🎲BetFury.com|🚀Join BetFury Cryptodrop 🌔 Share $20 MLN in BFG

[lienfaye]

It is really not surprising to see a 40 consecutive losses especially in dice.  Even in slots which often gives small amount just to break the dead spin streak gives 30 plus consecutive dead spin (read streak) when we are spinning for too long.  I always experienced that scenario since I am the kind of slot player that seldom hop to different games and often ends up playing in a single slot game.

In slots having a lot of consecutive losses happens pretty frequently especially on high volatile games. On the in-house games like Dice or limbo or crash it can also happen but more rarely. The longest "bad" streak I saw was about 20-25 consecutive losses (luckily for myself I was not playing Martingale than or otherwise I would have busted my entire bankroll lol).

Not usual but it can happen, 40 red losing streaks are something that you can't imagine happening if you are the one who's playing, those who are using martingale system who hopes that they can recover their losses after winning their next bet would be empty if that long losing streak take place.

Though, if you experienced that long red losing bets for sure the aggressiveness inside you will lead you to lose more than your expected budget.

You're so unlucky if you experienced such and it might discourage you to play that particular game again. Well, I don't stay in games that giving me bad experience, the reason why i'm not a fan of slot. Fortunately on the game where I usually play (live games), I never encounter yet of having consecutive losses (20-40 like others have experienced already). But even so, the ending is still favor in the house as i'm often finishing my gambling time with losses.

[piebeyb]

Not usual but it can happen, 40 red losing streaks are something that you can't imagine happening if you are the one who's playing, those who are using martingale system who hopes that they can recover their losses after winning their next bet would be empty if that long losing streak take place.

That's why the Martingale strategy requires big money when you really face a losing streak of more than 20x, let alone having to lose 40x in a row, that's definitely a big loss and drains all of our money, that's why I never really believe in dice or casino games others are called "Probably Fair", but again it's up to the gamblers how they stop playing before the dealer drains your money.

Never be tempted by big money targets, always enjoy the results you get, you don't need to be big, at least win a little, as long as you are consistent, that's more than enough, even though I can't do that, I think other people might be able to do it, as long as they are consistent with small achievements, that's enough .

[SamReomo]

It is really not surprising to see a 40 consecutive losses especially in dice.  Even in slots which often gives small amount just to break the dead spin streak gives 30 plus consecutive dead spin (read streak) when we are spinning for too long.  I always experienced that scenario since I am the kind of slot player that seldom hop to different games and often ends up playing in a single slot game.

In slots having a lot of consecutive losses happens pretty frequently especially on high volatile games. On the in-house games like Dice or limbo or crash it can also happen but more rarely. The longest "bad" streak I saw was about 20-25 consecutive losses (luckily for myself I was not playing Martingale than or otherwise I would have busted my entire bankroll lol).

Not usual but it can happen, 40 red losing streaks are something that you can't imagine happening if you are the one who's playing, those who are using martingale system who hopes that they can recover their losses after winning their next bet would be empty if that long losing streak take place.

Though, if you experienced that long red losing bets for sure the aggressiveness inside you will lead you to lose more than your expected budget.

I have seen that happening myself with the Crash game, the game crashed more than 20 times in sequel and many players have lost a lot of money during that gameplay. Those games are totally unpredictable and anytime the game could get annoyed for the gamblers when they see it failing in a sequel of 15 times or more. I tried a strategy on that game which was to bet only if I can see 10 times the game crashing as red, and I would start betting at 11th time, but the strategy was a complete failure because in such constant red multipliers a gambler will empty up the wallet if using Martingale strategy, and I mingled up my strategy with the Martingale's strategy.

The Martingale strategy is a total failure and anyone who uses it in such games will empty up his full balance. I think it's not a good way for a gambler to use that strategy on games where failure ratio is unpredicted because a user could empty up the account balance within minutes of gambling. When it comes to Crash game then I recommend everyone to avoid that strategy if they don't want their account to be emptied. Try to avoid it in such games and dice is also among these games so a good gambler would never go with such strategy in online casino games.

[Eternad]

Not usual but it can happen, 40 red losing streaks are something that you can't imagine happening if you are the one who's playing, those who are using martingale system who hopes that they can recover their losses after winning their next bet would be empty if that long losing streak take place.

That's why the Martingale strategy requires big money when you really face a losing streak of more than 20x, let alone having to lose 40x in a row, that's definitely a big loss and drains all of our money, that's why I never really believe in dice or casino games others are called "Probably Fair", but again it's up to the gamblers how they stop playing before the dealer drains your money.

Martingale strategy with big bankroll will make your gambling experience worst if ever you ever a losing streak like that or more because you are increasing your base bet exponentially. Thinking how terribe it can be on Martingale strategy makes my spine tingle. Assuming you invest your life savings on your bankroll just to have a room for long lose streak and then this kind of catastrophe hits you hard that wipe your money without you being notice it.

This is the important thing I learned on playing gambling. Just use bankroll that you can afford to lose since this kind of long lose streak can hit anytime since we are always exposed to risk the longer we play.

[o48o]

Martingale strategy with big bankroll will make your gambling experience worst if ever you ever a losing streak like that or more because you are increasing your base bet exponentially. Thinking how terribe it can be on Martingale strategy makes my spine tingle. Assuming you invest your life savings on your bankroll just to have a room for long lose streak and then this kind of catastrophe hits you hard that wipe your money without you being notice it.

This is the important thing I learned on playing gambling. Just use bankroll that you can afford to lose since this kind of long lose streak can hit anytime since we are always exposed to risk the longer we play.

I once was talking with a guy that i thought was intelligent as he was good in chess. And he was defending the martingale strategy to me and nothing i said made trough him. He was convinced that if you had enough money it would work. I tried to argue that eventually it's likely that there will be a losing strike that wipes your balance, no matter how small your bets are or how much money you had.

And if you had so much money what are you playing with small bets anyway. It would take ages to give him any meaningful wins. Then he started to argue that if he had infinite amount of money it would work.

That made me stop talking. I wasn't going to argue about the absurdity of infinity, but it was very telling to me how far people with gambler's fallacy are willing to go to not face the reality.

[abel1337]

Not usual but it can happen, 40 red losing streaks are something that you can't imagine happening if you are the one who's playing, those who are using martingale system who hopes that they can recover their losses after winning their next bet would be empty if that long losing streak take place.

That's why the Martingale strategy requires big money when you really face a losing streak of more than 20x, let alone having to lose 40x in a row, that's definitely a big loss and drains all of our money, that's why I never really believe in dice or casino games others are called "Probably Fair", but again it's up to the gamblers how they stop playing before the dealer drains your money.

Martingale strategy with big bankroll will make your gambling experience worst if ever you ever a losing streak like that or more because you are increasing your base bet exponentially. Thinking how terribe it can be on Martingale strategy makes my spine tingle. Assuming you invest your life savings on your bankroll just to have a room for long lose streak and then this kind of catastrophe hits you hard that wipe your money without you being notice it.

This is the important thing I learned on playing gambling. Just use bankroll that you can afford to lose since this kind of long lose streak can hit anytime since we are always exposed to risk the longer we play.

That's how casino counter the martingale strategy. Most of the bankroll won't keep up if they experience 20x losing streak. You need to have a ridiculous amount of capital to keep up with a very small base bet if you experience that kind of losing streak. This is why I don't do martingale only strategy on a casino since I've lost so much money just by doing it. It's an effective strategy but the risk of it will certainly drain all your bank rolls. I suggest to just use different strategies when you are doing a gambling session or mix some strategies.

[Beparanf]

That's how casino counter the martingale strategy. Most of the bankroll won't keep up if they experience 20x losing streak. You need to have a ridiculous amount of capital to keep up with a very small base bet if you experience that kind of losing streak. This is why I don't do martingale only strategy on a casino since I've lost so much money just by doing it. It's an effective strategy but the risk of it will certainly drain all your bank rolls. I suggest to just use different strategies when you are doing a gambling session or mix some strategies.

This is the reality. Martingale method is only effective on short term bets since its good for recovery. Player should set a stop loss are loss limit when using this kind of strategy to avoid being rekt in long term. I’m using martingale on blackjack but instead of increasing my bet on single sit, I just add another sit to have 2 hands that equivalent to martingale x2 bet. This way I still increase my bet while having 2 chances at the same time.

Using this strategy on dice is very risky because dice result is pure random and long lose streak can happened anytime if the player is bad luck.

[virasog]

That's how casino counter the martingale strategy. Most of the bankroll won't keep up if they experience 20x losing streak. You need to have a ridiculous amount of capital to keep up with a very small base bet if you experience that kind of losing streak. This is why I don't do martingale only strategy on a casino since I've lost so much money just by doing it. It's an effective strategy but the risk of it will certainly drain all your bank rolls. I suggest to just use different strategies when you are doing a gambling session or mix some strategies.

This is the reality. Martingale method is only effective on short term bets since its good for recovery. Player should set a stop loss are loss limit when using this kind of strategy to avoid being rekt in long term. I’m using martingale on blackjack but instead of increasing my bet on single sit, I just add another sit to have 2 hands that equivalent to martingale x2 bet. This way I still increase my bet while having 2 chances at the same time.

Using this strategy on dice is very risky because dice result is pure random and long lose streak can happened anytime if the player is bad luck.

If anyone wants to use the Martingale strategy, he should make up his mind before the game, that he will quit after how many unsuccessful bets.
People lose a lot in Martingale because they do not set a limit as to when they will stop in case of consecutive losses and thus lose their whole balance portfolio in the gambling site.

Most people use Martingale strategy on dice games and i guess Martingale strategy is best designed to play on dice but only if we play it with proper risk management.

[electronicash]

That's how casino counter the martingale strategy. Most of the bankroll won't keep up if they experience 20x losing streak. You need to have a ridiculous amount of capital to keep up with a very small base bet if you experience that kind of losing streak. This is why I don't do martingale only strategy on a casino since I've lost so much money just by doing it. It's an effective strategy but the risk of it will certainly drain all your bank rolls. I suggest to just use different strategies when you are doing a gambling session or mix some strategies.

This is the reality. Martingale method is only effective on short term bets since its good for recovery. Player should set a stop loss are loss limit when using this kind of strategy to avoid being rekt in long term. I’m using martingale on blackjack but instead of increasing my bet on single sit, I just add another sit to have 2 hands that equivalent to martingale x2 bet. This way I still increase my bet while having 2 chances at the same time.

Using this strategy on dice is very risky because dice result is pure random and long lose streak can happened anytime if the player is bad luck.

If anyone wants to use the Martingale strategy, he should make up his mind before the game, that he will quit after how many unsuccessful bets.
People lose a lot in Martingale because they do not set a limit as to when they will stop in case of consecutive losses and thus lose their whole balance portfolio in the gambling site.

Most people use Martingale strategy on dice games and i guess Martingale strategy is best designed to play on dice but only if we play it with proper risk management.

its hard to stop you when you are hopeful to win back the lose. its the reason why you double down. if you have been using martingale from time to time. you may not be able to remember how many times you fell for it.

its always what happens. the more you lose the more you double down as well until you have nothing left in your account. there could be time when you want to stop because you are wining and that i believe you may have done so. but after a day or two you still come back.

[FanEagle]

Very interesting point you brought up about your BetFury experience. It seems to me that, while a tad inconvenient, the log-outs could be an added layer of security. The age-old saying comes to mind: "Better safe than sorry." You never know who could have a go at your PC while you are away - and if you're anything like me, I'd rather not risk my crypto assets.

However, I  agree with the prior response suggesting to look into your security settings. Most platforms have a setting where you can control your session durations. Also, have you considered a password manager? They can securely store your passwords and log you in automatically when you return. It could be a win-win situation for you - security and convenience all in one.

Finally, it might be worth reaching out to BetFury's customer service. If you're experiencing this, there's a chance others are too. And hey, if it's a bug, they'll appreciate you bringing it to their attention.

When you are trying to use as much security as possible, you should also remember that you shouldn't put too much stress into yourself neither. If adding more and more security makes it even harder for you, then you are doing something a wee bit more excessive then needed. It's better to have a situation where you will handle your part easily and make it harder for others instead.

Like having 2fa is good enough, and if you are logged in then you are logged in but if others want to log in they will need your 2fa. That makes it a bit easier, that way others would have a hard time logging into your account but you would have no issues about it and that should be the case, never make it harder for yourself, make it harder for others.

[babygun]

That's how casino counter the martingale strategy. Most of the bankroll won't keep up if they experience 20x losing streak. You need to have a ridiculous amount of capital to keep up with a very small base bet if you experience that kind of losing streak. This is why I don't do martingale only strategy on a casino since I've lost so much money just by doing it. It's an effective strategy but the risk of it will certainly drain all your bank rolls. I suggest to just use different strategies when you are doing a gambling session or mix some strategies.

This is the reality. Martingale method is only effective on short term bets since its good for recovery. Player should set a stop loss are loss limit when using this kind of strategy to avoid being rekt in long term. I’m using martingale on blackjack but instead of increasing my bet on single sit, I just add another sit to have 2 hands that equivalent to martingale x2 bet. This way I still increase my bet while having 2 chances at the same time.

Using this strategy on dice is very risky because dice result is pure random and long lose streak can happened anytime if the player is bad luck.

There have been many discussions but I don't think Martingale is ever a good strategy. In the past, like so many members I used it a lot and in the beginning it always went well. I kept doing it and offcourse it went wrong 2 times. Sometimes I still want to try it again but most of the times I can stop myself from doing it.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

That's how casino counter the martingale strategy. Most of the bankroll won't keep up if they experience 20x losing streak. You need to have a ridiculous amount of capital to keep up with a very small base bet if you experience that kind of losing streak. This is why I don't do martingale only strategy on a casino since I've lost so much money just by doing it. It's an effective strategy but the risk of it will certainly drain all your bank rolls. I suggest to just use different strategies when you are doing a gambling session or mix some strategies.

This is the reality. Martingale method is only effective on short term bets since its good for recovery. Player should set a stop loss are loss limit when using this kind of strategy to avoid being rekt in long term. I’m using martingale on blackjack but instead of increasing my bet on single sit, I just add another sit to have 2 hands that equivalent to martingale x2 bet. This way I still increase my bet while having 2 chances at the same time.

Using this strategy on dice is very risky because dice result is pure random and long lose streak can happened anytime if the player is bad luck.

There have been many discussions but I don't think Martingale is ever a good strategy. In the past, like so many members I used it a lot and in the beginning it always went well. I kept doing it and offcourse it went wrong 2 times. Sometimes I still want to try it again but most of the times I can stop myself from doing it.

Martingale is good but only is you are lucky, it could help a gambler amass great wealth, but the fact remains that,  it is purely luck based, and one thing with pure luck based  games or strategies is that a gambler will always end up losing every thing in the long run, no matter how much you win..

But then again, martingale in itself is not a strategy used by or made for pleb Players, it can only be enjoyed by high rollers with big bank roll, if you are a pleb gambler like myself, you will end up burning away all your money without knowing what the money was used for.

[dwyane36]

But then again, martingale in itself is not a strategy used by or made for pleb Players, it can only be enjoyed by high rollers with big bank roll, if you are a pleb gambler like myself, you will end up burning away all your money without knowing what the money was used for.

I doubt that high rollers enjoy Martingale using it while gambling. Of course, if a user has a few bitcoins, then using such a strategy as Martingale might allow him to avoid losing the entire deposit due to a long losing streak. However, it also means that every time a user should start gambling with a minimum bet of literally 1 sat because even 25-30 losses in a row will be an unpleasant experience for a high roller.
Can a high roller enjoy gambling with an initial bet of 1 sat? I don't think so.

[babygun]

I doubt that high rollers enjoy Martingale using it while gambling. Of course, if a user has a few bitcoins, then using such a strategy as Martingale might allow him to avoid losing the entire deposit due to a long losing streak. However, it also means that every time a user should start gambling with a minimum bet of literally 1 sat because even 25-30 losses in a row will be an unpleasant experience for a high roller.
Can a high roller enjoy gambling with an initial bet of 1 sat? I don't think so.

If you start with 1 satoshis, you can have some losses but I think the high rollers start at some higher numbers maybe even a few bitcoin in one bet lol.
I think there is still a lot of ignorance about the Martingale strategy; I have a buddy that I went to the casino with recently (in real life) and he kept talking about that with Martingale you couldn't loose and that is not possible to have 20-25 losses in a row.

[delfastTions]

I doubt that high rollers enjoy Martingale using it while gambling. Of course, if a user has a few bitcoins, then using such a strategy as Martingale might allow him to avoid losing the entire deposit due to a long losing streak. However, it also means that every time a user should start gambling with a minimum bet of literally 1 sat because even 25-30 losses in a row will be an unpleasant experience for a high roller.
Can a high roller enjoy gambling with an initial bet of 1 sat? I don't think so.

If you start with 1 satoshis, you can have some losses but I think the high rollers start at some higher numbers maybe even a few bitcoin in one bet lol.
I think there is still a lot of ignorance about the Martingale strategy; I have a buddy that I went to the casino with recently (in real life) and he kept talking about that with Martingale you couldn't loose and that is not possible to have 20-25 losses in a row.

Even theoretically, if we take into account the likelihood of a series of lost bets in a row, as well as winning ones in a row, the Martingale strategy still has a limit on the size of the bet and therefore there can be no guarantee here. 
Moreover, this strategy is so well-known and widespread all over the world and known to all players that its value as some kind of interesting and unique strategy generally tends to zero.  So I think that your friend is simply mistaken in saying that this strategy is so good.   


And ask him a simple question  has he ever won really a lot of money using only the Martingale strategy.  Or at some point you still had to retreat from it, when the amounts become so psychologically significant that common sense prevails over the desire to continue the strategy.

[piebeyb]

Not usual but it can happen, 40 red losing streaks are something that you can't imagine happening if you are the one who's playing, those who are using martingale system who hopes that they can recover their losses after winning their next bet would be empty if that long losing streak take place.

That's why the Martingale strategy requires big money when you really face a losing streak of more than 20x, let alone having to lose 40x in a row, that's definitely a big loss and drains all of our money, that's why I never really believe in dice or casino games others are called "Probably Fair", but again it's up to the gamblers how they stop playing before the dealer drains your money.

Martingale strategy with big bankroll will make your gambling experience worst if ever you ever a losing streak like that or more because you are increasing your base bet exponentially. Thinking how terribe it can be on Martingale strategy makes my spine tingle. Assuming you invest your life savings on your bankroll just to have a room for long lose streak and then this kind of catastrophe hits you hard that wipe your money without you being notice it.

This is the important thing I learned on playing gambling. Just use bankroll that you can afford to lose since this kind of long lose streak can hit anytime since we are always exposed to risk the longer we play.

That's why losing will be a very bitter gambling experience for me, when the bookie spends my money with consecutive losses because using this mangrtingale strategy, they will give you consecutive defeats without mercy draining them without leaving money. It's frustrating and even makes you pause to regret it. but don't worry I won't repeat that mistake again.

I have to realize that the defeats I experienced at gambling made me think even more wisely that every time I play gambling I must consciously be prepared to lose with the money I have, that's why I don't think that I prioritize winning at gambling now, adjusting my budget every weekend and gambling. always gamble to fill my free time when i bet sports betting watching football events while playing casino games.

[dwyane36]

If you start with 1 satoshis, you can have some losses but I think the high rollers start at some higher numbers maybe even a few bitcoin in one bet lol.
I think there is still a lot of ignorance about the Martingale strategy; I have a buddy that I went to the casino with recently (in real life) and he kept talking about that with Martingale you couldn't loose and that is not possible to have 20-25 losses in a row.

I just noticed now that the maximum bet on Betfury is significantly limited. So, high rollers can not use one or more BTC per bet as the maximum size of the bet for regular users can't be more than 0.154 BTC, and for VIP users can't be more than 0.462 BTC. This means that if a regular user uses the martingale strategy, he will have the guaranteed loss after 23 losses in a row starting from the minimum bet of 1 sat, while a VIP user will have the guaranteed loss after 25 losses in a row.

[FatFork]

If you start with 1 satoshis, you can have some losses but I think the high rollers start at some higher numbers maybe even a few bitcoin in one bet lol.
I think there is still a lot of ignorance about the Martingale strategy; I have a buddy that I went to the casino with recently (in real life) and he kept talking about that with Martingale you couldn't loose and that is not possible to have 20-25 losses in a row.

I just noticed now that the maximum bet on Betfury is significantly limited. So, high rollers can not use one or more BTC per bet as the maximum size of the bet for regular users can't be more than 0.154 BTC, and for VIP users can't be more than 0.462 BTC. This means that if a regular user uses the martingale strategy, he will have the guaranteed loss after 23 losses in a row starting from the minimum bet of 1 sat, while a VIP user will have the guaranteed loss after 25 losses in a row.

And that's exactly why the martingale strategy is bound to fail in the long run. 23 consecutive losses in a row at a 2x multiplier is not at all impossible or even that rare. The longer you play, the higher the chances of encountering a losing streak that can devastate your bankroll.

[Taskford]

If you start with 1 satoshis, you can have some losses but I think the high rollers start at some higher numbers maybe even a few bitcoin in one bet lol.
I think there is still a lot of ignorance about the Martingale strategy; I have a buddy that I went to the casino with recently (in real life) and he kept talking about that with Martingale you couldn't loose and that is not possible to have 20-25 losses in a row.

I just noticed now that the maximum bet on Betfury is significantly limited. So, high rollers can not use one or more BTC per bet as the maximum size of the bet for regular users can't be more than 0.154 BTC, and for VIP users can't be more than 0.462 BTC. This means that if a regular user uses the martingale strategy, he will have the guaranteed loss after 23 losses in a row starting from the minimum bet of 1 sat, while a VIP user will have the guaranteed loss after 25 losses in a row.

And that's exactly why the martingale strategy is bound to fail in the long run. 23 consecutive losses in a row at a 2x multiplier is not at all impossible or even that rare. The longer you play, the higher the chances of encountering a losing streak that can devastate your bankroll.

That's crazy lose and I doubt martingale will work that way since provably those who do martingale strategy will go crazy when encountering that heavy losing streak. This is also one of the reason why we shouldn't rely on martingale since this is not gonna work and might good only to use when you want to have fun playing. But for profitability it will never guarantee us anything in return.

[Slow death]

If you start with 1 satoshis, you can have some losses but I think the high rollers start at some higher numbers maybe even a few bitcoin in one bet lol.
I think there is still a lot of ignorance about the Martingale strategy; I have a buddy that I went to the casino with recently (in real life) and he kept talking about that with Martingale you couldn't loose and that is not possible to have 20-25 losses in a row.

I just noticed now that the maximum bet on Betfury is significantly limited. So, high rollers can not use one or more BTC per bet as the maximum size of the bet for regular users can't be more than 0.154 BTC, and for VIP users can't be more than 0.462 BTC. This means that if a regular user uses the martingale strategy, he will have the guaranteed loss after 23 losses in a row starting from the minimum bet of 1 sat, while a VIP user will have the guaranteed loss after 25 losses in a row.

And that's exactly why the martingale strategy is bound to fail in the long run. 23 consecutive losses in a row at a 2x multiplier is not at all impossible or even that rare. The longer you play, the higher the chances of encountering a losing streak that can devastate your bankroll.

That's crazy lose and I doubt martingale will work that way since provably those who do martingale strategy will go crazy when encountering that heavy losing streak. This is also one of the reason why we shouldn't rely on martingale since this is not gonna work and might good only to use when you want to have fun playing. But for profitability it will never guarantee us anything in return.

I still can't understand why people still use this martigale strategy, I stopped using it when I lost everything I collected for months in the faucets, until today I remember. I spent months collecting satoshis and doge coin which I then converted to bitcoin and watched videos on youtube about ways to increase my satoshis until I saw channels talking about playing on a certain site that is not worth mentioning here, and in the strategy they they talked about martigale, so I went to play and lost everything

at that time I had no idea that the guys on youtube weren't giving that advice because they had tested that strategy, they were giving that tip because it was something that would attract people's attention and with that they made money with views, that was a good way It's hard that I learned that on the internet you have to be very careful with the advice that other people say, the best thing is that the person always does tests alone, put little money and test, create your own strategy and not depend on other people