LFC_bitcoin sending PMs to his friends to oppose flag and bribing DT inclusion

[Laudanum]

We've been over this 1000 times before. Just put Cryptohunter on ignore please.

Which one?  I swear they're getting close to the number of accounts anonymint made over the years.  Getting that same manic, obsessive compulsive vibe.  They won't stop until they're banned.  And even then, there's still a chance they won't stop.

Shut up fool.
You're as always meandering way off topic.
See my last post and try to debunk something  there you waste of space.

As per usual the entire DT1 rat crew are unable to refute anything that I say.

Now review the post and debunk it or fuck off you snivelling little twat.

Can you dare to answer even one question every other coward on DT1 refuses to answer?

Do you accept the evidence presented demonstrates lfcbitcoin  is a liar?
Yes or no?

[1714567070]

1714567070

[1714567070]

1714567070

[1714567070]

1714567070

[1714567070]

1714567070

[mindrust]

Yes or no?

Will you fuck off if somebody answers?

[Laudanum]

Yes or no?

Will you fuck off if somebody answers?

No rustymind.

I get horny when you all run away terrified of confirming that which the publically available evidence  reveals loud and clear.

It makes you all look like colluding slimeballs that dare not even say yes or no to me .  It's my viagra.

When I ask for specific evidence to substantiate your claims and  allegations and the deafening silence or diversionary irrelevant excuses are spewed out in desperation. Now ...that is addictive.

Imagine walking into a bar of 30 bad guys,  all bullies and general degenerate thugs. Then single handedly beating them into snivelling  submission until they run away and hide up all crying and busted up.

You leave them and go home get on with your usual things girls , cars, girls, bench pressing 400lbs for 15 reps , living the dream etc.

That bar full of bullies and scum bags is always calling out though. Of course they all need another good thrashing. It is as much for them as it is myself. They like to be dominated.

Now we have that sorted out.

Do you accept that lfcbitcoin lied? Yes or No?

Page 6 if you need to review again. 

[Rizzrack]

Why are you playing with me mate? I was excited to see the post but I do not see any PM from you. You have no idea how hard it's going on with me. Please stop it.

The account BitcoinGirl.Club is currently locked.
So the password would not help you as no one is logging in that account for the moment at least.
Please continue the recovery process through email and if everything checks out you will get the account unlocked.

[hacker1001101001]

What would you call asking bitcoingirl.club to lie about why she is taking her stance?

It is 100% manipulation. I think people with cycles in their avatar are trying to back LFC's action's now.

I just wanted to point something out for everyone throwing around the word "manipulative".

I don't see how you can call that manipulative.

I'd say it's entirely up to you if you let yourself be manipulated from a PM.

Doesn't look good at all.

@Theymos, when Blacklist ?

[Side chain]

Sorry BitcoinGirl.Club for all inconvenience. My goal was not to do any damage. Password sent to your PM.

Why are you playing with me mate? I was excited to see the post but I do not see any PM from you. You have no idea how hard it's going on with me. Please stop it.

I am sorry, please allow PM from newbies in pam_alt_ account. It's sad to see everyone is busy with CH now. All off topic!

For the users who are still trusting LFC_bitcoin:

1. kingcolex (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (248 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. peloso (Trust: +2 / =3 / -3) (171 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. bitserve (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (922 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. TMAN (Trust: +28 / =0 / -1) (1305 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Searing (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (323 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. Timelord2067 (Trust: +8 / =6 / -0) (470 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. jeremypwr (Trust: +18 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (1) 428 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. Swordsoffreedom (Trust: neutral) (74 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. Globb0 (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (867 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. SiNeReiNZzz (Trust: neutral) (55 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. JayJuanGee (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 2029 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. bitebits (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (505 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. owlcatz (Trust: +48 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (20) 364 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. examplens (Trust: +2 / =3 / -0) (244 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. nutildah (Trust: +8 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (11) 2506 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. Joca97 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (7 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. Fakhoury (Trust: +5 / =0 / -2) (23 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. SyGambler (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (665 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. psycodad (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (228 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. bones261 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (823 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. Last of the V8s (Trust: +8 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (0) 3406 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. DeathAngel (Trust: neutral) (301 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. bob123 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 1657 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. eddie13 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (9) 992 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. BitcoinGirl.Club (Trust: +1 / =1 / -5) (730 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. Hhampuz (Trust: +85 / =3 / -0) (2128 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
27. buwaytress (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (861 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
28. Csmiami (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (342 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
29. JollyGood (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (703 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
30. CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (1391 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
31. El duderino_ (Trust: +24 / =1 / -0) (3871 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
32. kenzawak (Trust: +0 / =1 / -13) (841 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
33. Don Pedro Dinero (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (188 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
34. o_e_l_e_o (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (4583 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
35. Kylapoiss (Trust: neutral) (187 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
36. fillippone (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 3762 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
37. DireWolfM14 (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1832 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
38. Harkorede (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (417 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
39. twiki (Trust: neutral) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
40. MisterBitconio (Trust: neutral) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Trusting a shill who has no moral is any good for the community? There are some interesting actions came from him.
"He distrust users who distrust him"
"Miss representation of the PM sent from his pals"
"He never received money from sportsbet"
"He never asked bitcoingril to oppose flag"
"Added then removed then added again a questionable user in the trust list"
"He blindly backs his employer and asks others to do the same"

If I give this guy 0.02 BTC a week which is 0.002 BTC more than his current employer for the next few months or years then slowly he will start backing my action too 
You still think this guy cares about the community? He cares more about his employers. Your trust inclusion is his strength to benefit his employers not the community.

[Hhampuz]

I'm good, thank you though!

[Side chain]

It is fine for jeremypwr, DeathAngel, DireWolfM14 and users who are wearing sportsbet/bitcasino signatures. Eventually all of these users are shilling for the same employer to secure their weekly payments.

[LoyceV]

I'd say it's entirely up to you if you let yourself be manipulated from a PM.

If you let yourself be manipulated by PM on an internet forum, you really have to work on your priorities! Who cares what someone on the internet thinks about you/them/someone?
I'm totally fine with being persuaded with arguments though.

Yes or no?

Will you fuck off if somebody answers?

That's a tricky one, as I have the troll on ignore and don't want to read the context. So I'm taking a guess, but I'm feeling positive today, so I'm going with "yes".
Now please all ignore the troll, he's had his 5 minutes of fame again by creating yet another account.

[JollyGood]

Ever since marlboroza outed this scamming little low-life he has been posting trash in threads to attention seek while avoiding answering accusations about his scam activities.

This pathetic hacker1001101001 should get back to the thread he is running away from and answer the questions about how many accounts heu created to bump ICO threads with propaganda in lieu of payments:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54227233#msg54227233

What would you call asking bitcoingirl.club to lie about why she is taking her stance?

It is 100% manipulation. I think people with cycles in their avatar are trying to back LFC's action's now.

I just wanted to point something out for everyone throwing around the word "manipulative".

I don't see how you can call that manipulative.

I'd say it's entirely up to you if you let yourself be manipulated from a PM.

Doesn't look good at all.

@Theymos, when Blacklist ?

[sirazimuth]

....snipped <same old CH shit>

okay CH, as if it ain't obvious.
I know you need a reply from a legendary to stroke your pathetic ego...here ya go.

[NotATether]

Sorry BitcoinGirl.Club for all inconvenience. My goal was not to do any damage. Password sent to your PM.

Why are you playing with me mate? I was excited to see the post but I do not see any PM from you. You have no idea how hard it's going on with me. Please stop it.

I am sorry, please allow PM from newbies in pam_alt_ account. It's sad to see everyone is busy with CH now. All off topic!

And give them back their email password too to end this whole ordeal.

[PrimeNumber7]

For the users who are still trusting LFC_bitcoin:

...

I have noticed that many, or maybe most people base their trust lists based more on personal interactions than business interactions. This has resulted in the sone of the most ‘trusted’ people not being businessmen. It also gives cover to people to keep others on their trust lists who have questionable ethics.

You are free to highlight those who have LFC on their trust lists, but I think you are wasting your time and won’t achieve anything other than cause stress for yourself. LFC seems to be a nice enough guy and appears to love bitcoin, which I can appreciate. This is true even if I condemn what he did in this case.

I hope everyone will just move on. As in nearly all disputes involving the trust system, no one appears to be willing to even acknowledge those with opposing views could possibly be in the right. 

[suchmoon]

I have noticed that many, or maybe most people base their trust lists based more on personal interactions than business interactions. This has resulted in the sone of the most ‘trusted’ people not being businessmen. It also gives cover to people to keep others on their trust lists who have questionable ethics.

Perhaps many, or maybe most people can read.

List the users who you trust to have good trust ratings and good trust lists, one user per line.

[PrimeNumber7]

I have noticed that many, or maybe most people base their trust lists based more on personal interactions than business interactions. This has resulted in the sone of the most ‘trusted’ people not being businessmen. It also gives cover to people to keep others on their trust lists who have questionable ethics.

Perhaps many, or maybe most people can read.

List the users who you trust to have good trust ratings and good trust lists, one user per line.

I guess the concept of self governance isn’t for everyone, or something you believe in.

[Rikafip]

I have noticed that many, or maybe most people base their trust lists based more on personal interactions than business interactions. This has resulted in the sone of the most ‘trusted’ people not being businessmen. It also gives cover to people to keep others on their trust lists who have questionable ethics.

When I look at this from LoyceV Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system, it seems that trust lists shouldn't be based on business interactions but on whether you trust someone else's judgment.

You should add users who left accurate feedback and have good Trust lists to your Trust list, and you should exclude users who leave inaccurate feedback.
This means your Trust list should be based on how you value the users' judgement on others, and it should not be based on whether or not you Trust those users (with money) or traded with them.

Isn't Trust Feedback more appropriate for business interactions?

[suchmoon]

I guess the concept of self governance isn’t for everyone, or something you believe in.

Non sequitur. "Being businessmen" is a straw man, it's not a criteria for trust lists and it has fuck all to do with "self governance".

Isn't Trust Feedback more appropriate for business interactions?

Yes, but that's not gonna prevent lying sockuppeting weasels from trying to spin it their way.

[Laudanum]

I guess the concept of self governance isn’t for everyone, or something you believe in.

Non sequitur. "Being businessmen" is a straw man, it's not a criteria for trust lists and it has fuck all to do with "self governance".

Isn't Trust Feedback more appropriate for business interactions?

Yes, but that's not gonna prevent lying sockuppeting weasels from trying to spin it their way.

Perhaps it should be criteria for trust lists.

It seems nobody in DT1 will even confirm when asked that which the publically available evidence clearly and undeniable demonstrates.
You're all weasels.

Lfcbitcoin was lying. He did clearly request his pal who has sent money to previously to reject the flag against his sponsors.
Suchmoon says lfc bitcoin misrepresented their messages to such a degree that he removed him from his trust list but didnt tag him.
Then when called to explain suchmoron runs off and usual.

You can't trust anyone on DT1 except a tiny handful perhaps less than 5 people.

This thread is a another gold mine in terms of lies, and even more the collusion and refusal to even admit he lied. Not one will simply answer yes and tell the truth lol.

[JollyGood]

 

I guess there is not much to say that can add to the image below  

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I think people with cycles in their avatar are trying to back LFC's action's now.

Well now that you indirectly brought me into this (and are implying a conspiracy of some sort), I'll have to go back and re-read this entire thread, because honestly at this point I have no idea what exactly happened.  I do remember getting the initial impression that LFC_Bitcoin had engaged in some low-level shenanigans, but sentiment among some of the members posting in this thread seem to indicate that it was worse than that.

Just for the record, I've got a cycle in my avatar but nobody has tried to sway my opinion on this drama in any way.  I ended up tuning it all out until about five minutes ago when I read several of the most recent posts here.  The fact that the "cyclers" happen to be agreeing with one another doesn't surprise me at all.  That's usually been the case on other matters from what I've seen, but I don't think there's anything going on behind the scenes if that's what you think.

I need a TL;DR.  If anyone wants to write an unbiased one that succinctly explains what has transpired with LFC_Bitcoin and the hack and everything else, I would be happy to give merits generously for anything useful until I've been brought up to speed.  This would be a perfect use of the merit system.