I Have a Question ~ Are 1xbit Campaigners Playing on 1xbit?

[Jemzx00]

I believe you can't expect to read the truth in case they will respond on these questions.
They can easily say yes, and make good reasons why, as we have different experiences in every casino.
But with the reputation of 1xbit, I believe they are also worried about the possible non payment if in case they will win big.
So in case they are playing on this site, I am thinking that they are playing small and cautious with how they play.

Actually we don't need any answers from them, they have the experience to give convincing answers but anyway they don't respond to any previous complaint reports, I hope gamblers should be selective in choosing other good casinos and in fact we already have a list of many other trusted casinos in the forum this.

We already know the answer however we still need to hear their side as to why they would like to promote such a gambling platform that has incredibly bad reputation. Unfortunately, most of their applicants already have a red tagged on their account or an alt account which doesn't care if it'll get tagged as long as they'll be able to earn from it.

I don't think that 1xbit campaign is doing well on this forum since they already have a bad reputation throughout the forum however they might receive some traffic on their banner and advertisement outside the forum as i was able to see some of their advertisement on various websites.

[1714889225]

1714889225

[1714889225]

1714889225

[Oshosondy]

We already know the answer however we still need to hear their side as to why they would like to promote such a gambling platform that has incredibly bad reputation. Unfortunately, most of their applicants already have a red tagged on their account or an alt account which doesn't care if it'll get tagged as long as they'll be able to earn from it.

What answer do you want from them when the truth is that they go for money regardless of a site of being good or scam, they do not care about reputation but money, there is nothing they are going to tell than that.

I don't think that 1xbit campaign is doing well on this forum since they already have a bad reputation throughout the forum however they might receive some traffic on their banner and advertisement outside the forum as i was able to see some of their advertisement on various websites.

Negative trust can help, but it would have been better if the campaign can be stopped from continuing on this forum, this would help most especially the guests on this forum from 1xbit. I saw some newbies that mistakenly wanted to join 1xbit, they removed the campaign signature after their account was tagged, not having the campaign on this forum would help some newbies and guests.

[cabron]

If they didn't require the campaign participants to play on the 1xbit casino then they are not playing on their own casino. The signature participants know the casino is shady, they are just promoting to make BTC weekly at least but not playing. They probably even suspect they will not get their BTC back if they deposited on 1xbit while they win big.

No signature campaign are  require to campaign participates to play casono on there platform. It cannot be part of the signature campaign rules. The purpose of the signature campaign is to promote only one project within the forum. So I think signature participants never gamble at 1xbet with there signature reword

I would however believe the participants are playing on 1xbit if the campaign pays through the 1xbit account like how Stake campaign do which they send the fees to the stake accounts. But then  it doesn't matter still.

The casino is not blacklisted and marketing here in the forum is not moderated and that's what made 1xbit circumvent the forum rules and are able to reach audience still.

[suzanne5223]

I am just curious to know  .

With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.

"The love of money is the root of all evil,"

When we look at this critically,  we will discover that not having money is the real root of all evil,  I believe that if this guys had money already,  they wouldn't be promoting scam in order to get paid.

I believe you said this because you have never met someone who has money and is still greedy for what a common man has. There are a lot of campaigns the people that promote this scam casino can join.

Back to your question. " Are 1xbit Campaigners Playing on 1xbit?" Is it possible for someone selling poison to eat it when he knows its poison and is fully aware of the result of eating it?

🤔 Hmmm,  you do have a point here,  but normal people do not sell human poison by the way,  they only sell poison for rats and cockrochies, the rat poison turns to human poison when the buyer decides to use it outside what it's meant for.

You said normal person don't sell human poison but if we look into the promoter of this scam casino they are poison to the newbies indirectly.

[Piesel]

First, we have to realize the place of personal responsibility and class because what I can not do is for money another user may be willing to do the same for the same amount or even a lesser amount and that is where reputation comes into play.
No one will trust a member that promotes scam that can hurt other people and steal their money with several unresolved accusations, am not sure if those participating in that signature play on that casino if they do then they should have spoken up on this thread or other related threads with proving that the casino fairly pays players. So far there has not been any evidence of that so I will say they just promoting the casino for the pee nuts they're paid weekly.

[rhomelmabini]

No one will trust a member that promotes scam that can hurt other people and steal their money with several unresolved accusations, am not sure if those participating in that signature play on that casino if they do then they should have spoken up on this thread or other related threads with proving that the casino fairly pays players. So far there has not been any evidence of that so I will say they just promoting the casino for the pee nuts they're paid weekly.

Exactly the point of the masses of those who responded in this very thread. I can understand if it the player is promoting a more trusted and proven casino but with 1xbit in the line, it's a doubtful stuff to even know. Well, if checked, most of their members has those trust issues and just my guess those are even alt accounts that joined the campaign. Just my guess but the possibilities are endless.

[noormcs5]

First, we have to realize the place of personal responsibility and class because what I can not do is for money another user may be willing to do the same for the same amount or even a lesser amount and that is where reputation comes into play.
No one will trust a member that promotes scam that can hurt other people and steal their money with several unresolved accusations, am not sure if those participating in that signature play on that casino if they do then they should have spoken up on this thread or other related threads with proving that the casino fairly pays players. So far there has not been any evidence of that so I will say they just promoting the casino for the pee nuts they're paid weekly.

Yes, they are only interested to get some money to promote the scam site through the signature campaign and they don't care how is the site responding to the players.

They are being paid to shill the casino all over the forum and they just do that. Even if some are gamblers among them, they may play at other trusted casino sites, who knows? They will surely never opt for 1xbit for gambling for themselves.

[smartaction]

First, we have to realize the place of personal responsibility and class because what I can not do is for money another user may be willing to do the same for the same amount or even a lesser amount and that is where reputation comes into play.
No one will trust a member that promotes scam that can hurt other people and steal their money with several unresolved accusations, am not sure if those participating in that signature play on that casino if they do then they should have spoken up on this thread or other related threads with proving that the casino fairly pays players. So far there has not been any evidence of that so I will say they just promoting the casino for the pee nuts they're paid weekly.

Yes, they are only interested to get some money to promote the scam site through the signature campaign and they don't care how is the site responding to the players.

They are being paid to shill the casino all over the forum and they just do that. Even if some are gamblers among them, they may play at other trusted casino sites, who knows? They will surely never opt for 1xbit for gambling for themselves.

Almost most of the forum members know that 1xbet is a scam gambling site since the forum declared 1xbet as a scam. Nevertheless, the 1xbet team continues to promote their project here . And some stupid members are helping to promote 1xbet by joining their signature campaign. But I think they join signature campaign only to earn money.  They don't gamble on 1xbet

[uneng]

Interesting that after 4 pages of thread nobody from the 1xbit signature campaign itself has come here to present their point of view. Probably it's because when there is nothing to say, it's better to say nothing.

Anyway, I don't think it's a good marketing for 1xbit, because once someone creates a thread asking if promoters play at the casino they promote and none of them replies, it lights a red alert for potential gamblers, besides the fact everyone connected to the company is negatively rated.

[rby]

Interesting that after 4 pages of thread nobody from the 1xbit signature campaign itself has come here to present their point of view. Probably it's because when there is nothing to say, it's better to say nothing.

Anyway, I don't think it's a good marketing for 1xbit, because once someone creates a thread asking if promoters play at the casino they promote and none of them replies, it lights a red alert for potential gamblers, besides the fact everyone connected to the company is negatively rated.

It is not all 1xbit promoters that are proud promoting the company. It is few keyboard warriors who already got bunches of red tag that aggressively defend the company. I don't actually know if they receive extra pay from 1xbit for doing the defence. Generally they are no longer strong or willing to defend their pay master, they could be focusing on their earning and thinking how to spam the upper week and get paid accordingly.

[ScamViruS]

Most of the participants of 1xbit's signature campaign have Red Trust accounts before joining the campaign. Because 1xbit accepts Red Trust members in their signature campaign. So you will not get any proper answer from the participants asking such questions, because they have been doing many illegal activities in this forum before joining the campaign which has led them to get red tag from DT members. As they are already more attracted to illegal things and love to do them. So it's no big deal for them to continue promoting 1xbit.

[erep]

It is not all 1xbit promoters that are proud promoting the company. It is few keyboard warriors who already got bunches of red tag that aggressively defend the company. I don't actually know if they receive extra pay from 1xbit for doing the defence. Generally they are no longer strong or willing to defend their pay master, they could be focusing on their earning and thinking how to spam the upper week and get paid accordingly.

The main factor is that they hold the signature because the weekly payment will be paid by the company, there are several participants who have supported the defense to improve the reputation of 1xbit but they do not provide solutions to complaints and accusations of scam at 1xbit, other participants do not care about all the accusations against 1xbit and nothing defense efforts, because they were aware of his involvement as a promoter of 1xbit for the work of fulfilling weekly posts and receiving weekly payments.

[UserU]

I checked the thread and it seemed Erdogan got banned?

[acroman08]

I checked the thread and it seemed Erdogan got banned?

I wonder why he got banned, I checked if he was reported for plagiarism but I can't find a report on the report plagiarism thread. he was so hell-bent on defending 1xbit despite the bad history it has in the forum. I also wonder if he was part of their team trying to minimalize the increasing bad reputation 1xbit has in this forum.

[Doan9269]

Their campaign which is reported for scam and employing set of scammers ad well to help them campaign their site were all scam, they care less if they participate or not just from my own view anyways, since they know that their campaign will always attract victims to them, i don't blame them since the forum does not place an auto ban on such promoting scam, so they will definitely get new preys that will always dip foot into their campaign/site before looking.

[Hamza2424]

Let me answer your curiosity, 1xBit campaigners are here only for a motive as their accounts are red trusted they cant join other campaign so here they just grinding bucks of money as they know account is waste lets make money until it ends.
So they are promoting the Project to make their earnings live if they even decide to half their payment they will still work for them that my personal point of as nobody likes to promote the scam projects. i can see many people making scam reports always here but they need to understand before trusting any project they should take a look to the feedback history

[Doell]

Probably because of money and all about money, the power to push someone to promote 1xbit is based on money. I doubt there are any promoters playing at their platform, their thread or that brand also I rarely seen on forums. So I can conclude that their campaign participants playing on a more trusted platform, also there have been many replies to your this thread 78 including me, none of them participants 1xbit have responded.

[Slow death]

I checked the thread and it seemed Erdogan got banned?

since the guy was banned, in that 1xbit thread there isn't much constructive discussion anymore, I know it sounds weird, but the guy really was a true defender of this scam site, he managed to have some arguments that even I think: " what kind of doraga gave this guy to be so devout?". he was a real fanatic of this scam site.


It's been days since this thread was created and I haven't seen the participants of this scam site's signature campaign come to answer if they use this scam site to place bets. I had already asked this question many times there on the scam site's thread, and they couldn't answer me, I suppose they won't answer me here either

[Zackgeno96]

You cannot answer this question in its entirety. 1xbit has had a ton of active campaign people, and some of them will gamble on the site but certainly not all of them is my guess. And if you already gamble on the site, then of course there are still significant differences in the volume with which people gamble on a site. I don't understand why the op wants to know this. What would that be relevant for? 1xbit is a very large and powerful platform and has a huge number of customers worldwide.

[Porfirii]

You cannot answer this question in its entirety. 1xbit has had a ton of active campaign people, and some of them will gamble on the site but certainly not all of them is my guess. And if you already gamble on the site, then of course there are still significant differences in the volume with which people gamble on a site. I don't understand why the op wants to know this. What would that be relevant for? 1xbit is a very large and powerful platform and has a huge number of customers worldwide.

Thanks for your answer Zackgeno96. In your case, have you ever played on 1xbit? How did it go? did you have any problems withdrawing? and, if you have never played, why? do you play in other betting sites?

I think that the motivation of the op asking this is to determine whether campaigners trust in the service they are advertising or not. The ratio of campaigners betting in the platform they promote is relevant, one can extract some insight from it.