Say NO to smoke detectors!

[o_e_l_e_o]

There is a great deal of people out there that don't even want to let you participate in society without a smoke detector installed in your home.  Talking about not having one could result in the loss of your job, friends, not to mention you won't be allowed into restaurants or to participate in any public events.

I don't want to go in to their buildings which all have smoke detectors in them anyway! That's why I live in a hut in the woods with no cancer causing electricity or mind controlling 5G.

In fact, smoke detectors are so important, I think we should double the money supply and cause a massive wave of inflation that will no doubt forever hurt the quality of life in this country just to make sure that everyone has a smoke detector

I mean, smoke detectors are a tiny part of it, but we definitely need to defund the whole thing. No more socialist fire departments for sure! Why am I paying for fire hydrants I've never used!? No more expensive government committees coming up with rules like "Don't start forest fires"!

made by a couple of companies the government selects.

Right! Why don't we see more homemade smoke detectors? Perhaps a parrot which is trained to shout "FIRE" if it smells smoke? Or maybe I could draw a picture of a smoke detector on my ceiling, and if I can't see it anymore, I'll know its because of smoke from a fire.

[1713995795]

1713995795

[1713995795]

1713995795

[1713995795]

1713995795

[1713995795]

1713995795

[Quickseller]

That website appears to be intended to get people to want to get vaccinated.

No, that's definitely not the case, and is covered in the FAQs:

Are smoke detectors a metaphor for vaccines?"
I have no idea what you're talking about.

Smoke detectors are very clearly being used as a metaphor for vaccines. The ridiculous arguments made on that website made it clear that Smoke Detectors were being used as a metaphor for something, and the FAQ gave it away. That website is linked to other sites that someone with extreme views might stumble upon.

I have to wonder as to just how much of the qAnon crap is actually being published by those on the left who are trying to make their political opponents look like stupid extremists. 

[Cnut237]

I have to wonder as to just how much of the qAnon crap is actually being published by those on the left who are trying to make their political opponents look like stupid extremists. 

I'd imagine the amount is zero or very low, as qAnon already look like stupid extremists, and don't need any help. But it would certainly be a sound strategy in general, yes. Not thinking so much about the US, but in countries where there are more than two parties who can win votes, the best way to get say a left-wing party into power would be to create a new right-wing party to split the right-wing vote, and vice versa.

Smoke detectors are very clearly being used as a metaphor for vaccines.

I don't think so. Past experience leads me to believe that many anti-vaxxers would not understand the concept of a metaphor, so the effort would largely be wasted.

The ridiculous arguments made on that website

I find their arguments to be solid, and intellectually compelling. For example, fire departments are certainly socialist.
Apologies, that's not sufficiently dramatic, it should be: SOCIALIST!!!

[o_e_l_e_o]

Smoke detectors are very clearly being used as a metaphor for vaccines.

"Are smoke detectors a metaphor for vaccines?"
I have no idea what you're talking about.

[Quickseller]

Smoke detectors are very clearly being used as a metaphor for vaccines.

"Are smoke detectors a metaphor for vaccines?"
I have no idea what you're talking about.

Sorry o_e_l_e_o, the denial on their FAQ is insufficient for me to believe them. The evidence is simply too strong that suggests otherwise.

[OgNasty]

made by a couple of companies the government selects.

Right! Why don't we see more homemade smoke detectors? Perhaps a parrot which is trained to shout "FIRE" if it smells smoke? Or maybe I could draw a picture of a smoke detector on my ceiling, and if I can't see it anymore, I'll know its because of smoke from a fire.

That is an excellent idea.  Imagine an entire industry being built around breeding of these parrots and new jobs for bird trainers, feeders, cleaners, vets, etc.  You have swayed me.  That's way better than some dumbass non-working smoke detector doubling our money supply and crippling our way of life for generations to make sure they're in every household to appease people who are afraid of fire.  I like how you think.  A legitimate solution by a free market participant that creates jobs instead of mandates that will destroy employment for millions.  If only others in our society were willing to think about solutions and how they could help instead of how they can impose their fear on others at the cost of us all, you could have saved my country 10 trillion dollars.  You have my vote for president.

[o_e_l_e_o]

Imagine an entire industry being built around breeding of these parrots and new jobs for bird trainers, feeders, cleaners, vets, etc.

Yes! All these new jobs would certainly help to offset the millions of jobs we would lose from people in smoke detector design, manufacture, testing, distribution, installation, etc.

That's way better than some dumbass non-working smoke detector doubling our money supply and crippling our way of life for generations to make sure they're in every household to appease people who are afraid of fire.

I mean, it's the socialist fire department handing out freebies to everyone that costs the money, not the smoke detectors, but I like your enthusiasm. Dying in a house fire never hurt anyone, am I right?

[gredinger]

Even if there is debate whether or not the smoke detectors actually work.  

This man understands that Big Phire knows how to pay scientists off.

Also, fuck firefighters and their knowledge or expertise.

[arielbit]

i have smoke detectors called nose and eyes 

[o_e_l_e_o]

This man understands that Big Phire knows how to pay scientists off.

Exactly. I went in to a recently burnt down building once and it was EMPTY! So much for the lame stream media saying that burning buildings kill people. I've seen loads of fires in my time and never once seen someone burn alive! Hell, I've even burnt myself by accident on more than one occasion and I got better in a few days. What a scam.

[_Miracle]

"Say NO to smoke detectors!"
Especially the ones with carbon monoxide detectors in them...
"They" hardwired one into my R.V. it kept making this high pitched screeching noise (almost drove me out of my mind) so I had to clip it to uninstall it. I feel more calm now, thinking more clearly and so so
 sleepy...


Seriously though: it would be a great thing if more people choose to get vaccinated and still oppose government mandates (write your legislators)

[Cnut237]

Big Phire

That's what they want you to think. Let me tell you, I used to have this smoke detector, and one battery wasn't enough, for some reason it "needed" two. And then one of the batteries got old and I had to get a booster third one. So I don't think it's Big Phire who are running this scam, it smells very strongly* of Big Battery to me.





*_{A heady zinc/manganese aroma, with notes of potassium.}

[o_e_l_e_o]

I have recently discovered that many fire departments and local governments are spending your tax dollars to give out free smoke detectors to people who can't afford them, as well as putting smoke detectors in schools and other public buildings. This is pure socialism! Say NO!

[Cnut237]

I have recently discovered that many fire departments and local governments are spending your tax dollars to give out free smoke detectors to people who can't afford them, as well as putting smoke detectors in schools and other public buildings. This is pure socialism! Say NO!

These smoke detectors are a scam. I've heard that smoke has changed recently, and the effects of inhalation aren't as severe as they used to be with previous variants. But the sheeple are still claiming that smoke is a threat to health, even though actually it's no different to seasonal fumes. And we've been living with seasonal fumes for a very long time, so why is this so-called smoke any different? Those clowns who run the country keep saying that if we spread the smoke everywhere then the fire departments will be overrun and won't be able to cope, but they don't get overrun with seasonal fumes, do they? So what's the problem? I say bring it on.

[ammodotcom]

I have recently discovered that many fire departments and local governments are spending your tax dollars to give out free smoke detectors to people who can't afford them, as well as putting smoke detectors in schools and other public buildings. This is pure socialism! Say NO!

Agreed! We have to make it mandatory for all schoolchildren to inject these smoke detectors into their blood!

[tvbcof]

I have recently discovered that many fire departments and local governments are spending your tax dollars to give out free smoke detectors to people who can't afford them, as well as putting smoke detectors in schools and other public buildings. This is pure socialism! Say NO!

Agreed! We have to make it mandatory for all schoolchildren to inject these smoke detectors into their blood!

The constant stream of smoke detectors are 'free' (because only a minority of brainwashed simps wants them), but they go off at random through the day and night.

Then they start a fire on whatever they are attached to or injected into and, that is the one time when they reliably don't make any noise.

On top of that, you cannot leave your house or go to work unless you can prove that all of the smoke detectors you've been assigned are attached to your wall and the corp/gov state will be tracking you and your house to make sure that is the case.

These are the 'market dynamics' of 'socialism'...brought to you by Pfizer just like everything else in the mainstream media.

[Quickseller]

I have recently discovered that many fire departments and local governments are spending your tax dollars to give out free smoke detectors to people who can't afford them, as well as putting smoke detectors in schools and other public buildings. This is pure socialism! Say NO!

The benefits of smoke detectors very clearly outweighs the costs of smoke detectors in every household, by a very large margin. Further, smoke detectors are not intrusive. Unless there is a fire (or the battery is running low), most people will not even notice the presence of a smoke detector.

I don't think there are any unserious people that are actually against smoke detectors, let alone serious people.

[Cnut237]

I don't think there are any unserious people that are actually against smoke detectors, let alone serious people.

I am a serious and unserious person, and I am against smoke detectors. It's a depopulation plan because smoke detectors are known to spread fire. There is no smoke without fire, and I don't think anyone would deny that smoke is found more often in places that have smoke detectors. And smoke detectors are actually made by Bill Gates, too, which tells you all you need to know. He's doing it through 5G, and 5G is another word for smoke detectors.

Don't you sheeple know what 5G stands for? Gates' Great Grey Gasses Gadgets.

[o_e_l_e_o]

The benefits of smoke detectors very clearly outweighs the costs of smoke detectors in every household, by a very large margin. Further, smoke detectors are not intrusive. Unless there is a fire (or the battery is running low), most people will not even notice the presence of a smoke detector.

They run on RADIATION! Radiation causes cancer! I don't want a cancer box in my house or near my children, thank you very much. Take your Big Phire shilling somewhere else.

[Quickseller]

The benefits of smoke detectors very clearly outweighs the costs of smoke detectors in every household, by a very large margin. Further, smoke detectors are not intrusive. Unless there is a fire (or the battery is running low), most people will not even notice the presence of a smoke detector.

They run on RADIATION!

No they don't. I am not aware of any evidence to support this (including the revised claim that smoke detectors emit radiation).