether the team is real photos and names or fake, and their partnership is also a good judge or not

[Snappycoco]

For Newbie How check Which bounty program is good or which one is Scammed and i have heard that many good ICO still not launching there coins

There are so many criteria, one of them is who's handling the bounty campaign, there are bounty manager that protect the reputation of their services and we have seen legit bounty campaign are under highly reputable bounty manager, another one, the project passed all legit test, like whitepaper not copy paste from old or already existing projects, the people behind the projects also counts.

I have been in some notable and reputable bounty managers but almost (not all) are scams. I worked in some bounty like Mb8 managed by Yahoo and Dogdata by Wapinter but it ends up trash. I somehow understand that these results are not because of the bounty manager but the project team.