⛏Team Black Miner (ETHB3 ETHW ETC VTC KAWPOW FIROPOW ZIL +dual +tripple mining )

[sp_]

How long to wait for it on HiveOS ?

They normally add it pretty quickly. 1 day perhaps?

[duddabudda]

https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner/releases/

TeamBlackMiner v1.24

Always happy to get new updates! Thanks to the developers of TBM!

I would like to add that I wish more changes were made for AMD cards because no other development team did what you did for 6x00 series)
Thanks again!

[wasarianta]

https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner/releases/

v1.24
1. Fixed issue with multiple set core, mem, power.
2. Fixed issue with dag cache when switching back from ZIL pow.
3. Always verify dag on regeneration. Not only on the first run.
4. Log date time format is now DD:HH:MM.
5. API bumped to v1.3: Added port, versioning in url and summary.

Superb... TBM ...cant wait for dev to crack down LHR..

already test 1.24 for 2H ....massive increase for me..

1.24

00:02:00 [2021-11-11 22:15:41.069] asia-eth.2miners.com (ethash)    PING: 23ms    DIFFICULTY: 2.03     EPOCH: 453
00:02:00 [2021-11-11 22:15:41.069]                                                                                 
00:02:00 [2021-11-11 22:15:41.069]
00:02:00 [2021-11-11 22:15:41.069] ID      BOARD    TYPE    KERN    XINT    TEMP    FAN     CORE    MEM     WATT   
00:02:00 [2021-11-11 22:15:41.069] GPU0    2080S    CUDA    8       4096    46/0    70      1394    8692    91     
00:02:00 [2021-11-11 22:15:41.069]                                                                          91     
00:02:00 [2021-11-11 22:15:41.069]
00:02:00 [2021-11-11 22:15:41.069] ID      BOARD    HASHRATE/W    HASHRATE      AVERAGE       SHARES       RATE   
00:02:00 [2021-11-11 22:15:41.069] GPU0    2080S    492.66 kH/W   44.83 MH/s    44.82 MH/s    52/0/2       100.00%
00:02:00 [2021-11-11 22:15:41.069]                  492.66 kH/W   44.83 MH/s    44.82 MH/s    52/0/2       100.00%
00:02:00 [2021-11-11 22:15:41.069]                                                                                 
00:02:00 [2021-11-11 22:15:41.069] SHARES PER MINUTE: 0.44            POOL HASHRATE: 63.55 MH/s
00:02:00 [2021-11-11 22:15:41.069]

1.23

   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:03.064] asia-eth.2miners.com (ethash)    PING: 23ms    DIFFICULTY: 2.03     EPOCH: 452
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:03.064]                                                                                 
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:03.064]
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:03.064] ID      BOARD    TYPE    KERN    XINT    TEMP    FAN     CORE    MEM     WATT   
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:03.064] GPU0    2080S    CUDA    6       4096    47/0    69      1394    8692    91     
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:03.064]                                                                          91     
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:03.064]
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:03.064] ID      BOARD    HASHRATE/W    HASHRATE      AVERAGE       SHARES       RATE   
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:03.064] GPU0    2080S    496.85 kH/W   45.21 MH/s    45.21 MH/s    41/0/13      100.00%
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:03.064]                  496.85 kH/W   45.21 MH/s    45.21 MH/s    41/0/13      100.00%
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:03.064]                                                                                 
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:03.064] SHARES PER MINUTE: 0.34            POOL HASHRATE: 50.11 MH/s
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:03.064]
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:05.157] Job 3ab9f
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:07.513] Job 3aba0
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:09.887] Job 3aba1
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:12.246] Job 3aba3
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:19.347] Job 3aba4
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:26.442] Job 3aba6
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:33.534] Job 3aba7
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:40.629] Job 3aba8
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:43.003] Job 3abaa
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:47.724] Job 3abae
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:52.473] GPU0 Solution found in 5.45s (Submit every 176.36 seconds)
   120m [2021-11-09 15:12:52.489] Accepted (42/42/13) Reply: 15ms

thank you dev...

[abanamat]

Absolutely same settings: --kernel 0 --xintensity 600 --dagintensity 1

[KillrBee]

It seems like the "Average Hash Rate" reported by the client is overly sensitive to high initial hash rates and in HiveOS is causing a significant mis-reporting of the miner hashrate.

For example, on startup I might see some hashrate like 94, or 114 for my AMD 6X00 cards and within a couple of minutes, the true hash rate has decreased to a stable hashing speed, however those initial readings keep the HiveOS reported rates much higher than what the client is actually reporting.  Maybe the client can simply dispose of the first few samples after a few minutes and then capture the real average -- or capture the median or mode instead of the mean value?

[sp_]

We had the same problem for nvidia but it is fixed now, the dag validation is not supposed to add hashrate. Will take a look in the opencl code as well. 

Absolutely same settings: --kernel 0 --xintensity 600 --dagintensity 1

The --xintensity setting is important in the tbminer. If you set it wrong you get -5%, set it right you can get 5%. The setting is pool dependent. There is no optimal intensity for all pools...
Important bugs on some pools have been fixed in 1.24 and users are adviced to upgrade...

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[abanamat]

Absolutely same settings: --kernel 0 --xintensity 600 --dagintensity 1

The --xintensity setting is important in the tbminer. If you set it wrong you get -5%, set it right you can get 5%. The setting is pool dependent. There is no optimal intensity for all pools...
Important bugs on some pools have been fixed in 1.24 and users are adviced to upgrade...

Same picture at 2miners. 1.23 is better for me. Thank you for your help!

[sp_]

Same picture at 2miners. 1.23 is better for me. Thank you for your help!

Chinese miners seem to be smarter than the american miners...  



live dev fee@teamblack...

[dle378]

Same picture at 2miners. 1.23 is better for me. Thank you for your help!

Chinese miners seem to be smarter than the american miners... 



live dev fee@teamblack...

I am getting 3% more accepted shares plus the additional 13% stale shares on TBM 1.24 compared to TBM 1.23.

TBM 1.23
--xintensity 1024
--dagintensity 9
--kernel 0

   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412] us-eth.2miners.com (ethash)    PING: 67ms    DIFFICULTY: 2.03     EPOCH: 453                                                                           
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412]
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412] ID        BOARD    TYPE    KERN   XINT    TEMP   FAN    CORE   MEM     WATT   
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412] GPU0    3060Ti    CUDA    4        1024    64/0    70      1415    8067    155   
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412] GPU1    3060Ti    CUDA    8        1024    74/0    79      1527    8067    175   
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412] GPU2    3060Ti    CUDA    5        1024    70/0    70      1427    8067    155   
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412] GPU3    3060Ti    CUDA    5        1024    64/0    79      1593    8067    184   
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412] GPU4    3060Ti    CUDA    8        1024    68/0    70      1486    8067    155   
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412] GPU5    3060Ti    CUDA    4        1024    63/0    70      1452    8067    155   
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412]                                                                                                       979   
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412]
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412] ID        BOARD    HASHRATE/W    HASHRATE      AVERAGE       SHARES     RATE   
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412] GPU0    3060Ti   419.30 kH/W      64.99 MH/s    64.97 MH/s    141/1/0      99.30% 
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412] GPU1    3060Ti   371.26 kH/W      64.97 MH/s    64.95 MH/s    159/0/0      100.00%
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412] GPU2    3060Ti   419.21 kH/W      64.98 MH/s    64.96 MH/s    150/0/0      100.00%
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412] GPU3    3060Ti   353.11 kH/W      64.97 MH/s    64.95 MH/s    147/0/0      100.00%
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412] GPU4    3060Ti   419.20 kH/W      64.98 MH/s    64.95 MH/s    153/0/0      100.00%
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412] GPU5    3060Ti   419.26 kH/W      64.99 MH/s    64.97 MH/s    170/0/0      100.00%
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412]                           400.23 kH/W   389.88 MH/s   389.76 MH/s   920/1/0 99.89% 
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412]                                                                                 
   360m [2021-11-10 23:51:35.412] SHARES PER MINUTE: 2.56            POOL HASHRATE: 372.70 MH/s

TBM 1.24
--xitensity 4096
--dagintensity 9
--kernel 0

00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443] us-eth.2miners.com (ethash)    PING: 68ms    DIFFICULTY: 2.03     EPOCH: 453
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443]                                                                                 
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443] ID         BOARD    TYPE    KERN    XINT    TEMP   FAN   CORE  MEM   WATT   
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443] GPU0    3060Ti    CUDA    7          4096    63/0    70      1417    8067    155   
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443] GPU1    3060Ti    CUDA    4          4096    64/0    79      1593    8067    184   
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443] GPU2    3060Ti    CUDA    5          4096    68/0    70      1437    8067    155   
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443] GPU3    3060Ti    CUDA    4          4096    57/0    79      1633    8067    183   
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443] GPU4    3060Ti    CUDA    8          4096    66/0    70      1496    8067    155   
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443] GPU5    3060Ti    CUDA    6          4096    62/0    70      1464    8067    155   
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443]                                                                                                         987
   
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443] ID         BOARD    HASHRATE/W    HASHRATE   AVERAGE       SHARES       RATE   
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443] GPU0    3060Ti   419.57 kH/W   65.03 MH/s    65.03 MH/s    158/0/22     100.00%
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443] GPU1    3060Ti   353.34 kH/W   65.01 MH/s    65.02 MH/s    152/0/13     100.00%
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443] GPU2    3060Ti   419.54 kH/W   65.03 MH/s    65.03 MH/s    160/0/21     100.00%
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443] GPU3    3060Ti   355.25 kH/W   65.01 MH/s    65.02 MH/s    153/0/23     100.00%
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443] GPU4    3060Ti   419.52 kH/W   65.03 MH/s    65.02 MH/s    166/0/25     100.00%
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443] GPU5    3060Ti   419.56 kH/W   65.03 MH/s    65.03 MH/s    157/0/19     100.00%
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443]                          397.80 kH/W  390.15 MH/s   390.15 MH/s   946/0/123 100.00%
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443]                                                                                 
00:06:01 [2021-11-11 20:24:58.443] SHARES PER MINUTE: 2.63            POOL HASHRATE: 382.17 MH/s

The xintensity setting is definitely allowing me to gain more accepted shares compared to what I was using before.

PLEASE KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK!!!!!!



Here is a screenshot of current mining results on localhost running TBM 1.24:



And another screenshot of the worker current/average/reported hashrate on 2Miners:







[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[sp_]

Do you get any stale shares on 2miners with --xintensity 4096?

[ep690d01]

Do you get any stale shares on 2miners with --xintensity 4096?

Worker   Valid Shares   Invalid Shares   Stale Shares   Last Share
Total   202   0 (0%)   1 (0%)   28 seconds ago
RTX3080   160   0 (0%)   1 (0%)   a minute ago
RX5500XT   42   0 (0%)   0 (0%)   28 seconds ago

RTX3080: --xintensity 4096
RX5500XT: --xintensity 256

After 14 hours:

RX5500XT: pool hashrate 26.59 / average reported 28.07 = 94.82%
RTX3080: pool hashrate 95.17 / average reported 101.32 = 93.93%

Do you think that with lower --xintensity I have better pool hashrate?

Thank you!

[sp_]

Always happy to get new updates! Thanks to the developers of TBM!

I would like to add that I wish more changes were made for AMD cards because no other development team did what you did for 6x00 series)
Thanks again!

Thanks for your support. In the next version we are recoding the AMDstats code so that you can get temps, and clocks of the gpu on linux. We are also going to add mining in the dag verification phrase that will add a few seconds of mining on every dag change.

Do you think that with lower --xintensity I have better pool hashrate?

Only if you get stale shares. Click on the worker on the pool and check for stales



[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[ep690d01]

Do you think that with lower --xintensity I have better pool hashrate?

Only if you get stale shares. Click on the worker on the pool and check for stales

https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FCdY6nEo.jpeg&t=631&c=k-EC-AsAuiTawQ

Yes I have only 1

Worker   Valid Shares   Invalid Shares   Stale Shares   Last Share
Total   202   0 (0%)   1 (0%)   28 seconds ago
RTX3080   160   0 (0%)   1 (0%)   a minute ago
RX5500XT   42   0 (0%)   0 (0%)   28 seconds ago

[sp_]

Yes I have only 1

So 0.5% is lost

There was another user who got a good result with --xintensity 3108 on a single rtx 3090, perhaps 4096 is too high for this pool.

[dle378]

Do you get any stale shares on 2miners with --xintensity 4096?

I get 0 stale shares reported.

[sp_]

Superb... TBM ...cant wait for dev to crack down LHR..
already test 1.24 for 2H ....massive increase for me..
thank you dev...

Thanks for your support the work on the LHR is progressing, but Nvidia will probobly release LHR3 and then the work could be wasted. Better to increase the speed on AMD cards. I expect a nice surprise for 6800xt and 6900xt owners soon. Perhaps a X-mas gift from the TBM team.

[xalinaventure]

TBM 1.24

My 15hrs mining report.

6800XT and 1080Ti:
https://i.imgur.com/rl8nTC6.jpg

3090 and 3070:
https://i.imgur.com/rFg801W.jpg

Pool Share:
https://i.imgur.com/Y7AV0oL.jpg

Pool Hashrate:
https://i.imgur.com/D8SByMj.jpg

Initially there was one stale share reported from 3090, then I reduced overclock (Loss of 1mh/s) after that no stale. All good with respective xintensity.
But somehow my 1080Ti is not performing well here as compared to previous (48Mh/s). (Was using v1.23 with kernel 8 )
Anything more to do now or is it all good?  

[sp_]

TBM 1.24

My 15hrs mining report.

6800XT and 1080Ti:


3090 and 3070:


Pool Share:


Pool Hashrate:


Initially there was one stale share reported from 3090, then I reduced overclock (Loss of 1mh/s) after that no stale. All good with respective xintensity.
But somehow my 1080Ti is not performing well here as compared to previous (48Mh/s). (Was using v1.23 with kernel 8 )
Anything more to do now or is it all good?  

On the 1080ti Kernel 0 is better with low power, but you have power. Perhaps you can add --kernel 8 to get back the 1mhash. Overall your setting looks good.
The pool share and the Pool Hashrate:picture  doen't seem to match the miner output though. Only 549 shares, but 1 894 shares total in the other pictures.


edit: 2miners only show the last 6 hours. in the stats.

[dle378]

Do you think that with lower --xintensity I have better pool hashrate?

Only if you get stale shares. Click on the worker on the pool and check for stales

Are there any settings I can modify to increase the number of submitted accepted shares on 2Miners?

[sp_]

The next version will have a --timeout option so you can mine for xxx minutes. Then you can create a script to find the optimal intensity setting for the pool.