I Have a Question ~ Are 1xbit Campaigners Playing on 1xbit?

[arwin100]

Most provably not because those campaign participants is just there to gain money, but this is not important thing to discuss after all because overall 1xbit only need them to promote their casino and not for them to play because at the end of the day the real target of 1xbit is those people who want to try their site and place a huge bets to them.

And participants is just milking this because they know they don't have anywhere to go since there account has a red tag so they maximize their opportunity to withdraw their money so that they can get something in return for wearing their signature codes.

[ethereumhunter]

You are wearing the signature of the Roobet site and you can play at that gambling site safely because that's a trusted site. But do you think that 1xbit signature campaigns participant will play at 1xbit and lose all the money when they earned through the campaign 

Do you think they will want to risk their money in the site? If they make money from the signature campaign and they feel like gambling, they will deposit the money to Roobet site because they know 1xbit can't be trusted and they won't also want to lose their money. I can't even imagine someone wearing 1xbit signature creating scam accusation against them. They are just after money and immediately they make money they will move to reputable site and gamble, I can't imagine marketing for a site you can't use because u don't trust them and you want other people to use it, I think that's just weakness.

Or they won't play on their site because they know what will happen if they keep playing there and keep their money for something else. But they won't stop no matter how many cases have happened on their site and they shouldn't have done that if they want to improve their reputation. We can't do anything if, for example, people come to their site and are tempted to see their offers because they will be very enthusiastic about getting attractive offers like that.

[danadc]

I have already said it before, the 1xbit activists are not able to play with their money because they know that they will lose and if they win they will be scammed, the alternatives that this casino has are not many, it is very difficult for them to clear their name, with everything they have done is not simple, here a constant monitoring of those who are part of the 1xbit campaign is maintained and they do not mind damaging the reputation much more.

You are wearing the signature of the Roobet site and you can play at that gambling site safely because that's a trusted site. But do you think that 1xbit signature campaigns participant will play at 1xbit and lose all the money when they earned through the campaign 

Do you think they will want to risk their money in the site? If they make money from the signature campaign and they feel like gambling, they will deposit the money to Roobet site because they know 1xbit can't be trusted and they won't also want to lose their money. I can't even imagine someone wearing 1xbit signature creating scam accusation against them. They are just after money and immediately they make money they will move to reputable site and gamble, I can't imagine marketing for a site you can't use because u don't trust them and you want other people to use it, I think that's just weakness.

All this talk is contradictory, you cannot compare a site like Robobet that has been exercising entertainment and fun for so many years with a fraudulent site, this site is wonderful next to 1xbit.

I don't think even a person with 4 fingers of brains has the intention of playing in 1xbit if they check his reputation. If you want to bet safely you can go to sites that are more trustworthy, there are many, duelbits is reliable, and just like this one you can choose betfury that also give good promotions to play, but don't fall for scams, take care of your money and go play it safe.

[Daltonik]

Do not forget that the 1xbit platform is already quite considered a scam and discussing the actions of scammers, and even more so trying to hope for a successful outcome when playing on their field, this is a hopeless occupation, if you can't stop it, then it's better to stay away.

[Issa56]

I have already said it before, the 1xbit activists are not able to play with their money because they know that they will lose and if they win they will be scammed,

I don't just know why some people are so heartless, they know people will get scammed if they use the site but just because of their selfish interests they are still marketing for that same project, lots of people will fall victim, because some people are just joining the forum and they don't know much about the forum, they might not know about the scam accusation against the site, users wearing the signature have been tagged with negative trust but some new users might not know about the trust system, some of them will definitely use the site and they will be scammed. Seriously I believe they deserve more punishment than tagging them with negative trust alone.

[Hispo]

Do not forget that the 1xbit platform is already quite considered a scam and discussing the actions of scammers, and even more so trying to hope for a successful outcome when playing on their field, this is a hopeless occupation, if you can't stop it, then it's better to stay away.

I mostly depends on what we would call a "successful outcome". For some a "successful outcome" would be to see 1xbit banned from the forum completely or even their platform to be completely wiped out of the internet, however those outcomes are very unlikely to happen.

In the case of the average 1xbit victim they just want their money back as soon as they realize the mistake they committed by depositing their crypto there. It is easy to ignore and stay away this mess if one has not lost any money, but it is quite a challenge to move on for victims they grieve the lost money.

[mindrust]

Probably not. They probably only care if they are getting paid or not. It is nothing new though, lots of people are getting paid to advertise something they don't really like. It is called having a "job".

I don't think anybody with a half functioning brain would play on that casino when there are numerous scam accusations against them. But somehow, some people must be playing on 1xbit. Otherwise they wouldn't be doing these aggressive ad camps everywhere.

[mak013]

Probably not. They probably only care if they are getting paid or not. It is nothing new though, lots of people are getting paid to advertise something they don't really like. It is called having a "job".

It is so. But there is one moment that makes differs. It is trust. When you make job that you don`t like - it`s not a problem. You change job and continue to work. But with negative trust you can have problems with getting a new job. But if accounts were leveluped before merit system - their owners don`t understand the price of this decision.

[UserU]

It is so. But there is one moment that makes differs. It is trust. When you make job that you don`t like - it`s not a problem. You change job and continue to work. But with negative trust you can have problems with getting a new job. But if accounts were leveluped before merit system - their owners don`t understand the price of this decision.

They don't really care. Most importantly, the money rolls in.

Assuming the campaign stops paying one day, they could always purchase an alt for another campaign or move on with life or their real job.

[peter0425]

and even if I am on their shoe? knowing how 1xbit doing for their players? I'm afraid that I will ever deposit even a single cent in their site .
most of their participants is practically joining just to earn money and that's all  and they even risk their account receiving multiple tags just for the sake of money so how could they ever spend this for scam gambling site.

[arwin100]

It is so. But there is one moment that makes differs. It is trust. When you make job that you don`t like - it`s not a problem. You change job and continue to work. But with negative trust you can have problems with getting a new job. But if accounts were leveluped before merit system - their owners don`t understand the price of this decision.

They don't really care. Most importantly, the money rolls in.

Assuming the campaign stops paying one day, they could always purchase an alt for another campaign or move on with life or their real job.

Well that's the case if they save their money to use it buying an account here but still it will hard for them to join on any campaigns due to merit and post quality requirements so for sure they might spend a lot of times before they can get a decent campaign here. But most likely for sure they cashout what they earn on that campaign since most provably they think like no tomorrow on that since there accounts have red trust and they grab the opportunity to earn while they can.

[Solosanz]

Well that's the case if they save their money to use it buying an account here but still it will hard for them to join on any campaigns due to merit and post quality requirements so for sure they might spend a lot of times before they can get a decent campaign here. But most likely for sure they cashout what they earn on that campaign since most provably they think like no tomorrow on that since there accounts have red trust and they grab the opportunity to earn while they can.

Yeah, that's the reason why signature campaigns with Bitcoin payment are only for good and active posters, but maybe they will join a bounty campaign even though there's no guarantee they will get payment and the price of the coin is same like their promise.

I'm just hoping when 1xbit campaign already ended, there's no campaign will accept negative feedback account anymore. This will make them regret to participate scam campaign and if they're able to join other campaigns, the negative trusts seems to be useless.

[nakamura12]

It's really sad that they have to sacrifice their credibility and principle because of 1xbit. It will surely affect even their personal reputation and they will also have a hard time finding trusted and legit campaigns in the future. I don't think the money they're getting from the said campaign is still worth it.

Based on what I know, not all participants doesn't have negative trust that join the campaign before they got negative trust for joining the campaign because some of them already have negative trust and the only thing they can do is to join 1xbit campaign since they are the only campaign that accept participants that has negative trust compared to other campaigns where a participant with negative trust can't join.

[UserU]

I'm just hoping when 1xbit campaign already ended, there's no campaign will accept negative feedback account anymore. This will make them regret to participate scam campaign and if they're able to join other campaigns, the negative trusts seems to be useless.

If they can sponsor tournaments and matches, signature campaigns are the least of their worries. The ROI seems to be quite decent, based on the number of allegations opened from time to time.

[stomachgrowls]

I'm just hoping when 1xbit campaign already ended, there's no campaign will accept negative feedback account anymore. This will make them regret to participate scam campaign and if they're able to join other campaigns, the negative trusts seems to be useless.

If they can sponsor tournaments and matches, signature campaigns are the least of their worries. The ROI seems to be quite decent, based on the number of allegations opened from time to time.

They wont be able to sustain on running their campaign for long if they arent really making revenue but since we are seeing the opposite thing then we could really indeed say that they are really making

sufficient revenue to sustain up in regarding into their marketing and other promotion.Totally that mind boggling considering on whats the reputation they do have specially into this forum.

They are indeed making money despite of those issues and continue on what they are doing.Campaigners arent mostly necessarily to be a player on the company that they
are really that promoting since it wouldnt really be that necessary.

[virasisog]

I'm just hoping when 1xbit campaign already ended, there's no campaign will accept negative feedback account anymore. This will make them regret to participate scam campaign and if they're able to join other campaigns, the negative trusts seems to be useless.

If they can sponsor tournaments and matches, signature campaigns are the least of their worries. The ROI seems to be quite decent, based on the number of allegations opened from time to time.

They wont be able to sustain on running their campaign for long if they arent really making revenue but since we are seeing the opposite thing then we could really indeed say that they are really making

sufficient revenue to sustain up in regarding into their marketing and other promotion.Totally that mind boggling considering on whats the reputation they do have specially into this forum.

They are indeed making money despite of those issues and continue on what they are doing.Campaigners arent mostly necessarily to be a player on the company that they
are really that promoting since it wouldnt really be that necessary.

The signature campaign isn't really a big deal to them because their main focus is to earn. The purpose of their campaign is to get advertised on this forum so the negative trust of some of their participants isn't their concern anymore. They don't need to use their payment as betting capital on their site because they're not asked to. I'm sure that participants also have an idea about the trust issues of the said campaign but they're also staying to earn.

[stomachgrowls]

I'm just hoping when 1xbit campaign already ended, there's no campaign will accept negative feedback account anymore. This will make them regret to participate scam campaign and if they're able to join other campaigns, the negative trusts seems to be useless.

If they can sponsor tournaments and matches, signature campaigns are the least of their worries. The ROI seems to be quite decent, based on the number of allegations opened from time to time.

They wont be able to sustain on running their campaign for long if they arent really making revenue but since we are seeing the opposite thing then we could really indeed say that they are really making

sufficient revenue to sustain up in regarding into their marketing and other promotion.Totally that mind boggling considering on whats the reputation they do have specially into this forum.

They are indeed making money despite of those issues and continue on what they are doing.Campaigners arent mostly necessarily to be a player on the company that they
are really that promoting since it wouldnt really be that necessary.

The signature campaign isn't really a big deal to them because their main focus is to earn. The purpose of their campaign is to get advertised on this forum so the negative trust of some of their participants isn't their concern anymore. They don't need to use their payment as betting capital on their site because they're not asked to. I'm sure that participants also have an idea about the trust issues of the said campaign but they're also staying to earn.

They are staying of course because those red painted accounts could never be useful and who would be that dumb person on not to jump into something that they do know that they could earn bucks?

Its an opportunity for them thats why there's nothing they could lose but rather they would earn something from those negative account and since 1xbit doesnt really care about reputation then it would

really be just understandable that they would really be allowing negative users to join up the campaign.They dont really care about reputation since from the beginning.

[malcovi2]

They don't need to use their payment as betting capital on their site because they're not asked to. I'm sure that participants also have an idea about the trust issues of the said campaign but they're also staying to earn.

I agree and I also think that most of the 1xbit signature participants are multiaccount users probably its a big reason why they are defending this scam platform. They aren't dumb enough to use a fellow thief's service/platform they know that they can be screwed once they put in money.

[Vaskiy]

I'm not sure about the participants spending, but 1xbit keeps themselves with addition of more sports events. In recent days it have added cosmos to the list of cryptocurrencies used for gambling. One of early established platform, for now if they've solved the acquisition it could've grown much bigger taking the lead role as cryptocurrency accepted sportsbook.

[mak013]

It is so. But there is one moment that makes differs. It is trust. When you make job that you don`t like - it`s not a problem. You change job and continue to work. But with negative trust you can have problems with getting a new job. But if accounts were leveluped before merit system - their owners don`t understand the price of this decision.

They don't really care. Most importantly, the money rolls in.

Assuming the campaign stops paying one day, they could always purchase an alt for another campaign or move on with life or their real job.

It is strange for me. I understand that they get money right now. But they must understand that it will end some day. But this is true for real users. There are businessman yet. I don`t know how much such account costs and i think that it is possible decision for the participants - there were lots of bot accounts here. I think that men, who made the bounty their main business calculates it and if they still do it - it is profitable. It is bad for the board but good for the business.