LFC_bitcoin sending PMs to his friends to oppose flag and bribing DT inclusion

[mindrust]

The money I lost from that trade is only 2.5btc. LoL what does that have to do with anything anyway. I can make that money back in a year at worst ( already made some of them back since gold made its thing- to da meewn) but your reputation will never recover from the deep shit it is in..

[1714547749]

1714547749

[1714547749]

1714547749

[1714547749]

1714547749

[JollyGood]

This Laudanum alt-account is an absolute disgusting low-life who needs psychological help and deserves to be put on ignore. Reading this drivel just re-enforces the point that he is mentally unstable.

 

Rustymind and suchmoron are clearly fucking retarded and dishonest shit eating cunts.

1. There is no proof of hack. That is impossible to prove with the information you have.
2. If there was proof of hack it would not
a/ change the fact lfcbitcoin is a fucking liar claiming he never asked people to reject the flag when he had done so
b/ change that lfc bitcoin is caught adding people to his inclusions right after they do exactly what he is messaging others to do which is collude with him to protect his sponsor by rejecting flags.
3. Suchmoron even states that lfcbitcoin was misrepresenting their conversation to a degree that they felt required they must remove lfcbitcoin from their trust list.


This is without taking into consideration this thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136759.msg50795949#msg50795949

I'd almost forgotten what a cesspool of low functioning plebs all scrapping around for btc dust one must sully themselves with simply to see the truth presented.  I'd also forgotten the fun it was to slap bunch of scammy miscreants around and watch them drool and spaz out trying to prevent the truth being heard.
Feels great to be a good guy.

Hilarious to try and discount all the important  above points and shift focus to something you can't even prove happened.
Lfc says the guy was getting worried that side was angry and wanting info? Then suddenly hacked  and gets the info? Oh really?

Mindrust is a fucking pleb. Is it unethical? Did nothing wrong?
Sounds like the sort of twat that sells bitcoin at the bottom only to watch it explode back straight away.

Hmm lfcbitcoin calling kids bastards now? Well that fits with his obsession with child sex abuse as you can see from reading the thread I have linked to.

Jollygood? That scammer enabling shit stain. Who refuses to hold his DT1 human centipede shit eaters to the same standards as he holds those he believes can do him no harm? You can't trust anything that imbecile says for the above reason plus is all falls to pieces as soon as you put it under the mildest of scrutiny.

If a person is on DT1 it is likely they are dirty and untrustworthy. That's how the system works. There are perhaps a handful of exceptions.

[Laudanum]

The money I lost from that trade is only 2.5btc. LoL what does that have to do with anything anyway. I can make that money back in a year at worst ( already made some of them back since gold made its thing- to da meewn) but your reputation will never recover from the deep shit it is in..

Only 2.5 btc.  Ha okay whale.
Why the crying it was all you had? Lol gold. Thanks for the laugh. If you had copper I would be shocked.
What If your sponsors suddenly found it undesirable and a negative to their business to let you shill?
I shouldn't complain think I may have bought those off you thanks for the free money friend.
Poor old rustymind.  To think I've been dining and enjoying myself on your stupidity for a few months is very satisfying. Think of all that gold you could have had rather than paying for me to live well.  

What deep shit? Tell me more. Bring evidence please. None will be forthcoming because mr gold ingots  here talks shit.
Reputation? That's a concern for broke ass losers. Not those who have made it already.
Although if you can provide no evidence my reputation is mint and in perfect condition.

Tip there will never be incontrovertible proof for something that never happened.

Now lfc bitcoin has been proven a liar with financial motivation that is pretty much scamming or scam facilitating.
You are attempting to whitewash it.  I bet you love a good DT1 whitewashing don't you?

This thread is about lfcbitcoin lying and manipulating the trust system. Take your hacking speculation to another thread. I doubt the account was hacked.  Theymos should look.  People just like using PM reveals to demonstrate lfcbitcoin is a backstabbing lying cheating and manipulating piece of shit.

I just stumbled on to this gem after the event. But I will make sure it is not forgotten.  Don't you guys worry DT1 smashing is my fav.

Lfcbitcoin had no rep he was a one line shit poster for years on end ...now a lying shill with scary obsession for child sex abuse.
Letting tman give him those protein injections was always going to damage his feeble mind.

So back on topic to lfcbitcoin proven lying and manipulation of DT and flags for his own financial interests.  


When low functioning dregs like jollygood and rusty mind or suchmoron or actually 99% of DT1 understand they can not dare to directly discuss the damning evidence or any specifics at all without being humiliated and crushed in public they run and try to hide behind claims of trolling,  mental illness, or just dive behind ignore.

He should be allowed to post the truth they cry. Just because he has indisputable proof and we can't debunk anything he says ...we don't like having out skulls crushed in public over and over again.

Stop crying jollygood you turd world peasant pleb.  Let's get specific let's examine the evidence together you cowardly little DT1 parasite.
Why so scared? Only want you to answer a few questions and provide some evidence. Why not?

[mindrust]

Are you sure you don't need a doctor? You sound unstable af.

Call 911 if you need help the professionals will take care of you.

[o_e_l_e_o]

We've been over this 1000 times before. Just put Cryptohunter on ignore please.

As I mentioned in the other thread, I'm not going to get pulled in to any drama here, I just wanted to point something out for everyone throwing around the word "manipulative".

If I PM someone and say "Can you red trust this person/exclude this person/support this flag/oppose this flag." - Not manipulative.

If I PM someone and say "You must red trust this person/exclude this person/support this flag/oppose this flag, or else I will red trust you/remove my inclusion of you/exclude you/not give you any more merit/share your nudes." - Manipulative.

DT selection is meant to be affected by user lists, and it is totally legitimate to try to honestly convince other (real) people to use a list more in-line with your views.

[asche]

If I PM someone and say "Can you red trust this person/exclude this person/support this flag/oppose this flag." - Definitely manipulative.

If I PM someone and say "You must red trust this person/exclude this person/support this flag/oppose this flag, or else I will red trust you/remove my inclusion of you/exclude you/not give you any more merit/share your nudes." - Blackmail/extortion.

I allowed myself to correct your wording in bold.

If someone that has some high reputation/is your friend/etc, explicitely asks you to do something, it definitely is manipulation.

Second example is 100% blackmail tho.

[Laudanum]

We've been over this 1000 times before. Just put Cryptohunter on ignore please.

As I mentioned in the other thread, I'm not going to get pulled in to any drama here, I just wanted to point something out for everyone throwing around the word "manipulative".

If I PM someone and say "Can you red trust this person/exclude this person/support this flag/oppose this flag." - Not manipulative.

If I PM someone and say "You must red trust this person/exclude this person/support this flag/oppose this flag, or else I will red trust you/remove my inclusion of you/exclude you/not give you any more merit/share your nudes." - Manipulative.

DT selection is meant to be affected by user lists, and it is totally legitimate to try to honestly convince other (real) people to use a list more in-line with your views.

Wrong the pm clearly is asking them to reject the tags on his sponsor. He has sent them money before for and then lied about doing iaskikg them to reject the flags , knowing full well it is wrong to just start requesting this kind of action.

[o_e_l_e_o]

If someone that has some high reputation/is your friend/etc, explicitely asks you to do something, it definitely is manipulation.

I would disagree that all requests are inherently manipulative simply because they come from a friend or a person with a good reputation.

[suchmoon]

If someone that has some high reputation/is your friend/etc, explicitely asks you to do something, it definitely is manipulation.

A friend asking for something is called being a friend. A friend asking for something unreasonable is a bit of an asshole but probably still a friend. Intent matters. If one doesn't leverage/abuse their high reputation / friendship / etc I don't see how you can call that manipulative. Otherwise someone like cryptohunter who has no reputation or friends would be a shining example of non-manipulativeness

[asche]

If someone that has some high reputation/is your friend/etc, explicitely asks you to do something, it definitely is manipulation.

A friend asking for something is called being a friend. A friend asking for something unreasonable is a bit of an asshole but probably still a friend. Intent matters. If one doesn't leverage/abuse their high reputation / friendship / etc I don't see how you can call that manipulative. Otherwise someone like cryptohunter who has no reputation or friends would be a shining example of non-manipulativeness

never said it was negative. But it's indeed manipulation. Because I or anyone might do what the friend asks, because it is your friend.
I'm not saying it's wrong or not natural. It manipulates what you would have done otherwise tho.

Then again I don't see an big issue in what LFC did in contacting BitcoinGirl, and I have stated so before.

[Laudanum]

If someone that has some high reputation/is your friend/etc, explicitely asks you to do something, it definitely is manipulation.

A friend asking for something is called being a friend. A friend asking for something unreasonable is a bit of an asshole but probably still a friend. Intent matters. If one doesn't leverage/abuse their high reputation / friendship / etc I don't see how you can call that manipulative. Otherwise someone like cryptohunter who has no reputation or friends would be a shining example of non-manipulativeness

Asking to reject a flag against your sponsor is unreasonable

Hence why lfc lied about doing it.

He knows he should have said can you review the evidence and so what you think best.

Suchmoron is also does not mention lfc has sent him money before.

Why lie about it? You accept he lied suchmoon right

Yes or no??

Watch the fat slob run off without daring to answer.

[suchmoon]

never said it was negative. But it's indeed manipulation. Because I or anyone might do what the friend asks, because it is your friend.
I'm not saying it's wrong or not natural. It manipulates what you would have done otherwise tho.

Perhaps we're just not on the same page as to what "manipulative" means then - it definitely has a negative meaning to me. Or Google:

Manipulative: "characterized by unscrupulous control of a situation or person."
Unscrupulous: "having or showing no moral principles; not honest or fair."

[LoyceV]

If someone that has some high reputation/is your friend/etc, explicitely asks you to do something, it definitely is manipulation.

I would disagree that all requests are inherently manipulative simply because they come from a friend or a person with a good reputation.

I'd say it's entirely up to you if you let yourself be manipulated from a PM. I think theymos had less than 10% success rate when he asked DT1 to exclude Lauda, which makes me believe many users don't just do anything they're asked.

[mindrust]

Most of us don't see theymos as a friend 

[asche]

If someone that has some high reputation/is your friend/etc, explicitely asks you to do something, it definitely is manipulation.

I would disagree that all requests are inherently manipulative simply because they come from a friend or a person with a good reputation.

Asking someone to review something is neutral a non manipulative.

Asking someone to take a position according to yours is manipulative in regards to the decision making.
I'm not a complete naive and I know that's exactly how the world works. The more friends you have, the more votes you get. But let's just call it what it is, shall we?

Edit:

@suchmoon

Found under 'manipulation':

Social influence is not necessarily negative. For example, people such as friends, family and doctors, can try to persuade to change clearly unhelpful habits and behaviors. Social influence is generally perceived to be harmless when it respects the right of the influenced to accept or reject it, and is not unduly coercive. Depending on the context and motivations, social influence may constitute underhanded manipulation.

[PrimeNumber7]

What would you call asking bitcoingirl.club to lie about why she is taking her stance?

[Laudanum]

If someone that has some high reputation/is your friend/etc, explicitely asks you to do something, it definitely is manipulation.

I would disagree that all requests are inherently manipulative simply because they come from a friend or a person with a good reputation.

I'd say it's entirely up to you if you let yourself be manipulated from a PM. I think theymos had less than 10% success rate when he asked DT1 to exclude Lauda, which makes me believe many users don't just do anything they're asked.

Robovac enters totally forgetting how lfcbitcoin admitted he was forced and manipulated against his will by PM to backstabbing  billgator at the request of lauda cos didnt want to fall out with " them"

Lol you can't have both ways morons.

You bunch of dummies are hilarious.

So far...

1. Lfc proven liar
2  shady as fuck includes to those colluding to protect his sponsor quick backtrack
3. Crying again pms have shown him to be scum
4. Blaming others for revealing the truth about him
5. Suchmoon excludes lfc for gross misrepresentation of their messages but won't give details.

Thanks for the laughs.

Not proven

1. Any hack took place
2. Who did the hack that may not have taken place

Now a lot twisting and turning trying to make it all someone else's fault.

Haha dirty turds 1 what a cess pool.


Suchmoon is a crazy mofo. I note now it gets jealous of any kind of attention stealing.
It was all negative on lfcbitcoin now swinging 180 not even able to confirm the documented lie lfc has told.

Do you agree lfcbitcoin was lying suchmoon? Yes or no

How hard is it?

[pam_alt_]

Sorry BitcoinGirl.Club for all inconvenience. My goal was not to do any damage. Password sent to your PM.

Why are you playing with me mate? I was excited to see the post but I do not see any PM from you. You have no idea how hard it's going on with me. Please stop it.

[DooMAD]

We've been over this 1000 times before. Just put Cryptohunter on ignore please.

Which one?  I swear they're getting close to the number of accounts anonymint made over the years.  Getting that same manic, obsessive compulsive vibe.  They won't stop until they're banned.  And even then, there's still a chance they won't stop.

[JollyGood]

It is very sad to see the hacker that committed a criminal act by hacking in to your emails raising your hopes by saying he sent you the password but then lied.

Though hell is punishment enough, this evil low-life deserves to find abode in one of the most painful parts of hell for the misery he has caused you.

Sorry BitcoinGirl.Club for all inconvenience. My goal was not to do any damage. Password sent to your PM.

Why are you playing with me mate? I was excited to see the post but I do not see any PM from you. You have no idea how hard it's going on with me. Please stop it.