Bitlucy withdrawal problem, does this acceptable?

[DireWolfM14]

I had a $21k balance at one stage with Bitlucy.com.

I deposited $1,000. Wagered $200k and was exactly within and also exceeded the terms set out to withdraw.

So, you deposited $1,000 and eventually won $21,000 with multiple wagers, or you you wagered $200 once and won $21,000?

Sorry, I am not a forum goer, other than a fishing one...  

Lol, obviously, you really buggered up that reply.  

Whatever, I really don't care.  Forgive my cynicism, but these types of threads seem to always attract some scampuppet johnny-come-lately crying "woe is me, I got scammed too" hoping to cash in on a payday (if a payday ever happens.)  So far you're not doing a great job convincing me otherwise.

Can you please confirm to me how to post a photo on here, and I will do it.

In addition to the ones mentioned by Bitcoin_Arena I just started using postimages.org.

[ABCbits]

Are there are any snapshot of their ToS on internet? I'd like to check it if possible.

You can check them all at the bottom of their website, I haven't archived them or anything but hope they don't change it overnight.

The website only show black screen on Tor Browser, so i was assuming it was down when i asked the question. But i just checked it with Chrome/Firefox + VPN and it loads fine. Anyway, i just archived the ToS page using online service. Here's the link,
1. https://archive.ph/iRVLo
2. https://web.archive.org/web/20220623095835/https://www.bitlucy.com/about/terms-conditions

[Wildsyy]

I had a $21k balance at one stage with Bitlucy.com.

I deposited $1,000. Wagered $200k and was exactly within and also exceeded the terms set out to withdraw.

So, you deposited $1,000 and eventually won $21,000 with multiple wagers, or you you wagered $200 once and won $21,000?

Sorry, I am not a forum goer, other than a fishing one...  

Lol, obviously, you really buggered up that reply.  

Whatever, I really don't care.  Forgive my cynicism, but these types of threads seem to always attract some scampuppet johnny-come-lately crying "woe is me, I got scammed too" hoping to cash in on a payday (if a payday ever happens.)  So far you're not doing a great job convincing me otherwise.

Can you please confirm to me how to post a photo on here, and I will do it.

In addition to the ones mentioned by Bitcoin_Arena I just started using postimages.org.

When I said fishing, I literally meant fishing. Like with a hook and a line, lol.

I am at work with no access to my pc. But, here is an iPhone screenshot of part of the email, with the time corresponding to now:

https://i.postimg.cc/qqkyc7zV/6-F36-F6-B5-4-EA1-4925-8-D15-BDFA7-EABD23-E.png



Whatever, I really don't care.  Forgive my cynicism, but these types of threads seem to always attract some scampuppet johnny-come-lately crying "woe is me, I got scammed too" hoping to cash in on a payday (if a payday ever happens.)  So far you're not doing a great job convincing me otherwise.

Also I didn’t pick up on this as I was working.

I am disappointed that you would think this, however, I guess that this is the world that we live in now.

People scam innocent people, then innocent people are doubted that they have actually been scammed.

I am a very small-time person on Twitch. Bitlucy was contacting lots of small streamers, like myself, offering a partnership deal. With lots of bells and whistles.

I personally, just do it as a hobby. And I think if I gamble, I might as well stream it. That way, it might stop someone else gambling.

I’ll refer you to here: https://m.twitch.tv/wildsyy/clip/DifficultOnerousAnteaterPMSTwin-8m-I-7vh1Cd9hKA2

Which is one of the ~$5k wins.

If you’d like to see more detailed evidence, I am happy to send everything over to you on Discord. You can add me here: wildsy#1445

Roysee seems to be on the case and working with me to solve the issues. I will be happy to update, once this is done

[JollyGood]

About Bitlucy withdrawal problem and could claimed with scam casino gambling platform and run away much money from member still not respond from DT usually active give flag for participants on 1xbit, why the most active DT like
logfiles
_BlackStar
JollyGood

Shut up and none of them are actively responding in this thread, are they just daring with 1xbit and turning a blind eye to what happened to Bitlucy, even though these two gambling platforms are both committing fraud against their members. Is the reason for the three DTs because Royse777 is a close friend of them so they don't dare to give a red flag?

Come on guy we are waiting all your respond about Bitlucy, show you are gentlemen said about Bitlucy and Royse777 are scammer.

What is the real game with you? How many alt-accounts do you have here? It seems you dislike Royse777 to the extent you are pushing others to do your bidding and that will not happen. Each member of this community can make up their own mind about how to proceed in any case of scam allegations.

I really hoped to hear the opinions of each of the members, logfiles _BlackStar JollyGood especially since they used to race to monitor fraudulent projects and defend employees against thieves and scammers.
I honestly don't understand why they ignore Bitlucy's situation even though one of their friends is involved with it.

In the face of this silence applied by the members who we used to see defending the right against fraudsters, and with their complete disregard for what is happening with Bitlucy, contrary to what we saw in their reactions with other fraudulent projects, the rule in this forum has become as clear as the sun..

- Create an account on the forum.
- Manage some projects to get everyone's trust.
- Add trusted members to your trust list. They will add you in turn.
- Now all you have to do is wait for an opportunity to be assigned to a big project or launch it yourself because your reputation is the guarantee that no one will verify its seriousness and your friends on the trust list will of course support you.
- Collect as much money as you can, and it doesn't matter that you lose your reputation because you've got enough in return.

I think everyone here remembers Luda and that great project that she worked on in her last days before leaving the forum. Does anyone remember how much money that project collected and about the fate of the investors after the project became forgotten? Has anyone ever thought about the members who joined the project just because they trusted Luda?
Almost the same scenario has been repeated over and over again, and the current example with Royse777 and Bitlucy is nothing but another piece in a big puzzle of thiefs who can manage things using bitcointalk forum.

Silence on my part? Exactly where have I remained silent?

I think between logfiles _BlackStar JollyGood and Royse777 are close friend and have special relationship how keep hidden each other if become scammer. It is possible that some of them have received a commission from Bitlucy so that until now there has been no response, not even a single comment on this tread. Especially for JollyGood he is immediately active when giving red trust to members who join the 1xbit campaign without giving warning first, but when  scams happened to bitlucy he was a thousand languages ​​and not at odds with 1xbit.

I am not associated with Royse777, we never been friends or even close at all. We hardly interacted with each other.

Judging by the manner in which you are taking the opportunity to attack Royse777 for her participation in the Bitlucy scam as well as to attack various members including myself making wild accusations, I am curious to know what the name of your original account is? Why are you not using it to post instead creating another alt-account?

What is the purpose of mentioning my name constantly? Did I negatively tag your other accounts? Why do you have an anti-Royse777 agenda? Did one of your other accounts receive a negative from her? Is that it?

And to suggest any of the names you mentioned have received payment from Bitlucy is simply preposterous.

[JanEmil]

Also lost $600

CEO was very friendly and talked me into help him on Telegram. He spoke my language so my normal caution was lower because we normaly don't have so many cheaters here.

I think the plan in the beginning was to run the site but he did not have the funds to promote, develop and run the site same time. The classic mistake where you borrow funds from game accounts. And at some point not possible to recover.

Probably pop up again with new name.

[icopress]

Also lost $600 [...]

Weird, you lost $600 and didn't leave a tag (it doesn't matter if there are already red tags or not).

[JanEmil]

Weird, you lost $600 and didn't leave a tag (it doesn't matter if there are already red tags or not).

It was on telegram where CEO used the user @BitlucyCEO

Has notting to do with Royse777

I was contacted because I have a post here om bitcointalk where I seek crypto jobs. Was stupid pay some services for the CEO. He should then give me funds back.


The CEO sent me little funds from
3FP7WqmGjWVTJC3x2Rj8XoDUmrXNCHkxRg
trxID 4dd585211813ce348976c7f16819bd47bf7b9e0b9d1c865ad6ff39d71210210b

For helping to give feedback on version 1 of their site.

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[JollyGood]

Also lost $600

CEO was very friendly and talked me into help him on Telegram. He spoke my language so my normal caution was lower because we normaly don't have so many cheaters here.

I think the plan in the beginning was to run the site but he did not have the funds to promote, develop and run the site same time. The classic mistake where you borrow funds from game accounts. And at some point not possible to recover.

Probably pop up again with new name.

I feel for you losing approximately $600, it is not a small amount therefore I am sorry for your non-payment. And yes they could easily pop-up with another website using a different domain and brand name.

Weird, you lost $600 and didn't leave a tag (it doesn't matter if there are already red tags or not).

It was on telegram where CEO used the user @BitlucyCEO

Has notting to do with Royse777

I was contacted because I have a post here om bitcointalk where I seek crypto jobs. Was stupid pay some services for the CEO. He should then give me funds back.

Well it does not matter which employee or part owner of Bitlucy contacted you to work for them. Based on the facts as they are known thus far, Bitlucy was owned by two people: Royse777 and the Bitlucy CEO - therefore some would say it does have something to do with Royse777.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Weird, you lost $600 and didn't leave a tag (it doesn't matter if there are already red tags or not).

It was on telegram where CEO used the user @BitlucyCEO

Has notting to do with Royse777

I was contacted because I have a post here om bitcointalk where I seek crypto jobs. Was stupid pay some services for the CEO. He should then give me funds back.

Well it does not matter which employee or part owner of Bitlucy contacted you to work for them. Based on the facts as they are known thus far, Bitlucy was owned by two people: Royse777 and the Bitlucy CEO - therefore some would say it does have something to do with Royse777.

I am interested to know who are these some of them. A user who paid for feedback, a user decodx who is advocating for you and who else?

This is a perfect example of how you justify a case and hostage users with your red tag. You are pissed because Royse777 did not share you private information and ignored your unlawful demand. Now when JanEmil, a victim himself is admitting that Royse777 has nothing to do with it, you are advising him to involve Royse777. Are you saying for example, in a group of company if the chairman runaway with the fund resulting the entire company including their shareholders in loss, you are going to tag the chairman and all the shareholders? This is pathetic. You were the same pathetic against the user nemgun too. I would like others to understand your arguments are totally inappropriate which obviously reflects on the tag I left for you.

[dkbit98]

CEO was very friendly and talked me into help him on Telegram. He spoke my language so my normal caution was lower because we normaly don't have so many cheaters here.

Sorry to hear about you losing $600 but I think other people lost much more.
All scammers are friendly at start, and really good ones are able to scam and trick a lot of people and take away their money.
Best thing people should do with this case is to report Bitlucy owner and release all his personal details in public, that could prevent next scam project he creates, and I am sure he is already working on it.

Weird, you lost $600 and didn't leave a tag (it doesn't matter if there are already red tags or not).

Leave a red tag on who?
Member Bitlucy is long gone from forum and that wouldn't help anyone.

[LoyceV]

Was stupid pay some services for the CEO. He should then give me funds back.

I'm still amazed how many people pay things upfront for a job they're taking. I always have one basic rule: if you have to pay to get paid, you're getting scammed.

[JollyGood]

You are right, if you are paying in order to get paid then you are getting scammed but unfortunately warning signs can be missed or can get blurred when people sell a dream to unsuspecting victims.

I was surprised to read JanEmil was a victim. Not only that, he paid money upfront to the Bitlucy CEO in order to be employed. It is not always about victims being greedy, it can on occasion get confusing when they have prolonged chats with those trying to scam them and they fall victim in the process.

Was stupid pay some services for the CEO. He should then give me funds back.

I'm still amazed how many people pay things upfront for a job they're taking. I always have one basic rule: if you have to pay to get paid, you're getting scammed.

[mv1986]

Weird, you lost $600 and didn't leave a tag (it doesn't matter if there are already red tags or not).

It was on telegram where CEO used the user @BitlucyCEO

Has notting to do with Royse777

I was contacted because I have a post here om bitcointalk where I seek crypto jobs. Was stupid pay some services for the CEO. He should then give me funds back.

Well it does not matter which employee or part owner of Bitlucy contacted you to work for them. Based on the facts as they are known thus far, Bitlucy was owned by two people: Royse777 and the Bitlucy CEO - therefore some would say it does have something to do with Royse777.

I am interested to know who are these some of them. A user who paid for feedback, a user decodx who is advocating for you and who else?

This is a perfect example of how you justify a case and hostage users with your red tag. You are pissed because Royse777 did not share you private information and ignored your unlawful demand. Now when JanEmil, a victim himself is admitting that Royse777 has nothing to do with it, you are advising him to involve Royse777. Are you saying for example, in a group of company if the chairman runaway with the fund resulting the entire company including their shareholders in loss, you are going to tag the chairman and all the shareholders? This is pathetic. You were the same pathetic against the user nemgun too. I would like others to understand your arguments are totally inappropriate which obviously reflects on the tag I left for you.

You are illegitimately expanding JollyGoods' argument from "two people owning a company" to a "corporation with countless of shareholders". Makes sense to you? Not to me.

You are neglecting that the Bitlucy CEO seems to have had no outreach to a valuable community except for some private, absolutely ridiculous, publicly available chats (I read them, did you?). It seems to me that Royse777 saw an opportunity here, huh? Who knows the crypto people loving to gamble with their cryptos? The Bitlucy CEO? Or Royse777? There are a couple of synergies that Royse777 was able to deliver. You are talking as if she was sitting on a desk in a quiet room stamping some unimportant letters and shredding some of the letters that are not needed anymore. At times she brought coffee to her boss. Sorry, no, that is not the case.

[bislom]

How many victims are paid so far by our liar Royse?

[decodx]

I am interested to know who are these some of them. A user who paid for feedback, a user decodx who is advocating for you and who else?

Why are you involving me in this discussion? I have never commented anything about JanEmil or JollyGood here. My only comment in this topic was almost two months ago and all I wanted to know then was the truth about the Bitlucy case. You can read it here.

[AB de Royse777]

Has notting to do with Royse777

Thanks for your input, at least someone is speaking. Although it does not matter much now, we never talked to each others too. I am just wondering what job you did for him?

[JanEmil]

Thanks for your input, at least someone is speaking. Although it does not matter much now, we never talked to each others too. I am just wondering what job you did for him?

He asked me to promote his site. I said no few times.
Then he started to write in my native language. And he talked me into help.

First task was to give feedback on the site. In retrospective thinking that task was to pay me very little so I as thinking he was good guy ;-)

Then I should promote. I have my own system for that. But he talked me into using bitmedia. The amounts got wilder and wilder. 10000$ he asked for one day. And many other things. Every day some friendly message and some request for money. The classic I am out. Could you transfor for me and get money when I home. And different things.

I ended up losing 600$, Some will say that is wild. But I could have lost so much more. But I got out fast.

Then you wrote on a post I have here on bitcointalk. I looked a bit at your profile and found this post.

edit:

I do some referral marketing and normal you have to do ALOT work and maybe use paid promotion before you start to earn.

Bitlucy CEO flushed the database. He said some new systen. And it did not matter. But ofc it matters to lose your refs, deposits etc.

I think he wanted to make the site in the beginning. Maybe because hard to accept I was an idiot.

edit 2:

Looks like he still on telegram. The account say - recently online.

Edit 3:
"Royse as BOB" on telegram still online as well. Yours?
https://i.ibb.co/ZMZJYMq/2.png

[P2PECS]

Let's see if you also find this curious. There is an IBCO in the Securities section that aims to raise 7 BTC, without much success so far.

[IBCO - Whitelist] ⚽🎰 Casino Critique⭐ FREE Chip for BCT Members ❤️‍🔥








The OP registered on Bitcointalk on July 10 this year.

We are a few bitcointalk old timers....

Food for thought.

[yahoo62278]

Let's see if you also find this curious. There is an IBCO in the Securities section that aims to raise 7 BTC, without much success so far.


Food for thought.

It's just an icon that a few announcement threads are usuing.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5409276.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1221154.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=238323.0

Here are a few threads using the same icon and I seriously doubt that using that icon connects anyone to BitLucy.

[rat03gopoh]

~~~

It's not enough to attribute their relationship to just the number 777. The service you suspect doesn't use that number as a mascot, so anyone can use it. These emojis are generally synonymous with casino services which I think is a better form of interpretation than writing numbers manually.