Another New Rule On Gambling Adverts Ban Celebrities and Sports Stars

[Fortify]

What impact will be received by gambling companies, both fiat and crypto, because we know that gambling companies use celebrities to boost the popularity of these gambling sites?

In terms of promotion, the gambling company may change its strategy in using these celebrities or use an age limit for those allowed to see these advertisements.

But from another perspective, it doesn't seem easy to do because children under 18 years old may already know how to see the ad. But indeed, the problem of gambling addiction is a very serious problem that needs everyone's attention. They can play gambling but with strict terms and conditions.

What they need to do is make effective punishments to deter rulebreakers and this is often overlooked throughout the whole process. In the world of corporatism we far to often see fines factored into the cost of doing business which is completely against the spirit of what they're intended to do. If you start by using percentage of turnover as a calculation of fines instead of fixed amounts and combine it with incremental multipliers if they are caught more than once, it'll stop being worth their while to break such laws. Politicians are starting to wise up to this but those same politicians can also be offered lucrative "consulting" jobs if they nudge laws in a way that pleases such money making giants. I walked past an advert for a Heineken beer the other day and had to double check, because it looked like a Fortnite advert, absolutely disgraceful targeting of children.

[YOSHIE]

But from another perspective, it doesn't seem easy to do because children under 18 years old may already know how to see the ad. But indeed, the problem of gambling addiction is a very serious problem that needs everyone's attention. They can play gambling but with strict terms and conditions.

Minors are involved in the world of gambling, I think it is common knowledge among the people, especially in my country, it's a fact, with the ease with which advertisements can be seen on the internet and also on social media, it will be a serious challenge for the government.

Coupled with gambling advertisements that celebrities promote, 70% of 18 year olds can fall into the world of gambling, but what do you want to say the world is already filled with technology and easy applications to get, but on the contrary if the prohibition of gambling advertising is only aimed at celebrities, I'm not sure it will affect the lack of 18-year-olds involved, because the basic gambling site applications already know it, except for 18-year-olds it's not recommended to use laptops and Android phones.

[BitcoinAccepted]

There are different forms of advertising. You also have many sites where famous people are advertised, but in an illegal way because the people in question have not given permission for this. There are also sites that have appointed well-known former football lessons as ambassadors. I can remember Ruud Gullit doing that once at Betclic. There is nothing wrong with that in itself. In some countries it is also forbidden to broadcast such commercials on television if famous actors or the Netherlands are involved. However, I never understood why, it is not fraud, not a scam and not a deception.

[milewilda]

It looks like the streaming of fake casino games will end.
Casinos created fake accounts for streamers who played at the casino and won huge amounts of money. Of course, these were fake winnings, but the viewer did not know this. Thought it was a real win. Unfortunately, most of them were kids who, seeing how easy it was to win money, most often deposited their parents money and lose everything immediately. Fortunately, it will end now.

if people will continue to report those fake streamers, YT and other streaming services will take down those videos. because if no one is reporting, definitely, there will always be something like this in circulation. but don't get too confident that they will be out of the market, because for sure, there will always be a new casino willing to pay an influencer to advertise their site showing fake winnings and all.
but on the note about ban on known personalities, or sports athletes, i have to agree with this. because some of these personalities have young followers. and they will see them as examples they want to imitate with.

They should really get rid of that first before banning out celebs who are promoting or with have partnerships with gambling companies because it  would really be totally useless if they would still let
those things running or exposed yet considering that we are on a high tech era which basically means that kids or youth could still make able to see these things where gambling videos or streams are
almost everywhere so its not totally the solution for this problem but if they do really strictly impose such laws then companies would be having no choice but to deal with it.

But they can totally get rid of this casino since some part of the country are earning benefits thru tax so taking them down will also cost them a lot of money lost as income to their country that's why they just do this to minimize the damage what possibly can bring by those huge promotions made by celebrities. Also for sure they will take an action towards streamers since if they ban celebrities they will also do the same with those influencers who promote casinos.

If they would make out an overall ban then that would surely be making out some effect when it comes to tax revenue do to that effect on the decision that they do had made but if they do have
other various sources which they could rely on then they would surely stick on standing on the  decision.Protecting against gambling addiction kind of motive is somewhat really that commendable
since the government is really showing up some care into its citizens but only a few would definitely be doing this stuff and the rest would be minding about tax.

[jrrsparkles]

It doesn't affect much in my opinion and also good for the gambling community because public figure with huge followers of young age might be attracted if they are used in gambling related advertisement so when minor does something which harms the community then it might affect the entire gambling community as well. But someone is going to be a part kf advertisement which isn't an actual solution to the issue we are talking but the regulations has to be followed.

[btc78]

There are different forms of advertising. You also have many sites where famous people are advertised, but in an illegal way because the people in question have not given permission for this. There are also sites that have appointed well-known former football lessons as ambassadors. I can remember Ruud Gullit doing that once at Betclic. There is nothing wrong with that in itself. In some countries it is also forbidden to broadcast such commercials on television if famous actors or the Netherlands are involved. However, I never understood why, it is not fraud, not a scam and not a deception.

it is not about scamming nor fraud or even deception mate but what those celebrity to take effect in their fans and followers most specially younger generation , because more than anyone? they are the one who can be lured easily.
so i think that the government is only taking the chance to risk the future of younger people when they are doing nothing as this has been the problem over the years,
when even Highschool student becomes gamblers and badly turns addicted .

[Peanutswar]

This is a common rule with the gambling platform that prevents the 18 years old below to play gambling because of their not builder knowledge and being responsible in a gambling platform but I guess its a good move too that preventing the celebrities with the promotion because of their reputation too if the platform fails they will get with it that destroys their image as well but it depends on the organization we know they so much gain influence right.

[Silberman]

There are different forms of advertising. You also have many sites where famous people are advertised, but in an illegal way because the people in question have not given permission for this. There are also sites that have appointed well-known former football lessons as ambassadors. I can remember Ruud Gullit doing that once at Betclic. There is nothing wrong with that in itself. In some countries it is also forbidden to broadcast such commercials on television if famous actors or the Netherlands are involved. However, I never understood why, it is not fraud, not a scam and not a deception.

This has to do with protecting those that are underage and nothing more, we know that people underage have not completed their development and as such they are more prone to act on their impulses and make mistakes they would not make if they were older, so it makes sense to protect them from certain behaviors which could be damaging for them at such an early age, as an example this is why alcohol consumption is forbidden for them, so its reasonable that similar regulations are passed to avoid casinos to target their ads to them.

[TopT3ns]

This is a common rule with the gambling platform that prevents the 18 years old below to play gambling because of their not builder knowledge and being responsible in a gambling platform but I guess its a good move too that preventing the celebrities with the promotion because of their reputation too if the platform fails they will get with it that destroys their image as well but it depends on the organization we know they so much gain influence right.

Almost with gambling platform is not allowed for children under 18 years old and depending with parent how controlling their children, I think some celebrities are advertiser on gambling platform as adult person and not allowed with children as advertising or member. Usually with gambling casino support with fiat deposit only not ability for children under 18 years old participant on gambling games because they still not have ID card and not possibility for creating bank account, but different with cryptocurrency gambling platform have chance for children as active there are member.

[iv4n]

It doesn't affect much in my opinion and also good for the gambling community because public figure with huge followers of young age might be attracted if they are used in gambling related advertisement so when minor does something which harms the community then it might affect the entire gambling community as well. But someone is going to be a part kf advertisement which isn't an actual solution to the issue we are talking but the regulations has to be followed.

Of course, this move will not have an effect on the growing gambling industry! Generally, I don't like rules, but this sounds good! The majority of celebrities of any kind are followed by many minors, so they should pay attention to what they are advertising! Obviously, many of them are not aware of what is good and what is bad, then there should be a rule that will guide them a little.

But can this have any effect with so many social networks around where many influencers do whatever they want?! Look at Twitch, although there are rules there are still streamers who gamble millions on slots with many followers, probably most of them are minors!

[Uang_kartal]

This has to do with protecting those that are underage and nothing more, we know that people underage have not completed their development and as such they are more prone to act on their impulses and make mistakes they would not make if they were older, so it makes sense to protect them from certain behaviors which could be damaging for them at such an early age, as an example this is why alcohol consumption is forbidden for them, so its reasonable that similar regulations are passed to avoid casinos to target their ads to them.

If it's protective, I agree, because for something that prevents it, especially when they've made a need, even at a young age, they can access some sites that are even blocked by local authorities because they're underage, it's not an offer. Maybe some people will agree and parents at there will monitor and protect wifi devices/networks in their homes. It's more of a delay for their developing self and sufficient education about a mindset and the legal basis for an action. maybe later after the age of 18 years and over. I believe that hobbies or interests Everyone's interests are different, all types of games, gambling and the like will be more appropriate at the time. Even though it goes massively, I think there are other ways, either the marketing team or the owner, to market their products by attracting better

[Jody.Drummer]

This may be a little detrimental to some casinos which always promote with stars in it but refers to gambling whether this will be in accordance with the reality later because considering that even teenagers do see advertisements from stars but when discussing gambling I don't think they really look there . because even they can still do that even if they don't see the ad there.
but maybe there will be a slight adjustment now if you really want to be limited to those who gamble over the age of 18

Even if the celebrities and famous personalities are not banned they try to keep themselves away from controversial topics. In my opinion they are banned because there are multicultural societies and people of different ethnicities live in close community. And in some communities gambling is prohibited and people do not gamble at all. If they do they  don't do that in public.

this is true, but if that's the reason then there will be a bit of another debate because indeed we live with the will we want and that includes rights even though they are artists and famous people but that doesn't mean they can't determine their lives to the fullest. which direction the goal is and the work done.
but indeed there are few who can do that considering famous people can be a reflection for others who follow them.
Well this can be a good thing but on the other hand it can be a double-edged sword for casinos

[perla]

This is a good rule in my opinion, sports stars should be a model for next generation and they should be look up as an inspiration for upcoming generation and if they saw them promoting gambling site youths would think that it could be good for them which would ruin their future. I would agree with charity advertisement, shoes, etc. but not gambling advertisements.

[michellee]

This has to do with protecting those that are underage and nothing more, we know that people underage have not completed their development and as such they are more prone to act on their impulses and make mistakes they would not make if they were older, so it makes sense to protect them from certain behaviors which could be damaging for them at such an early age, as an example this is why alcohol consumption is forbidden for them, so its reasonable that similar regulations are passed to avoid casinos to target their ads to them.

If it's protective, I agree, because for something that prevents it, especially when they've made a need, even at a young age, they can access some sites that are even blocked by local authorities because they're underage, it's not an offer. Maybe some people will agree and parents at there will monitor and protect wifi devices/networks in their homes. It's more of a delay for their developing self and sufficient education about a mindset and the legal basis for an action. maybe later after the age of 18 years and over. I believe that hobbies or interests Everyone's interests are different, all types of games, gambling and the like will be more appropriate at the time. Even though it goes massively, I think there are other ways, either the marketing team or the owner, to market their products by attracting better

Maybe parents should pay attention to the gadget they use to explore the internet because, with the development of internet technology that can easily access, they will be able to find gambling sites by coincidence. And this is how parents can monitor while their children are using their gadgets. Even though they are over 18 years old but still under 20 years old, the role of parents should be with them because, at their age, they are very vulnerable to the entry of things that they don't know yet. Parents can explain gambling or other things so that their children will not be misguided in getting along.

[xSkylarx]

This is a good rule in my opinion, sports stars should be a model for next generation and they should be look up as an inspiration for upcoming generation and if they saw them promoting gambling site youths would think that it could be good for them which would ruin their future. I would agree with charity advertisement, shoes, etc. but not gambling advertisements.

I agree, and this would have a big impact on the younger generation because, you know, when they see something popular, they tend to follow it. I don't know what is going on with the youth in this decade because they follow everything, unlike in my time when we just wanted it but didn't really follow it, and unlike today, they will beg their parents to try it. This is really good news in terms of gambling since it could reduce the underage interest in gambling and reduce addictions. I think this also has no big impact on the gambling industry because it only targets the under-18s.

[stepwilli]

I think any rule will be useless if gambling can still be found and played everywhere, because even countries that clearly prohibit gambling but people still gamble both young and old. So in this case I personally think that the gambling site company will still operate well even without the frills of stars or celebrities because after all, the rules are only about dealing with celebrities or top sports players and not about sports sponsors. So, basically they can still advertise their company and it will not make teenagers avoid gambling, because the only rule to avoid gambling is from themselves.

A rule is not useless because many people are going to comply with it but yes there will be some that are hard headed and will not follow any rules but they are not a good example. They have the guts and the skill and if ever they caught out, they are ready to get punished.

I think celebrities that advertise a gambling company are a new thing but I haven't seen or heard that a gambling company are doing that on the past so yeah they can always operate normally even if without those gimmicks. They can still gather a lot of customers from a normal advertisement or promotions as long as what is stated is true and if they are offering a good service.

[Maslate]

I think any rule will be useless if gambling can still be found and played everywhere, because even countries that clearly prohibit gambling but people still gamble both young and old. So in this case I personally think that the gambling site company will still operate well even without the frills of stars or celebrities because after all, the rules are only about dealing with celebrities or top sports players and not about sports sponsors. So, basically they can still advertise their company and it will not make teenagers avoid gambling, because the only rule to avoid gambling is from themselves.

A rule is not useless because many people are going to comply with it but yes there will be some that are hard headed and will not follow any rules but they are not a good example. They have the guts and the skill and if ever they caught out, they are ready to get punished.

I think celebrities that advertise a gambling company are a new thing but I haven't seen or heard that a gambling company are doing that on the past so yeah they can always operate normally even if without those gimmicks. They can still gather a lot of customers from a normal advertisement or promotions as long as what is stated is true and if they are offering a good service.

If that rule is a law, non-compliant people will be punished by the law, I don't think they'll be " hard headed" enough if they know the penalty of the violation, especially if it has a serious penalty. The thing is, the penalty might not be serious enough that gambling sites and advertisers could violate it as they know can afford to pay the penalty.

[Fatunad]

I think any rule will be useless if gambling can still be found and played everywhere, because even countries that clearly prohibit gambling but people still gamble both young and old. So in this case I personally think that the gambling site company will still operate well even without the frills of stars or celebrities because after all, the rules are only about dealing with celebrities or top sports players and not about sports sponsors. So, basically they can still advertise their company and it will not make teenagers avoid gambling, because the only rule to avoid gambling is from themselves.

A rule is not useless because many people are going to comply with it but yes there will be some that are hard headed and will not follow any rules but they are not a good example. They have the guts and the skill and if ever they caught out, they are ready to get punished.

I think celebrities that advertise a gambling company are a new thing but I haven't seen or heard that a gambling company are doing that on the past so yeah they can always operate normally even if without those gimmicks. They can still gather a lot of customers from a normal advertisement or promotions as long as what is stated is true and if they are offering a good service.

If that rule is a law, non-compliant people will be punished by the law, I don't think they'll be " hard headed" enough if they know the penalty of the violation, especially if it has a serious penalty. The thing is, the penalty might not be serious enough that gambling sites and advertisers could violate it as they know can afford to pay the penalty.

Neither it would be having big amount violation or would really be in incremental behavior but it would really be that understandable that it would be a huge one considering that Gambling industry is a profitable or big
business which it would really be common sense that penalty would be big.If this would really be law then they wont really be having no option but to abide or obey it specially if that one cost big.
Its sad that celebs wont really able to get attached with gambling  industry which is really a total loss in between the two which is casino and those influencers.

[DoublerHunter]

This is a good rule in my opinion, sports stars should be a model for next generation and they should be look up as an inspiration for upcoming generation and if they saw them promoting gambling site youths would think that it could be good for them which would ruin their future. I would agree with charity advertisement, shoes, etc. but not gambling advertisements.

I agree, and this would have a big impact on the younger generation because, you know, when they see something popular, they tend to follow it. I don't know what is going on with the youth in this decade because they follow everything, unlike in my time when we just wanted it but didn't really follow it, and unlike today, they will beg their parents to try it. This is really good news in terms of gambling since it could reduce the underage interest in gambling and reduce addictions. I think this also has no big impact on the gambling industry because it only targets the under-18s.

^ As I see, this is a case to case basis because not all younger generations now can afford to gamble and they know how to gamble still they cannot able to do it because they don't have enough funds to try and the reason is they are still relying on the parent. This is how parents should have a responsibility to their children, if they will expose to gambling because of the promotions from the celebrities, educate them about gambling and for sure they know which is good or bad. I will not blame those celebrity advertisements who promote gambling to become a threat to the children from gambling addiction, it should be from the parents on how they will guide their children.

[dothebeats]

Given their fame and the amount of influence these guys have, I partly agree that they shouldn't partake in any activity promoting and advertising gambling. Though their target market is obviously the adults which can gamble, there is no way that they can control what the youngsters can see online or in the TV. Most of the time when young people see their idols advertise something, they tend to want it, or copy whatever it is that their idol is doing because they think it can make them look cool. Then again it's really a controversial law because it only targets the gambling sector and not other sectors which may also have a negative effect on the young population (liquors, tobacco-based stuff, etc.)