POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana

[bamb]

In terms of pricing and the potential for value appreciation,  I will pick polygon.  Polygon price is in accumulating phase,  and I believe polygon might break when it is least expected.  Solana gave had a good run and people are beginning to feel it's over value,  Solana however have an amazing platform!

[Kezacky]

Pollygon and Solana are currently competing against each other to demonstrate their presence in the crypto market, and several other blockchains such as Fanthom and Harmony. back to the main topic, I would personally recommend both. matic and solana worthy of investment in the future. During the current bear market, there are a lot of surprises coming to new projects on the Solana and Matic blockchain. which allows you to get a good return on investment.

[ene1980]

I prefer matic polygon , because the Matic blockchain is also listed on Opensea, which makes it have a high volume of visitors and a better market has a solid future for those who trust it

If you are fan of the NFT market then all the projects that are using ETH network will be using Polygon to overcome the high transaction fees, when it comes to usability i think Polygon is serving the purpose when users are struggling with high transaction fees in the ETH network.  When it comes to token valuation Solana has a much higher valuation and i am yet to invest in Solana but i am holding Matic to make NFT transactions.

[pjwaffle]

POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana

No Doubt， Both are smart contract platforms that support several  DeFi and NFT protocols.


Polygon had  a well-developed NFT ecosystem with many tools, marketplaces and other products being built on it.

It has more than 150 NFT Dapps and marketplaces like OpenSea already built and working on it.


But Solana is undoubtedly a worthy contender.BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC


lots of the NFT/ game project on Solana ecosystem.

Such as ：$Aurory ，Burnt Fiance ， Solanians

Plus ：  new  NFT marketplace -SolPixel Powered by Solana


what is your options or opinions?

You should choose MATIC and SOLANA if it were me I would choose these 2 coins for long-term investment, it is considered to grow quite high in the future and you will be able to fix the errors of these 2 networks in a few months, that is The reason the price will continue to increase in the near future is because I have been following and learning a lot of analysis from this coin and it is highly appreciated by many famous analysts. I have used up all my savings to keep and keep these 2 coins as I believe these are the two coins that will see the best growth in the coming years.

[BlackRexuz]

I'm more interested in Matic polygons than Solana. because it has a more developed community, then I will definitely prefer to invest in MATIC, because I believe if MATIC can give me more profits than Solana in the future. do not take this as financial advice and do your own analysis.

[otundebis]

Polygon naturally flows into ethereum platform. If you have worked on ethereum platform,  you don't need to repeat your work if you are going to launch on polygon platforms!  The EVM compatibility just  make your work easy.  Solana however require new language,  new structures and totally different protocol! I prefer polygon to Solana for my work!

[Devifajarina]

POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana

No Doubt， Both are smart contract platforms that support several  DeFi and NFT protocols.


Polygon had  a well-developed NFT ecosystem with many tools, marketplaces and other products being built on it.

It has more than 150 NFT Dapps and marketplaces like OpenSea already built and working on it.


But Solana is undoubtedly a worthy contender.BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC


lots of the NFT/ game project on Solana ecosystem.

Such as ：$Aurory ，Burnt Fiance ， Solanians

Plus ：  new  NFT marketplace -SolPixel Powered by Solana


what is your options or opinions?

There are no similarities that can compare Solana with Bitcoin, the two are very clear the difference, both the selling price and the buying price, let alone talking about people's interest in Solana and bitcoin, it is certain that people prefer bitcoin to make investments that have a clear big impact on crypto, even the level of stability of these two coins tends to be more secure than bitcoin compared to solana, even if it is considered a competition, then bitcoin is more superior than solana.

[bishopcrypto]

I think Matic has the slight edge in that it has a more burgeoning community which drives more adoption

Matic also has OpenSea which is not only a legacy project and largest NFT market, it's a major on-ramp for noobs.

[elisabetheva]

Polygon naturally flows into ethereum platform. If you have worked on ethereum platform,  you don't need to repeat your work if you are going to launch on polygon platforms!  The EVM compatibility just  make your work easy.  Solana however require new language,  new structures and totally different protocol! I prefer polygon to Solana for my work!

indeed because both are new platforms, it is clear to prove whether which one is better cannot be done quickly and needs to be analyzed in real time in the future. you are right that polygons are identical to the ethereum platform and it is clear that its development guarantees that, but because the cost of ethereum gas is still high, there will be problems of its own at a certain time.

more merchants signed up to SOL for DeFi and NFT projects, a very consistent increase in the number of active traders. even some oracle networks like Switchboard are bringing feeds to Solana, obviously greatly underpinning Solana's popularity, which has the effect of making it mainstream and increasing demand across exchanges.

but everything will be visible for a while and can't see for now. so both have their own advantages and who is more ready to compete, because the competition is not only on the platform of the two of them alone because there are other platforms that are also very good.

[PeerSend]

Both are interesting techwise.

I lean more towards Solana, as it has much better PR, community, and major players backing.

[Joshapat]

I've tried both and for transaction fees I think Polygon is 50% cheaper than Solana, this is what makes many devs currently switch projects to Polygon because I believe Polygon is a coin that will be a tough competitor to BSC.

[Wildwest]

Both coins can indeed be relied on because they have their own advantages, but polygon coins are easier for us to use because there are many platforms that adopt polygon so that for the development of both coins are superior to polygon, and I have tried to use the solana network but the arrangement is very complicated so we are a little difficult in using the network, but for polygon networks we can connect with metamask and how to use it is very easy so I prefer polygon network.

[Pamadar]

I've tried both and for transaction fees I think Polygon is 50% cheaper than Solana, this is what makes many devs currently switch projects to Polygon because I believe Polygon is a coin that will be a tough competitor to BSC.

Developers always look for good alternatives when creating project, Matic provides cheaper fees but do have a good quality of services.

Though that's an advantage, I also agree that both are good for investors, definitely depending on how you project your goals between these two good and quality assets.

More on your own interpretations and how well you see the future for both coins, you have to decide according to your proper understanding.

[Sweetbtc]

Solona Usecase and partnerships are much  higher than Matics at this time. Specially in Nfts Solona beat all other contracts even Etherium.
Matic fee is very low and many Gaming projects are entering in Matic and this is positive signs for Matics. I believe that in near future Matics and Solona both will beat Etherium and Bsc.

[lixer]

Solona Usecase and partnerships are much  higher than Matics at this time. Specially in Nfts Solona beat all other contracts even Etherium.
Matic fee is very low and many Gaming projects are entering in Matic and this is positive signs for Matics. I believe that in near future Matics and Solona both will beat Etherium and Bsc.

Solana team is doing some better from other projects because they are feeling in near future we will have some good hype in NFT games and NFT related stuff, so they are doing partnerships and better features in this way even Matic is also having some good at gaming industry and too many new gamer projects joining them just because of very low cost, but this is good for community and devs as now they have some good choices for their projects with very good features and fees is also very affordable as sometime back we were living with just alone Ethereum.

Currently, Ethereum team is also doing some better if they solve fees issue then surely this competition could be much better, and we will have some more interesting features and developments in these platforms for crypto community.

[Devifajarina]

Both are interesting techwise.

I lean more towards Solana, as it has much better PR, community, and major players backing.

For me, both have different portions, but in its development, matic has an easier and cheaper transaction rate, while Solana has a large ecosystem and is fully supported by the community, both in my opinion are good and can be used according to the needs of the community for both, this is that encourage people to choose one of the two, this bias cannot be interpreted on a small scale.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Solona Usecase and partnerships are much  higher than Matics at this time. Specially in Nfts Solona beat all other contracts even Etherium.
Matic fee is very low and many Gaming projects are entering in Matic and this is positive signs for Matics. I believe that in near future Matics and Solona both will beat Etherium and Bsc.

Solana team is doing some better from other projects because they are feeling in near future we will have some good hype in NFT games and NFT related stuff, so they are doing partnerships and better features in this way even Matic is also having some good at gaming industry and too many new gamer projects joining them just because of very low cost, but this is good for community and devs as now they have some good choices for their projects with very good features and fees is also very affordable as sometime back we were living with just alone Ethereum.

Currently, Ethereum team is also doing some better if they solve fees issue then surely this competition could be much better, and we will have some more interesting features and developments in these platforms for crypto community.

Corresponding to his statement, today I was seeing a very interesting project that is of NFT origin running through Polygon, and the truth was in the pre-sale stage of a Metaverse, the truth is that the project has a lot of future, I think now everything is It will go through the metaverses and through the NFTs, and in the sale through the Polygon network for those who entered it was a success, it lasted 30 minutes and things went well, what I do not like about these networks is that there is always a bridge that When you make the change, it takes away some of the fee, and it is not necessary, if there is a network that has already had many beta tests, at least the fee should not be charged, it is a way to be able to compete with networks such as BSC and obviously ETH, but in itself, everything was very fast and safe, the truth is the experience with Polygon ..

[Anonymous100]

~

Between Polygon and Solana, I'm more interested in Solana. Because the Solana system was built from the ground up. Not on a mainnet system. Maybe Polygon is almost the same as Binance Smart Chain, we can still use the same wallet just need to change the mainnet system.
But if you say Bitcoin competitor, I think this is the dream of people who don't sleep. Bitcoin does not provide smart contract services, and the capabilities of the Bitcoin blockchain system have been tested for years without any changes. Solana's rivals may be BSC, Tron, ADA, in terms of a better blockchain concept going forward and mass adoption.

[Abiky]

Developers always look for good alternatives when creating project, Matic provides cheaper fees but do have a good quality of services.

Though that's an advantage, I also agree that both are good for investors, definitely depending on how you project your goals between these two good and quality assets.

More on your own interpretations and how well you see the future for both coins, you have to decide according to your proper understanding.

Both are good projects, but only one is truly decentralized. Polygon fits the bill nicely as a decentralized alternative of the ETH blockchain. Solana, on the other hand, is less-decentralized making it extremely-vulnerable to external attacks. The fact that the network was disrupted a while ago, tells us that Solana is not as reliable as we thought it would be.

Ultimately, it all comes down to a person's preference. As long as these coins have strong community backing, they won't be going anywhere soon. Who knows how far Polygon and Solana will go? Just my thoughts

[mdzahed134]

MATIC & Solana definitely both of promising. I recommend to buy both of coins. Solana price too high, If right now MATIC is pretty low i think it will big profits in long run investment. In the development Solana is strong fundamental than MATIC. But to use MATIC network is quite easy accessible, like as ETH and MATIC are similar just changing network from Metamask.