I Have a Question ~ Are 1xbit Campaigners Playing on 1xbit?

[_act_]

1xbit accepted users with neg trust and some of the participants had red trust prior to joining the campaign. Others that did not have neg trust received it shortly after joining. I really doubt any of them are gambling a penny of the money they earn as well. It's quite possible that there are some multi accounts in the campaign as well.

With how you explained it, it is easy to join 1xbit campaign, definitely there are disused accounts that become useful when 1xbit campaign came again to this forum, many of the accounts also are alts and multi accounts. Some people will see it as a bonus and not minding the negative trust given.

Would be better to ask the campaign participants ^{(better mention those in the campaign spreadsheet list)} straight forward than making assumptions. Well, only if they will post here and tell the truth.
Plus, the campaign don't required them to make an account so i doubt they did.

Either they remain mute about it or they may speak what is not true, but I have seen one of them posted before that he has struggled to join a reputable campaign in the past that he was unable to, that 1xbit accepted him. They do not care if others are scammed as long as they are paid.

I am 100% certain that even 1xBit Bitcointalk signature campaigners aka promoters do not trust 1xBit enough to depost their funds there. Its just about the money for them.

Definitely they joined the campaign for the money and nothing else than promoting a gambling site that many people are complaining that they were scammed by 1xbit. They know people are complaining about the the betting site, they will not want to risk their money to play, only people that do not know about 1xbit would join and probably complain again that they won and not able to withdraw.

[1714882524]

1714882524

[1714882524]

1714882524

[1714882524]

1714882524

[Johnyz]

The answers are straight forward, 1xbit campaign participants can not give you the true answers, but we know the reasons they join 1xbit.

Many of the participants in the past are spammers and low quality posters. Psychologically speaking, some people even make use of their alts that have been abandoned to join. It was easy to get accepted in 1xbit campaign because no reputed accounts wants to join, no competition, people that re applying are accepted.

Basically they joined for the money.

Even though they have a trust issues, it looks like they are still effective since some newbies fall on their trap and we've seen a lot of accusation recently.
If we could have a way to totally ban their thread especially that signature campaign, that could be a big help to reduce scam projects. They are here for the money, and scamming gamblers is their main objective, those signature participants don't really care if they market a scam project, as long as they get paid they will still join.

[aioc]

With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.

They are not blacklisted I wish they are, they still have an active thread here and they still have an ongoing signature campaign, those who participate in their campaign are members with bad reputations and are not likely to get accepted by reputable bounty managers, they take a shot risking their reputation and so far they are making a lot because 1XBIT proved to be a long term campaign they are on the run as the longest signature campaign, they sometimes do 2 to 4 campaigns at the same time.

[rby]

The question of whether 1xbit promoters bet in 1xbit doesn't really matter or hold weight. It is not compulsory for a participant of a campaign to partake in the services of the campaign.
There is nothing more motivating people to join the campaign apart from the initial time they came with high paying amount upto $150 per week for legendary accounts. Some people who were hungry for money went in with their account. They are making the money but lost reputation.

Another reason is spamming and post bursting. 1x bit managers or should I say payers (because the campaign isn't managed) doesn't care about the quality of post, in as much as you can complete your post quota, you would be paid.

[Shamm]

This is a good question like other user said above  what ever  campaign you've promoted is not compulsory to take part of the team. Some campaign promoters choose other casino to play with. but other promoters enter or play in the casino they promote and its a good practice to join in the casino on what you've promoted to know everything about the casino you've promoted.

Like 1xbit team maybe  some promoters playing 1xbit casino. But you those promoters who already know what is 1xbit is I think they are only promote to earn but not playing.

[acroman08]

I am just curious to know   .

With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.

I have two simple questions to ask to all, but not limited to 1xbit promoters alone ~

• 1. What is your driving force,  motivation in promoting 1xbit?, knowing fully well that the casino is blacklisted on Bitcointalk due to numerous complaints and scam accusations that remains unattended to by those in charge of the casino.
• • 1.1. Is the money you are being paid, your motivation?
  Or
  
  • 1.2. Is your lack of ability to join or get accepted in other signature campaigns belonging to more reputable businesses, your motivation in deciding to promote 1xbit?

I am quite sure it is money and the lack of ability to join other campaigns. if you noticed when they launched their first campaign majority of the people who post their applications are accounts that were previously inactive or already have a negative tag.

1xbit accepted users with neg trust and some of the participants had red trust prior to joining the campaign. Others that did not have neg trust received it shortly after joining. I really doubt any of them are gambling a penny of the money they earn as well. It's quite possible that there are some multi accounts in the campaign as well.

yep, I agree, I am pretty sure that a lot of them are just alts of someone or owned by the same person. it also made my suspicion increase when a lot of them suddenly woke up hours after the first 1xbit campaign was launched.[/list]

[cabron]

If they didn't require the campaign participants to play on the 1xbit casino then they are not playing on their own casino. The signature participants know the casino is shady, they are just promoting to make BTC weekly at least but not playing. They probably even suspect they will not get their BTC back if they deposited on 1xbit while they win big.

[UserU]

If they didn't require the campaign participants to play on the 1xbit casino then they are not playing on their own casino. The signature participants know the casino is shady, they are just promoting to make BTC weekly at least but not playing. They probably even suspect they will not get their BTC back if they deposited on 1xbit while they win big.

Most likely that. Bit doesn't even bother since their ROI greatly exceed the advertising costs

[coinerer]

If they didn't require the campaign participants to play on the 1xbit casino then they are not playing on their own casino. The signature participants know the casino is shady, they are just promoting to make BTC weekly at least but not playing. They probably even suspect they will not get their BTC back if they deposited on 1xbit while they win big.

No signature campaign are  require to campaign participates to play casono on there platform. It cannot be part of the signature campaign rules. The purpose of the signature campaign is to promote only one project within the forum. So I think signature participants never gamble at 1xbet with there signature reword

[Jawhead999]

No signature campaign are  require to campaign participates to play casono on there platform. It cannot be part of the signature campaign rules. The purpose of the signature campaign is to promote only one project within the forum. So I think signature participants never gamble at 1xbet with there signature reword

There's no requirement, but of course it doesn't make sense if you're the participant but you never play at the project you've advertised. You will have no idea with your casino and you can't know what the advantages of the casino you've promoted.

I'm confused did you mean signature campaign only promote for one project or each signature participant only able to promote on project? Both of them were wrong, there's many signature campaign with various project and there's few users have advertised 2 projects (one project on their avatar and the another project on their signature).

[Jemzx00]

No signature campaign are  require to campaign participates to play casono on there platform. It cannot be part of the signature campaign rules. The purpose of the signature campaign is to promote only one project within the forum. So I think signature participants never gamble at 1xbet with there signature reword

There's no requirement, but of course it doesn't make sense if you're the participant but you never play at the project you've advertised. You will have no idea with your casino and you can't know what the advantages of the casino you've promoted.

I'm confused did you mean signature campaign only promote for one project or each signature participant only able to promote on project? Both of them were wrong, there's many signature campaign with various project and there's few users have advertised 2 projects (one project on their avatar and the another project on their signature).

Familiarity on the events and platform of the project your promoting on is one of the necessary key to better advertise the platform throughout the forum. It is not required to any signature campaign but it is necessary since the main purpose of a campaign is to promote the project throughout the forum.

Most but not all users that has joined a signature campaign on the forum can only promote one project at a time but if the campaign manager says otherwise then they are free to do so. This especially applies if you are promoting a gambling platform on your signature and would like to promote another gambling platform which might conflict the first one.

Anyways, I still haven't seen any replies from the participants of 1xbit campaign on this thread which only shows their true nature on why they've joined the campaign.

[qwertyup23]

I actually doubt so- majority of the people participating into this campaign are the ones who have alt accounts who were previously negatively tagged due to an infarction to the forum rules. Since most of their accounts are just lying around, they took advantage of this "scheme" to participate into 1xbit campaign purely for profits and money.

To be honest, I also do think that the people advertising 1xbit believes that the latter is a scam gambling website. But just because they are paying users in attractive rates, they are just taking advantage of this pay at the end.

[AbuBhakar]

I’m sure 1xbit participants will not gonna bite the dust here because they have no obligation to answer on this survey and also most them is already back on dormant state because 1xbit signature campaign is over. These account is just bought for the sole purpose of participating on 1xbit. I’m sure they don’t care anything besides money and I doubt too that they are playing on the casino because they just destroy the account reputation just to earn back the account worth when they purchased it.

They just doing work done.

[agustina2]

Should be obvious to me that their participants are not playing on 1xbit.

These guys are just for earning money thru posting and won't gamble their money on a gambling site. I can't even see them, at least joining discussions on some analysis thread where some bettors here make those discussions as a reference on their bets. Not used to seeing their campaigners active in gambling discussion.

Should not be a big concern for us. Soon their campaign will be ended or are they ended already as I don't bother to look at their thread?

[Porfirii]

It' a pitty. I really wanted some campaign promoter to talk about his experience and defend himself, but it seems that no one wants to speak (or wanted so far).

I can understand that those who are new to the campaign maybe haven't played in their website yet, but the casino was created some time ago and I can't believe that no long-time promoter has had the curiosity to give it a try.

[serjent05]

I’m sure 1xbit participants will not gonna bite the dust here because they have no obligation to answer on this survey and also most them is already back on dormant state because 1xbit signature campaign is over. These account is just bought for the sole purpose of participating on 1xbit. I’m sure they don’t care anything besides money and I doubt too that they are playing on the casino because they just destroy the account reputation just to earn back the account worth when they purchased it.

They just doing work done.

So the timing of the question is off since you said that the campaign of 1xbit is already over.  What a pity, I was expecting a barrage of replies from 1xbit sig campaign participants here but to my surprise, not a single one from them take time to answer the question here now I got it, there is no use in answering here because they are not getting paid for their post.

[dothebeats]

If they didn't require the campaign participants to play on the 1xbit casino then they are not playing on their own casino. The signature participants know the casino is shady, they are just promoting to make BTC weekly at least but not playing. They probably even suspect they will not get their BTC back if they deposited on 1xbit while they win big.

I am amazed on how daring the campaign participants are tbh. They know that they are dealing with a shady platform and they still went for it head-first, especially those accounts that doesn't have a negative trust rating before they joined this campaign. Still, it's surprising that 1xbit managed to pay these users promptly and accordingly every week, even with the high rates of the campaign back then. Also, it's surprising that they aren't paid on their 1xbit account because that will surely make things worse for the members of the campaign.

[Daltonik]

During the 1xbit campaign, its participants could well play on its platform, why not, but only if the payment for participation went on the organizer's platform, so that the signature campaign participants could use weekly payments for the game, but since the payments went to bitcoin wallets, we did not see the real picture we'll find out.  

[abel1337]

Still haven't seen an answer from current 1xbit campaign participants. I guess they are guilty themselves that they are promoting the malicious casino and just avoid this thread to be safe from not being removed by their manager . I also has a guess that some of those participants/accounts are being controlled by 1xbit employees cause of the history of the participants account which are abandoned for a long time, has a bad post quality, red tagged and other reasons why it can't enter a campaign that has a good reputations.

I also guess that those participants isn't even playing on 1xbit because I'm sure they know the background about the casino.

[|MINER|]

I tried very hard to see if anyone to whom you asked the question gave an answer to your . And  I am sad because I could not see a single reply from them yet. Personally I think their purpose is only one and that is to earn money and even if it is a scam like 1xbit there is no problem. There can be another big reason and that is mostly whos got negative feedback applied here beacause not being able to join any other good signature campaign. I just wonder what will happen to them if 1xbit's signature campaign stops? Aren't you killing the duck that laid the golden egg by selling your reputation unnecessarily?