I Have a Question ~ Are 1xbit Campaigners Playing on 1xbit?

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I am just curious to know  .

With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.

I have two simple questions to ask to all, but not limited to 1xbit promoters alone ~

• 1. What is your driving force,  motivation in promoting 1xbit?, knowing fully well that the casino is blacklisted on Bitcointalk due to numerous complaints and scam accusations that remains unattended to by those in charge of the casino.
• • 1.1. Is the money you are being paid, your motivation?
  Or
  
  • 1.2. Is your lack of ability to join or get accepted in other signature campaigns belonging to more reputable businesses, your motivation in deciding to promote 1xbit?
• 2. As a 1xbit promoter,  are you playing/gambling on 1xbit casino platform?
• • 2.1. If "Yes" is your answer to the question above ~ then what is your experience like? Please tell us..
  • 2.2. If "No" is your answer to the question above ~ then why?

I myself can not promote what I can not use,  because I have this believe that it is absolutely wrong to ask other people to use something you know within yourself is not good enough for you to use,  it is insincerity to yourself and to those around you.

[Oshosondy]

The answers are straight forward, 1xbit campaign participants can not give you the true answers, but we know the reasons they join 1xbit.

Many of the participants in the past are spammers and low quality posters. Psychologically speaking, some people even make use of their alts that have been abandoned to join. It was easy to get accepted in 1xbit campaign because no reputed accounts wants to join, no competition, people that re applying are accepted.

Basically they joined for the money.

We too in another campaigns joined those campaigns not only because we want to interact with people on Bitcointalk, bitcoin that we are paid is involved, but I noticed that it is not easy to join a signature campaign. We still care about campaign reputation, if the present campaign I am is tagged with negative trust and people are complaining about the gambling site, I will have no option than to leave after red flag, that is what 1xbit participants are not getting correctly. We should not promote scam gambling sites.

I was lured for the incentive paid by the campaign when I had no campaign, but I had to wait for a better campaign to come this forum, or joining a reputed one that is already on this forum, but some participants can not wait that long because of the money involved and ease of joining 1xbit. They do not care about the people that are scammed, but care more about the money they are paid.

[MAAManda]

I think the questions you ask are unnecessary for you to ask them (1xbit campaign participant) . We all know for sure that they follow the 1xbit campaign just to earn money, without wanting to know the experience of playing there. Maybe we won't even find the serious posts they made in their post history since joining the 1xbit campaign.

I myself can not promote what I can not use,  because I have this believe that it is absolutely wrong to ask other people to use something you know within yourself is not good enough for you to use,  it is insincerity to yourself and to those around you.

This is very important to do, I also before joining Rollbit, first tried to play there and see how big their community is. And it turns out, even when I win big, they will pay for it, about the community, they also have a very active community on Discord.

[robelneo]

I cannot answer for 1XBIT campaign participants but logic tells me that many of them are not playing there and they are fully aware of 1XBIT behavior on this forum, but they consider themselves freelancers with all the risks and benefits that they can get from promoting sites like 1XBIT.

The rewards are very tempting you are torn between protecting your credibility and reputation here in this forum and many of the members, give in, those who have a bad reputation are easy to give in but those who just got their reputation tagged after participating in 1XBIT can only hope that the campaign will last long for them to say that the financial benefits are all worth it.

I just hope that casinos with the existing signature campaigns can keep and there will be a new campaign for reputable casinos and newly launched casinos that want to establish their reputation here, I dread to see that majority of banners or signatures here are on 1XBIT, at one time they are holding 2 to 3 campaign they really have a huge budget on this and sadly they are gaining new users because if not the campaign would have been stopped.

[yahoo62278]

1xbit accepted users with neg trust and some of the participants had red trust prior to joining the campaign. Others that did not have neg trust received it shortly after joining. I really doubt any of them are gambling a penny of the money they earn as well. It's quite possible that there are some multi accounts in the campaign as well.

[PX-Z]

Would be better to ask the campaign participants ^{(better mention those in the campaign spreadsheet list)} straight forward than making assumptions. Well, only if they will post here and tell the truth.
Plus, the campaign don't required them to make an account so i doubt they did.

[Strongkored]

The answer is definitely because of money, but many of the accounts that follow the signature have already received neg trusts and they are accepted because unreliable businesses will accept unreliable participants.
Regarding their participants whether they play there, most likely not but to be honest there are also many participants in other campaigns who also don't use the services they promote, but since it's not part of the rules so that's not a problem, it's just that it would be better if these participants play or use the services he promotes to better understand the casino or the services they promote

[smartaction]

I don't think 1xbet campaign participants gamble on 1xbet. Their purpose is only to earn money.  They reward their participants with good amount every week. Which every participant gets as remuneration. I don't think they can waste their hard earned money by gambling. must if the signature campaigners use there money for there Daily expenses.

[bittraffic]

1xbit is buying those accounts itself. They were talking about it on the telegram channel which someone hired by 1xbit is buying the high-rank accounts with negative trust for less than $200. Meaning the majority of those accounts are now owned by 1xbit.

If those are not bought then those accounts are merely promoting 1xbit for the pay. EArning BTC still is more appealing than earning bounty tokens.   

[coin-investor]

1xbit is buying those accounts itself. They were talking about it on the telegram channel which someone hired by 1xbit is buying the high-rank accounts with negative trust for less than $200. Meaning the majority of those accounts are now owned by 1xbit.

Really? This is surprising many do not know this, so we can conclude that they are on a long term campaign because they are not going to buy those accounts if these campaigns are for the short term, I'm surprised how cheap these high-rank accounts were bought, you can easily earn $200 for a month of a campaign on a good campaign, anyway, these are disposable accounts

If those are not bought then those accounts are merely promoting 1xbit for the pay. EArning BTC still is more appealing than earning bounty tokens.   

Those other accounts will not play on 1XBIT because of the reputation issue, they don't want to be the next victim and they cannot complain because they are promoting 1XBIT.

[xSkylarx]

If a product is proven to be not good, would you still use it?

I'm pretty sure that these people promoting 1xbit are being paid in some way. Many are in tough times now considering the economic crisis we currently experiencing so some people would be willing to do anything. They are in desperate need of money that it reach to a point where they have no choice but to grab that opportunity to earn some money by promoting a scam platform.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

It seems to me to be something like the drug dealer who doesn't take drugs.

Since we haven't heard from any of the participants complaining that 1xBit has ripped them off and won't let them withdraw or anything like that, I think it's unlikely, unless 1xBit has a whitelisting to avoid ripping off those who participate in the signature campaigns.

But I understand that it is more likely that they are unscrupulous people who get paid for working for a casino that they know they are scamming and as they know it they don't deposit in it.

[dothebeats]

Probably not.

They know the reputation of the platform that they are campaigning for, and since most of them had already been red tagged due to advertisement of an obvious scam, they can't use the account to apply on other campaigns hence they are stuck with 1xbit. They'd probably just staying for the weekly benefits that they are getting from the campaign, but aren't brave enough to go play on the actual casino since they know what will happen to their hard-earned funds once they tried.

[Adbitco]

From on your questions i will love to answer it parabolically which says 'Flood doesn't know farm, crops, weeds and trees', when it comes it covers everywhere.
Which means if the 1xbit site could scam people and forum have blacklisted them doesn't mean it won't harm it promoters because same process others goes same process the promoters would also faced. It's quiet bad seeing people still promoting them.
Though it may be for some other reason like, if a user got Reflagged they may decides to join the campaign since no other managers accept them for their campaign so they may decides to rent out their sig space to them and be receiving some payment from the site without minding the effect of promoting the site around the forum. I think basically they are being paid directly to their btc address and is not certain they must used the site, all less their payment is being sent directly to 1xbit site.

[PX-Z]

I'm pretty sure that these people promoting 1xbit are being paid in some way.

They are indeed, it's a weekly for signature campaign.

If you're talking about the people outside bitcointalk promoting this casino, then again, it is. Knowing it's a casino, gambling niche rate for promotion is different from other niche, which is much more costly. And even those gambling/casino reviews sites are most probably paid, no one will give an almost 5/5 star review without being paid especially if the casino is a shit like this one. For f*ck sake, i don't know if there are people here still using this casino except for the newbies knowing what kind of service they provide.

[rhomelmabini]

I think this question isn't for 1xbit alone but to all who promote casinos on their signature profiles. For me, I will surely get the gist first about the site because it would be a shame if I'll be question how's the site and why do I choose to play their, that's just my take for a legitimate casino and by far has few accusations and whatnots.

For 1xbit, I doubt if most of the user plays on their site. I think it wouldn't be close to 50% if I'll be asked on how many users who participated on their campaign that plays as well in their casino. They may try but with the payment goes directly on their personal wallets, I really doubt if they happen to play there.

[NeuroticFish]

I am just curious to know

I was expecting a lot of answers from those users (easy way to fill quota, you know), but, surprisingly, none has come yet.
But I am curious what you expect to see as answers. I mean, we already know that the campaign in question has taken problematic accounts and shitposters. Would you really expect honest answers from those? Do you expect a meaningful discussion with those?

[Porfirii]

I am just curious to know

I was expecting a lot of answers from those users (easy way to fill quota, you know), but, surprisingly, none has come yet.

I'm expecting the same and I'm really curious too because if they play in their betting platform it means that they trust in them, but if they gamble somewhere else, but not there, it would be suspicious.

Maybe they have gambled there without problems and that's the reason they trust and promote their sportsbook. And negative trust would be fair in these cases? Anyway, I don't think 1xbit would risk to not pay to any participant in their signature campaign.

[fortunecrypto]

So far none of the 1Xbit participant has drop here to participate in the discussion, but its unlikeley that they are going to use 1XBIT platform because if they do that, and they got an issue they cannot file a complaint, imagine you are promoting 1XBIT then you are filing a complaint, they will just let it pass or not file a complaint or they will be taken out of the campaign, they are aware of 1XBIT's reputation.

[goldkingcoiner]

I am just curious to know  .

With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.

I have two simple questions to ask to all, but not limited to 1xbit promoters alone ~

• 1. What is your driving force,  motivation in promoting 1xbit?, knowing fully well that the casino is blacklisted on Bitcointalk due to numerous complaints and scam accusations that remains unattended to by those in charge of the casino.
• • 1.1. Is the money you are being paid, your motivation?
  Or
  
  • 1.2. Is your lack of ability to join or get accepted in other signature campaigns belonging to more reputable businesses, your motivation in deciding to promote 1xbit?
• 2. As a 1xbit promoter,  are you playing/gambling on 1xbit casino platform?
• • 2.1. If "Yes" is your answer to the question above ~ then what is your experience like? Please tell us..
  • 2.2. If "No" is your answer to the question above ~ then why?

I myself can not promote what I can not use,  because I have this believe that it is absolutely wrong to ask other people to use something you know within yourself is not good enough for you to use,  it is insincerity to yourself and to those around you.

I am 100% certain that even 1xBit Bitcointalk signature campaigners aka promoters do not trust 1xBit enough to depost their funds there. Its just about the money for them. Some people need it desperately, others just do not care about the damage they cause to the community as long as they earn a few more bucks each week. I for one would have to be extremely desperate to join their campaign. And even then it would leave a bitter taste in my mouth, knowing that I will harvest a lot of negative trust and my image with the community would be quite negative as well...

There are other ways to make money though. No matter how desperate you get, you should never support scammers.