LFC_bitcoin sending PMs to his friends to oppose flag and bribing DT inclusion

[suchmoon]

I need a TL;DR.  If anyone wants to write an unbiased one that succinctly explains what has transpired with LFC_Bitcoin and the hack and everything else, I would be happy to give merits generously for anything useful until I've been brought up to speed.  This would be a perfect use of the merit system.

LFC_Bitcoin sent out some PMs to his friends and acquaintances on this forum. At the time he claimed that he asked those users to look at flags raised against Sportsbet.io, and didn't ask to oppose the flags.

The OP hacked BitcoinGirl.Club's account and leaked the PMs in question showing that LFC_Bitcoin asked to oppose the flags. Prior to that a lot of noise was made about whether it's ethical to ask to oppose flags, which I think is bullshit (there ends the "unbiased" part LOL) as anyone can ask anything and can also get told to fuck off, but the whole debacle probably pushed LFC_Bitcoin to make the stupidly false claim that he didn't ask for opposition.

There was a lot of speculation about the hack and whatnot and the usual suspects like the guild members jumping in to stir some extra shit into all this but it's boring and probably of no interest to you.

And please don't send me any merits unless you want to give crypthunter an orgasm.

 

[1714517650]

1714517650

[The Sceptical Chymist]

<snip>

OK, I actually knew most of what you wrote (but thanks for writing it anyway).  I guess I'm confused as to LFC_Bitcoin's relationship is with Sportsbet.io and why he sent those PMs--and I might have simply forgotten.  What was written in OP's post wasn't written very clearly--or I'm brain dead.

One thing I wasn't fully aware of was that LFC_Bitcoin denied asking for opposition to that flag, and whether he actually did  ask for opposition (or just asked people to "look at the flag").  Is that the big controversy?  

Edit:

Yes, that's pretty much the molehill that got a 15-page-long LED floodlight built next to it to make its shadow look like a mountain.

Ah, gotcha.

LFC is being paid by bitcasino, which shares common ownership with sportsbet. The common ownership is not obvious to the casual onlooker.

One thing that SM left out was that, in the PM that LFC sent, he asked bitcoingirl.club to lie, and LFC explicitly said in his PM that him sending a PM looks like shilling for sportsbet.

OK, all of that info is helpful, especially the first part about the relationship between the two casinos. 

I'm going to give the OP another read-through just for shits & giggles.

[suchmoon]

OK, I actually knew most of what you wrote (but thanks for writing it anyway).  I guess I'm confused as to LFC_Bitcoin's relationship is with Sportsbet.io and why he sent those PMs--and I might have simply forgotten.  What was written in OP's post wasn't written very clearly--or I'm brain dead.

He's in their sig campaign (or rather their sister site bitcasino.io) and apparently 100% certain that sportsbet/bitcasino are not scammers.

One thing I wasn't fully aware of was that LFC_Bitcoin denied asking for opposition to that flag, and whether he actually did  ask for opposition (or just asked people to "look at the flag").  Is that the big controversy?  

Yes, that's pretty much the molehill that got a 15-page-long LED floodlight built next to it to make its shadow look like a mountain.

[PrimeNumber7]

<snip>

OK, I actually knew most of what you wrote (but thanks for writing it anyway).  I guess I'm confused as to LFC_Bitcoin's relationship is with Sportsbet.io and why he sent those PMs--and I might have simply forgotten.  What was written in OP's post wasn't written very clearly--or I'm brain dead.

One thing I wasn't fully aware of was that LFC_Bitcoin denied asking for opposition to that flag, and whether he actually did  ask for opposition (or just asked people to "look at the flag").  Is that the big controversy? 

LFC is being paid by bitcasino, which shares common ownership with sportsbet. The common ownership is not obvious to the casual onlooker.

One thing that SM left out was that, in the PM that LFC sent, he asked bitcoingirl.club to lie, and LFC explicitly said in his PM that him sending a PM looks like shilling for sportsbet.

[hacker1001101001]

~snip~

I don't think there is anything behind the scenes, everything is clear. All of the replies I quoted in my previous post were wearing a merits cycling avatar and had baised views about the case, claiming that LFC's action was not manipulative where as it was highly manipulative in the first place in many aspects of the situation. Most importantly it manipulated the flag against sportsbet. There became an unexpected need of unbiased DT1's like Royse777 and efialtis to actually fight or even attract exclusions from other DT powered user's supporting LFC and Sportsbet at specific to bring justice at the table.

I don't know how you see this, but I would never try to fuck with the weaker side of the case, even after all evidences are presented by the victim.

There was a lot of speculation about the hack and whatnot and the usual suspects like the guild members jumping in to stir some extra shit into all this but it's boring and probably of no interest to you.

And please don't send me any merits unless you want to give crypthunter an orgasm.

Bad attempt to fly him back. You should show what PMs you sent to LFC that he got a big backing bump.

[nutildah]

One thing that SM left out was that, in the PM that LFC sent, he asked bitcoingirl.club to lie

No he didn't. If you're referring to the part where he says "just say I asked you to look at the flags & oppose them if you thought necessary," how is that a "lie"? You keep repeating he asked him to lie, but that in itself is a lie.

[suchmoon]

You should show what PMs you sent to LFC that he got a big backing bump.

Ok. I suppose that's Klingon. I translated it to English and back a few times and this is what I got:

God be wi' you, sir.

Sounds about right.

[PrimeNumber7]

One thing that SM left out was that, in the PM that LFC sent, he asked bitcoingirl.club to lie

No he didn't. If you're referring to the part where he says "just say I asked you to look at the flags & oppose them if you thought necessary," how is that a "lie"? You keep repeating he asked him to lie, but that in itself is a lie.

That is a lie because that is not what LFC asked bitcoingirl.club to do. LFC asked her to:
"Bro, could you oppose these false flags these ass hats have done against sportsbet, would help them"

LFC asked her to oppose the flags. Not to look at the evidence, and not to make her own judgment.

[nutildah]

One thing that SM left out was that, in the PM that LFC sent, he asked bitcoingirl.club to lie

No he didn't. If you're referring to the part where he says "just say I asked you to look at the flags & oppose them if you thought necessary," how is that a "lie"? You keep repeating he asked him to lie, but that in itself is a lie.

That is a lie because that is not what LFC asked bitcoingirl.club to do. LFC asked her to:
"Bro, could you oppose these false flags these ass hats have done against sportsbet, would help them"

LFC asked her to oppose the flags. Not to look at the evidence, and not to make her own judgment.

 

You're being overly myopic here. The conversation contained more relevant back and forth after the statement you highlighted. Tell us what your end goal is by continuing to harp on this dead issue.

If anything we should be trying to figure out who side chain is so we can get their main account tagged and removed from whatever sig campaign they are currently in.

[PrimeNumber7]

Tell us what your end goal is

I have no agenda. I only seek the unbiased truth.

If anything we should be trying to figure out who side chain is so we can get their main account tagged and removed from whatever sig campaign they are currently in.

I see no benefit to that. You are also making a number of unproven assumptions, such as that there is a hacker, that the hacker, if he exists is a regular forum user, and that he is in a signature campaign.

If the hacker does exist, my prime suspect would be the person that SB refused to pay out. My second suspect would be anyone else SB has refused to pay out.

It seems like you are more concerned about LFC's shanaggians exposed than the shanaggians themselves.

[hacker1001101001]

You should show what PMs you sent to LFC that he got a big backing bump.

Ok. I suppose that's Klingon. I translated it to English and back a few times and this is what I got:

God be wi' you, sir.

Sounds about right.

I am not suppose to post that backing PM again to prove it. I don't want be labled as promoting unethical hacking by topic twisters like you.

[suchmoon]

You should show what PMs you sent to LFC that he got a big backing bump.

Ok. I suppose that's Klingon. I translated it to English and back a few times and this is what I got:

God be wi' you, sir.

Sounds about right.

I am not suppose to post that backing PM again to prove it. I don't want be labled as promoting unethical hacking by topic twisters like you.

Or you could post in English and not make me guess what you want to say.

Let me untwist this. You hacked my account and you got some PM to prove something but you can't post it because you're so ethical. Is that what you're trying to say?

[JollyGood]

I don't know how you see this, but I would never try to fuck with the weaker side of the case, even after all evidences are presented by the victim.

You really are about as useful as a bull in a China shop.

You complain about this and that but you avoid explaining how may alts you have and how many users colluded in your game of receiving payments for making posts to bump ICO threads.

There was a lot of speculation about the hack and whatnot and the usual suspects like the guild members jumping in to stir some extra shit into all this but it's boring and probably of no interest to you.

And please don't send me any merits unless you want to give crypthunter an orgasm.

Bad attempt to fly him back. You should show what PMs you sent to LFC that he got a big backing bump.

Nobody owes you anything, why should anybody release any PMs to a multi-alt scammer such as you?

[notblox1]

Will LFC_bitcoin sin of sending PM to other members ever be forgiven by trolls and hackers from this forum?  
I guess the answer is no.
I can only suspect that sidechain and hacker with many zeros are connected and maybe the same person.
If not, then they are sure part of same lowlife crew (like Laudanumoron)

[Laudanum]

Will LFC_bitcoin sin of sending PM to other members ever be forgiven by trolls and hackers from this forum?  
I guess the answer is no.
I can only suspect that sidechain and hacker with many zeros are connected and maybe the same person.
If not, then they are sure part of same lowlife crew.

Look at nobollox above. Typical ass licking noob low functioning dreg eager for his poverty grubby paws to get banging out more low functioning spew sponsored by chipmixer.

As if being caught abusing the trust system and lying all out of personal financial interest is simply sending a PM.

Not to mention giving trust includes to people who help reject flags on his sponsors and apparently misrepresenting suchmorons conversation to such a degree even she ~ him.

Nobollox will say anything like most asslickers who want to get in with the dt/chipmixer crew.


Jollygood the independently verifiable scammer enabler and facilitator who turns a blind eye to his pals attempting to repatriate scams on this forum that he has identified previously just because they are DT buddies?

Or how he runs around tagging those wearing sigs for certain sponsors but avoids tagging DT that are managing those projects or advertising them too

These things anyone can research then provides a picture of their clear abuse of the Dt system on my account as some kind of evidence that a bunch of scammer and scammer supporters can abuse the trust system in an attempt to prevent whistle blowing on them.

Lfcbitcoin has been caught out before on PMs admitting he takes orders from scammers because he is scared of them.

Not one person on DT defending LFC has a clean sheet here. What does that tell you.

Only suchmoon has now kind of admitted LFCbitcoin lied the rest of the DT1 colluding scum would not even dare answer yes or no.

The trust system is a protection racket that allows them and their sponsors if they choose to scam with impunity. They will block flags and tag you if you mention something they don't like even if it is independently verifiable as being true.

They then gang up to try and attack the character of the person presenting the truth.
When they can find nothing they will simply make things up for which they have no proof at all.

Nobollox and jollygood who? What are these noob trash accounts? Non achieving broke down bums like the rest of the DT1 sig spamming crew.

Lfcbitcoin or laudas felching clown is a scum bag, all those defending him are likely worse when you start digging.

The usual scumbags here trying to spin it into.....err....just simply sending other members some PMs?

Surely all this is just making a mountain out of a mole hill. lol these pieces of shit have flagged and tagged people for far less.

[JollyGood]

I can only suspect that sidechain and hacker with many zeros are connected and maybe the same person.

hacker1001101001 barely has any functioning brain cells so I would put the theory he and Side chain are the same person aside but they are definitely connected because they follow each other around like a bad smell.

If not, then they are sure part of same lowlife crew (like Laudanumoron)

Thank you for mentioning this, it is a keyword that correctly connects these two.

In the past I have referred to hacker1001101001 (and some other members) as "lowlife" because the word certainly was apt.

[Laudanum]

I can only suspect that sidechain and hacker with many zeros are connected and maybe the same person.

hacker1001101001 barely has any functioning brain cells so I would put the theory he and Side chain are the same person aside but they are definitely connected because they follow each other around like a bad smell.

If not, then they are sure part of same lowlife crew (like Laudanumoron)

Thank you for mentioning this, it is a keyword that correctly connects these two.

In the past I have referred to hacker1001101001 (and some other members) as "lowlife" because the word certainly was apt.

Lol ...thank you nobody noob trash nobollox for saying this keyword.
Haha when you have to start thanking nobody noob trash asslickers for their undeniably stupid and incorrect interpretation of independently verifiable evidence then you just are demonstrating what a desperate bunch of dregs you all are.

Oh wait jollygood is just another nobody noob trash scammer enabler actually.

Get it through your thick skull dip shit this thread is about

Lfcbitcoin undeniably telling lies.
He lied because he knew he should not be requesting people he has previously sent money to protect his own sponsors from a flag
He also was handing out trust includes to who rejected the flag
Several trust system abuses and certainly not how it's intended to be used.
Then grossly misrepresented his discussion with suchmoon

This thread is not about attacking any person that simply presents the truth about LFCbitcoin

Nobollox will slather his slobber on the balls and ass of any DT1 he thinks gets him extra favor.
Rather like you jollygood scammer enabler.

Couple of little noob peasant pissant nobodies with zero achievements and zero skin in the crypto game.

Looks like nobollox is trying to whitewash this along with all the other scumbags that have red tagged and flagged people for way less.
Double standards colluding scum.

These new details need to be added to the dirtyturds thread.

[hacker1001101001]

Attack from LFC_Bitcoin against me for presenting some solid facts about the situation and asking some on point questions, related to the issues.

LFC_Bitcoin   2020-08-25   Reference   ICO bump account, I really do not trust this person. Seems to have an unhealthy obsession with trying to discredit me too

This reaction clearly show's how this DT would react to anyone criticizing him of any wrong doing.

He was even doing the same and scaring away legimate opinions and views from many other users in the Sportsbet accusation thread.

Anybody who responds to this thread who isn’t directly involved in the investigation after my post is at the risk of receiving negative trust

I think he is not mentally stable and should seek doctor's help. I even remember him posting images of mentally disabled children's to make fun. Should be booted off DT asap.

Shit

_{PS: this nice post of mine was deleted by mod so posting it again with an on topic discussion.}

[KaneVWE]

Since the evidence is clearly there of lfcbitcoin lying on page 6 with relation to his abuse of the trust system why is he not blacklisted now?

[JollyGood]

More nonsense from this multi-scamming user who has been exposed in this thread but refuses to post there as he has literally no defence thanks to the efforts by marlboroza: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.0

Attack from LFC_Bitcoin against me for presenting some solid facts about the situation and asking some on point questions, related to the issues.

*TRASH*