Is it the event where a streamer sets the standard? The multiplier? A crazy win by a streamer to achieve that 592x. Crazy. You should do a crazy bankroll type of thing and make sure you bet a minimum amount so you have the maximum tries to reach that multiplier. I haven't reached that high yet. 

Yes, it is. Last week, their streamer Serena hit that 592x multiplier on Le King slot, and this became the standard for this week's challenge. Actually, some whales eventually chase these multipliers. As you can see, Someone named Donavito has already hit a massive 6830x on this slot already, and he is holding the first position. Now, someone has to hit at least 1463x if they want to win the 3rd prize, which is only $200. I don't think it is worth chasing if you do not want to gamble for fun only.


Just checked after seeing your comment. The new UI looks more modern and goes with the current casino standard. I can see the Live win section now, which I think they added in the last update. Or am I wrong?

Yeah, but for the current contest, it seems like 592x or even a 1000x is not enough to win the 3rd prize. The leaderboard shows that the current 3rd position is holding a massive 1462x multiplier. If someone wants to take the 3rd place, they will have to hit a 1463x+ multiplier. If that were a 100x or a 200x, I would have said that people should try to hit that. But we are talking about nearly 1500x multiplier, which is kinda rare.

We usually see multiplier contests in this forum, and these are exclusive on the BitcoinTalk forum only. Usually the forum members compete with each other. But when it comes to the global slot multiplier contest, hundreds of unknown whales can hit massive multipliers. I won't suggest people chasing these multipliers.

Just checked your case and it does seem like Chips screwed you out of your money using their TOS as a shield since it seemed like you were value betting. They should have paid you your winnings and limited your account instead.

I advise you to move on asap since you won't be getting your winnings, but you at least got back your deposit. Looks like I'll be avoiding this site for sportsbetting going forward.

You posted a reasonable way of thinking and your approach is safe. I really don't think betting on a same match at different gambling sites that use a same sportsbook provider is a careful bet approach. I don't accuse anyone but if it is not for arbitraging bet intention, a gambler does not need to bet on two or more different sites on a same match, with different odds, while a sportsbook provider is only one.

If a sportsbook provider does not have effective tool for arbitraging bet detection, your bet activities can be not noticed but otherwise, your accounts will possibly red flagged and have big problems.