Is the government can really make a way to end poverty or it depends on us?

[Woodie]

As much as i dont want to say it, unfortunately the government does play a role in poverty eradication!!!

Why do i say so , well the govt is in charge of policing which affects the economy generally and translates into either well paying jobs meeting minimum wages and also helps in setting the tone of employment ,  the govts involvement also helps bring down inflation which helps fix price of goods and service's which trickle down to the citizenry and the ability to afford them or not.

Btw i dont know about other countries but the government is the biggest employer in most countries and if its not employing it means more people will be out in the street's jobless trying to survive if poverty doesnt get to them first but in this modern technology its important to equip ourselves with extra skills to survive.

[1714543007]

1714543007

[fuer44]

Depending on us, they will only help a little to create jobs in various ways, one of which is bringing in foreign investors. The government is also only tasked with regulating the circulation of the local currency to prevent inflation. The government will also only regulate security and order for everyone who wants to run a business. So the main actors to end poverty are ourselves and the government is just the people behind the scenes.

[DrBeer]

As much as i dont want to say it, unfortunately the government does play a role in poverty eradication!!!

Why do i say so , well the govt is in charge of policing which affects the economy generally and translates into either well paying jobs meeting minimum wages and also helps in setting the tone of employment ,  the govts involvement also helps bring down inflation which helps fix price of goods and service's which trickle down to the citizenry and the ability to afford them or not.

Btw i dont know about other countries but the government is the biggest employer in most countries and if its not employing it means more people will be out in the street's jobless trying to survive if poverty doesnt get to them first but in this modern technology its important to equip ourselves with extra skills to survive.

What you are talking about now is called "state control". But... It's a bit off about a "guaranteed solution to poverty". Although not, there are examples of state control, or attempts. For example, Venezuela. A "wonderful" example is when control and attempts to "force everyone to live well" led to a diametrically opposite result.
Therefore, a NORMAL state will never engage in "manual control in your refrigerator."
The state must create conditions for people to live with dignity. Once again, "conditions" and "people could", i.e. not to take money and give it to everyone, but to create conditions so that people, working, have the opportunity to achieve a higher standard of living. This is where the state assumes obligations - it is the socially unprotected sections of the population - pensioners, disabled, functionally limited citizens of the country. But their standard of living is directly proportional to the volume of tax collections, and inversely proportional to the level of corruption. Therefore, I clarify once again - the state is only a regulator, and we must "forge happiness" ourselves!

[ultrloa]

Government has a role to play to enhance the life of his constituent since they are the one who will give opportunity or skills to their people to get more better job or create good ideas which can be converted to money for theirselves. If no government support will exist for sure the country will struggle to find good programs to help their people.

But people shouldn't rely on what government could provide since at the end they are also the one who will work for it so thay they will be equip with knowledge and can get better jobs to get out of poverty where they currently on.

[karmamiu]

Government has a role to play to enhance the life of his constituent since they are the one who will give opportunity or skills to their people to get more better job or create good ideas which can be converted to money for theirselves. If no government support will exist for sure the country will struggle to find good programs to help their people.

But people shouldn't rely on what government could provide since at the end they are also the one who will work for it so thay they will be equip with knowledge and can get better jobs to get out of poverty where they currently on.

In short, the government's role is to provide more opportunities to for the poor to work and earn a living for themselves. I have seen lots of cases about people who keeps depending on the government's benefits without even taking action for themselves. This is why by teaching them how to handle their own finances can also be a big help for them to improve their way of thinking or approach towards money.

[S3300]

Government are not responsible for making people rich, some people believe that government is responsible for their own laziness, the government can only bring good opportunities like free education, run water and build schools, this is the job of the government, not to enrich people, or something.

[southerngentuk]

I see there are some problems in the current society that make people's life difficult but I don't want to talk about this. Because I think that not everywhere everyone's life is the same, we want equality in life, but so far it has almost never happened because of selfish greed or selfishness. groups with conservative views.
I'm not sure if the OP is really looking at the right problem, when the truth is that if there was no government to operate the economic machine and support the people, the economic situation of the war epidemic in recent years would this will probably turn some countries down. So the solution is to be patient and act ethically.

[G_Besar]

Government are not responsible for making people rich, some people believe that government is responsible for their own laziness, the government can only bring good opportunities like free education, run water and build schools, this is the job of the government, not to enrich people, or something.

I think what you say is very appropriate to explain the duties of the government in each country they lead. However, sometimes some citizens are not aware of this, so they continue to ask for help from the government, even though the assistance requested is in the form of money consumed within half a month.

Actually this clearly needs to be straightened out so that everyone can understand the duties of the government because the government, apart from providing free education, clean water and building schools, the government now in several countries also provides free health and employment opportunities for young people who have certain talent in each of them. The point is lazy is a trait that must be completely discarded by everyone if they want to get rich independently in their life.

[DrBeer]

By the way - there is a great example when the state decided to build a "state of general welfare." This is about the USSR!
On the one hand, there were a lot of slogans, propaganda, and even a legislative framework, within which all inhabitants of the USSR were supposed to have at least an average standard of living, a set of social benefits, etc. utopian promises.
What really happened? As a resident of the USSR, I tell this in the first person, a direct "participant in the events." What did you end up building? They built a country where 90% of the population is a POOR population, with pseudo-incomes, pseudo-social guarantees. No more ! That is - the global poor, without prospects, rights and opportunities to change something. And this despite the fact that the USSR had huge resources! At the same time, the propaganda landmark has always been on the phantom "poor population of the capitalist world"! That is, propaganda invented how unacceptably people live in the West, and the poverty of the USSR was presented as a "high standard of living"!

[romero121]

Wealth getting accumulated in few people's hands is the major reason for the existence and increasing poverty around the market world. This can be overcome through proper study and taking necessary measures. When the government does things in an effective way, automatically common people will give hands and support. In very few countries we were able to see the diverse growth, whereas in most of the countries the growth gets accumulated in specific region. This increase the market In that specific region and the rest stay as it is for years. This makes job opportunity accessible for specific groups. So, some form of diversification could make life better and eliminate poverty.

[MusaPk]

Government has a role to play to enhance the life of his constituent since they are the one who will give opportunity or skills to their people to get more better job or create good ideas which can be converted to money for theirselves. If no government support will exist for sure the country will struggle to find good programs to help their people.

But people shouldn't rely on what government could provide since at the end they are also the one who will work for it so thay they will be equip with knowledge and can get better jobs to get out of poverty where they currently on.

The reason why some countries are more developed then others is because of there governments working in right direction by creating job opportunities, providing adequate health and education facilities to its citizens. You can see that countries that are far behind in development is mostly because there governments are involved in corruption.
You are right if we live in a country where government is not doing enough for its people then one must not keep himself dependent on the government rather take some initiative that can improve one's lifestyle.

[Flexystar]

As much as i dont want to say it, unfortunately the government does play a role in poverty eradication!!!

Why do i say so , well the govt is in charge of policing which affects the economy generally and translates into either well paying jobs meeting minimum wages and also helps in setting the tone of employment ,  the govts involvement also helps bring down inflation which helps fix price of goods and service's which trickle down to the citizenry and the ability to afford them or not.

Btw i dont know about other countries but the government is the biggest employer in most countries and if its not employing it means more people will be out in the street's jobless trying to survive if poverty doesnt get to them first but in this modern technology its important to equip ourselves with extra skills to survive.

There are many thoughts on this one. Considering the population, the literacy rate in the country, infrastructure, and people's voting towards good government can make big difference. If a country is hosting a government body which has very poor co-ordinated people then definitely they won't good for the country. Poverty is not the definition of money actually, it's all about how literate people are. If the literacy rate increases then definitely employment changes, people start earning money as per their skills and increase their wagers over the period of time.

So if any country promotes education at its best then they will develop. The government will also receive a handsome amount of revenue in return considering 99% of people are working class. Thus, they can focus on other stuff like national infra, more educational institutes, higher research, and much more.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

You can't totally depend your life sustainability on governments, because they will fail you and you will get disappointed, but better still, you should learn to take full confidence in yourself and the ability from what you can delivers, hope in man is vain, some things we ought to do were left undone, how much more are we getting concerned on the affairs of the well-being of others, one need to encourage himself and be bold, less of fear and takes courageous actions towards life and live a determined independent kind of life.

[erep]

You can't totally depend your life sustainability on governments, because they will fail you and you will get disappointed, but better still, you should learn to take full confidence in yourself and the ability from what you can delivers, hope in man is vain, some things we ought to do were left undone, how much more are we getting concerned on the affairs of the well-being of others, one need to encourage himself and be bold, less of fear and takes courageous actions towards life and live a determined independent kind of life.

You're right, expecting the government to be disappointed because some officials don't have time to think about the welfare of the citizens but they are busy taking care of big projects to enrich themselves, instead of believing in the government's promises but we better have to work hard to improve history and make life better, so take advantage of every opportunity to work and you will be able to end poverty without help from the government.

[lionheart78]

As much as i dont want to say it, unfortunately the government does play a role in poverty eradication!!!

Why do i say so , well the govt is in charge of policing which affects the economy generally and translates into either well paying jobs meeting minimum wages and also helps in setting the tone of employment ,  the govts involvement also helps bring down inflation which helps fix price of goods and service's which trickle down to the citizenry and the ability to afford them or not.

Btw i dont know about other countries but the government is the biggest employer in most countries and if its not employing it means more people will be out in the street's jobless trying to survive if poverty doesnt get to them first but in this modern technology its important to equip ourselves with extra skills to survive.

There are many thoughts on this one. Considering the population, the literacy rate in the country, infrastructure, and people's voting towards good government can make big difference. If a country is hosting a government body which has very poor co-ordinated people then definitely they won't good for the country. Poverty is not the definition of money actually, it's all about how literate people are. If the literacy rate increases then definitely employment changes, people start earning money as per their skills and increase their wagers over the period of time.

So if any country promotes education at its best then they will develop. The government will also receive a handsome amount of revenue in return considering 99% of people are working class. Thus, they can focus on other stuff like national infra, more educational institutes, higher research, and much more.

This should be coupled with opportunity.  Yes, the government focused on education but failed to implement job opportunities, then the impact of this education campaign will be lessen.  So the focus shouldn;t stop on literacy, it should continue with job offers that give an opportunity to people to practice what they had learned.  The availability of jobs, both that demands intellect and physical labor, will somehow ensure the source of income for people in all walk of life thus elevating the status of an individual family.

[deathcode]

You can't totally depend your life sustainability on governments, because they will fail you and you will get disappointed, but better still, you should learn to take full confidence in yourself and the ability from what you can delivers, hope in man is vain, some things we ought to do were left undone, how much more are we getting concerned on the affairs of the well-being of others, one need to encourage himself and be bold, less of fear and takes courageous actions towards life and live a determined independent kind of life.

You're right, expecting the government to be disappointed because some officials don't have time to think about the welfare of the citizens but they are busy taking care of big projects to enrich themselves, instead of believing in the government's promises but we better have to work hard to improve history and make life better, so take advantage of every opportunity to work and you will be able to end poverty without help from the government.

There are many factors that affect poverty whether it's from the government or indeed from the people themselves. In some countries there are indeed some governments that have not been optimal in carrying out their duties to eradicate poverty. It is possible that most governments today are good fields for enriching themselves.
Or maybe it is also due to the lack of jobs because the more years the population in a country will increase and the competition between workers will be higher.
And the poverty rate will be high if the citizens are not optimal in their education, causing people with low education to be unable to compete with others so that they become unemployed which causes poverty.
Actually, I admit that it is not easy to eradicate poverty for all citizens if you only rely on the government. It would be better if we also work together with the government to be creative in creating new jobs to help some people who are less fortunate or still in poverty.
We really shouldn't have to rely entirely on the government because our destiny depends on what we do.

[Wakate]

Depending on us, they will only help a little to create jobs in various ways, one of which is bringing in foreign investors. The government is also only tasked with regulating the circulation of the local currency to prevent inflation. The government will also only regulate security and order for everyone who wants to run a business. So the main actors to end poverty are ourselves and the government is just the people behind the scenes.

We need to understand that we don't need to always depends on the government to spoon feed us. We need to create business opportunities for other who are in search of jobs. We should not build our mind of working for people like getting a job with a mentality of not becoming an investor. We need to work on creating businesses so that we can become a boss and make good money not having the mindset of working for people. The government can only project the necessary effort to create good roads and provide some basic amenities in the society nit getting us a job.

[mvdheuvel1983]

The poverty eradication is on both side, that is the government and her citizens (Thats us). The government can do it alone without our help.
Though the government has a vital role to play in the since that the price control agencies are not really working.
In my country, I bet you that the government are not really aware of some price increment on some commodities.
If we the citizen will help the government by not adding too much price on the commodities it will help a long way.
So, it all depends on both the government and us.

[AnonBitCoiner]

Actually government cannot end the poverty as the population of country is very large and government cannot provide necessary things and jobs to all of the individuals. It's depend on a person that how he managed their life expenses and how they will earn and make money.

Government hasn't set any rules of earning and there are not enough salaries of people therefore they are trying to make money in some different ways and using different assets. Reason behind blaming is that daily uses necessities are increasing more in price while the salary remains low therefore a poor man cannot manage the life expenses.

I think that government should set certain rules that if things of daily uses increases in price then there must be increase in salaries otherwise inflation should be stop.

[boyptc]

A government that has a heart to its people will do everything to give those services to make life easier for them. But if you understand that the government can't help you have a better situation, that's for you to decide that no one will help you.

It's like being alone in the wild and you need to survive. Poverty is one of the biggest problem in many countries and we can understand by that, that governments can't eradicate it.

So instead of waiting for their help, do your initiation to make your life better by either working hard or working smart. And in today's time, many do use poverty as their inspiration to become better and have a greater future.