POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana

[kojektea]

In terms of quality I prefer solana. As much as gozali NFT who had trended with polygon networks I think NFT in opensea is mostly just duplication, Solana is more qualified even though it does not have a large community can lift some projects that are published in their networks, such as Solanium and Samo.

[1714759261]

1714759261

[panduryk]

On my opinion, both of those deserves attention. Im buying 30%/30% for both in my portfolio.
We cant say they are similar, they are different, Matic it's 1 layer problem solution resolve for Ethereum, which contains  same secure like in eth, lower commission for mass adoption and faster network on PoS.
Solana have the same, lower commission, faster network and etc,  but one different resolve, solana its hybrid  PoS and Proof of History.
So ive think we should use both of them.

[Pasa32]

Both are great to invest, SOL has increased a lot in few months, but the matic is still there so now the chances of matic breakout are more than Solana breakout. There is also another project same as these. Terra is also a good project and growing too fast looking competitive with Solana .
Let's see who wins.

[JayTrain]

my choice is polygon, for all the time of use there are no problems with the network, transactions are fast and most importantly cheap, but the solana network has hung up several times and this is a big minus today, this project occupies the top 10 CMC and should work without failures.

[7788bitcoin]

my choice is polygon, for all the time of use there are no problems with the network, transactions are fast and most importantly cheap, but the solana network has hung up several times and this is a big minus today, this project occupies the top 10 CMC and should work without failures.

What do you mean Solana network has hung up several times, i have not encountered that situation. When it comes to investment, i will go to Matic aka Polygon because of the use case and the really low valuation and on the other hand Solana had its rally and majority of the projects that uses ETH network as their base platform usually migrate to Polygon because of the ease of migration and i always felt it is undervalued.

[jc12345]

my choice is polygon, for all the time of use there are no problems with the network, transactions are fast and most importantly cheap, but the solana network has hung up several times and this is a big minus today, this project occupies the top 10 CMC and should work without failures.

I beg to differ regarding your point on no problems with the Polygon network. While Polygon Matic is the more promising of the two, there was a big outage on Polygon on March 10th and the chain halted. I just checked the groups and the latest status is that everything is back on line. A lot of people were worried over the weekend. In addition, there was recently a big performance impact on Polygon due to SFF. The network fees have gone up sharply on Polygon as well, although still negligible in comparison with Eth.

[omone1]

Both are okay. Polygon is a layer2 helping ETH scale the congested chain, some ERC20 easily port to polygon to reduce operational fees to customers. Very fast and cheap. While Solana is a layer1 blockchain. You need to understand SOL ecosystem currently doing about 60K TPS, with ability to do more at a near zero transaction fee.

[TimeTeller]

In fact, POLYGON'S MATIC and Solana are both very good and it's hard to choose between them, but I tend to prefer MATIC a bit more because of the good growth in a year compared to Solana's growth in a year can be clearly seen through the following comparison:



Investing in both coins is good, but for me I prefer investing in Matic because of the good growth in a year as well because its price is low compared to Solana, so you can buy larger quantities at a lower price and store them for a long time.

Of course here I have a better idea than looking at your chart. Matic from Solana is definitely very good here.Again two coins but very popular. But lately we have noticed that although the market has been dumping, the highest dumping here has been Solana.So the Matic token from Solana is popular with me.

Both platforms for me are promising as trading platforms are integrating both of these networks in their options.
The fees are quite cheaper also than existing ERC20 network, which of course, is the main reason why these new chains are getting popular.
But we still need to see which of them can truly attract good projects. Because if the dev and users are satisfied, they will endorse it to others.
By the way, I saw one casino using the Polygon network in their USDT withdrawal and I can say, it is very cheap with 0.05 USDT as fee.

[NIKUBHI]

In my opinion, Solana has more potential than Matic and it has also a different blockchain and crypto ecosystem. It is not a supportive blockchain from erc20 but a new program with a new ecosystem. Many of the new crypto projects and tokens are also launching on SOL blockchain and providing a big use-case of SOL in the crypto market. I prefer Solana and It is my own opinion.

[Ngemmeng]

In terms of quality I prefer solana. As much as gozali NFT who had trended with polygon networks I think NFT in opensea is mostly just duplication, Solana is more qualified even though it does not have a large community can lift some projects that are published in their networks, such as Solanium and Samo.

talking about samo maybe the price has increased sharply because the samo coin is the first coin meme on the Solana network. On the other hand the price of new altcoins on the Solana network does have a better price than on other networks such as BNB or Matic.

my choice is polygon, for all the time of use there are no problems with the network, transactions are fast and most importantly cheap, but the solana network has hung up several times and this is a big minus today, this project occupies the top 10 CMC and should work without failures.

what do you mean Solana network has died several times? So far I'm making transactions on the Solana network without any issues and very low network fees. speaking of rankings on CMC lately Solana's ranking has dropped quite far from the 4th rank to the 9th rank. If this situation continues it is possible that Solana will be eliminated from the top 10 of CMC in the near future.

[llecrf]

Actually I'm happy to see Solana is in the top 20 altcoin list along with Polygon (Matic)
But Solana doesn't support EVM, some blockchains are still being developed and I hope there will be new ideas and products that are better from these two projects like, can send tokens to different chains in just one click

[marcous]

Actually I'm happy to see Solana is in the top 20 altcoin list along with Polygon (Matic)
But Solana doesn't support EVM, some blockchains are still being developed and I hope there will be new ideas and products that are better from these two projects like, can send tokens to different chains in just one click

If for the reason that token delivery can only be done in one click, then the BSC network can also be like that and the ERC20 network can also be like that, it's just that each network has different transaction fees from one another so that's what makes the difference now and some people look forward to the Matic and Solana Networks to continue to grow and be better than BSC and ERC20.

[Pamadar]

Both platforms for me are promising as trading platforms are integrating both of these networks in their options.
The fees are quite cheaper also than existing ERC20 network, which of course, is the main reason why these new chains are getting popular.
But we still need to see which of them can truly attract good projects. Because if the dev and users are satisfied, they will endorse it to others.
By the way, I saw one casino using the Polygon network in their USDT withdrawal and I can say, it is very cheap with 0.05 USDT as fee.

If you have a good amount of money to invest, both still have a good future ahead, but if you are trying

to minimize your investment, you can go with matic and try figuring out if you'll going to short or to take a lone ride.
We never know what future would be for this industry but as long as you have a good overview of possible outcome
choosing your investment is very important to take.

[lenovop-70]

Tough choice I have to say because both are equally strong, and I feel unable to win either of them, if I could, I would buy both and I would keep them for next five years. But I think for shorter distances, MATIC has more opportunities because the price is still cheap now, this is related to the gas fee from the network. IMHO

[trendcoin]

...
what is your options or opinions?

Ethereum has had many competitors in the past. All of them have been deleted. Investing in Layer 1 projects is always a bit risky. That's why I choose the Layer 2 project Matic. A good solution partner for Ethereum. But I think both are overpriced. They do not make money for their investors in the short term. I don't think they are good options to invest in. I wish you good luck.

[ZaMRoneY]

POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana

No Doubt， Both are smart contract platforms that support several  DeFi and NFT protocols.


Polygon had  a well-developed NFT ecosystem with many tools, marketplaces and other products being built on it.

It has more than 150 NFT Dapps and marketplaces like OpenSea already built and working on it.


But Solana is undoubtedly a worthy contender.BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC


lots of the NFT/ game project on Solana ecosystem.

Such as ：$Aurory ，Burnt Fiance ， Solanians

Plus ：  new  NFT marketplace -SolPixel Powered by Solana


what is your options or opinions?

Well i tend to go with the general feeling of the project overall on market, and i've been hearing a lot on how solana crashes every now and then which scares plenty of people off but i still see the potiential in it. But i'm putting my stables in the Polygon bag. I'm thinking of going with #Lunafi when they finally release next month, they're mostly a gambling protocol with plans to bring their own casino to the metaverse, but i'm more into their yield farming which gives you a cut every time someone makes a bet on Lunafi which sounds ideal for a laid back investing strategy. Also i found this new game from $ENGN that's being released this march and by the looks of it, it looks like Fortnite but on roids! Any suggestions if i should diversify my portfolio or just stick with these 2 ?

[Captain Corporate]

 It is quite obvious to me that we will definitely see these "ethereum killers" go down in the list for sure. Some of them are making themselves not be against ETH all times and have their own merit and their own ecosystem for sure. Like Avax is something I can see going for a while, its really not that terrible because they are working on a project that changes the "proof of ...." part of the crypto world. But even they may not end up with something decent. All in all I believe that we should not really be surprised if top ten rankings will not look like this in a year or two, most of them will be gone when ETH 2.0 hits the market.

[Abiky]

That's right Solana is good, but there are still many obstacles. The frequent offline network on Solana makes investors panic, this problem has often happened on the Solana network, for my personal opinion for the long term of course I choose Polygon Matic for now because the supply of coins is limited and costs cheap transactions and also a fairly fast network.

Polygon also experienced a network outage with the recent upgrade pushed by the project's developers. People weren't able to use MATIC for more than 10 hours, putting its reliability in question. It's no wonder why Ethereum is still the "King of De-Fi" even if other chains promise faster and cheaper transactions. Security/reliability/decentralization comes first in order to make the Blockchain work as intended. Without prioritizing this, you'd get nothing more than an unstable system that's flawed by design (similar to centralized payment processors).

Solana may be the fastest (and possibly the cheapest) smart contract platform in the world, but its security is terrible compared to Polygon (MATIC). I'd choose MATIC over SOL anytime just because it's much more secure and reliable. But there's always a risk, so I'd advise anyone to proceed with caution. Just my opinion

[poonam8288]

You can choose both. Solana and Mathic are both huge projects. In my opinion, if you are talking about a long-term future investment, I can see this badge project currently competing with Ethereum. Because both have good features and their future planning is very strong. In my opinion, both these projects, which have reached a good height in a short period of time, can give you wonderful benefits for long term investment.

[Tony116]

In my opinion, Solana has more potential than Matic and it has also a different blockchain and crypto ecosystem. It is not a supportive blockchain from erc20 but a new program with a new ecosystem. Many of the new crypto projects and tokens are also launching on SOL blockchain and providing a big use-case of SOL in the crypto market. I prefer Solana and It is my own opinion.

That's right Solana is good, but there are still many obstacles. The frequent offline network on Solana makes investors panic, this problem has often happened on the Solana network, for my personal opinion for the long term of course I choose Polygon Matic for now because the supply of coins is limited and costs cheap transactions and also a fairly fast network.

Solana is a blockchain base-layer protocol, Solana can be considered as a direct competitor to Ethereum. The fact that the network went offline last year is very worrying and this is likely to continue if the transaction volume on the sol network increases rapidly, which will overload the sol network.

Matic and sol are both very good and worth using, but for investment and profit I think I will choose Matic for now because Matic is still undervalued compared to its potential.