I Have a Question ~ Are 1xbit Campaigners Playing on 1xbit?

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I am just curious to know  .

With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.

I have two simple questions to ask to all, but not limited to 1xbit promoters alone ~

• 1. What is your driving force,  motivation in promoting 1xbit?, knowing fully well that the casino is blacklisted on Bitcointalk due to numerous complaints and scam accusations that remains unattended to by those in charge of the casino.
• • 1.1. Is the money you are being paid, your motivation?
  Or
  
  • 1.2. Is your lack of ability to join or get accepted in other signature campaigns belonging to more reputable businesses, your motivation in deciding to promote 1xbit?
• 2. As a 1xbit promoter,  are you playing/gambling on 1xbit casino platform?
• • 2.1. If "Yes" is your answer to the question above ~ then what is your experience like? Please tell us..
  • 2.2. If "No" is your answer to the question above ~ then why?

I myself can not promote what I can not use,  because I have this believe that it is absolutely wrong to ask other people to use something you know within yourself is not good enough for you to use,  it is insincerity to yourself and to those around you.

[1714865063]

1714865063

[Oshosondy]

The answers are straight forward, 1xbit campaign participants can not give you the true answers, but we know the reasons they join 1xbit.

Many of the participants in the past are spammers and low quality posters. Psychologically speaking, some people even make use of their alts that have been abandoned to join. It was easy to get accepted in 1xbit campaign because no reputed accounts wants to join, no competition, people that re applying are accepted.

Basically they joined for the money.

We too in another campaigns joined those campaigns not only because we want to interact with people on Bitcointalk, bitcoin that we are paid is involved, but I noticed that it is not easy to join a signature campaign. We still care about campaign reputation, if the present campaign I am is tagged with negative trust and people are complaining about the gambling site, I will have no option than to leave after red flag, that is what 1xbit participants are not getting correctly. We should not promote scam gambling sites.

I was lured for the incentive paid by the campaign when I had no campaign, but I had to wait for a better campaign to come this forum, or joining a reputed one that is already on this forum, but some participants can not wait that long because of the money involved and ease of joining 1xbit. They do not care about the people that are scammed, but care more about the money they are paid.

[MAAManda]

I think the questions you ask are unnecessary for you to ask them (1xbit campaign participant) . We all know for sure that they follow the 1xbit campaign just to earn money, without wanting to know the experience of playing there. Maybe we won't even find the serious posts they made in their post history since joining the 1xbit campaign.

I myself can not promote what I can not use,  because I have this believe that it is absolutely wrong to ask other people to use something you know within yourself is not good enough for you to use,  it is insincerity to yourself and to those around you.

This is very important to do, I also before joining Rollbit, first tried to play there and see how big their community is. And it turns out, even when I win big, they will pay for it, about the community, they also have a very active community on Discord.

[robelneo]

I cannot answer for 1XBIT campaign participants but logic tells me that many of them are not playing there and they are fully aware of 1XBIT behavior on this forum, but they consider themselves freelancers with all the risks and benefits that they can get from promoting sites like 1XBIT.

The rewards are very tempting you are torn between protecting your credibility and reputation here in this forum and many of the members, give in, those who have a bad reputation are easy to give in but those who just got their reputation tagged after participating in 1XBIT can only hope that the campaign will last long for them to say that the financial benefits are all worth it.

I just hope that casinos with the existing signature campaigns can keep and there will be a new campaign for reputable casinos and newly launched casinos that want to establish their reputation here, I dread to see that majority of banners or signatures here are on 1XBIT, at one time they are holding 2 to 3 campaign they really have a huge budget on this and sadly they are gaining new users because if not the campaign would have been stopped.

[yahoo62278]

1xbit accepted users with neg trust and some of the participants had red trust prior to joining the campaign. Others that did not have neg trust received it shortly after joining. I really doubt any of them are gambling a penny of the money they earn as well. It's quite possible that there are some multi accounts in the campaign as well.

[PX-Z]

Would be better to ask the campaign participants ^{(better mention those in the campaign spreadsheet list)} straight forward than making assumptions. Well, only if they will post here and tell the truth.
Plus, the campaign don't required them to make an account so i doubt they did.

[Strongkored]

The answer is definitely because of money, but many of the accounts that follow the signature have already received neg trusts and they are accepted because unreliable businesses will accept unreliable participants.
Regarding their participants whether they play there, most likely not but to be honest there are also many participants in other campaigns who also don't use the services they promote, but since it's not part of the rules so that's not a problem, it's just that it would be better if these participants play or use the services he promotes to better understand the casino or the services they promote

[smartaction]

I don't think 1xbet campaign participants gamble on 1xbet. Their purpose is only to earn money.  They reward their participants with good amount every week. Which every participant gets as remuneration. I don't think they can waste their hard earned money by gambling. must if the signature campaigners use there money for there Daily expenses.

[bittraffic]

1xbit is buying those accounts itself. They were talking about it on the telegram channel which someone hired by 1xbit is buying the high-rank accounts with negative trust for less than $200. Meaning the majority of those accounts are now owned by 1xbit.

If those are not bought then those accounts are merely promoting 1xbit for the pay. EArning BTC still is more appealing than earning bounty tokens.   

[coin-investor]

1xbit is buying those accounts itself. They were talking about it on the telegram channel which someone hired by 1xbit is buying the high-rank accounts with negative trust for less than $200. Meaning the majority of those accounts are now owned by 1xbit.

Really? This is surprising many do not know this, so we can conclude that they are on a long term campaign because they are not going to buy those accounts if these campaigns are for the short term, I'm surprised how cheap these high-rank accounts were bought, you can easily earn $200 for a month of a campaign on a good campaign, anyway, these are disposable accounts

If those are not bought then those accounts are merely promoting 1xbit for the pay. EArning BTC still is more appealing than earning bounty tokens.   

Those other accounts will not play on 1XBIT because of the reputation issue, they don't want to be the next victim and they cannot complain because they are promoting 1XBIT.

[xSkylarx]

If a product is proven to be not good, would you still use it?

I'm pretty sure that these people promoting 1xbit are being paid in some way. Many are in tough times now considering the economic crisis we currently experiencing so some people would be willing to do anything. They are in desperate need of money that it reach to a point where they have no choice but to grab that opportunity to earn some money by promoting a scam platform.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

It seems to me to be something like the drug dealer who doesn't take drugs.

Since we haven't heard from any of the participants complaining that 1xBit has ripped them off and won't let them withdraw or anything like that, I think it's unlikely, unless 1xBit has a whitelisting to avoid ripping off those who participate in the signature campaigns.

But I understand that it is more likely that they are unscrupulous people who get paid for working for a casino that they know they are scamming and as they know it they don't deposit in it.

[dothebeats]

Probably not.

They know the reputation of the platform that they are campaigning for, and since most of them had already been red tagged due to advertisement of an obvious scam, they can't use the account to apply on other campaigns hence they are stuck with 1xbit. They'd probably just staying for the weekly benefits that they are getting from the campaign, but aren't brave enough to go play on the actual casino since they know what will happen to their hard-earned funds once they tried.

[Adbitco]

From on your questions i will love to answer it parabolically which says 'Flood doesn't know farm, crops, weeds and trees', when it comes it covers everywhere.
Which means if the 1xbit site could scam people and forum have blacklisted them doesn't mean it won't harm it promoters because same process others goes same process the promoters would also faced. It's quiet bad seeing people still promoting them.
Though it may be for some other reason like, if a user got Reflagged they may decides to join the campaign since no other managers accept them for their campaign so they may decides to rent out their sig space to them and be receiving some payment from the site without minding the effect of promoting the site around the forum. I think basically they are being paid directly to their btc address and is not certain they must used the site, all less their payment is being sent directly to 1xbit site.

[PX-Z]

I'm pretty sure that these people promoting 1xbit are being paid in some way.

They are indeed, it's a weekly for signature campaign.

If you're talking about the people outside bitcointalk promoting this casino, then again, it is. Knowing it's a casino, gambling niche rate for promotion is different from other niche, which is much more costly. And even those gambling/casino reviews sites are most probably paid, no one will give an almost 5/5 star review without being paid especially if the casino is a shit like this one. For f*ck sake, i don't know if there are people here still using this casino except for the newbies knowing what kind of service they provide.

[rhomelmabini]

I think this question isn't for 1xbit alone but to all who promote casinos on their signature profiles. For me, I will surely get the gist first about the site because it would be a shame if I'll be question how's the site and why do I choose to play their, that's just my take for a legitimate casino and by far has few accusations and whatnots.

For 1xbit, I doubt if most of the user plays on their site. I think it wouldn't be close to 50% if I'll be asked on how many users who participated on their campaign that plays as well in their casino. They may try but with the payment goes directly on their personal wallets, I really doubt if they happen to play there.

[NeuroticFish]

I am just curious to know

I was expecting a lot of answers from those users (easy way to fill quota, you know), but, surprisingly, none has come yet.
But I am curious what you expect to see as answers. I mean, we already know that the campaign in question has taken problematic accounts and shitposters. Would you really expect honest answers from those? Do you expect a meaningful discussion with those?

[Porfirii]

I am just curious to know

I was expecting a lot of answers from those users (easy way to fill quota, you know), but, surprisingly, none has come yet.

I'm expecting the same and I'm really curious too because if they play in their betting platform it means that they trust in them, but if they gamble somewhere else, but not there, it would be suspicious.

Maybe they have gambled there without problems and that's the reason they trust and promote their sportsbook. And negative trust would be fair in these cases? Anyway, I don't think 1xbit would risk to not pay to any participant in their signature campaign.

[fortunecrypto]

So far none of the 1Xbit participant has drop here to participate in the discussion, but its unlikeley that they are going to use 1XBIT platform because if they do that, and they got an issue they cannot file a complaint, imagine you are promoting 1XBIT then you are filing a complaint, they will just let it pass or not file a complaint or they will be taken out of the campaign, they are aware of 1XBIT's reputation.

[goldkingcoiner]

I am just curious to know  .

With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.

I have two simple questions to ask to all, but not limited to 1xbit promoters alone ~

• 1. What is your driving force,  motivation in promoting 1xbit?, knowing fully well that the casino is blacklisted on Bitcointalk due to numerous complaints and scam accusations that remains unattended to by those in charge of the casino.
• • 1.1. Is the money you are being paid, your motivation?
  Or
  
  • 1.2. Is your lack of ability to join or get accepted in other signature campaigns belonging to more reputable businesses, your motivation in deciding to promote 1xbit?
• 2. As a 1xbit promoter,  are you playing/gambling on 1xbit casino platform?
• • 2.1. If "Yes" is your answer to the question above ~ then what is your experience like? Please tell us..
  • 2.2. If "No" is your answer to the question above ~ then why?

I myself can not promote what I can not use,  because I have this believe that it is absolutely wrong to ask other people to use something you know within yourself is not good enough for you to use,  it is insincerity to yourself and to those around you.

I am 100% certain that even 1xBit Bitcointalk signature campaigners aka promoters do not trust 1xBit enough to depost their funds there. Its just about the money for them. Some people need it desperately, others just do not care about the damage they cause to the community as long as they earn a few more bucks each week. I for one would have to be extremely desperate to join their campaign. And even then it would leave a bitter taste in my mouth, knowing that I will harvest a lot of negative trust and my image with the community would be quite negative as well...

There are other ways to make money though. No matter how desperate you get, you should never support scammers.

[_act_]

1xbit accepted users with neg trust and some of the participants had red trust prior to joining the campaign. Others that did not have neg trust received it shortly after joining. I really doubt any of them are gambling a penny of the money they earn as well. It's quite possible that there are some multi accounts in the campaign as well.

With how you explained it, it is easy to join 1xbit campaign, definitely there are disused accounts that become useful when 1xbit campaign came again to this forum, many of the accounts also are alts and multi accounts. Some people will see it as a bonus and not minding the negative trust given.

Would be better to ask the campaign participants ^{(better mention those in the campaign spreadsheet list)} straight forward than making assumptions. Well, only if they will post here and tell the truth.
Plus, the campaign don't required them to make an account so i doubt they did.

Either they remain mute about it or they may speak what is not true, but I have seen one of them posted before that he has struggled to join a reputable campaign in the past that he was unable to, that 1xbit accepted him. They do not care if others are scammed as long as they are paid.

I am 100% certain that even 1xBit Bitcointalk signature campaigners aka promoters do not trust 1xBit enough to depost their funds there. Its just about the money for them.

Definitely they joined the campaign for the money and nothing else than promoting a gambling site that many people are complaining that they were scammed by 1xbit. They know people are complaining about the the betting site, they will not want to risk their money to play, only people that do not know about 1xbit would join and probably complain again that they won and not able to withdraw.

[Johnyz]

The answers are straight forward, 1xbit campaign participants can not give you the true answers, but we know the reasons they join 1xbit.

Many of the participants in the past are spammers and low quality posters. Psychologically speaking, some people even make use of their alts that have been abandoned to join. It was easy to get accepted in 1xbit campaign because no reputed accounts wants to join, no competition, people that re applying are accepted.

Basically they joined for the money.

Even though they have a trust issues, it looks like they are still effective since some newbies fall on their trap and we've seen a lot of accusation recently.
If we could have a way to totally ban their thread especially that signature campaign, that could be a big help to reduce scam projects. They are here for the money, and scamming gamblers is their main objective, those signature participants don't really care if they market a scam project, as long as they get paid they will still join.

[aioc]

With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.

They are not blacklisted I wish they are, they still have an active thread here and they still have an ongoing signature campaign, those who participate in their campaign are members with bad reputations and are not likely to get accepted by reputable bounty managers, they take a shot risking their reputation and so far they are making a lot because 1XBIT proved to be a long term campaign they are on the run as the longest signature campaign, they sometimes do 2 to 4 campaigns at the same time.

[rby]

The question of whether 1xbit promoters bet in 1xbit doesn't really matter or hold weight. It is not compulsory for a participant of a campaign to partake in the services of the campaign.
There is nothing more motivating people to join the campaign apart from the initial time they came with high paying amount upto $150 per week for legendary accounts. Some people who were hungry for money went in with their account. They are making the money but lost reputation.

Another reason is spamming and post bursting. 1x bit managers or should I say payers (because the campaign isn't managed) doesn't care about the quality of post, in as much as you can complete your post quota, you would be paid.

[Shamm]

This is a good question like other user said above  what ever  campaign you've promoted is not compulsory to take part of the team. Some campaign promoters choose other casino to play with. but other promoters enter or play in the casino they promote and its a good practice to join in the casino on what you've promoted to know everything about the casino you've promoted.

Like 1xbit team maybe  some promoters playing 1xbit casino. But you those promoters who already know what is 1xbit is I think they are only promote to earn but not playing.

[acroman08]

I am just curious to know   .

With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.

I have two simple questions to ask to all, but not limited to 1xbit promoters alone ~

• 1. What is your driving force,  motivation in promoting 1xbit?, knowing fully well that the casino is blacklisted on Bitcointalk due to numerous complaints and scam accusations that remains unattended to by those in charge of the casino.
• • 1.1. Is the money you are being paid, your motivation?
  Or
  
  • 1.2. Is your lack of ability to join or get accepted in other signature campaigns belonging to more reputable businesses, your motivation in deciding to promote 1xbit?

I am quite sure it is money and the lack of ability to join other campaigns. if you noticed when they launched their first campaign majority of the people who post their applications are accounts that were previously inactive or already have a negative tag.

1xbit accepted users with neg trust and some of the participants had red trust prior to joining the campaign. Others that did not have neg trust received it shortly after joining. I really doubt any of them are gambling a penny of the money they earn as well. It's quite possible that there are some multi accounts in the campaign as well.

yep, I agree, I am pretty sure that a lot of them are just alts of someone or owned by the same person. it also made my suspicion increase when a lot of them suddenly woke up hours after the first 1xbit campaign was launched.[/list]

[cabron]

If they didn't require the campaign participants to play on the 1xbit casino then they are not playing on their own casino. The signature participants know the casino is shady, they are just promoting to make BTC weekly at least but not playing. They probably even suspect they will not get their BTC back if they deposited on 1xbit while they win big.

[UserU]

If they didn't require the campaign participants to play on the 1xbit casino then they are not playing on their own casino. The signature participants know the casino is shady, they are just promoting to make BTC weekly at least but not playing. They probably even suspect they will not get their BTC back if they deposited on 1xbit while they win big.

Most likely that. Bit doesn't even bother since their ROI greatly exceed the advertising costs

[coinerer]

If they didn't require the campaign participants to play on the 1xbit casino then they are not playing on their own casino. The signature participants know the casino is shady, they are just promoting to make BTC weekly at least but not playing. They probably even suspect they will not get their BTC back if they deposited on 1xbit while they win big.

No signature campaign are  require to campaign participates to play casono on there platform. It cannot be part of the signature campaign rules. The purpose of the signature campaign is to promote only one project within the forum. So I think signature participants never gamble at 1xbet with there signature reword

[Jawhead999]

No signature campaign are  require to campaign participates to play casono on there platform. It cannot be part of the signature campaign rules. The purpose of the signature campaign is to promote only one project within the forum. So I think signature participants never gamble at 1xbet with there signature reword

There's no requirement, but of course it doesn't make sense if you're the participant but you never play at the project you've advertised. You will have no idea with your casino and you can't know what the advantages of the casino you've promoted.

I'm confused did you mean signature campaign only promote for one project or each signature participant only able to promote on project? Both of them were wrong, there's many signature campaign with various project and there's few users have advertised 2 projects (one project on their avatar and the another project on their signature).

[Jemzx00]

No signature campaign are  require to campaign participates to play casono on there platform. It cannot be part of the signature campaign rules. The purpose of the signature campaign is to promote only one project within the forum. So I think signature participants never gamble at 1xbet with there signature reword

There's no requirement, but of course it doesn't make sense if you're the participant but you never play at the project you've advertised. You will have no idea with your casino and you can't know what the advantages of the casino you've promoted.

I'm confused did you mean signature campaign only promote for one project or each signature participant only able to promote on project? Both of them were wrong, there's many signature campaign with various project and there's few users have advertised 2 projects (one project on their avatar and the another project on their signature).

Familiarity on the events and platform of the project your promoting on is one of the necessary key to better advertise the platform throughout the forum. It is not required to any signature campaign but it is necessary since the main purpose of a campaign is to promote the project throughout the forum.

Most but not all users that has joined a signature campaign on the forum can only promote one project at a time but if the campaign manager says otherwise then they are free to do so. This especially applies if you are promoting a gambling platform on your signature and would like to promote another gambling platform which might conflict the first one.

Anyways, I still haven't seen any replies from the participants of 1xbit campaign on this thread which only shows their true nature on why they've joined the campaign.

[qwertyup23]

I actually doubt so- majority of the people participating into this campaign are the ones who have alt accounts who were previously negatively tagged due to an infarction to the forum rules. Since most of their accounts are just lying around, they took advantage of this "scheme" to participate into 1xbit campaign purely for profits and money.

To be honest, I also do think that the people advertising 1xbit believes that the latter is a scam gambling website. But just because they are paying users in attractive rates, they are just taking advantage of this pay at the end.

[AbuBhakar]

I’m sure 1xbit participants will not gonna bite the dust here because they have no obligation to answer on this survey and also most them is already back on dormant state because 1xbit signature campaign is over. These account is just bought for the sole purpose of participating on 1xbit. I’m sure they don’t care anything besides money and I doubt too that they are playing on the casino because they just destroy the account reputation just to earn back the account worth when they purchased it.

They just doing work done.

[agustina2]

Should be obvious to me that their participants are not playing on 1xbit.

These guys are just for earning money thru posting and won't gamble their money on a gambling site. I can't even see them, at least joining discussions on some analysis thread where some bettors here make those discussions as a reference on their bets. Not used to seeing their campaigners active in gambling discussion.

Should not be a big concern for us. Soon their campaign will be ended or are they ended already as I don't bother to look at their thread?

[Porfirii]

It' a pitty. I really wanted some campaign promoter to talk about his experience and defend himself, but it seems that no one wants to speak (or wanted so far).

I can understand that those who are new to the campaign maybe haven't played in their website yet, but the casino was created some time ago and I can't believe that no long-time promoter has had the curiosity to give it a try.

[serjent05]

I’m sure 1xbit participants will not gonna bite the dust here because they have no obligation to answer on this survey and also most them is already back on dormant state because 1xbit signature campaign is over. These account is just bought for the sole purpose of participating on 1xbit. I’m sure they don’t care anything besides money and I doubt too that they are playing on the casino because they just destroy the account reputation just to earn back the account worth when they purchased it.

They just doing work done.

So the timing of the question is off since you said that the campaign of 1xbit is already over.  What a pity, I was expecting a barrage of replies from 1xbit sig campaign participants here but to my surprise, not a single one from them take time to answer the question here now I got it, there is no use in answering here because they are not getting paid for their post.

[dothebeats]

If they didn't require the campaign participants to play on the 1xbit casino then they are not playing on their own casino. The signature participants know the casino is shady, they are just promoting to make BTC weekly at least but not playing. They probably even suspect they will not get their BTC back if they deposited on 1xbit while they win big.

I am amazed on how daring the campaign participants are tbh. They know that they are dealing with a shady platform and they still went for it head-first, especially those accounts that doesn't have a negative trust rating before they joined this campaign. Still, it's surprising that 1xbit managed to pay these users promptly and accordingly every week, even with the high rates of the campaign back then. Also, it's surprising that they aren't paid on their 1xbit account because that will surely make things worse for the members of the campaign.

[Daltonik]

During the 1xbit campaign, its participants could well play on its platform, why not, but only if the payment for participation went on the organizer's platform, so that the signature campaign participants could use weekly payments for the game, but since the payments went to bitcoin wallets, we did not see the real picture we'll find out.  

[abel1337]

Still haven't seen an answer from current 1xbit campaign participants. I guess they are guilty themselves that they are promoting the malicious casino and just avoid this thread to be safe from not being removed by their manager . I also has a guess that some of those participants/accounts are being controlled by 1xbit employees cause of the history of the participants account which are abandoned for a long time, has a bad post quality, red tagged and other reasons why it can't enter a campaign that has a good reputations.

I also guess that those participants isn't even playing on 1xbit because I'm sure they know the background about the casino.

[|MINER|]

I tried very hard to see if anyone to whom you asked the question gave an answer to your . And  I am sad because I could not see a single reply from them yet. Personally I think their purpose is only one and that is to earn money and even if it is a scam like 1xbit there is no problem. There can be another big reason and that is mostly whos got negative feedback applied here beacause not being able to join any other good signature campaign. I just wonder what will happen to them if 1xbit's signature campaign stops? Aren't you killing the duck that laid the golden egg by selling your reputation unnecessarily?

[coupable]

Do you really imagine that those involved in an advertising campaign for a website that tricks its users will be honest in answering your questions? The frank and clear answer will come to you from the rest of the members, of course.
Here is my answer to your questions in a nutshell:
1. What drives them most to participate in this campaign is firstly their ignorance of the forum rules and that their profiles have a reputation that could have been better used in the long run and not just for one campaign, and secondly their greed to get money in any way.
2. I bet most of them do not gamble at all and did not visit the gambling department before joining that campaign.

[iv4n]

A much better question would be whether people who advertise gambling and various casinos gamble at all?!

In my opinion, less than 30% actually gamble, and under 10% are active gamblers!

I am an active gambler, I guess we are playing at several casinos most of the time, but we tried/played in almost all crypto casinos around...

The casino whose signature I currently have is fine for now, they are young and I guess it's too early to say anything! I already have some of their tokens and I will try to make a bit more... So yes, I usually gamble in the casino I advertise with my signature!

[Eureka_07]

<snip>

The driving force behind that will be money. They earn from advertising them even though they do know that the company has a really bad reputation and continuously scamming people everyday.
They are greedy and do not care to people that might become the next victim of their casino.
I think very few of them play also. On the other hand, most are just for the signature campaign salary.

[inanilujimi]

So far none of the 1Xbit participant has drop here to participate in the discussion, but its unlikeley that they are going to use 1XBIT platform because if they do that, and they got an issue they cannot file a complaint, imagine you are promoting 1XBIT then you are filing a complaint, they will just let it pass or not file a complaint or they will be taken out of the campaign, they are aware of 1XBIT's reputation.

This is the part that I like, looks ticklish when it happens. those who are bouty participants are very aware of what they are doing, and are ready to accept the consequences, so it is impossible for them to want to play there because the risk they take is already very big.

[Hispo]

1.1. Is the money you are being paid, your motivation?[/li][/list]
Or
1.2. Is your lack of ability to join or get accepted in other signature campaigns belonging to more reputable businesses, your motivation in deciding to promote 1xbit?[/li][/list]

I'd speculate that the main reason for people to join that campaign is the money but there are a couple of factors that also contribute for people to join 1xbit: they do not care their personal reputation on the forum and they do not manage to get accepted in any other legitimate campaign.

Sure, most of us that join signature campaigns do it to get some bucks, but we dont want to get involved with a scam service.

[suzanne5223]

I am just curious to know  .

With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.

"The love of money is the root of all evil," they said because it always makes good girls go bad and it is not only on this forum because there are some reputable crypto sites that are promoting the shady casino.
Back to your question. " Are 1xbit Campaigners Playing on 1xbit?" Is it possible for someone selling poison to eat it when he knows its poison and is fully aware of the result of eating it?

[nakamura12]

I can't answer on behalf of the 1xbit participants but my guess is that some may be gambling on 1xbit and some are only joining 1xbit just to earn money even though they will get negative trust after joining. I would say that the answer to your questions is two either 1xbit campaign participants are playing on 1xbit or 1xbit participants are not playing on 1xbit but only joining in the campaign to earn some money.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I am just curious to know  .

With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.

"The love of money is the root of all evil,"

When we look at this critically,  we will discover that not having money is the real root of all evil,  I believe that if this guys had money already,  they wouldn't be promoting scam in order to get paid.

Back to your question. " Are 1xbit Campaigners Playing on 1xbit?" Is it possible for someone selling poison to eat it when he knows its poison and is fully aware of the result of eating it?

🤔 Hmmm,  you do have a point here,  but normal people do not sell human poison by the way,  they only sell poison for rats and cockrochies, the rat poison turns to human poison when the buyer decides to use it outside what it's meant for.

[DoublerHunter]

I can't answer on behalf of the 1xbit participants but my guess is that some may be gambling on 1xbit and some are only joining 1xbit just to earn money even though they will get negative trust after joining. I would say that the answer to your questions is two either 1xbit campaign participants are playing on 1xbit or 1xbit participants are not playing on 1xbit but only joining in the campaign to earn some money.

^ Look, it sounds funny.
This thread has reached 3 pages of replies but I did not see any 1xbit participants joining this discussion and giving their opinion.
Probably they are afraid to state the fact that they are only milking that casino and promoting them even though they know it is a scam, just because of the money that they will get. No one will play if they know it is a scam and it could be they become the next victim.

[goaldigger]

I can't answer on behalf of the 1xbit participants but my guess is that some may be gambling on 1xbit and some are only joining 1xbit just to earn money even though they will get negative trust after joining. I would say that the answer to your questions is two either 1xbit campaign participants are playing on 1xbit or 1xbit participants are not playing on 1xbit but only joining in the campaign to earn some money.

This is the only signature that accept users with a negative trust and they are actually paying good so many still want to participate despite of the scam issues. They are fully  driven by the reward and the money, they can also be a player on that site but of course they are not safe to become a victim as well. Nevertheless, we should continue to spread awareness about this scam site so they wont succeed on fooling people especially with the newbie gamblers, you really have to mark this site as a scam and don’t ever play with this.

[nakamura12]

^ Look, it sounds funny.
This thread has reached 3 pages of replies but I did not see any 1xbit participants joining this discussion and giving their opinion.
Probably they are afraid to state the fact that they are only milking that casino and promoting them even though they know it is a scam, just because of the money that they will get. No one will play if they know it is a scam and it could be they become the next victim.

I think it's because they are promoting a scam site and if they did reply on this thread then many won't believe their opinion. (My thoughts on why they didn't join the discussion). I don't know the real reason why no 1xbit participants are replying on this thread or my guess might be right or you are right they are just milking 1xbit.

This is the only signature that accept users with a negative trust and they are actually paying good so many still want to participate despite of the scam issues. They are fully  driven by the reward and the money, they can also be a player on that site but of course they are not safe to become a victim as well. Nevertheless, we should continue to spread awareness about this scam site so they wont succeed on fooling people especially with the newbie gamblers, you really have to mark this site as a scam and don’t ever play with this.

Even if many people spread the news about 1xbit being a scam gambling site and yet there's still people who fall for the site. I replied on a thread in the same board and the topic is about 1xbit where the op is not paid. It's this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5408635.0

[Slow death]

1xbit is a scam company that spends a lot of money on advertising and they have an advantage: they make selective scams, or rather they make selective payments and there is another important thing that people who complain about them are newbies, which in a way they do with that they still continue on this forum with their signature campaign because not many trusted members have appeared yet to give a bad review with evidence, if we had many cases where trusted forum members appeared on this forum posting bad reviews and with evidence then they probably wouldn't have subscription campaign because no one would participate. but we don't have that, so they always justify that newbie accounts are from the same person who is trying to defame them, so we have a situation where even having evidence of some serious cases they still manage to have justifications that allow them to be here

[crzy]

First, they have no reputation to protect at all since all the participants already have an issue before prior to joining the campaign and probably they are doing this for the money. They are not a gambler for sure since they don’t want to become a victim as well, they just want money from the signature campaign. I’m still wondering why the campaign still live, probably they are paying good enough for this and for sure the funds is come from the scammed money which personally I can’t afford to work with because i still have a conscience.  

[Hamphser]

MONEY!

Participants that joined on this campaign are all having negative trust which means there's no reputation that they would need to protect into their accounts and we know that negative tagged accounts
is as good as a garbage or doesnt really have much use since you cant really join up most campaigns and surprisingly here's 1xbit who do allow those negged users to join and since the company
is a scammy and lots of issues then it would be normal for them to consider those red tagged accounts to advertise because if they would set out limits then for sure no one would able
to join their campaign but since its been allowed then its a win-win situation for those participants where they could still make use of their accounts and getting paid on every post they made
and talking about being ethical? They dont really care as long they could make money.

[samcrypto]

First, they have no reputation to protect at all since all the participants already have an issue before prior to joining the campaign and probably they are doing this for the money. They are not a gambler for sure since they don’t want to become a victim as well, they just want money from the signature campaign. I’m still wondering why the campaign still live, probably they are paying good enough for this and for sure the funds is come from the scammed money which personally I can’t afford to work with because i still have a conscience.  

We can’t stop a signature campaign like this, there’s no feature yet like this in the forum and we can only give warning by putting a negative trust to every participants of this scam campaign.

The participants join for the money and that’s an obvious reason but you can see them ignoring all the issues about the site just to get the reward, very desperate move for them. 1xBit is a scam, we’ve talked so many times about this and they have no plan to solve the issues at all, they just let the victim hang without any explanation, such a bad site to gamble.

[capedbaldy]

We can’t stop a signature campaign like this, there’s no feature yet like this in the forum and we can only give warning by putting a negative trust to every participants of this scam campaign.

The participants join for the money and that’s an obvious reason but you can see them ignoring all the issues about the site just to get the reward, very desperate move for them. 1xBit is a scam, we’ve talked so many times about this and they have no plan to solve the issues at all, they just let the victim hang without any explanation, such a bad site to gamble.

They are so greedy to make money from promoting signature campaigns for scammer casinos that even some of the participants have dedicated themselves to working to defend the scammers. But whatever their statements will be ignored because defending scammers is a big mistake and we just need to educate gamblers to get out of this scammer gambling site.

[coin-investor]

So far none of the 1xbit campaigners dropped here to answer all these questions the questions are specifically for them to answer, they don't want to be put in the spotlight, they just want to post and do not want to get into a discussion about 1XBIT because they know that they have a lost cause, it's hard to defend something that is notorious on doing something, but I still like to see at least one participant dropping here to post and answer some of the questions there.

[TimeTeller]

So far none of the 1xbit campaigners dropped here to answer all these questions the questions are specifically for them to answer, they don't want to be put in the spotlight, they just want to post and do not want to get into a discussion about 1XBIT because they know that they have a lost cause, it's hard to defend something that is notorious on doing something, but I still like to see at least one participant dropping here to post and answer some of the questions there.

I believe you can't expect to read the truth in case they will respond on these questions.
They can easily say yes, and make good reasons why, as we have different experiences in every casino.
But with the reputation of 1xbit, I believe they are also worried about the possible non payment if in case they will win big.
So in case they are playing on this site, I am thinking that they are playing small and cautious with how they play.

[lienfaye]

MONEY!

Yes its because of money. They have nothing to lose since mostly of 1xbit campaigners had a red paint even before they apply for the campaign and 1xbit allowed users with red paint. Its an opportunity for these campaigners to earn money using their garbage account. Its not surprising actually for a scam casino to hire a no credibility campaigners since they're in the same boat. Anyway to answer the question, I dont think these campaigners are playing on the casino that they advertise knowing its reputation. They can lie to say they're playing but deep inside they also know their money is at risk if they decided to gamble on 1xbit.

[PX-Z]

I hope gamblers should be selective in choosing other good casinos and in fact we already have a list of many other trusted casinos in the forum this.

Unfortunately, it didn't work like that. I dont know the percentage, but it's a lot where new comers ^{(new gamblers)} to crypto casino are prone to be lured to scam websites ^{(Scam casino)} due to most of the ads spread all through out the internet from google, social media websites, gambling review websites, to forums.
 
Signatures here showing 1xbit are somewhat working at least because if not they will stop already knowing their reputation here.

[Jemzx00]

I believe you can't expect to read the truth in case they will respond on these questions.
They can easily say yes, and make good reasons why, as we have different experiences in every casino.
But with the reputation of 1xbit, I believe they are also worried about the possible non payment if in case they will win big.
So in case they are playing on this site, I am thinking that they are playing small and cautious with how they play.

Actually we don't need any answers from them, they have the experience to give convincing answers but anyway they don't respond to any previous complaint reports, I hope gamblers should be selective in choosing other good casinos and in fact we already have a list of many other trusted casinos in the forum this.

We already know the answer however we still need to hear their side as to why they would like to promote such a gambling platform that has incredibly bad reputation. Unfortunately, most of their applicants already have a red tagged on their account or an alt account which doesn't care if it'll get tagged as long as they'll be able to earn from it.

I don't think that 1xbit campaign is doing well on this forum since they already have a bad reputation throughout the forum however they might receive some traffic on their banner and advertisement outside the forum as i was able to see some of their advertisement on various websites.

[Oshosondy]

We already know the answer however we still need to hear their side as to why they would like to promote such a gambling platform that has incredibly bad reputation. Unfortunately, most of their applicants already have a red tagged on their account or an alt account which doesn't care if it'll get tagged as long as they'll be able to earn from it.

What answer do you want from them when the truth is that they go for money regardless of a site of being good or scam, they do not care about reputation but money, there is nothing they are going to tell than that.

I don't think that 1xbit campaign is doing well on this forum since they already have a bad reputation throughout the forum however they might receive some traffic on their banner and advertisement outside the forum as i was able to see some of their advertisement on various websites.

Negative trust can help, but it would have been better if the campaign can be stopped from continuing on this forum, this would help most especially the guests on this forum from 1xbit. I saw some newbies that mistakenly wanted to join 1xbit, they removed the campaign signature after their account was tagged, not having the campaign on this forum would help some newbies and guests.

[cabron]

If they didn't require the campaign participants to play on the 1xbit casino then they are not playing on their own casino. The signature participants know the casino is shady, they are just promoting to make BTC weekly at least but not playing. They probably even suspect they will not get their BTC back if they deposited on 1xbit while they win big.

No signature campaign are  require to campaign participates to play casono on there platform. It cannot be part of the signature campaign rules. The purpose of the signature campaign is to promote only one project within the forum. So I think signature participants never gamble at 1xbet with there signature reword

I would however believe the participants are playing on 1xbit if the campaign pays through the 1xbit account like how Stake campaign do which they send the fees to the stake accounts. But then  it doesn't matter still.

The casino is not blacklisted and marketing here in the forum is not moderated and that's what made 1xbit circumvent the forum rules and are able to reach audience still.

[suzanne5223]

I am just curious to know  .

With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.

"The love of money is the root of all evil,"

When we look at this critically,  we will discover that not having money is the real root of all evil,  I believe that if this guys had money already,  they wouldn't be promoting scam in order to get paid.

I believe you said this because you have never met someone who has money and is still greedy for what a common man has. There are a lot of campaigns the people that promote this scam casino can join.

Back to your question. " Are 1xbit Campaigners Playing on 1xbit?" Is it possible for someone selling poison to eat it when he knows its poison and is fully aware of the result of eating it?

🤔 Hmmm,  you do have a point here,  but normal people do not sell human poison by the way,  they only sell poison for rats and cockrochies, the rat poison turns to human poison when the buyer decides to use it outside what it's meant for.

You said normal person don't sell human poison but if we look into the promoter of this scam casino they are poison to the newbies indirectly.

[Piesel]

First, we have to realize the place of personal responsibility and class because what I can not do is for money another user may be willing to do the same for the same amount or even a lesser amount and that is where reputation comes into play.
No one will trust a member that promotes scam that can hurt other people and steal their money with several unresolved accusations, am not sure if those participating in that signature play on that casino if they do then they should have spoken up on this thread or other related threads with proving that the casino fairly pays players. So far there has not been any evidence of that so I will say they just promoting the casino for the pee nuts they're paid weekly.

[rhomelmabini]

No one will trust a member that promotes scam that can hurt other people and steal their money with several unresolved accusations, am not sure if those participating in that signature play on that casino if they do then they should have spoken up on this thread or other related threads with proving that the casino fairly pays players. So far there has not been any evidence of that so I will say they just promoting the casino for the pee nuts they're paid weekly.

Exactly the point of the masses of those who responded in this very thread. I can understand if it the player is promoting a more trusted and proven casino but with 1xbit in the line, it's a doubtful stuff to even know. Well, if checked, most of their members has those trust issues and just my guess those are even alt accounts that joined the campaign. Just my guess but the possibilities are endless.

[noormcs5]

First, we have to realize the place of personal responsibility and class because what I can not do is for money another user may be willing to do the same for the same amount or even a lesser amount and that is where reputation comes into play.
No one will trust a member that promotes scam that can hurt other people and steal their money with several unresolved accusations, am not sure if those participating in that signature play on that casino if they do then they should have spoken up on this thread or other related threads with proving that the casino fairly pays players. So far there has not been any evidence of that so I will say they just promoting the casino for the pee nuts they're paid weekly.

Yes, they are only interested to get some money to promote the scam site through the signature campaign and they don't care how is the site responding to the players.

They are being paid to shill the casino all over the forum and they just do that. Even if some are gamblers among them, they may play at other trusted casino sites, who knows? They will surely never opt for 1xbit for gambling for themselves.

[smartaction]

First, we have to realize the place of personal responsibility and class because what I can not do is for money another user may be willing to do the same for the same amount or even a lesser amount and that is where reputation comes into play.
No one will trust a member that promotes scam that can hurt other people and steal their money with several unresolved accusations, am not sure if those participating in that signature play on that casino if they do then they should have spoken up on this thread or other related threads with proving that the casino fairly pays players. So far there has not been any evidence of that so I will say they just promoting the casino for the pee nuts they're paid weekly.

Yes, they are only interested to get some money to promote the scam site through the signature campaign and they don't care how is the site responding to the players.

They are being paid to shill the casino all over the forum and they just do that. Even if some are gamblers among them, they may play at other trusted casino sites, who knows? They will surely never opt for 1xbit for gambling for themselves.

Almost most of the forum members know that 1xbet is a scam gambling site since the forum declared 1xbet as a scam. Nevertheless, the 1xbet team continues to promote their project here . And some stupid members are helping to promote 1xbet by joining their signature campaign. But I think they join signature campaign only to earn money.  They don't gamble on 1xbet

[uneng]

Interesting that after 4 pages of thread nobody from the 1xbit signature campaign itself has come here to present their point of view. Probably it's because when there is nothing to say, it's better to say nothing.

Anyway, I don't think it's a good marketing for 1xbit, because once someone creates a thread asking if promoters play at the casino they promote and none of them replies, it lights a red alert for potential gamblers, besides the fact everyone connected to the company is negatively rated.

[rby]

Interesting that after 4 pages of thread nobody from the 1xbit signature campaign itself has come here to present their point of view. Probably it's because when there is nothing to say, it's better to say nothing.

Anyway, I don't think it's a good marketing for 1xbit, because once someone creates a thread asking if promoters play at the casino they promote and none of them replies, it lights a red alert for potential gamblers, besides the fact everyone connected to the company is negatively rated.

It is not all 1xbit promoters that are proud promoting the company. It is few keyboard warriors who already got bunches of red tag that aggressively defend the company. I don't actually know if they receive extra pay from 1xbit for doing the defence. Generally they are no longer strong or willing to defend their pay master, they could be focusing on their earning and thinking how to spam the upper week and get paid accordingly.

[ScamViruS]

Most of the participants of 1xbit's signature campaign have Red Trust accounts before joining the campaign. Because 1xbit accepts Red Trust members in their signature campaign. So you will not get any proper answer from the participants asking such questions, because they have been doing many illegal activities in this forum before joining the campaign which has led them to get red tag from DT members. As they are already more attracted to illegal things and love to do them. So it's no big deal for them to continue promoting 1xbit.

[erep]

It is not all 1xbit promoters that are proud promoting the company. It is few keyboard warriors who already got bunches of red tag that aggressively defend the company. I don't actually know if they receive extra pay from 1xbit for doing the defence. Generally they are no longer strong or willing to defend their pay master, they could be focusing on their earning and thinking how to spam the upper week and get paid accordingly.

The main factor is that they hold the signature because the weekly payment will be paid by the company, there are several participants who have supported the defense to improve the reputation of 1xbit but they do not provide solutions to complaints and accusations of scam at 1xbit, other participants do not care about all the accusations against 1xbit and nothing defense efforts, because they were aware of his involvement as a promoter of 1xbit for the work of fulfilling weekly posts and receiving weekly payments.

[UserU]

I checked the thread and it seemed Erdogan got banned?

[acroman08]

I checked the thread and it seemed Erdogan got banned?

I wonder why he got banned, I checked if he was reported for plagiarism but I can't find a report on the report plagiarism thread. he was so hell-bent on defending 1xbit despite the bad history it has in the forum. I also wonder if he was part of their team trying to minimalize the increasing bad reputation 1xbit has in this forum.

[Doan9269]

Their campaign which is reported for scam and employing set of scammers ad well to help them campaign their site were all scam, they care less if they participate or not just from my own view anyways, since they know that their campaign will always attract victims to them, i don't blame them since the forum does not place an auto ban on such promoting scam, so they will definitely get new preys that will always dip foot into their campaign/site before looking.

[Hamza2424]

Let me answer your curiosity, 1xBit campaigners are here only for a motive as their accounts are red trusted they cant join other campaign so here they just grinding bucks of money as they know account is waste lets make money until it ends.
So they are promoting the Project to make their earnings live if they even decide to half their payment they will still work for them that my personal point of as nobody likes to promote the scam projects. i can see many people making scam reports always here but they need to understand before trusting any project they should take a look to the feedback history

[Doell]

Probably because of money and all about money, the power to push someone to promote 1xbit is based on money. I doubt there are any promoters playing at their platform, their thread or that brand also I rarely seen on forums. So I can conclude that their campaign participants playing on a more trusted platform, also there have been many replies to your this thread 78 including me, none of them participants 1xbit have responded.

[Slow death]

I checked the thread and it seemed Erdogan got banned?

since the guy was banned, in that 1xbit thread there isn't much constructive discussion anymore, I know it sounds weird, but the guy really was a true defender of this scam site, he managed to have some arguments that even I think: " what kind of doraga gave this guy to be so devout?". he was a real fanatic of this scam site.


It's been days since this thread was created and I haven't seen the participants of this scam site's signature campaign come to answer if they use this scam site to place bets. I had already asked this question many times there on the scam site's thread, and they couldn't answer me, I suppose they won't answer me here either

[Zackgeno96]

You cannot answer this question in its entirety. 1xbit has had a ton of active campaign people, and some of them will gamble on the site but certainly not all of them is my guess. And if you already gamble on the site, then of course there are still significant differences in the volume with which people gamble on a site. I don't understand why the op wants to know this. What would that be relevant for? 1xbit is a very large and powerful platform and has a huge number of customers worldwide.

[Porfirii]

You cannot answer this question in its entirety. 1xbit has had a ton of active campaign people, and some of them will gamble on the site but certainly not all of them is my guess. And if you already gamble on the site, then of course there are still significant differences in the volume with which people gamble on a site. I don't understand why the op wants to know this. What would that be relevant for? 1xbit is a very large and powerful platform and has a huge number of customers worldwide.

Thanks for your answer Zackgeno96. In your case, have you ever played on 1xbit? How did it go? did you have any problems withdrawing? and, if you have never played, why? do you play in other betting sites?

I think that the motivation of the op asking this is to determine whether campaigners trust in the service they are advertising or not. The ratio of campaigners betting in the platform they promote is relevant, one can extract some insight from it.

[danadc]

It is not all 1xbit promoters that are proud promoting the company. It is few keyboard warriors who already got bunches of red tag that aggressively defend the company. I don't actually know if they receive extra pay from 1xbit for doing the defence. Generally they are no longer strong or willing to defend their pay master, they could be focusing on their earning and thinking how to spam the upper week and get paid accordingly.

The main factor is that they hold the signature because the weekly payment will be paid by the company, there are several participants who have supported the defense to improve the reputation of 1xbit but they do not provide solutions to complaints and accusations of scam at 1xbit, other participants do not care about all the accusations against 1xbit and nothing defense efforts, because they were aware of his involvement as a promoter of 1xbit for the work of fulfilling weekly posts and receiving weekly payments.

I do not think that everyone in that campaign plays, because they know very well that 1xbit is a scam, if what they do is receive profits from what they comment, they don't care or even try their luck there, do not see any user who publishes Gains or anything relevant, then it means that the site is a scam. I am not surprised that there are activists, if they receive profits, it is for them regardless of anything or worrying about others.

[Wiwo]

Am glad to see that some of the users promoting the casinos. are.already coming here to speak out but have failed to let us know if they truly have a personal experience on the site, or are just here to defend the casino If the user said the casino has a large community worldwide does that now make it a.right for them to scam those members, we have read a lot of accusation against them and they trust rating is nothing to write home about and yet no attempt is made to rewrite that bad reputation, having an active signature campaign ongoing does not make the fact that a lot of users are scammed already and it is ineffective to have a promotion because there is a lot of pending issues with the site.

[Cookdata]

I can bet my balls that those participants don't contribute anything to 1xbit, they receive their weekly payout in their private wallets, they don't know what the casino is all about otherwise none will want to promote them after losing all their weekly earnings on the scam casino.
It has also been discussed that almost half of the accounts that are participating on 1xbit  belong to them which means they are only paying a few accounts that promote their banner on the forum, they add little or no value to them and to the forum, the ones that get accepted wouldn't try their game either.

[Yogee]

I checked the thread and it seemed Erdogan got banned?

since the guy was banned, in that 1xbit thread there isn't much constructive discussion anymore, I know it sounds weird, but the guy really was a true defender of this scam site, he managed to have some arguments that even I think: " what kind of doraga gave this guy to be so devout?". he was a real fanatic of this scam site.

Wasn't he the same member that edited the 1x wiki page and use it as "evidence" to defend the site? I can't remember who caught him doing that. It seems like nobody else is willing to argue. I was waiting for edenhazard to respond here as he is probably the only member wearing their signature that I have not ignored yet.

[serjent05]

You cannot answer this question in its entirety. 1xbit has had a ton of active campaign people, and some of them will gamble on the site but certainly not all of them is my guess. And if you already gamble on the site, then of course there are still significant differences in the volume with which people gamble on a site. I don't understand why the op wants to know this. What would that be relevant for? 1xbit is a very large and powerful platform and has a huge number of customers worldwide.

This does not answer the question OP asked though, since your answer seemed dodgy.  And I can't understand the fact that you as 1xbit participant can't directly answer whether you gambled on the platform or not.  It is quite easy, an answer of yes or no is enough but you need to make your answer way long trying to dodge the question.  So I think I may take that you do not gamble on 1xbit?

[Fivestar4everMVP]

1xbit has had a ton of active campaign people, and some of them will gamble on the site but certainly not all of them is my guess.

Well,  unfortunately,  this is not relatedly to the question being asked, neither is it an answer to it.
The question is - you as a person and a 1xbit promoter,  do you Gamble on 1xbit?
And also (if you don't mind)  - why did you choose to promote 1xbit when there are several other legitimate companies here to promote?.

I didn't ask whether 1xbit have ton of active campaigners or not.

I don't understand why the op wants to know this. What would that be relevant for?

It is relevant for us to know if you all that are promoting 1xbit trust the company enough to put your money their care,  this is why I asked the question,  maybe you can answer the question this time and not dodge it again.  .

This does not answer the question OP asked though, since your answer seemed dodgy.  And I can't understand the fact that you as 1xbit participant can't directly answer whether you gambled on the platform or not.  It is quite easy, an answer of yes or no is enough but you need to make your answer way long trying to dodge the question.  So I think I may take that you do not gamble on 1xbit?

LOL,    ,  he clearly does not gamble on 1xbit, that is why he dodged the question,  maybe he will come back and give us a direct answer to the question this time. 🤞

[mak013]

I think that it doesn`t matter how they spend their rewards. They can even don`t gamble ever. The only question is why they are ready to destroy their reputation for enough small(as for me) reward.
But there are only 2 answers that i can imagine: someone even doesn`t cares about the company - they just make for what they are paid. And the second reason is money. For someone even such sums costs more than reputation.

[xSkylarx]

The only question is why they are ready to destroy their reputation for enough small(as for me) reward.

For someone even such sums costs more than reputation.

There are some people that are willing to compromise their reputation when they are really desperate for money. It's such a waste seeing those accounts being red-tagged because of supporting a scam when their accounts are already high ranked which is not easy to achieve. Those accounts could already be sold because if it's still handled by the real owner then he would know himself that it's not worth it to grab the offer of 1xbit.

[Hamza2424]

The only question is why they are ready to destroy their reputation for enough small(as for me) reward.

For someone even such sums costs more than reputation.

There are some people that are willing to compromise their reputation when they are really desperate for money. It's such a waste seeing those accounts being red-tagged because of supporting a scam when their accounts are already high ranked which is not easy to achieve. Those accounts could already be sold because if it's still handled by the real owner then he would know himself that it's not worth it to grab the offer of 1xbit.

That is a sad part, the accounts on the Hero / Legendary level stuck/Willingly promoting the campaign Hurts more then a Member / Full Member as Sr,Hero,Legendary Accounts with out any +Ve Green feedback considered as Trust worth and Natural. For sure as you said for some Bucks the people Desperate for money use to Ruin their reputation with such high rank which is a dream comes true for a Jr / Member.
Another point is that they are still promoting the campaign as they want grind as much money as much they can because now they cant turns all Reds into Neutral or Green.
 

[indah rezqi]

I think that it doesn`t matter how they spend their rewards. They can even don`t gamble ever. The only question is why they are ready to destroy their reputation for enough small(as for me) reward.
But there are only 2 answers that i can imagine: someone even doesn`t cares about the company - they just make for what they are paid. And the second reason is money. For someone even such sums costs more than reputation.

For users living in third world countries, money is much more important than reputation "at least that's what I can imagine" so you will find some high ranking users no matter how bad their reputation is in promoting campaigns as long as they make money. Obviously their thinking is unwise so the decision will not benefit them in the long run considering no campaign will last forever on this forum regardless of how well known their brand is.

1xbit campaign participants are more likely to avoid playing on the sites they promote because they also know the reputation of the site is not good so they won't consider the risk of losing money, imo. It looks like participants receive payments directly into their btc wallet, so it's less likely to see them bet on that site.

[Porfirii]

Well, Zackgeno96 was brave to show up in this thread and try to answer our questions, but it seems that no other campaign participants are willing to comment.

If you are right and many do it because in their countries poverty is a real issue and they need to do it, I can understand, and in that case I guess that they won't gamble what they may need to eat. But I don't think all participants are in the same situation, that's why I expected more people talking in this thread.

[Road21Bitcoin]

I think that it doesn`t matter how they spend their rewards. They can even don`t gamble ever. The only question is why they are ready to destroy their reputation for enough small(as for me) reward.
But there are only 2 answers that i can imagine: someone even doesn`t cares about the company - they just make for what they are paid. And the second reason is money. For someone even such sums costs more than reputation.

Obviously the majority joined in the campaign for the money even though they didn't know they're advertising a scam casino. If you didn't notice some of the participant's accounts are already red tagged  in the past and use it for the signature campaign. Once they get accepted from the campaign they don't care about the reputation, if they get tagged or any critics within the forum. Hopefully if some new members encounter their casino they should think twice before opening an account.  

[yourthankyou]

they have a very strong advertisiment though. i think people who are not experinced in online casinos might fall for this trick

[Maslate]

Most of the campaigners of a gambling site are not actually playing in a gambling site, their job is just to post and get paid, that's the reality. for 1xbit participants, I doubt that majority are actually playing on the site knowing the reputation of the gambling sites. I am not here to judge, it's only my personal opinion.

[imamusma]

Most of the campaigners of a gambling site are not actually playing in a gambling site, their job is just to post and get paid, that's the reality. for 1xbit participants, I doubt that majority are actually playing on the site knowing the reputation of the gambling sites. I am not here to judge, it's only my personal opinion.

You are not required to bet on any gambling platform you are promoting, but it would be best if you give it a try so you have a good knowledge of the casino. But especially about 1xbit, I'm sure everyone will not gamble there even if they are participants of the signature campaign. I doubt 1/10 of the people in a signature campaign will gamble and try that casino because of its reputation, so I agree with most of the opinions here.

[UserU]

There's no trick you will fall into because we advertise for our company and our company is not what people thought is not what it is if you want to bet with us you can go ahead and bed with us and when you win the you will they will credit you whatever thing that you're going so do not be afraid of scamvbecause of many people is lamenting of the platform PS can try and see if you can notice that he and when you play a bet then win they will give your entitlement

Well, that escalated quickly

[fortunecrypto]

they have a very strong advertisiment though. i think people who are not experinced in online casinos might fall for this trick

There's no trick you will fall into because we advertise for our company and our company is not what people thought is not what it is if you want to bet with us you can go ahead and bed with us and when you win the you will they will credit you whatever thing that you're going so do not be afraid of scamvbecause of many people is lamenting of the platform PS can try and see if you can notice that he and when you play a bet then win they will give your entitlement

You are either blind or a lier or both but I admire your courage to drop here and participate in the discussion you did not answer the question if you're playing in 1XBIT and how is your experience, instead you blindly defend 1XBIT you are exposing yourself through more tags for defending a casino that is hard to defend with so many accusations in the scam section.

[Solosanz]

You are either blind or a lier or both but I admire your courage to drop here and participate in the discussion you did not answer the question if you're playing in 1XBIT and how is your experience, instead you blindly defend 1XBIT you are exposing yourself through more tags for defending a casino that is hard to defend with so many accusations in the scam section.

Even he can give a proof if he really play on 1xbit and successfully withdraw his winning, it's still not make people change their mind if 1xbit isn't scam anymore because 1xbit is a selective scammer that only freeze a high rollers. If they're scam only for little money, it just make people quit and close their accounts. With the help of paid reviews that wrote 1xbit is a good casino, that's why many people still fall on this scam casino.

[YOSHIE]

With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.

All of that because the 1xbit manager accepts participants who have red on their profile, many factors make them want to promote the 1xbit gambling site according to my understanding.
for example:
1. Because of money.
2. Red accounts, not accepted in other campaigns, 1xbit has a chance for them.
3. They realize that many are victims of the 1xbit site, but they don't care about that, the important thing is money.

That's according to my understanding, I can see that the 1xbit campaign announces a new slot for sure that registers all accounts with red trust.

[stomachgrowls]

With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.

All of that because the 1xbit manager accepts participants who have red on their profile, many factors make them want to promote the 1xbit gambling site according to my understanding.
for example:
1. Because of money.
2. Red accounts, not accepted in other campaigns, 1xbit has a chance for them.
3. They realize that many are victims of the 1xbit site, but they don't care about that, the important thing is money.

That's according to my understanding, I can see that the 1xbit campaign announces a new slot for sure that registers all accounts with red trust.

Money is the main reason and people who advertise doesnt really mind nor care about other peoples condition whether they would really be getting scammed by this casino as long they do got paid

then that what matter the most.They dont care about being ethical since their account is already good as trash and now they have chance or opportunity on making money despite of the red then it would

really be just common sense for them to make use of these accounts and since its been legible for them to be selected then it would be no surprise that they would be diving on the chance.
Even surprised that there are some neutral members do tend to join up and ending up on having reds.

[bhooscream]

I am just curious to know  .

I am also so curious because many participants here are still promoting this campaign. It means that 1xbit really pays those participants for signature campaign promotion right? And the payment is also not low, which means that 1xbit has a good income. Well, if we know that there are so many accusations to 1xbit, will those participants really trust the platform and play over there? haha, it seems a dilemma for the participants. For me, I better avoid this kind of platform.

[Zlantann]

1xbit campaign is a refuge house for the outcaste of the forum. It serves as a source of income for those that have been rejected by other renowned and trusted campaign. I think these days people careless about reputation and good name. All they want now is money to enable them meet there daily needs. I expected to get more response from participants of this campaign but we just got only one. And I couldn't even understand his statements because of too many grammatical and typographical errors. 

[buwaytress]

One might be surprised with the answers if asking any campaign participant if they use the service they advertise.

It is not required to do so, it is, after all, renting out of space. I do think if people do promote the services they advertise, that they should also then be users, or at least,have used to service -- exchange, casino, mixer, etc.

But if you think the majority of people here on campaigns use the services they advertise? Ha.

They are not even active users. I PM some users every now and then, those I feel are spam posters. Tag them, PM them, they don't reply.

Recommend you just use the report function when you see them.

[wxa7115]

I am just curious to know  .

I am also so curious because many participants here are still promoting this campaign. It means that 1xbit really pays those participants for signature campaign promotion right? And the payment is also not low, which means that 1xbit has a good income. Well, if we know that there are so many accusations to 1xbit, will those participants really trust the platform and play over there? haha, it seems a dilemma for the participants. For me, I better avoid this kind of platform.

I doubt those people actually use that casino to gamble, after all they are part of this forum and they should be aware of the reputation that 1xbit has and how strongly the community opposes that casino.

In fact if I remember correctly it seems some users send a PM to anyone that applies to the campaign to warn them about it and they still decide to promote that casino despite all of this, so it would be incredibly odd those people still selected to gamble at that casino when knowing all of that information.

[Haunebu]

The simple answer to all your questions which some of the posters above pointed out is money op. Many people can do anything(I mean anything) for money in order to survive in this competitive world.

1xbit is basically the final option for many posters who don't find work elsewhere in this forum for various reasons. The ironic thing is that they actually pay them without any issues majority of the time.

Some of their shills like @Erdogan(Banned now) etc made a killing by enrolling multiple accounts into their signature campaigns.

[Piesel]

The simple answer to all your questions which some of the posters above pointed out is money op. Many people can do anything(I mean anything) for money in order to survive in this competitive world.

1xbit is basically the final option for many posters who don't find work elsewhere in this forum for various reasons. The ironic thing is that they actually pay them without any issues the majority of the time.

Some of their shills like @Erdogan(Banned now) etc made a killing by enrolling multiple accounts into their signature campaigns.

Good to know that some of those that are promoting the scam is getting banned, this will help clean up the forum a little as there have been a lot spam and low-quality posts around the forum and all from this 1xbit shils.

Since the forum does not have regulations for scams we the individual members will always try our best to help clean the forum and the worst heat board is the gambling board, I wish the mod in this board will do more to help clean out the trash being put out by those signature spammers from 1xbits.

[mak013]

The only question is why they are ready to destroy their reputation for enough small(as for me) reward.

For someone even such sums costs more than reputation.

There are some people that are willing to compromise their reputation when they are really desperate for money. It's such a waste seeing those accounts being red-tagged because of supporting a scam when their accounts are already high ranked which is not easy to achieve. Those accounts could already be sold because if it's still handled by the real owner then he would know himself that it's not worth it to grab the offer of 1xbit.

That is a sad part, the accounts on the Hero / Legendary level stuck/Willingly promoting the campaign Hurts more then a Member / Full Member as Sr,Hero,Legendary Accounts with out any +Ve Green feedback considered as Trust worth and Natural. For sure as you said for some Bucks the people Desperate for money use to Ruin their reputation with such high rank which is a dream comes true for a Jr / Member.
Another point is that they are still promoting the campaign as they want grind as much money as much they can because now they cant turns all Reds into Neutral or Green.

I think that the most part of these account got their level before the merit system was created. Possible that they were bought from some bot farm. The main part of users that improved their accounts from the newbies for merit understand how much it costs and i don`t think they are willing to repeat this way.

I think that it doesn`t matter how they spend their rewards. They can even don`t gamble ever. The only question is why they are ready to destroy their reputation for enough small(as for me) reward.
But there are only 2 answers that i can imagine: someone even doesn`t cares about the company - they just make for what they are paid. And the second reason is money. For someone even such sums costs more than reputation.

For users living in third world countries, money is much more important than reputation "at least that's what I can imagine" so you will find some high ranking users no matter how bad their reputation is in promoting campaigns as long as they make money. Obviously their thinking is unwise so the decision will not benefit them in the long run considering no campaign will last forever on this forum regardless of how well known their brand is.

1xbit campaign participants are more likely to avoid playing on the sites they promote because they also know the reputation of the site is not good so they won't consider the risk of losing money, imo. It looks like participants receive payments directly into their btc wallet, so it's less likely to see them bet on that site.

If these accounts were created when just posting was enough for level up - they don`t understand it cost.
And i`m sure that they get their reward directly, without the site. Or have an opportunity to withdraw their reward without any restrictions.

[Piesel]

()
If these accounts were created when just posting was enough for level up - they don`t understand it cost.
And I`m sure that they get their reward directly, without the site. Or have an opportunity to withdraw their reward without any restrictions.

I don't see any sense in all of this even if those accounts are old accounts from when a newbie can wear an avatar it doesn't lower its worth, I understand your point because back then it was easy to rank up with just activities because there was no merit then but then one reputation does not have a cost, some of us hold our reputation with high esteem and believe me when I said there have been a lot of scams like 1xbits since from time past but we survived through it and here we are still on the forum making our little contributions. Those participating in that campaign have nothing to offer so most time I just ignore them whenever I come across any of their posts and replies.

[Hamphser]

()
If these accounts were created when just posting was enough for level up - they don`t understand it cost.
And I`m sure that they get their reward directly, without the site. Or have an opportunity to withdraw their reward without any restrictions.

I don't see any sense in all of this even if those accounts are old accounts from when a newbie can wear an avatar it doesn't lower its worth, I understand your point because back then it was easy to rank up with just activities because there was no merit then but then one reputation does not have a cost, some of us hold our reputation with high esteem and believe me when I said there have been a lot of scams like 1xbits since from time past but we survived through it and here we are still on the forum making our little contributions. Those participating in that campaign have nothing to offer so most time I just ignore them whenever I come across any of their posts and replies.

Speaking about ranking up your account comparing the past and the present then it is really hard on building up your account rank and it would really be just a waste on making those accounts that you had trying

to rank up so hard nowadays and ending up on getting tagged just because you had applied on a signature campaign launched by a shady or scam casino and since scams arent moderated on this forum then we

should really be that careful and as experienced users we should really give warning to people specially to newbies.Honestly they are just wasting off money on making advertisement on this forum
because it wont really be making significant effect because people will really be warned on stopping to engage this site or platform.

[dataispower]

With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.

All of that because the 1xbit manager accepts participants who have red on their profile, many factors make them want to promote the 1xbit gambling site according to my understanding.
for example:
1. Because of money.
2. Red accounts, not accepted in other campaigns, 1xbit has a chance for them.
3. They realize that many are victims of the 1xbit site, but they don't care about that, the important thing is money.

That's according to my understanding, I can see that the 1xbit campaign announces a new slot for sure that registers all accounts with red trust.

Actually those people who is promoting 1xbit casino game they are there because of those things you listed because from my understanding anyone who had a red trust it is understandable that it does not have any hope of joining any signature campaign that is been managed by reputable member of this organisation so I believe that is why many people join the signature campaign in order to and Bitcoin for a living but a normal sense nobody who is of red trust can Join 1xbit signature campaign.

[robelneo]

1xbit campaign is a refuge house for the outcaste of the forum. It serves as a source of income for those that have been rejected by other renowned and trusted campaign. I think these days people careless about reputation and good name. All they want now is money to enable them meet there daily needs. I expected to get more response from participants of this campaign but we just got only one. And I couldn't even understand his statements because of too many grammatical and typographical errors.  

You hit it right, those with a bad reputation and on hiatus became active because of 1XBIT they finally find a project to monetize their account, and they become active because of 1XBIT but once 1XBIT pauses or stopped their campaign these accounts will go to hiatus again because they cannot sell their account and they think being active is useless here because no one will accept whatever they promote here.

Don't expect any more responses to come from 1XBIT participants they will hurt or even get banned from the campaign if they tell us the truth that it's all about money.

[Haunebu]

Since the forum does not have regulations for scams we the individual members will always try our best to help clean the forum and the worst heat board is the gambling board, I wish the mod in this board will do more to help clean out the trash being put out by those signature spammers from 1xbits.

Honestly, signature spammers are present in literally every single board in this forum. The worst hit board isn't the gambling board though. It's the alternate cryptocurrencies board which is a spamfest and most posters would agree with me.

The mods cannot delete everything that the 1xbit shills write since this is a free speech forum. This is why the 1xbit team keep relaunching their signature campaigns again and again.

I noticed that their shills usually get banned for breaking certain forum rules(Copy-Paste etc).

[Wexnident]

There are like 2 replies from 1xbit users out of 6 pages of replies, I think the silence from them basically answers what OP requested in itself imo. Not to mention that both answers don't actually answer the question, (which is a simple yes and no tbf). I'd actually just say that most of them actually aren't playing on the site or don't even gamble in general at all. Wouldn't really surprise me if a person who doesn't know jack about gaming suddenly made an article advertising a game (It's a thing alright), same thing here imo.

[bittraffic]

Since the forum does not have regulations for scams we the individual members will always try our best to help clean the forum and the worst heat board is the gambling board, I wish the mod in this board will do more to help clean out the trash being put out by those signature spammers from 1xbits.

Honestly, signature spammers are present in literally every single board in this forum. The worst hit board isn't the gambling board though. It's the alternate cryptocurrencies board which is a spamfest and most posters would agree with me.

The mods cannot delete everything that the 1xbit shills write since this is a free speech forum. This is why the 1xbit team keep relaunching their signature campaigns again and again.

I noticed that their shills usually get banned for breaking certain forum rules(Copy-Paste etc).

Users are however very concerned whether the signature campaign can influence and make outside users register and bet on 1xbit. Although we know the forum supports free speech and does not moderate signature campaigns, I think the DT had done thier job tagging its participants which the forum users are already aware of its reputation. Anyone outside the forum becomes a victim of the casino, I guess had not done their research before engaging.

[btc78]

I'm not sure if they are , but what I am sure off is that some if them are even asking for the community in which site they can play safely , meaning even those participants aren't sure or feel safer when playing in their own advertised site.

but surely what they will tell us is that it wasn't our concern at all .

[mak013]

()
If these accounts were created when just posting was enough for level up - they don`t understand it cost.
And I`m sure that they get their reward directly, without the site. Or have an opportunity to withdraw their reward without any restrictions.

I don't see any sense in all of this even if those accounts are old accounts from when a newbie can wear an avatar it doesn't lower its worth, I understand your point because back then it was easy to rank up with just activities because there was no merit then but then one reputation does not have a cost, some of us hold our reputation with high esteem and believe me when I said there have been a lot of scams like 1xbits since from time past but we survived through it and here we are still on the forum making our little contributions. Those participating in that campaign have nothing to offer so most time I just ignore them whenever I come across any of their posts and replies.

It is very big difference. If you spent at least a year trying to right big and interesting posts you understand that it is difficult enough and you don`t want to lose the results of this job in a moment. And if you just wrote "Good job" or "Nice project" 20 times a week and for several accounts - you don`t think that this is smth difficult to repeat.

[Franctoshi]

1. What is your driving force,  motivation in promoting 1xbit?, knowing fully well that the casino is blacklisted on Bitcointalk due to numerous complaints and scam accusations that remains unattended to by those in charge of the casino.
1.1. Is the money you are being paid, your motivation?
2. As a 1xbit promoter,  are you playing/gambling on 1xbit casino platform?

It's cristal clear that there is no other reason than is indeed that they are looking for that peanut that they are getting from the platform called 1xbit and too in regards to be betting on the platform I don't think they will equally take that double risk of having got their account neg tag base on promoting 1xbit and risk the money they earn from promoting them in same 1xbit as well even in their conscience they all know very well that is risky too.

[Piesel]

Honestly, signature spammers are present in literally every single board in this forum. The worst hit board isn't the gambling board though. It's the alternate cryptocurrencies board which is a spamfest and most posters would agree with me.

The mods cannot delete everything that the 1xbit shills write since this is a free speech forum. This is why the 1xbit team keep relaunching their signature campaigns again and again.

I noticed that their shills usually get banned for breaking certain forum rules(Copy-Paste etc).

You are right on that may be their signature participants are warn by 1xbit not to respond to any drama that bring their brand name to the discussion, because their are aware of the level of crime the casino has committed and will not want members from this forum to attack them with facts and evidence.

And I. On the other hand, those users who are getting banned have no choice since most of them are bought accounts that are being handled by another who may not know the rules of the forum but want to make posts just to spam the signature around the forum. So the ban is a welcome development.

[Zackgeno96]

This has nothing to do with the 1xbit gambling site. As I have written before (and other people for that matter) there is a group of scammers who find it necessary to cheat for information using. They bet on table tennis matches in which there is an occasional 2 point delay in the 1xbit platform. 1xbit tries its best to offer as many matches as possible, and then there is a group of scammers who are taking advantage of that. The saddest part of all is that this scam group then goes on to complain on the forum that they have been scammed and not paid. What do you think when you cheat? Then you have to bear the consequences and not act pathetic.

[nakamura12]

^ Look, it sounds funny.
This thread has reached 3 pages of replies but I did not see any 1xbit participants joining this discussion and giving their opinion.

Now it's different since there is now a reply from a 1xbit campaign participant in this thread at page 4 and page 7 from same person. I thought it will take another pages before a 1xbit participant will share their answer to this question.

<....>

My guess is that those people you mentioned might be those who didn't get paid when they won on 1xbit or they are just people who exploited flaws in 1xbit gambling site. I wouldn't call them scammers as you have said but I agree that they are cheater if they take advantage of something like that but we can't prove that the those who are complaining against 1xbit in this forum are part of their team. Unless you have something to prove of that claim.

[Wiwo]

This has nothing to do with the 1xbit gambling site. As I have written before (and other people for that matter) there is a group of scammers who find it necessary to cheat for information use. They bet on table tennis matches in which there is an occasional 2-point delay in the 1xbit platform. 1xbit tries its best to offer as many matches as possible, and then there is a group of scammers who are taking advantage of that. The saddest part of all is that this scam group then goes on to complain on the forum that they have been scammed and not paid. What do you think when you cheat? Then you have to bear the consequences and not act pathetic.

You put up a strong defense but without any evidence so how can we trust your statement, many members here like myself will take this statement as just speculation because as long as u know you did not support your claims with anything to drive home your point. We have witnessed cases of players trying to abuse a casino system but in the case of 1xbit, the report is different from what you are pointing out as the reason why those players are denied their money when their win. I will appreciate it more if you can come up with more evidence to support your claims as you are the first from that company to comment here atlist I have not seen any, maybe others may have replied to the thread.

[Mahanton]

This has nothing to do with the 1xbit gambling site. As I have written before (and other people for that matter) there is a group of scammers who find it necessary to cheat for information use. They bet on table tennis matches in which there is an occasional 2-point delay in the 1xbit platform. 1xbit tries its best to offer as many matches as possible, and then there is a group of scammers who are taking advantage of that. The saddest part of all is that this scam group then goes on to complain on the forum that they have been scammed and not paid. What do you think when you cheat? Then you have to bear the consequences and not act pathetic.

You put up a strong defense but without any evidence so how can we trust your statement, many members here like myself will take this statement as just speculation because as long as u know you did not support your claims with anything to drive home your point. We have witnessed cases of players trying to abuse a casino system but in the case of 1xbit, the report is different from what you are pointing out as the reason why those players are denied their money when their win. I will appreciate it more if you can come up with more evidence to support your claims as you are the first from that company to comment here atlist I have not seen any, maybe others may have replied to the thread.

You would really be expecting some kind of defending from into its participants and it isnt really that a shocking one and since they do get paid then you would really be expecting these kind of sympathetic kind words
but eventually they cant really provide any solid evidences or proofs about their claims and trying out to defend which if we do really go into that casual part of things when it comes to issues and complaints towards
1xbit then we do have tons of it and it is something that cant really be ignored by the masses or public for us not to be aware on whats happening and now that they do have this signature campaign
then it would really be just common sense that it would really be getting bad impressions throughout.

[uneng]

This has nothing to do with the 1xbit gambling site. As I have written before (and other people for that matter) there is a group of scammers who find it necessary to cheat for information use. They bet on table tennis matches in which there is an occasional 2-point delay in the 1xbit platform. 1xbit tries its best to offer as many matches as possible, and then there is a group of scammers who are taking advantage of that. The saddest part of all is that this scam group then goes on to complain on the forum that they have been scammed and not paid. What do you think when you cheat? Then you have to bear the consequences and not act pathetic.

You put up a strong defense but without any evidence so how can we trust your statement, many members here like myself will take this statement as just speculation because as long as u know you did not support your claims with anything to drive home your point. We have witnessed cases of players trying to abuse a casino system but in the case of 1xbit, the report is different from what you are pointing out as the reason why those players are denied their money when their win. I will appreciate it more if you can come up with more evidence to support your claims as you are the first from that company to comment here atlist I have not seen any, maybe others may have replied to the thread.

It would be interesting indeed if they could bring their statements within evidences to corroborate their claims 1xbit isn't a scammer casino. If they were able to prove their words, I'm sure forum members who put negative feedbacks on every accounts related to 1xbit would kindly remove all of them without any further complaints. That would be positive for both, 1xbit company and signature campaign promoters to recover their neutral reputation at bitcointalk forum. However, it's easier said than done and words when not followed by actions or proofs, mean nothing... So far, that is 1xbit's situation.

[DoublerHunter]

This has nothing to do with the 1xbit gambling site. As I have written before (and other people for that matter) there is a group of scammers who find it necessary to cheat for information using. They bet on table tennis matches in which there is an occasional 2 point delay in the 1xbit platform. 1xbit tries its best to offer as many matches as possible, and then there is a group of scammers who are taking advantage of that. The saddest part of all is that this scam group then goes on to complain on the forum that they have been scammed and not paid. What do you think when you cheat? Then you have to bear the consequences and not act pathetic.

^What kind of cheat? Is that not easy to fix?
It could be there's no one who falls into the trap if there is no trap.
However, this is very far from the question of the OP, it is good if you will answer it directly. You yourself also gamble using the site that you are promoting even though you know that someday you will become next to their victim?

[Issa56]

From my own perspective the people participating in 1xbit campaign are just after the amount they are being paid which is bad, they sold their reputation just because of the little amount they are receiving, I don’t think have any serious reason for participating in the campaign, they just want to make their money and they don’t care if people get scammed, they are promoting the project that have been blacklisted on the forum, they know but don’t care I always feel disappointed whenever I see people wearing the signature, I think they really deserve the negative trust that’s being given to them. Also I think most of them are having alt account on the forum. Am sure non of them will gamble on the site, they know the site is not a trusted site so they won’t want to risk gambling their, they are just marketing for them just for their own selfish interest.

[Chikito]

The thread was already 7 pages, and so far only Zackgeno96 dared to come and did not also answer the 2 questions or dodge unrelated Questions.

I have a conclusion about this situation, we all know the 1xbit participant is only money-oriented, they are fully aware of not depositing there and know they can't withdraw it.

or maybe in the future don't have any participants if 1xbit makes a payment via 1xbit account, not using BTC address.

[peter0425]

The thread was already 7 pages, and so far only Zackgeno96 dared to come and did not also answer the 2 questions or dodge unrelated Questions.

I have a conclusion about this situation, we all know the 1xbit participant is only money-oriented, they are fully aware of not depositing there and know they can't withdraw it.

or maybe in the future don't have any participants if 1xbit makes a payment via 1xbit account, not using BTC address.

This is a complete answer mate , that their campaign participants aren't playing in 1xbit but only garnering Money from the team.
their member even asking for some particularities and safer site to play means yes they are aware of their future from this site if they deposit and play or even to try doubling their money from the campaign.
and also we cannot blame them mate ,  because this is their earned money and they wanted to gather all they can before that campaign finally close sooner.

[bitterguy28]

while we are all curious about that yet it is not our concern if they are or not , because like us who are wearing and being paid by gambling site also it is our privilege to play and advertise this site but of course we have the rights to deny playing as we are not forced to play from our own work payments.

But  I am proud to say that I am playing in this site I am wearing so yes lets play in our site so we can prove how trustworthy they are and not just randomly talking for no reason and sense at all.

[Reatim]

visiting their ANN Thread , it seems that their Army stopped posting and supporting this site for quite some time now not like in the past months that they are continuously protecting the site interest.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267172.msg60784621#new

but with their answers from the past I have not noticed them mentioning that they are a regular player or at least playing in that site so maybe the answer is Not?I'm not sure but according to my observation yes they are not a player.

though there is a one participant that dare to post here yet no confirmation that he is a player at all .

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

I just went through all the comments on this thread thinking I could see any 1xbit promoter coming here to give us a viable reason why he or she chose to promote 1xbit, but only did I find only just one person out of the numerous 1xbit promoters @Zackgeno96, who couldn't even answer the question as O.P gave but went about bitting round the bush. And here is what he said..

You cannot answer this question in its entirety. 1xbit has had a ton of active campaign people, and some of them will gamble on the site but certainly not all of them is my guess. And if you already gamble on the site, then of course there are still significant differences in the volume with which people gamble on a site. I don't understand why the op wants to know this.

And the funniest part of it was when he later made this statement given below, which I think what he meant was that 1xbit is a very large and powerful platform and has a huge number of customers worldwide who they scam to pay us peanut for our campaigns🤣🤣

1xbit is a very large and powerful platform and has a huge number of customers worldwide.

So in general conclusion, from the statement given above it actually proves that this promoter do not gamble on 1xbit, but only there for the campaign commission.

[Eureka_07]

while we are all curious about that yet it is not our concern if they are or not , because like us who are wearing and being paid by gambling site also it is our privilege to play and advertise this site but of course we have the rights to deny playing as we are not forced to play from our own work payments.

But  I am proud to say that I am playing in this site I am wearing so yes lets play in our site so we can prove how trustworthy they are and not just randomly talking for no reason and sense at all.

1xbit had received a lot of accusations. Most of them are not solved. As of now, this casino is one of the biggest (if not the biggest) shady casino that is still running.So if you know these things about 1xbit and still decided to advertise them, how can other members trust you? Remember that there could be people out there that can discover and reach 1xbit through the signature, being so they have a very high potential to not be paid, and it will be because they've seen and clicked the signature which a member is wearing.

[bitbollo]

definitely all members wearing their signature are aware that 1xbit is just posing at risk any sum on their platform.
if you take a look on trust rate of people that support their betting platform you can clearly see that most have been already tagged with negative trust... hence they are pretty aware of these issues but for few bucks they prefer to close one eye (or maybe both) and continue to wear the signature. I will be pretty surprised to see someone bet these earned money on their website

[darkangel11]

I think they aren't playing there just trying to make some money. They know they're limiting their chances of finding another campaign because nobody will take them once 1xbit is over, but they either need the money desperately and will sacrifice their account for it, or they have multiple alts and don't care much about losing the account. Nowadays it's hard to sell an account so getting red trust for some money is an alternative.

Simple calculation. You could've been in the campaign since the beginning of the year so 8 months and a Sr Member makes $160 a month. You could make 1280 USD. For many people that's a fair trade for red trust especially if they have an alt and can dump the account when the campaign ends.

[Dunamisx]

From my own perspective the people participating in 1xbit campaign are just after the amount they are being paid which is bad

That's very bad in deed because everything is not all about money, there should be trust, integrity and reputation and as a matter of fact, working for a scam organization is not good enough because one is also supporting thier illegal acts by promoting them and their services.

they sold their reputation just because of the little amount they are receiving

Don't be surprised that this same set of people will compromise truth for deceit in any settings they finds themselves, everything we do is not all about now, but it's great consequences in future.

[abel1337]

This has nothing to do with the 1xbit gambling site. As I have written before (and other people for that matter) there is a group of scammers who find it necessary to cheat for information using. They bet on table tennis matches in which there is an occasional 2 point delay in the 1xbit platform. 1xbit tries its best to offer as many matches as possible, and then there is a group of scammers who are taking advantage of that. The saddest part of all is that this scam group then goes on to complain on the forum that they have been scammed and not paid. What do you think when you cheat? Then you have to bear the consequences and not act pathetic.

I hope you know that there are many proven claims about 1xbit scamming them. Those claims includes necessary informations like transaction id's, gambling history, chat support history and anything that can make their claim valid. I'm sure there are chances that there are real scammers between those claims but those scammers wouldn't repeat their actions on a casino that don't solve their backlogs accusations where it's obvious that they won't gain anything.

[noormcs5]

while we are all curious about that yet it is not our concern if they are or not , because like us who are wearing and being paid by gambling site also it is our privilege to play and advertise this site but of course we have the rights to deny playing as we are not forced to play from our own work payments.

But  I am proud to say that I am playing in this site I am wearing so yes lets play in our site so we can prove how trustworthy they are and not just randomly talking for no reason and sense at all.

You are wearing the signature of the Roobet site and you can play at that gambling site safely because that's a trusted site. But do you think that 1xbit signature campaigns participant will play at 1xbit and lose all the money when they earned through the campaign 

Only the ignorant and fool will play and deposit at 1xbit as everyone (including signature participants) knows that 1xbit is a scam.

[bitterguy28]

while we are all curious about that yet it is not our concern if they are or not , because like us who are wearing and being paid by gambling site also it is our privilege to play and advertise this site but of course we have the rights to deny playing as we are not forced to play from our own work payments.

But  I am proud to say that I am playing in this site I am wearing so yes lets play in our site so we can prove how trustworthy they are and not just randomly talking for no reason and sense at all.

You are wearing the signature of the Roobet site and you can play at that gambling site safely because that's a trusted site. But do you think that 1xbit signature campaigns participant will play at 1xbit and lose all the money when they earned through the campaign 

Yups that is what I posted lol, considering that we are all wearing banner from gambling sites we must be proud of what we are advertising but them? those participants does not look same because they are not even confirming being a player all these years.

Only the ignorant and fool will play and deposit at 1xbit as everyone (including signature participants) knows that 1xbit is a scam.

well , some are Noob and not  ignorant , those people that only visited internet as 1xbit had been advertised all over the internet and not just here in this forum .

[Issa56]

You are wearing the signature of the Roobet site and you can play at that gambling site safely because that's a trusted site. But do you think that 1xbit signature campaigns participant will play at 1xbit and lose all the money when they earned through the campaign 

Do you think they will want to risk their money in the site? If they make money from the signature campaign and they feel like gambling, they will deposit the money to Roobet site because they know 1xbit can't be trusted and they won't also want to lose their money. I can't even imagine someone wearing 1xbit signature creating scam accusation against them. They are just after money and immediately they make money they will move to reputable site and gamble, I can't imagine marketing for a site you can't use because u don't trust them and you want other people to use it, I think that's just weakness.

[wxa7115]

You are wearing the signature of the Roobet site and you can play at that gambling site safely because that's a trusted site. But do you think that 1xbit signature campaigns participant will play at 1xbit and lose all the money when they earned through the campaign 

Do you think they will want to risk their money in the site? If they make money from the signature campaign and they feel like gambling, they will deposit the money to Roobet site because they know 1xbit can't be trusted and they won't also want to lose their money. I can't even imagine someone wearing 1xbit signature creating scam accusation against them. They are just after money and immediately they make money they will move to reputable site and gamble, I can't imagine marketing for a site you can't use because u don't trust them and you want other people to use it, I think that's just weakness.

This is really problematic, if a person does not gamble at the casino they are promoting this can be justified if they already have a casino they like and they are not willing to change their ways, in that case I would not think too much about the fact they are promoting something they are not using, as long as they could be willing to use it if the circumstances were slightly different.

However we know that those that are promoting 1xbit do not gamble there because they know there is no guarantee they will get their money back if they happen to win, and promoting something you do not believe in and that you know will eventually bring misfortune to the people which decide to follow your link is simply impossible to justify.

[rodskee]

I believe that it doesn't matter of how they  are using their money in gambling because it wasn't our concern because we are all free to play and deposit in any gambling site that we wanted or pleases us.

and also we knew that those campaigners also understand how risky playing in that said site because of so many problem and scam accusation they are facing.

with all of those who will be in their right mind that will going to play while you know that by any chance you wont get your money upon withdrawing?

[arwin100]

Most provably not because those campaign participants is just there to gain money, but this is not important thing to discuss after all because overall 1xbit only need them to promote their casino and not for them to play because at the end of the day the real target of 1xbit is those people who want to try their site and place a huge bets to them.

And participants is just milking this because they know they don't have anywhere to go since there account has a red tag so they maximize their opportunity to withdraw their money so that they can get something in return for wearing their signature codes.

[ethereumhunter]

You are wearing the signature of the Roobet site and you can play at that gambling site safely because that's a trusted site. But do you think that 1xbit signature campaigns participant will play at 1xbit and lose all the money when they earned through the campaign 

Do you think they will want to risk their money in the site? If they make money from the signature campaign and they feel like gambling, they will deposit the money to Roobet site because they know 1xbit can't be trusted and they won't also want to lose their money. I can't even imagine someone wearing 1xbit signature creating scam accusation against them. They are just after money and immediately they make money they will move to reputable site and gamble, I can't imagine marketing for a site you can't use because u don't trust them and you want other people to use it, I think that's just weakness.

Or they won't play on their site because they know what will happen if they keep playing there and keep their money for something else. But they won't stop no matter how many cases have happened on their site and they shouldn't have done that if they want to improve their reputation. We can't do anything if, for example, people come to their site and are tempted to see their offers because they will be very enthusiastic about getting attractive offers like that.

[danadc]

I have already said it before, the 1xbit activists are not able to play with their money because they know that they will lose and if they win they will be scammed, the alternatives that this casino has are not many, it is very difficult for them to clear their name, with everything they have done is not simple, here a constant monitoring of those who are part of the 1xbit campaign is maintained and they do not mind damaging the reputation much more.

You are wearing the signature of the Roobet site and you can play at that gambling site safely because that's a trusted site. But do you think that 1xbit signature campaigns participant will play at 1xbit and lose all the money when they earned through the campaign 

Do you think they will want to risk their money in the site? If they make money from the signature campaign and they feel like gambling, they will deposit the money to Roobet site because they know 1xbit can't be trusted and they won't also want to lose their money. I can't even imagine someone wearing 1xbit signature creating scam accusation against them. They are just after money and immediately they make money they will move to reputable site and gamble, I can't imagine marketing for a site you can't use because u don't trust them and you want other people to use it, I think that's just weakness.

All this talk is contradictory, you cannot compare a site like Robobet that has been exercising entertainment and fun for so many years with a fraudulent site, this site is wonderful next to 1xbit.

I don't think even a person with 4 fingers of brains has the intention of playing in 1xbit if they check his reputation. If you want to bet safely you can go to sites that are more trustworthy, there are many, duelbits is reliable, and just like this one you can choose betfury that also give good promotions to play, but don't fall for scams, take care of your money and go play it safe.

[Daltonik]

Do not forget that the 1xbit platform is already quite considered a scam and discussing the actions of scammers, and even more so trying to hope for a successful outcome when playing on their field, this is a hopeless occupation, if you can't stop it, then it's better to stay away.

[Issa56]

I have already said it before, the 1xbit activists are not able to play with their money because they know that they will lose and if they win they will be scammed,

I don't just know why some people are so heartless, they know people will get scammed if they use the site but just because of their selfish interests they are still marketing for that same project, lots of people will fall victim, because some people are just joining the forum and they don't know much about the forum, they might not know about the scam accusation against the site, users wearing the signature have been tagged with negative trust but some new users might not know about the trust system, some of them will definitely use the site and they will be scammed. Seriously I believe they deserve more punishment than tagging them with negative trust alone.

[Hispo]

Do not forget that the 1xbit platform is already quite considered a scam and discussing the actions of scammers, and even more so trying to hope for a successful outcome when playing on their field, this is a hopeless occupation, if you can't stop it, then it's better to stay away.

I mostly depends on what we would call a "successful outcome". For some a "successful outcome" would be to see 1xbit banned from the forum completely or even their platform to be completely wiped out of the internet, however those outcomes are very unlikely to happen.

In the case of the average 1xbit victim they just want their money back as soon as they realize the mistake they committed by depositing their crypto there. It is easy to ignore and stay away this mess if one has not lost any money, but it is quite a challenge to move on for victims they grieve the lost money.

[mindrust]

Probably not. They probably only care if they are getting paid or not. It is nothing new though, lots of people are getting paid to advertise something they don't really like. It is called having a "job".

I don't think anybody with a half functioning brain would play on that casino when there are numerous scam accusations against them. But somehow, some people must be playing on 1xbit. Otherwise they wouldn't be doing these aggressive ad camps everywhere.

[mak013]

Probably not. They probably only care if they are getting paid or not. It is nothing new though, lots of people are getting paid to advertise something they don't really like. It is called having a "job".

It is so. But there is one moment that makes differs. It is trust. When you make job that you don`t like - it`s not a problem. You change job and continue to work. But with negative trust you can have problems with getting a new job. But if accounts were leveluped before merit system - their owners don`t understand the price of this decision.

[UserU]

It is so. But there is one moment that makes differs. It is trust. When you make job that you don`t like - it`s not a problem. You change job and continue to work. But with negative trust you can have problems with getting a new job. But if accounts were leveluped before merit system - their owners don`t understand the price of this decision.

They don't really care. Most importantly, the money rolls in.

Assuming the campaign stops paying one day, they could always purchase an alt for another campaign or move on with life or their real job.

[peter0425]

and even if I am on their shoe? knowing how 1xbit doing for their players? I'm afraid that I will ever deposit even a single cent in their site .
most of their participants is practically joining just to earn money and that's all  and they even risk their account receiving multiple tags just for the sake of money so how could they ever spend this for scam gambling site.

[arwin100]

It is so. But there is one moment that makes differs. It is trust. When you make job that you don`t like - it`s not a problem. You change job and continue to work. But with negative trust you can have problems with getting a new job. But if accounts were leveluped before merit system - their owners don`t understand the price of this decision.

They don't really care. Most importantly, the money rolls in.

Assuming the campaign stops paying one day, they could always purchase an alt for another campaign or move on with life or their real job.

Well that's the case if they save their money to use it buying an account here but still it will hard for them to join on any campaigns due to merit and post quality requirements so for sure they might spend a lot of times before they can get a decent campaign here. But most likely for sure they cashout what they earn on that campaign since most provably they think like no tomorrow on that since there accounts have red trust and they grab the opportunity to earn while they can.

[Solosanz]

Well that's the case if they save their money to use it buying an account here but still it will hard for them to join on any campaigns due to merit and post quality requirements so for sure they might spend a lot of times before they can get a decent campaign here. But most likely for sure they cashout what they earn on that campaign since most provably they think like no tomorrow on that since there accounts have red trust and they grab the opportunity to earn while they can.

Yeah, that's the reason why signature campaigns with Bitcoin payment are only for good and active posters, but maybe they will join a bounty campaign even though there's no guarantee they will get payment and the price of the coin is same like their promise.

I'm just hoping when 1xbit campaign already ended, there's no campaign will accept negative feedback account anymore. This will make them regret to participate scam campaign and if they're able to join other campaigns, the negative trusts seems to be useless.

[nakamura12]

It's really sad that they have to sacrifice their credibility and principle because of 1xbit. It will surely affect even their personal reputation and they will also have a hard time finding trusted and legit campaigns in the future. I don't think the money they're getting from the said campaign is still worth it.

Based on what I know, not all participants doesn't have negative trust that join the campaign before they got negative trust for joining the campaign because some of them already have negative trust and the only thing they can do is to join 1xbit campaign since they are the only campaign that accept participants that has negative trust compared to other campaigns where a participant with negative trust can't join.

[UserU]

I'm just hoping when 1xbit campaign already ended, there's no campaign will accept negative feedback account anymore. This will make them regret to participate scam campaign and if they're able to join other campaigns, the negative trusts seems to be useless.

If they can sponsor tournaments and matches, signature campaigns are the least of their worries. The ROI seems to be quite decent, based on the number of allegations opened from time to time.

[stomachgrowls]

I'm just hoping when 1xbit campaign already ended, there's no campaign will accept negative feedback account anymore. This will make them regret to participate scam campaign and if they're able to join other campaigns, the negative trusts seems to be useless.

If they can sponsor tournaments and matches, signature campaigns are the least of their worries. The ROI seems to be quite decent, based on the number of allegations opened from time to time.

They wont be able to sustain on running their campaign for long if they arent really making revenue but since we are seeing the opposite thing then we could really indeed say that they are really making

sufficient revenue to sustain up in regarding into their marketing and other promotion.Totally that mind boggling considering on whats the reputation they do have specially into this forum.

They are indeed making money despite of those issues and continue on what they are doing.Campaigners arent mostly necessarily to be a player on the company that they
are really that promoting since it wouldnt really be that necessary.

[virasisog]

I'm just hoping when 1xbit campaign already ended, there's no campaign will accept negative feedback account anymore. This will make them regret to participate scam campaign and if they're able to join other campaigns, the negative trusts seems to be useless.

If they can sponsor tournaments and matches, signature campaigns are the least of their worries. The ROI seems to be quite decent, based on the number of allegations opened from time to time.

They wont be able to sustain on running their campaign for long if they arent really making revenue but since we are seeing the opposite thing then we could really indeed say that they are really making

sufficient revenue to sustain up in regarding into their marketing and other promotion.Totally that mind boggling considering on whats the reputation they do have specially into this forum.

They are indeed making money despite of those issues and continue on what they are doing.Campaigners arent mostly necessarily to be a player on the company that they
are really that promoting since it wouldnt really be that necessary.

The signature campaign isn't really a big deal to them because their main focus is to earn. The purpose of their campaign is to get advertised on this forum so the negative trust of some of their participants isn't their concern anymore. They don't need to use their payment as betting capital on their site because they're not asked to. I'm sure that participants also have an idea about the trust issues of the said campaign but they're also staying to earn.

[stomachgrowls]

I'm just hoping when 1xbit campaign already ended, there's no campaign will accept negative feedback account anymore. This will make them regret to participate scam campaign and if they're able to join other campaigns, the negative trusts seems to be useless.

If they can sponsor tournaments and matches, signature campaigns are the least of their worries. The ROI seems to be quite decent, based on the number of allegations opened from time to time.

They wont be able to sustain on running their campaign for long if they arent really making revenue but since we are seeing the opposite thing then we could really indeed say that they are really making

sufficient revenue to sustain up in regarding into their marketing and other promotion.Totally that mind boggling considering on whats the reputation they do have specially into this forum.

They are indeed making money despite of those issues and continue on what they are doing.Campaigners arent mostly necessarily to be a player on the company that they
are really that promoting since it wouldnt really be that necessary.

The signature campaign isn't really a big deal to them because their main focus is to earn. The purpose of their campaign is to get advertised on this forum so the negative trust of some of their participants isn't their concern anymore. They don't need to use their payment as betting capital on their site because they're not asked to. I'm sure that participants also have an idea about the trust issues of the said campaign but they're also staying to earn.

They are staying of course because those red painted accounts could never be useful and who would be that dumb person on not to jump into something that they do know that they could earn bucks?

Its an opportunity for them thats why there's nothing they could lose but rather they would earn something from those negative account and since 1xbit doesnt really care about reputation then it would

really be just understandable that they would really be allowing negative users to join up the campaign.They dont really care about reputation since from the beginning.

[malcovi2]

They don't need to use their payment as betting capital on their site because they're not asked to. I'm sure that participants also have an idea about the trust issues of the said campaign but they're also staying to earn.

I agree and I also think that most of the 1xbit signature participants are multiaccount users probably its a big reason why they are defending this scam platform. They aren't dumb enough to use a fellow thief's service/platform they know that they can be screwed once they put in money.

[Vaskiy]

I'm not sure about the participants spending, but 1xbit keeps themselves with addition of more sports events. In recent days it have added cosmos to the list of cryptocurrencies used for gambling. One of early established platform, for now if they've solved the acquisition it could've grown much bigger taking the lead role as cryptocurrency accepted sportsbook.

[mak013]

It is so. But there is one moment that makes differs. It is trust. When you make job that you don`t like - it`s not a problem. You change job and continue to work. But with negative trust you can have problems with getting a new job. But if accounts were leveluped before merit system - their owners don`t understand the price of this decision.

They don't really care. Most importantly, the money rolls in.

Assuming the campaign stops paying one day, they could always purchase an alt for another campaign or move on with life or their real job.

It is strange for me. I understand that they get money right now. But they must understand that it will end some day. But this is true for real users. There are businessman yet. I don`t know how much such account costs and i think that it is possible decision for the participants - there were lots of bot accounts here. I think that men, who made the bounty their main business calculates it and if they still do it - it is profitable. It is bad for the board but good for the business.

[Docnaster]

I'm not sure about the participants spending, but 1xbit keeps themselves with addition of more sports events. In recent days it have added cosmos to the list of cryptocurrencies used for gambling. One of early established platform, for now if they've solved the acquisition it could've grown much bigger taking the lead role as cryptocurrency accepted sportsbook.

It keeps making me wonder why 1xbit chose to scam. Whether it was intentional or a certain management mismanaged the company and spoilt her reputation.  If 1xbit don't want to scam they will make good company because of variety they put in their site. But it's unfortunate they are happy scamming people. Who knows if it is only members of the forum that are affected or random victims.

[rodskee]

They don't need to use their payment as betting capital on their site because they're not asked to. I'm sure that participants also have an idea about the trust issues of the said campaign but they're also staying to earn.

I agree and I also think that most of the 1xbit signature participants are multiaccount users probably its a big reason why they are defending this scam platform. They aren't dumb enough to use a fellow thief's service/platform they know that they can be screwed once they put in money.

exactly , they already understand what kind of company that pays them so with those agreement , surely they will prevent themselves from playing as the chance of being another victim or problem to occur .

I'm not sure about the participants spending, but 1xbit keeps themselves with addition of more sports events. In recent days it have added cosmos to the list of cryptocurrencies used for gambling. One of early established platform, for now if they've solved the acquisition it could've grown much bigger taking the lead role as cryptocurrency accepted sportsbook.

maybe they are just extending the option of players so they can gain more players from crypto users yet their cases and issues are still  floating and no clear answers at all.

[Porfirii]

Are they accepting CROs now? I'm curious how this altcoinwill perform in the future (Matt Damon's commercial was like OMG but the price, even when it spiked, it wasn't as high as I could expect).

About 1xbit, I don't think campaigners would have any issues in their platform, because it would suppose worse reputation for them. On the other hand, what's the problem with them? is that they don't let you withdraw if you are in a country excluded from their platform in their TOS? I guess that admins would bypass this rule in the case of campaigners/promoters.

[Tomohisa]

For member or full member accounts, I can understand since it's easy to get merit to rank up to that level. But for Hero/Legendary, yeah I don't get why they throw away such accounts and reputations for weekly payment from a scam campaign like 1xbit. I suspect most of those accounts are alts or multi account or already have a low reputation already.
That means they can anytime ditch that account for another or give merit to rank up a new account.

[Piesel]

For member or full member accounts, I can understand since it's easy to get merit to rank up to that level. But for Hero/Legendary, yeah I don't get why they throw away such accounts and reputations for weekly payment from a scam campaign like 1xbit. I suspect most of those accounts are alts or multi-account or already have a low reputation.
That means they can anytime ditch that account for another or give merit to rank up a new account.

When you talk about reputation, it doesn't necessarily mean the level or rank of an individual in any space, it is a matter of personality and self-respect. A lot of conditions are attached to an individual decision but above all good reputation is far better than money most especially in a decentralized space like bitcointalk where a lot of opportunities to learn from other experience members and become something good in society.

So a newbie can decide to build a reputation where an ignorant legendary will throw away his reputation just for a weekly Penny from a proven scam casino.

[Hispo]

For member or full member accounts, I can understand since it's easy to get merit to rank up to that level. But for Hero/Legendary, yeah I don't get why they throw away such accounts and reputations for weekly payment from a scam campaign like 1xbit. I suspect most of those accounts are alts or multi account or already have a low reputation already.
That means they can anytime ditch that account for another or give merit to rank up a new account.

The merit system we currently have it is actually quite recent in comparison to the age of the forum itself. The merit system started in 2018, I think. Before the merit system implementation, users could rank up to Hero/Legendary rank just by accumulating activity (participating during enough months in a consistent way).

When the merit system got implemented those who already had rank earned by activity received "airdropped merit", Hero Members received 500 merits and Legendaries Received 1000 free merits. This means that today in order to have a Legendary account to throw away by joining 1xbit, that account just needed to have activity and be old enough to have received free merits in 2018.

[Docnaster]

For member or full member accounts, I can understand since it's easy to get merit to rank up to that level. But for Hero/Legendary, yeah I don't get why they throw away such accounts and reputations for weekly payment from a scam campaign like 1xbit. I suspect most of those accounts are alts or multi account or already have a low reputation already.
That means they can anytime ditch that account for another or give merit to rank up a new account.

When the merit system got implemented those who already had rank earned by activity received "airdropped merit", Hero Members received 500 merits and Legendaries Received 1000 free merits. This means that today in order to have a Legendary account to throw away by joining 1xbit, that account just needed to have activity and be old enough to have received free merits in 2018.

What actually you are saying is that those legend accounts that joined 1xbit didn't work so hard to build their account from zero to legendary, since they received airdrop merits. You are right if it is what you meant. I have another approach to this. If the purpose of someone is to make money in the forum only, those legendary accounts didn't just spoil their accounts but they have made good money for over 1year. 1xbit started with $150 per week and they have been consistent in running multiple campaigns.

[dezoel]

I'm not sure about the participants spending, but 1xbit keeps themselves with addition of more sports events. In recent days it have added cosmos to the list of cryptocurrencies used for gambling. One of early established platform, for now if they've solved the acquisition it could've grown much bigger taking the lead role as cryptocurrency accepted sportsbook.

It keeps making me wonder why 1xbit chose to scam. Whether it was intentional or a certain management mismanaged the company and spoilt her reputation.  If 1xbit don't want to scam they will make good company because of variety they put in their site. But it's unfortunate they are happy scamming people. Who knows if it is only members of the forum that are affected or random victims.

On this world there is always a bad guy aside from the good guy and unfortunately 1xbit chooses to be a bad guy/service provider. I don't know what they can get with it but maybe bad guys can only answer it?

It is intentional for sure because if it's about miss management then they can always revert their reputation back to normal and replace the old manager with a better manager which is more fair and only wants the best for the company that they are working with. If they didn't choose be a scammer then maybe their performance will also change.

Maybe they will not be aggressive in terms of advertisement and site improvements and the reason why they do this is only to attract and scam more people.

[Porfirii]

It is intentional for sure because if it's about miss management then they can always revert their reputation back to normal and replace the old manager with a better manager which is more fair and only wants the best for the company that they are working with. If they didn't choose be a scammer then maybe their performance will also change.

That's what they claimed a year ago or so: that old management was changed and the new one was going to solve the pending problems with many users. I don't follow the case every day, but it seems that the number of complaints remains the same. Whether they are about old problems or about the same ones but in the present, I haven't looked into it yet.

[erep]

That's what they claimed a year ago or so: that old management was changed and the new one was going to solve the pending problems with many users. I don't follow the case every day, but it seems that the number of complaints remains the same. Whether they are about old problems or about the same ones but in the present, I haven't looked into it yet.

Their efforts to change management haven't improved anything even the reputation is still with bad trust, I also didn't follow the news from this casino site but some new users complained the same thing with the previous case, they should restore the reputation to solve the old case but it won't be easy because they have a lot of cases about gambler funds. So they just released a signature campaign to spread the casino link promotion in various threads and campaign participants don't care about account trust even they just to get paid from bad reputation casino.

[abel1337]

That's what they claimed a year ago or so: that old management was changed and the new one was going to solve the pending problems with many users. I don't follow the case every day, but it seems that the number of complaints remains the same. Whether they are about old problems or about the same ones but in the present, I haven't looked into it yet.

Their efforts to change management haven't improved anything even the reputation is still with bad trust, I also didn't follow the news from this casino site but some new users complained the same thing with the previous case, they should restore the reputation to solve the old case but it won't be easy because they have a lot of cases about gambler funds. So they just released a signature campaign to spread the casino link promotion in various threads and campaign participants don't care about account trust even they just to get paid from bad reputation casino.

Sadly they don't want to improve their current reputation. They haven't solve previous scam accusation on their casino and it just keep piling up day by day. I really do think the move that they do on having a signature campaign won't help them in promoting here in the forum. They are one of the hottest active scam casino that is well known in this forum and having a signature campaign will just spread the awareness that it is a scam because most of signature campaign members are red tagged. It's good that we have forum members actively red tagging these users who are participants of signature campaign. Special thanks to JollyGood for actively tagging those accounts.

[Vaskiy]

I'm not sure about the participants spending, but 1xbit keeps themselves with addition of more sports events. In recent days it have added cosmos to the list of cryptocurrencies used for gambling. One of early established platform, for now if they've solved the acquisition it could've grown much bigger taking the lead role as cryptocurrency accepted sportsbook.

It keeps making me wonder why 1xbit chose to scam. Whether it was intentional or a certain management mismanaged the company and spoilt her reputation.  If 1xbit don't want to scam they will make good company because of variety they put in their site. But it's unfortunate they are happy scamming people. Who knows if it is only members of the forum that are affected or random victims.

In my understanding, 1xbit once got into acquisition of some scam and they never took it serious. It went like, they were out of the business. Later once again they came back, but the popularity of the domain name doesn't let them go for a change. Here they solved few acquisition and tried to gain reputation. This failed and now they're trying to continue their service amidst the acquisition.

[noormcs5]

They don't need to use their payment as betting capital on their site because they're not asked to. I'm sure that participants also have an idea about the trust issues of the said campaign but they're also staying to earn.

I agree and I also think that most of the 1xbit signature participants are multiaccount users probably its a big reason why they are defending this scam platform. They aren't dumb enough to use a fellow thief's service/platform they know that they can be screwed once they put in money.

I don't think that 1xbit signature participants have multi accounts at 1xbit, rather i think that they do not have any account there and they never play at 1xbit.

That's the reason that they are always posting good about the site and also they are being paid to write in favor of 1xbit else they have the danger to be removed from the campaign. They only care about few pennies which they get every month for 1xbit.

[lienfaye]

I don't think that 1xbit signature participants have multi accounts at 1xbit, rather i think that they do not have any account there and they never play at 1xbit.

Thats possible because they're also afraid to experience the same problem of complainants and lose their money if they play on 1xbit due to numerous unresolved accusations against the site.

That's the reason that they are always posting good about the site and also they are being paid to write in favor of 1xbit else they have the danger to be removed from the campaign. They only care about few pennies which they get every month for 1xbit.

They're getting paid so its obvious that they will defend 1xbit and will spread awareness to help the site get more players even they know to themselves that it cant be trusted.

[shasan]

I do  not think participant plays on the 1xbit gambling site though there is a chance that few user may play but they do not deposit fund they may play with the fund which they get as payment from their their signature campaign. As the fund is low the winning amount is also low and for that reason they may not face any issue.

[rhomelmabini]

I do  not think participant plays on the 1xbit gambling site though there is a chance that few user may play but they do not deposit fund they may play with the fund which they get as payment from their their signature campaign. As the fund is low the winning amount is also low and for that reason they may not face any issue.

Considering they are paid on their own personal Bitcoin addresses, it's likely they don't play there at all or a small portion of the participants was just trying. For me personally, these participants know the reputation of the casino, they're just blindly promoting it for their own self interests to get money. Money is money and this is crypto, the wild wild west.

[Chato1977]

I do  not think participant plays on the 1xbit gambling site though there is a chance that few user may play but they do not deposit fund they may play with the fund which they get as payment from their  signature campaign. As the fund is low the winning amount is also low and for that reason they may not face any issue.

Majority of their members in signature are literally a signature spammer in which does not even Know about gambling , meaning they are only for Money and why would they risk the payments to gamble when they also  have  idea about them being scammer? nope I don't think that there are even few of them who truly played because if does? then they must be posted here to clear the thoughts we are pointing about them.

[rodskee]

I'm not sure about the participants spending, but 1xbit keeps themselves with addition of more sports events. In recent days it have added cosmos to the list of cryptocurrencies used for gambling. One of early established platform, for now if they've solved the acquisition it could've grown much bigger taking the lead role as cryptocurrency accepted sportsbook.

It keeps making me wonder why 1xbit chose to scam. Whether it was intentional or a certain management mismanaged the company and spoilt her reputation.  If 1xbit don't want to scam they will make good company because of variety they put in their site. But it's unfortunate they are happy scamming people. Who knows if it is only members of the forum that are affected or random victims.

In my understanding, 1xbit once got into acquisition of some scam and they never took it serious. It went like, they were out of the business. Later once again they came back, but the popularity of the domain name doesn't let them go for a change. Here they solved few acquisition and tried to gain reputation. This failed and now they're trying to continue their service amidst the acquisition.

Years back they are interested in addressing those accusation against them but nowadays? it looks like they are already immune about all the cases coming here and there means one thing that they are only for profit or income and not caring about the players , in need of attention then they will not gain anything from the community and I'm not sure if there are even one forum member that plays in this site.

[wxa7115]

I'm not sure about the participants spending, but 1xbit keeps themselves with addition of more sports events. In recent days it have added cosmos to the list of cryptocurrencies used for gambling. One of early established platform, for now if they've solved the acquisition it could've grown much bigger taking the lead role as cryptocurrency accepted sportsbook.

It keeps making me wonder why 1xbit chose to scam. Whether it was intentional or a certain management mismanaged the company and spoilt her reputation.  If 1xbit don't want to scam they will make good company because of variety they put in their site. But it's unfortunate they are happy scamming people. Who knows if it is only members of the forum that are affected or random victims.

In my understanding, 1xbit once got into acquisition of some scam and they never took it serious. It went like, they were out of the business. Later once again they came back, but the popularity of the domain name doesn't let them go for a change. Here they solved few acquisition and tried to gain reputation. This failed and now they're trying to continue their service amidst the acquisition.

Years back they are interested in addressing those accusation against them but nowadays? it looks like they are already immune about all the cases coming here and there means one thing that they are only for profit or income and not caring about the players , in need of attention then they will not gain anything from the community and I'm not sure if there are even one forum member that plays in this site.

There was a time in which the owners of the 1xbit casino made an effort to try to clean their image but they failed, and once they realized that it was going to be impossible for them to ever regain the image they wanted they decided to openly scam their customers.

After all if they do not have a reputation to protect then it is not possible for us to do much to them because we do not really have the means to recover the coins they have stolen from their customers, and the only thing that we can do is to try to prevent newbies from gambling there, and while I'm sure that we are successful in our endeavors and we can protect a great deal of newbies from losing their money, we cannot protect everyone and they are able to remain in business because of that.

[peter0425]

There was a time in which the owners of the 1xbit casino made an effort to try to clean their image but they failed, and once they realized that it was going to be impossible for them to ever regain the image they wanted they decided to openly scam their customers.

We are not sure if the one who are talking to us here are Owner of 1xbit or just a part of the team , they tried to clean up their name but the problem is that Victims or claimants asks for proof of them being cheaters but nothing that they bring out.

After all if they do not have a reputation to protect then it is not possible for us to do much to them because we do not really have the means to recover the coins they have stolen from their customers, and the only thing that we can do is to try to prevent newbies from gambling there, and while I'm sure that we are successful in our endeavors and we can protect a great deal of newbies from losing their money, we cannot protect everyone and they are able to remain in business because of that.

they already accept those facts mate , they even still run their signature campaign here even with hundreds of complaints and with tens of negative trust on their account.

but what is important here is that to continue showing the forum on how this site runs their business for prevention .

[danadc]

I don't think that 1xbit signature participants have multi accounts at 1xbit, rather i think that they do not have any account there and they never play at 1xbit.

Thats possible because they're also afraid to experience the same problem of complainants and lose their money if they play on 1xbit due to numerous unresolved accusations against the site.

That's the reason that they are always posting good about the site and also they are being paid to write in favor of 1xbit else they have the danger to be removed from the campaign. They only care about few pennies which they get every month for 1xbit.

They're getting paid so its obvious that they will defend 1xbit and will spread awareness to help the site get more players even they know to themselves that it cant be trusted.

But what are those people who have such a bad reputation going to do for spreading the 1Xbit scam? There are many accounts and they are from legendary, why do they throw so much rope around their necks with this campaign, and where do they get so much money from? A person who realizes that a site is a scam will disclose it and will not play, is that the owner of this casino steals in what ways?

On the web there is this casino and they put it as one of the good and trustworthy ones, these things can be achieved by paying a very good advertising on google, for money they do anything, right? but when they decide not to be in the forum anymore, how can those ceutas do? Reaching Legendary is not an easy thing.

[shasan]

But what are those people who have such a bad reputation going to do for spreading the 1Xbit scam?

Those who have an inactive/active account with almost no earned merit or those who can't be accepted on any good signature campaign can join the 1xbit signature campaign. Or those who have multiple accounts may work on this project. Or those who had negative trust though 1xbit now not accepting negatively trusted users who got negative trust not for promoting 1xbit.

[Cookdata]

Years back they are interested in addressing those accusation against them but nowadays? it looks like they are already immune about all the cases coming here and there means one thing that they are only for profit or income and not caring about the players , in need of attention then they will not gain anything from the community and I'm not sure if there are even one forum member that plays in this site.

They are not immune, they are very corrupt as a company and just don't have the heart to function as a company who have a reputation to protect. Last weekend while watching Premier League, I came across their adverts on the Brentford Community Stadium and I was pissed, I still wonder if those agencies usually look deeply at their client's banners and if they are actually having problems with their customers before they endorse them on their places but I think it is only this community that fight against scammers here and I'm glad DT is doing there Job tagging their asses with red feedbacks.

[Reatim]

But what are those people who have such a bad reputation going to do for spreading the 1Xbit scam?

Those who have an inactive/active account with almost no earned merit or those who can't be accepted on any good signature campaign can join the 1xbit signature campaign. Or those who have multiple accounts may work on this project. Or those who had negative trust though 1xbit now not accepting negatively trusted users who got negative trust not for promoting 1xbit.

it is given that those are the accounts that advertising this site , and Wondering what will happen to their accounts once the campaign is Over or atleast they are being denied of payments or being scammed from this 1xbit .

and yes they are not actually playing in that site but only using the site as their bread and butter .

[Jemzx00]

But what are those people who have such a bad reputation going to do for spreading the 1Xbit scam?

Those who have an inactive/active account with almost no earned merit or those who can't be accepted on any good signature campaign can join the 1xbit signature campaign. Or those who have multiple accounts may work on this project. Or those who had negative trust though 1xbit now not accepting negatively trusted users who got negative trust not for promoting 1xbit.

That's the thing, they don't really care about their account anymore as long as they get paid through promoting such an ill reputed platform. Most of them are really account farmers way back before merit has been introduced and just woke up as this campaign doesn't really care about any metrics or quality of the account.

[Yaunfitda]

But what are those people who have such a bad reputation going to do for spreading the 1Xbit scam?

Those who have an inactive/active account with almost no earned merit or those who can't be accepted on any good signature campaign can join the 1xbit signature campaign. Or those who have multiple accounts may work on this project. Or those who had negative trust though 1xbit now not accepting negatively trusted users who got negative trust not for promoting 1xbit.

it is given that those are the accounts that advertising this site , and Wondering what will happen to their accounts once the campaign is Over or atleast they are being denied of payments or being scammed from this 1xbit .

and yes they are not actually playing in that site but only using the site as their bread and butter .

Those accounts are going to hibernate again for sure because there aren't any campaigns that are going to accept members who have negative trust.
I will just answer the part of wherein you join a campaign, for sure if you join a signature campaign, you should at least test what you have been promoting and see how the platform is. This is how you return the favor from those gambling sites. Get to feel and play some games on the platform.

[slaman29]

I have a question to moderators, if they're reading this. Do you guys see a lot of spam from 1xbit people or do you see everything objectively? I mean, I literally just don't even see what they post when I see their signature so in a way it's like a blessing and a help to wear it, so I can immediately filter out spam

I know not a single gambler who wears it.

[Haunebu]

I have a question to moderators, if they're reading this. Do you guys see a lot of spam from 1xbit people or do you see everything objectively? I mean, I literally just don't even see what they post when I see their signature so in a way it's like a blessing and a help to wear it, so I can immediately filter out spam

I know not a single gambler who wears it.

I guess they watch them objectively. If they didn't, most or all of their participants would have been banned by now for spamming etc. They have to monitor them just like everyone else since this is a free speech forum after all.

Very few 1xbit participants actually post interesting stuff now and then which is why it's a shame that they decided to sell their souls for money to be honest.

I did observe some of their participants getting banned for reasons like spamming, copy-pasting etc over time.

[shasan]

guess they watch them objectively. If they didn't, most or all of their participants would have been banned by now for spamming etc. They have to monitor them just like everyone else since this is a free speech forum after all.

Very few 1xbit participants actually post interesting stuff now and then which is why it's a shame that they decided to sell their souls for money to be honest.

I did observe some of their participants getting banned for reasons like spamming, copy-pasting etc over time.

Those who have multiple accounts and who can't be enrolled in any campaign may join this campaign. As the account cant be enrolled on any other campaign or they have multiple accounts they have nothing except to do. They are trying to post within as short a time as possible and for that reason, they may create copy-paste/spam posts and as a result, they may get banned.