Joe Biden is President of the United States of America

[Sayeds56]

May I interject something, anti-vax believes that the virus is not real in the first place, that's why they see the vaccine as poison or whatever.
...

You would do better analysis if you didn't fall into the trap of letting a third party tell you what a 2nd party thinks.

That would rule out pretty much anything based on research, most books, articles etc.

There are plenty of errors in a lot of research, books, articles, etc.  Some of it prima-facie as is the case here, and leading to a bunch of assertions built on top of an obviously incorrect assumption.  Ergo, a waste of the author's time and everyone elses'.

In India right now, people are dying on the streets because their government wasn't able to get a vaccine program rolled out on the national level. We know what covid looks like when it's out of control and no vaccine, in fact, every first world country has documented the consequences very well. If the research is wrong, so be it. Something has to be killing all these people. What else would it be?

With all my sympathies with the  people of India who are passing through very difficult time of Indian history,  I would dare to comment that India is too big to be ruled by an illiterate person like Modi. His priority was not to vaccinate the people but go for provincial elections and hold huge rallies. During Rallies in India means inviting covid-19 to spread all over because it is very  difficult to implement social distancing and force everybody to wear Masks. The priority of BJP government is not to kill poverty and improve quality of life but to divide society in multiple segments on the basis of religion and cast and win the elections.

[1714703867]

1714703867

[1714703867]

1714703867

[1714703867]

1714703867

[1714703867]

1714703867

[1714703867]

1714703867

[BADecker]

The vaccines kill, and the deaths are being hidden.

[Sayeds56]

The vaccines kill, and the deaths are being hidden.

I think vaccination on Mass scale is the only way to fight covid-19 beside Social distancing and using Masks though vaccine is not Life Insurance. The issue is availability of vaccine is not  for every citizen in many countries in particular third world countries. NOBODY IS SAFE IF EVERYBODY IS NOT SAFE. Let's work together to vaccinate everybody worldwide.

[Tash]

The vaccines kill, and the deaths are being hidden.

I think vaccination on Mass scale is the only way to fight covid-19 beside Social distancing and using Masks though vaccine is not Life Insurance. The issue is availability of vaccine is not  for every citizen in many countries in particular third world countries. NOBODY IS SAFE IF EVERYBODY IS NOT SAFE. Let's work together to vaccinate everybody worldwide.

You where doing fine...... then you started thinking.
.

[Natsuu]

May I interject something, anti-vax believes that the virus is not real in the first place, that's why they see the vaccine as poison or whatever.
...

You would do better analysis if you didn't fall into the trap of letting a third party tell you what a 2nd party thinks.

That would rule out pretty much anything based on research, most books, articles etc.

There are plenty of errors in a lot of research, books, articles, etc.  Some of it prima-facie as is the case here, and leading to a bunch of assertions built on top of an obviously incorrect assumption.  Ergo, a waste of the author's time and everyone elses'.

Researches are studies made by the authors assumptions and interpretation based on evidences and data he collected.

This researches are compiled and being set free in public for public used, but this is not enough.

For this to be a valid research articles, other researchers must have a similar interpretations from their own evidence and data, that will strengthen the validity of the previous research.

Therefore, if you, and audience of a research who reads it and decides to disapprove based on your own opinion.

Publish it, and see if others will approve, cause they have published their own, and many researchers agrees and strengthen their stands.

So your opinion about them being "INCORRECT ASSUMPTION" do not have a weight.

[tvbcof]

I think vaccination on Mass scale is the only way to fight covid-19 beside Social distancing and using Masks though vaccine is not Life Insurance. The issue is availability of vaccine is not  for every citizen in many countries in particular third world countries. NOBODY IS SAFE IF EVERYBODY IS NOT SAFE. Let's work together to vaccinate everybody worldwide.

BRAWDO: IT'S GOT WHAT PLANTS CRAVE!

I've said it before and I'll say it again, I could have such fun with you tools if I were an evil motherfucker and had gone into 'public relations'...though I would probably have to change my name to Goldsteinowitz or some such to enjoy the benefits of nepotism and/or get work with the U.S. govt.

[Mauser]

I think Mr. Joe Biden is a famous politician. He has the quality of a leader. The world economy will flourish for many years to come under his management. I hope Mr. Joe Biden will help orphans around the world.

Now that's the spirit!!!!

It's been almost 6 months since Biden moved into the white house and so far he seems to be doing a decent job. I didn't hear of any scandal yet and if he keeps going like that he should be fine. If he doesn't change his mind and will start doing some strange policies everything should be okay. Who knows if he will run for office again in 4 years, maybe he will also step down and make room for the first female president.

[Hispo]

I have read around some places on the internet that Mr.Biden's policy on keeping inmigrants in un-suitable conditions are not much different from Trump's.

Could someone from the States give me some explanation / opinion?

[Natsuu]

I have read around some places on the internet that Mr.Biden's policy on keeping inmigrants in un-suitable conditions are not much different from Trump's.

Could someone from the States give me some explanation / opinion?

The "around some places on the internet" smells sketchy enough for you to even have the sense of belief in that statement. But curiosity kill so who knows lol. Though, people living in the state will have the same opinion as people from other places as what you have said "KEEPING IMMIGRANTS" therefore they were somehow hidden from plain sight away from public, or what they say.

[Hispo]

I have read around some places on the internet that Mr.Biden's policy on keeping inmigrants in un-suitable conditions are not much different from Trump's.

Could someone from the States give me some explanation / opinion?

The "around some places on the internet" smells sketchy enough for you to even have the sense of belief in that statement. But curiosity kill so who knows lol. Though, people living in the state will have the same opinion as people from other places as what you have said "KEEPING IMMIGRANTS" therefore they were somehow hidden from plain sight away from public, or what they say.

Perhaps i did not choose my words correctly, since english is not my first language.
I ask this because I have seen a couple of videos on youtube about a politician who went into a facility at the USD-Mexico border and started recording. I think it was Ted Cruz.

[TwitchySeal]

The Jan 6 riot at the Capital posed no threat to anyone. The Capital is normally open to the public, but it has been closed. If the Capital had been open, the rioters would have entered via the normal channels and made their voices be heard. Instead, two or three people breached the entrance into the Capital, and the rest of those who entered the capital were waived in by the police. There was a relatively minimal amount of damage done, and the majority of those in the capital were showing disrespect for those in power by doing things like sitting at Pelosi's desk or standing at the podium.

I'm going to assume they you've just been fooled by someone else into thinking that's what happened and you aren't intentionally spreading lies about the Jan 6 attack.

The Jan 6 riot at the Capital posed no threat to anyone.

The capital riot posed an immediate threat to hundreds of police officers, members of congress, journalists, etc.

There were more police injured that day in DC than any other day since 9/11.  Some lost fingers, there were concussions, one cop was dragged down the steps of the capital and beaten.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/11/us/politics/capitol-riot-police-officer-injuries.html

The Capital is normally open to the public, but it has been closed. If the Capital had been open, the rioters would have entered via the normal channels and made their voices be heard.

And then would they have broken into private offices of congress members?  What about when they entered the building but weren't allowed into the chamber?  What would've happened if the they were allowed into the gallery but then asked to leave for being too loud?

Instead, two or three people breached the entrance into the Capital, and the rest of those who entered the capital were waived in by the police.

This one is my favorite lie.  2 or 3 people lol.  Which are the 2 or 3 you're talking about:






I encourage you to do your own research before posting about the Jan 6 attack.  There's tons of information and footage out there showing exactly what happened. Also, stop getting information from whoever told you that 2 or 3 people breached the entrance and the rest were waved in.  

[BADecker]

^^^ And it is so a shame that so many people are blaming good Republicans, when the infiltration was lead by Dem riot infiltrators... simply to discredit Republicans.

[TwitchySeal]

^^^ And it is so a shame that so many people are blaming good Republicans, when the infiltration was lead by Dem riot infiltrators... simply to discredit Republicans.

Primenumber7s alternate reality is even further from the truth than yours.  That's saying something.

[PrimeNumber7]

.


The Jan 6 riot at the Capital posed no threat to anyone.

The capital riot posed an immediate threat to hundreds of police officers, members of congress, journalists, etc.

There were more police injured that day in DC than any other day since 9/11.  Some lost fingers, there were concussions, one cop was dragged down the steps of the capital and beaten.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/11/us/politics/capitol-riot-police-officer-injuries.html

There were over 2,000 police officers injured during the BLM terrorist attacks over the summer. Also the number of officers injured on Jan 6 included injuries such as minor bruises that are not serious.

The Capital is normally open to the public, but it has been closed. If the Capital had been open, the rioters would have entered via the normal channels and made their voices be heard.

And then would they have broken into private offices of congress members?  What about when they entered the building but weren't allowed into the chamber?  What would've happened if the they were allowed into the gallery but then asked to leave for being too loud?

The “private” offices of congress are actually open to the public. You quite literally need to open the door. There is a sign in book outside the door, but actually signing the book is not enforced.  

Instead, two or three people breached the entrance into the Capital, and the rest of those who entered the capital were waived in by the police.

This one is my favorite lie.  2 or 3 people lol.  Which are the 2 or 3 you're talking about:

That image is of well outside the capital. A small number of people breached the capital building (not the outside parameter) and the rest were waived in by capital police.

If the capital was open, it basically would have been like the Kavanaugh hearings, except the protesters would be protesting something legitimate.

[tvbcof]

The Jan 6 riot at the Capital posed no threat to anyone.  ...

I'm going to assume they you've just been fooled by someone else into thinking that's what happened and you aren't intentionally spreading lies about the Jan 6 attack.
...

Wow.  It's hard to believe that you guys are going to try to make this clown-show your new holohoax given that it was so obviously fake and gay...and brought to us by the same people more or less.  But hey, knock yourself out.

I suppose that it will become illegal to question the narrative under penalty of 'cancellation' even as it bloats and mutates.  Likely also there will be remembrance days and 'Capital Survivors' and kids will be force marched though to learn about the great evil as part of their childhood indoctrination and programming.

[Natsuu]

.


The Jan 6 riot at the Capital posed no threat to anyone.

The capital riot posed an immediate threat to hundreds of police officers, members of congress, journalists, etc.

There were more police injured that day in DC than any other day since 9/11.  Some lost fingers, there were concussions, one cop was dragged down the steps of the capital and beaten.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/11/us/politics/capitol-riot-police-officer-injuries.html

There were over 2,000 police officers injured during the BLM terrorist attacks over the summer. Also the number of officers injured on Jan 6 included injuries such as minor bruises that are not serious.

And then what?, there are still injuries and his stand remains, so you don't actually have a rebut, instead you just add some other incident aside from the one which are talking about.


Your logic dictates like this: Fast food chains are open to the public, so guards cannot enforce rules about it, even if thousands of people tried to enter, NOT TO EAT, but to stand there and play mobile games.


The image states that there is a parameter and there is a "line" where rallyist are not allowed to enter, but what did they do?, see the image

Hearings are always planned with time and date, While rallies are normally done in public streets or highways, and normally has "PERMITS" that allows them to do so

[BADecker]

We're finding out more and more how useless the Presidency is. Biden is proving it to us.


Glock wins (and Biden loses) in major liability suit

God didn’t deliver for President Joe Biden, who recently begged “the Lord” to help him erase the congressionally approved immunity that gun-makers have from lawsuits.

(Article by Paul Bedard republished from WashingtonExaminer.com)

In a little-noticed decision with a major impact on the firearms industry, a federal judge in Arizona has ruled in favor of pistol manufacturer Glock and dismissed a suit brought by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence on behalf of a man who was accidentally shot and paralyzed.

U.S. District Court Judge Susan Brnovich upheld liability immunity granted in the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act passed in 2005 to block gun-makers from a potential wave of industry-killing lawsuits.

Brnovich, nominated by former President Donald Trump and the wife of Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, dismissed multiple claims in the suit that the act’s protections were illegal, writing, “The statute is constitutional.”

While she made her decision in mid-March, it is just now winning attention as Biden and top congressional Democrats begin a campaign to impose new gun control restrictions and end liability immunity for gun-makers.

“The dismissal of this case is welcome news and demonstrates the importance of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act,” said Mark Oliva, the spokesman for the industry trade group National Shooting Sports Foundation.

“These attempts to hold manufacturers responsible for the criminal and negligent misuse of firearms are misguided and are attempts at legislation through litigation. The PLCAA law was passed with a bipartisan majority in both chambers of Congress to keep activists from attempting to bankrupt firearm manufacturers by tying them up in court with unfounded claims. This demonstrates why protecting this legislation against attacks by President Biden and gun control factions in Congress is critical,” he added.

Last month, Biden falsely claimed that the firearms industry is “the only industry in America” that can’t be sued, and he called for divine intervention to end that.

During a Rose Garden event, he said, “This is the only outfit that is exempt from being sued. If I get one thing on my list, (if) the Lord came down and said, ‘Joe, you get one of these,’ give me that one.” He added, “Because I tell you what, there would be a come-to-the-Lord moment these folks would have, real quickly.”

The suit was filed against Glock, an Austrian gun-maker, on behalf of Carlos Travieso Jr., who was in a car with others returning from a church retreat in 2018. Another teenager found the 9 mm pistol in the car and apparently thought it was safe because the magazine holding the bullets was missing. However, there was a bullet in the chamber, and when she pulled the trigger, it hit Travieso, paralyzing him.

The suit charged that Glock, the No. 1 firearms manufacturer in U.S. sales, did not have adequate safety features on the gun warning that a live round was in the chamber. The pistol does have a chamber indicator, but the suit said the gun was defective because it did not include other warnings or safeties.

Glock said it was covered by the immunity act because the shooting was a criminal act.

...

[TwitchySeal]

Instead, two or three people breached the entrance into the Capital, and the rest of those who entered the capital were waived in by the police.

This one is my favorite lie.  2 or 3 people lol.  Which are the 2 or 3 you're talking about:

That image is of well outside the capital. A small number of people breached the capital building (not the outside parameter) and the rest were waived in by capital police.

If the capital was open, it basically would have been like the Kavanaugh hearings, except the protesters would be protesting something legitimate.

The police eventually stood down after fighting for literally hours.  There's tons of footage of all the violence that happened, but it seems someone tricked you by showing you only clips of the police standing down and none of what happened leading up to it.  I'm surprised you fell for it.   Sort of.

Here's a minute by minute break down of what happened between the the Trump rally, the law makers and the mob, all pieced together with footage - a lot of it from the actual Trump supporters.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/01/12/us/capitol-mob-timeline.html

Try forgetting about the politics and just educate yourself on what actually happened.  The version you keep repeating is just not reality.

[BADecker]

^^^ Most of them were rioters Soros sent in from the few places in the US where major riots just Soros-happened to happen... supported, of course, by the Dem leaders.

[TwitchySeal]

^^^ Most of them were rioters Soros sent in from the few places in the US where major riots just Soros-happened to happen... supported, of course, by the Dem leaders.

Still less crazy than "only 2 or 3 people breached the Capital, the lest were invited in by police"