I Have a Question ~ Are 1xbit Campaigners Playing on 1xbit?

[Docnaster]

I'm not sure about the participants spending, but 1xbit keeps themselves with addition of more sports events. In recent days it have added cosmos to the list of cryptocurrencies used for gambling. One of early established platform, for now if they've solved the acquisition it could've grown much bigger taking the lead role as cryptocurrency accepted sportsbook.

It keeps making me wonder why 1xbit chose to scam. Whether it was intentional or a certain management mismanaged the company and spoilt her reputation.  If 1xbit don't want to scam they will make good company because of variety they put in their site. But it's unfortunate they are happy scamming people. Who knows if it is only members of the forum that are affected or random victims.

[rodskee]

They don't need to use their payment as betting capital on their site because they're not asked to. I'm sure that participants also have an idea about the trust issues of the said campaign but they're also staying to earn.

I agree and I also think that most of the 1xbit signature participants are multiaccount users probably its a big reason why they are defending this scam platform. They aren't dumb enough to use a fellow thief's service/platform they know that they can be screwed once they put in money.

exactly , they already understand what kind of company that pays them so with those agreement , surely they will prevent themselves from playing as the chance of being another victim or problem to occur .

I'm not sure about the participants spending, but 1xbit keeps themselves with addition of more sports events. In recent days it have added cosmos to the list of cryptocurrencies used for gambling. One of early established platform, for now if they've solved the acquisition it could've grown much bigger taking the lead role as cryptocurrency accepted sportsbook.

maybe they are just extending the option of players so they can gain more players from crypto users yet their cases and issues are still  floating and no clear answers at all.

[Porfirii]

Are they accepting CROs now? I'm curious how this altcoinwill perform in the future (Matt Damon's commercial was like OMG but the price, even when it spiked, it wasn't as high as I could expect).

About 1xbit, I don't think campaigners would have any issues in their platform, because it would suppose worse reputation for them. On the other hand, what's the problem with them? is that they don't let you withdraw if you are in a country excluded from their platform in their TOS? I guess that admins would bypass this rule in the case of campaigners/promoters.

[Tomohisa]

For member or full member accounts, I can understand since it's easy to get merit to rank up to that level. But for Hero/Legendary, yeah I don't get why they throw away such accounts and reputations for weekly payment from a scam campaign like 1xbit. I suspect most of those accounts are alts or multi account or already have a low reputation already.
That means they can anytime ditch that account for another or give merit to rank up a new account.

[Piesel]

For member or full member accounts, I can understand since it's easy to get merit to rank up to that level. But for Hero/Legendary, yeah I don't get why they throw away such accounts and reputations for weekly payment from a scam campaign like 1xbit. I suspect most of those accounts are alts or multi-account or already have a low reputation.
That means they can anytime ditch that account for another or give merit to rank up a new account.

When you talk about reputation, it doesn't necessarily mean the level or rank of an individual in any space, it is a matter of personality and self-respect. A lot of conditions are attached to an individual decision but above all good reputation is far better than money most especially in a decentralized space like bitcointalk where a lot of opportunities to learn from other experience members and become something good in society.

So a newbie can decide to build a reputation where an ignorant legendary will throw away his reputation just for a weekly Penny from a proven scam casino.

[Hispo]

For member or full member accounts, I can understand since it's easy to get merit to rank up to that level. But for Hero/Legendary, yeah I don't get why they throw away such accounts and reputations for weekly payment from a scam campaign like 1xbit. I suspect most of those accounts are alts or multi account or already have a low reputation already.
That means they can anytime ditch that account for another or give merit to rank up a new account.

The merit system we currently have it is actually quite recent in comparison to the age of the forum itself. The merit system started in 2018, I think. Before the merit system implementation, users could rank up to Hero/Legendary rank just by accumulating activity (participating during enough months in a consistent way).

When the merit system got implemented those who already had rank earned by activity received "airdropped merit", Hero Members received 500 merits and Legendaries Received 1000 free merits. This means that today in order to have a Legendary account to throw away by joining 1xbit, that account just needed to have activity and be old enough to have received free merits in 2018.

[Docnaster]

For member or full member accounts, I can understand since it's easy to get merit to rank up to that level. But for Hero/Legendary, yeah I don't get why they throw away such accounts and reputations for weekly payment from a scam campaign like 1xbit. I suspect most of those accounts are alts or multi account or already have a low reputation already.
That means they can anytime ditch that account for another or give merit to rank up a new account.

When the merit system got implemented those who already had rank earned by activity received "airdropped merit", Hero Members received 500 merits and Legendaries Received 1000 free merits. This means that today in order to have a Legendary account to throw away by joining 1xbit, that account just needed to have activity and be old enough to have received free merits in 2018.

What actually you are saying is that those legend accounts that joined 1xbit didn't work so hard to build their account from zero to legendary, since they received airdrop merits. You are right if it is what you meant. I have another approach to this. If the purpose of someone is to make money in the forum only, those legendary accounts didn't just spoil their accounts but they have made good money for over 1year. 1xbit started with $150 per week and they have been consistent in running multiple campaigns.

[dezoel]

I'm not sure about the participants spending, but 1xbit keeps themselves with addition of more sports events. In recent days it have added cosmos to the list of cryptocurrencies used for gambling. One of early established platform, for now if they've solved the acquisition it could've grown much bigger taking the lead role as cryptocurrency accepted sportsbook.

It keeps making me wonder why 1xbit chose to scam. Whether it was intentional or a certain management mismanaged the company and spoilt her reputation.  If 1xbit don't want to scam they will make good company because of variety they put in their site. But it's unfortunate they are happy scamming people. Who knows if it is only members of the forum that are affected or random victims.

On this world there is always a bad guy aside from the good guy and unfortunately 1xbit chooses to be a bad guy/service provider. I don't know what they can get with it but maybe bad guys can only answer it?

It is intentional for sure because if it's about miss management then they can always revert their reputation back to normal and replace the old manager with a better manager which is more fair and only wants the best for the company that they are working with. If they didn't choose be a scammer then maybe their performance will also change.

Maybe they will not be aggressive in terms of advertisement and site improvements and the reason why they do this is only to attract and scam more people.

[Porfirii]

It is intentional for sure because if it's about miss management then they can always revert their reputation back to normal and replace the old manager with a better manager which is more fair and only wants the best for the company that they are working with. If they didn't choose be a scammer then maybe their performance will also change.

That's what they claimed a year ago or so: that old management was changed and the new one was going to solve the pending problems with many users. I don't follow the case every day, but it seems that the number of complaints remains the same. Whether they are about old problems or about the same ones but in the present, I haven't looked into it yet.

[erep]

That's what they claimed a year ago or so: that old management was changed and the new one was going to solve the pending problems with many users. I don't follow the case every day, but it seems that the number of complaints remains the same. Whether they are about old problems or about the same ones but in the present, I haven't looked into it yet.

Their efforts to change management haven't improved anything even the reputation is still with bad trust, I also didn't follow the news from this casino site but some new users complained the same thing with the previous case, they should restore the reputation to solve the old case but it won't be easy because they have a lot of cases about gambler funds. So they just released a signature campaign to spread the casino link promotion in various threads and campaign participants don't care about account trust even they just to get paid from bad reputation casino.

[abel1337]

That's what they claimed a year ago or so: that old management was changed and the new one was going to solve the pending problems with many users. I don't follow the case every day, but it seems that the number of complaints remains the same. Whether they are about old problems or about the same ones but in the present, I haven't looked into it yet.

Their efforts to change management haven't improved anything even the reputation is still with bad trust, I also didn't follow the news from this casino site but some new users complained the same thing with the previous case, they should restore the reputation to solve the old case but it won't be easy because they have a lot of cases about gambler funds. So they just released a signature campaign to spread the casino link promotion in various threads and campaign participants don't care about account trust even they just to get paid from bad reputation casino.

Sadly they don't want to improve their current reputation. They haven't solve previous scam accusation on their casino and it just keep piling up day by day. I really do think the move that they do on having a signature campaign won't help them in promoting here in the forum. They are one of the hottest active scam casino that is well known in this forum and having a signature campaign will just spread the awareness that it is a scam because most of signature campaign members are red tagged. It's good that we have forum members actively red tagging these users who are participants of signature campaign. Special thanks to JollyGood for actively tagging those accounts.

[Vaskiy]

I'm not sure about the participants spending, but 1xbit keeps themselves with addition of more sports events. In recent days it have added cosmos to the list of cryptocurrencies used for gambling. One of early established platform, for now if they've solved the acquisition it could've grown much bigger taking the lead role as cryptocurrency accepted sportsbook.

It keeps making me wonder why 1xbit chose to scam. Whether it was intentional or a certain management mismanaged the company and spoilt her reputation.  If 1xbit don't want to scam they will make good company because of variety they put in their site. But it's unfortunate they are happy scamming people. Who knows if it is only members of the forum that are affected or random victims.

In my understanding, 1xbit once got into acquisition of some scam and they never took it serious. It went like, they were out of the business. Later once again they came back, but the popularity of the domain name doesn't let them go for a change. Here they solved few acquisition and tried to gain reputation. This failed and now they're trying to continue their service amidst the acquisition.

[noormcs5]

They don't need to use their payment as betting capital on their site because they're not asked to. I'm sure that participants also have an idea about the trust issues of the said campaign but they're also staying to earn.

I agree and I also think that most of the 1xbit signature participants are multiaccount users probably its a big reason why they are defending this scam platform. They aren't dumb enough to use a fellow thief's service/platform they know that they can be screwed once they put in money.

I don't think that 1xbit signature participants have multi accounts at 1xbit, rather i think that they do not have any account there and they never play at 1xbit.

That's the reason that they are always posting good about the site and also they are being paid to write in favor of 1xbit else they have the danger to be removed from the campaign. They only care about few pennies which they get every month for 1xbit.

[lienfaye]

I don't think that 1xbit signature participants have multi accounts at 1xbit, rather i think that they do not have any account there and they never play at 1xbit.

Thats possible because they're also afraid to experience the same problem of complainants and lose their money if they play on 1xbit due to numerous unresolved accusations against the site.

That's the reason that they are always posting good about the site and also they are being paid to write in favor of 1xbit else they have the danger to be removed from the campaign. They only care about few pennies which they get every month for 1xbit.

They're getting paid so its obvious that they will defend 1xbit and will spread awareness to help the site get more players even they know to themselves that it cant be trusted.

[shasan]

I do  not think participant plays on the 1xbit gambling site though there is a chance that few user may play but they do not deposit fund they may play with the fund which they get as payment from their their signature campaign. As the fund is low the winning amount is also low and for that reason they may not face any issue.

[rhomelmabini]

I do  not think participant plays on the 1xbit gambling site though there is a chance that few user may play but they do not deposit fund they may play with the fund which they get as payment from their their signature campaign. As the fund is low the winning amount is also low and for that reason they may not face any issue.

Considering they are paid on their own personal Bitcoin addresses, it's likely they don't play there at all or a small portion of the participants was just trying. For me personally, these participants know the reputation of the casino, they're just blindly promoting it for their own self interests to get money. Money is money and this is crypto, the wild wild west.

[Chato1977]

I do  not think participant plays on the 1xbit gambling site though there is a chance that few user may play but they do not deposit fund they may play with the fund which they get as payment from their  signature campaign. As the fund is low the winning amount is also low and for that reason they may not face any issue.

Majority of their members in signature are literally a signature spammer in which does not even Know about gambling , meaning they are only for Money and why would they risk the payments to gamble when they also  have  idea about them being scammer? nope I don't think that there are even few of them who truly played because if does? then they must be posted here to clear the thoughts we are pointing about them.

[rodskee]

I'm not sure about the participants spending, but 1xbit keeps themselves with addition of more sports events. In recent days it have added cosmos to the list of cryptocurrencies used for gambling. One of early established platform, for now if they've solved the acquisition it could've grown much bigger taking the lead role as cryptocurrency accepted sportsbook.

It keeps making me wonder why 1xbit chose to scam. Whether it was intentional or a certain management mismanaged the company and spoilt her reputation.  If 1xbit don't want to scam they will make good company because of variety they put in their site. But it's unfortunate they are happy scamming people. Who knows if it is only members of the forum that are affected or random victims.

In my understanding, 1xbit once got into acquisition of some scam and they never took it serious. It went like, they were out of the business. Later once again they came back, but the popularity of the domain name doesn't let them go for a change. Here they solved few acquisition and tried to gain reputation. This failed and now they're trying to continue their service amidst the acquisition.

Years back they are interested in addressing those accusation against them but nowadays? it looks like they are already immune about all the cases coming here and there means one thing that they are only for profit or income and not caring about the players , in need of attention then they will not gain anything from the community and I'm not sure if there are even one forum member that plays in this site.

[wxa7115]

I'm not sure about the participants spending, but 1xbit keeps themselves with addition of more sports events. In recent days it have added cosmos to the list of cryptocurrencies used for gambling. One of early established platform, for now if they've solved the acquisition it could've grown much bigger taking the lead role as cryptocurrency accepted sportsbook.

It keeps making me wonder why 1xbit chose to scam. Whether it was intentional or a certain management mismanaged the company and spoilt her reputation.  If 1xbit don't want to scam they will make good company because of variety they put in their site. But it's unfortunate they are happy scamming people. Who knows if it is only members of the forum that are affected or random victims.

In my understanding, 1xbit once got into acquisition of some scam and they never took it serious. It went like, they were out of the business. Later once again they came back, but the popularity of the domain name doesn't let them go for a change. Here they solved few acquisition and tried to gain reputation. This failed and now they're trying to continue their service amidst the acquisition.

Years back they are interested in addressing those accusation against them but nowadays? it looks like they are already immune about all the cases coming here and there means one thing that they are only for profit or income and not caring about the players , in need of attention then they will not gain anything from the community and I'm not sure if there are even one forum member that plays in this site.

There was a time in which the owners of the 1xbit casino made an effort to try to clean their image but they failed, and once they realized that it was going to be impossible for them to ever regain the image they wanted they decided to openly scam their customers.

After all if they do not have a reputation to protect then it is not possible for us to do much to them because we do not really have the means to recover the coins they have stolen from their customers, and the only thing that we can do is to try to prevent newbies from gambling there, and while I'm sure that we are successful in our endeavors and we can protect a great deal of newbies from losing their money, we cannot protect everyone and they are able to remain in business because of that.

[peter0425]

There was a time in which the owners of the 1xbit casino made an effort to try to clean their image but they failed, and once they realized that it was going to be impossible for them to ever regain the image they wanted they decided to openly scam their customers.

We are not sure if the one who are talking to us here are Owner of 1xbit or just a part of the team , they tried to clean up their name but the problem is that Victims or claimants asks for proof of them being cheaters but nothing that they bring out.

After all if they do not have a reputation to protect then it is not possible for us to do much to them because we do not really have the means to recover the coins they have stolen from their customers, and the only thing that we can do is to try to prevent newbies from gambling there, and while I'm sure that we are successful in our endeavors and we can protect a great deal of newbies from losing their money, we cannot protect everyone and they are able to remain in business because of that.

they already accept those facts mate , they even still run their signature campaign here even with hundreds of complaints and with tens of negative trust on their account.

but what is important here is that to continue showing the forum on how this site runs their business for prevention .