Agriculture vs oil

[AirtelBuzz]

Agriculture vs oil, which is the big deal when it comes to the economic strength of a country?

I think both agriculture and oil are important in the economic strength of a country. There are many countries in the world where most people depend on agriculture, such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, India and many countries in South Asia are dependent on agriculture. These countries earn dollar income by exporting the crops produced in their country abroad which plays a major role in the economic development or strength of their country. But nowadays agriculture is also heavily dependent on oil as power tillers and tractors to cultivate agricultural land require oil to run the machines. Oil is used in most of the machinery and equipment used in agriculture.

[edy_58]

The importance of oil in a country's economic power is certainly immense. No machinery can run without oil and arable land cannot be prepared without machinery. Suppose I have oil production plant in my country but no arable land in my country then I can trade oil in unique country and buy food grains from there then my cost to buy food grains will be less. So if you think about it, you will see that a country is completely immobile without oil. I can simply say that the importance of oil in terms of economic power is immense.

Yes, oil is of course a very important thing to be able to run machines that can work on land because without oil of course we have to go back to the past by using the help of animals to be able to cultivate agricultural land, each region certainly has its own advantages and disadvantages and for Countries that have oil revenues do not necessarily mean that their countries have fertile land to be able to find plants that can meet their food needs and the same goes for countries that have fertile land.
What you say is very true, currently oil is very important and has something to do with economic turnover.

[Z_MBFM]

Agriculture vs oil, which is the big deal when it comes to the economic strength of a country?

I think both agriculture and oil are important in the economic strength of a country. There are many countries in the world where most people depend on agriculture, such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, India and many countries in South Asia are dependent on agriculture. These countries earn dollar income by exporting the crops produced in their country abroad which plays a major role in the economic development or strength of their country. But nowadays agriculture is also heavily dependent on oil as power tillers and tractors to cultivate agricultural land require oil to run the machines. Oil is used in most of the machinery and equipment used in agriculture.

Yes I agree with you. One is dependent on the other. One is incomplete without the other. In ancient times, people used to fill the gaps of tractors with cows and googs, but nowadays people cannot do farming without power tractors, tractors. And even though irrigation is done using electricity in some places, oil is still used in some places. On the other hand, oil is also used in the cargo vehicles or ships required to transport goods. So oil is required in almost all cases.  Again, without agriculture, our food needs will not be met.  Which will push us to death. So both oil and agriculture are very important for us. There is no alternative to any of these

[cakravothy]

online markets aka stock markets in forex or real market offline market. the petroleum market is more promising for big profits. in agriculture or plantations represented by palm oil in this case palm oil. which in the world of developed countries is a lot about because it destroys forests. maybe because in developed countries do not have large areas of land, aka not planting oil palm so many are against palm oil exports.

[sekalitas]

We know the oil market is booming and countries with oil resources are really making a huge fund out of it and sometimes they do it at the negligence of another local natural resource.

But, of course, the agricultural sector, though not given the proper recognition and the required investment is one sector that contributes seriously to the development and dependence of most nations .

No matter how blessed a country is with oil minerals, if its agricultural sector isn't working and she has to rely on other country for her food and agricultural resources then in event of war or political differences they might suffer.

Agriculture vs oil, which is the big deal when it comes to the economic strength of a country?

If we develop technologies powered by sustainable and financially feasible alternative energy sources, agriculture could become the leading economic force. Unlike oil, which is a finite resource, agriculture offers long-term potential. With vertical farming, we can even overcome land limitations.  However, currently, oil holds significant economic sway due to its widespread use in various industries.

[BD Technical]

Burdwan is dependent on agriculture in almost all countries because if you don't have agriculture, if you don't have some management then what will you eat bro?  Moreover in that case if you are talking about oil then it is ok then you have to generate because everywhere it is not possible to generate from the company.  Because different countries see how much they have progressed from an oil mine in Qatar, we Bangladeshi people of Bangladesh are largely dependent on agriculture.  Because the current condition of Bangladesh is at the rate that the price of oil has increased, people do not think that after a few days.  The use of oil can keep it so normal because the night is gradually decreasing but there is no alternative to oil without oil. Oil has to be used.  But agriculture gives rice to people's stomach. Agriculture you can't do these things because what material will you make from the mill factory.

[Vinaa77]

We know the oil market is booming and countries with oil resources are really making a huge fund out of it and sometimes they do it at the negligence of another local natural resource.

But, of course, the agricultural sector, though not given the proper recognition and the required investment is one sector that contributes seriously to the development and dependence of most nations .

No matter how blessed a country is with oil minerals, if its agricultural sector isn't working and she has to rely on other country for her food and agricultural resources then in event of war or political differences they might suffer.

Agriculture vs oil, which is the big deal when it comes to the economic strength of a country?

If we develop technologies powered by sustainable and financially feasible alternative energy sources, agriculture could become the leading economic force. Unlike oil, which is a finite resource, agriculture offers long-term potential. With vertical farming, we can even overcome land limitations.  However, currently, oil holds significant economic sway due to its widespread use in various industries.

Developing technology that is supported by alternative energy sources that are sustainable and financially viable will indeed be an economic force, because if we only rely on oil in the agricultural industry of course we will have to spread a lot of costs because resources are limited and it will indeed be very profitable if we can manage vertical farming and this is very helpful if we can do it on the remaining land in the yard and this also really helps with household needs in terms of food needs.

[Linggajanitra]

In fact, agriculture & oil as a pillar that strengthens our economy. The agricultural sector will be very large responsibility in providing community food needs. The agricultural sector can also be a sector that provides the biggest opportunity for labor. If development in this sector will be intended for the welfare of people's lives, then in the context of the state in Indonesia the rural development must be more specifically emphasized for farmers. So far, agriculture is considered as a field that requires a lot of energy, thus exceeding the boundaries of industrial and trade labor (especially other sectors).
For the development of the agricultural sector that supports the welfare of farmers, then an agricultural sector is a production of the sector that must have high economic value.

While oil, is still relied upon as one of the main commodities. Significant changes in oil prices will affect the economy in Indonesia. If world oil prices also increase, in addition to increasing state income, subsidies will also increase. The Middle East region is a producer and export of oil that still plays the main actor in influencing the development of the world oil industry. With the start of oil exports, income and operations from the oil industry have a big impact on the economic situation. This happens because of excessive dependence on oil income and the value of the dollar to change the Arab economy into a revenue economy with an imbalance between production and consumption. Electing and selling oil is not enough indication for a productive economy. Which results in an unstable and fluctuating economic development which implies that a country that is very dependent on oil income cannot ensure the success of its economic development in the long run because it cannot be ascertained about the true amount of the oil revenue that will be received in the future there. However, because the weak political system causes less maximum oil export results for the economy of the producing country. Problems such as corruption, authoritarian government as well as the political system is weak, armed kkonflik and then Arabic waves that increasingly make regional atmosphere more chaotic. This problem is still ongoing and the response of each country is also different.

[Assface16678]

I think there's no need to argue which resource is more powerful for a country; not every country can have access to both oil and agriculture, and oil is only located or can be obtained in some regions of the world as it is a rare resource, and around it there can't be agricultural resources. And in fact, agriculture can sometimes depend on oil, as some machines and equipment used for agriculture use oil, which is essential. In short, each country has different resources that could make it powerful, and it's impossible for a nation or country to have all these rare and valuable resources. That's the beauty of the world; it's balanced and equal. But to sum up, oil is more powerful as it can be used to make machines and equipment that can be used for agriculture and other aspects. I think that concludes this argument or topic.

[shield132]

Yes, oil is of course a very important thing to be able to run machines that can work on land because without oil of course we have to go back to the past by using the help of animals to be able to cultivate agricultural land, each region certainly has its own advantages and disadvantages and for Countries that have oil revenues do not necessarily mean that their countries have fertile land to be able to find plants that can meet their food needs and the same goes for countries that have fertile land.
What you say is very true, currently oil is very important and has something to do with economic turnover.

Countries with massive oil reserves don't necessarily need fertile land for agriculture. They can sell their oil to countries that lack oil but have very fertile land and then buy back some products from them, this is why global trading is very beneficial for everyone. Also, vertical farming companies are emerging every day and that will help countries like Saudi Arabia to produce food and don't make themselves dependent on imports.

While we talk about agriculture versus oil, we should not forget blockchain technologies. They add important value to agriculture because blockchain technologies can track all types of information about food.

[martinex]

While we talk about agriculture versus oil, we should not forget blockchain technologies. They add important value to agriculture because blockchain technologies can track all types of information about food.

Indeed, the use of this technology can be placed in several places and of course not in all lines and one of them is as you said. Indeed, if we pay attention to the natural resources of each country, they are different and if they were the same, there would not be supply and demand exactly like trading patterns in crypto.

Yes. That is true. The most important thing for me is new food, moving on to oil and others, of course they all have their own correlation and function.

[cakravothy]

There are people who say that the name black gold is called petroleum. people equate it with gold because the potential to make money is very large and a lot for countries that have large oil refineries. the same is the case with agriculture which is called green gold there is the name palm oil, forest wood and more.

[yohananaomi]

There are people who say that the name black gold is called petroleum. people equate it with gold because the potential to make money is very large and a lot for countries that have large oil refineries. the same is the case with agriculture which is called green gold there is the name palm oil, forest wood and more.

It just depends on the situation, everything is clearly very useful, and the only difference is the value. But it is equally needed and cannot be replaced. But perhaps if petroleum is limited, it can be extracted because supplies will be depleted by the exploration carried out, but if agriculture will continue to develop and will always be the main thing for human needs in time.
Although perhaps currently everyone is still prioritizing petroleum because it is very expensive and needed,, but in the future, if there is a substitute, then everyone will switch, as they are now starting to use electric transportation.

[kenpachiofficial]

Both agriculture and oil have their important roles to play in the economic success of a country. Countries that have very fertile land for agriculture but low oil reserves can grow produce and trade such products with countries that have abundant oil reserves but in turn don't have the fertile land to grow agricultural produce, develop good international relations with such countries and could also import oil from such countries and vice versa.


International trade plays a good role in this perspective, when you don't have what you need, you use what you have to get what you need from who has what you need but doesn't have what you have and are in need of it.

[leonair]

Agriculture vs oil, which is the big deal when it comes to the economic strength of a country?

I think both agriculture and oil are important in the economic strength of a country. There are many countries in the world where most people depend on agriculture, such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, India and many countries in South Asia are dependent on agriculture. These countries earn dollar income by exporting the crops produced in their country abroad which plays a major role in the economic development or strength of their country. But nowadays agriculture is also heavily dependent on oil as power tillers and tractors to cultivate agricultural land require oil to run the machines. Oil is used in most of the machinery and equipment used in agriculture.

Both agriculture and oil are very important to us because without either one we cannot survive. so there is no comparison between these two. no country can survive either of these two. Oil will be required for agricultural work and without agricultural products our daily food needs will not be met. so we cannot exclude any of these two from our life. So I don't think there are any users here who can prove that life will go on without one of these two.

[Claudeake]

Agrobusiness and Petrodollar investment are complimentary components of a Postindustrial economy under pinned by the indices of capitalism. However, what makes a difference or the relative rewards of both are just a matter of two factors; structural trajectory ( neo colonialism / sovereign independent nation), and leadership dexterity.( Comprador class/ Pan nationalist class). Both factors have two variants of clear dichotomy. Thus, the argument goes that in a Neocolonial trajectory, the leadership sect is a reflection of comprador characterizations, so there would be absolute neglect of agriculture and the accruals of the hydrocarbon ( oil/ gas) deposits would be the centre of class struggles and all forms of manipulations. Again, there would be an adverse effects of macroeconomic indices such as; high unemployment, galloping inflation, hunger, misery, want, diseases, ignorance, squalor and disproportionate inequality. The much cherished advocacy and adoption of both fiscal and monetary policies to addressing these social evils are mere fascades . But, in an advance capitalist climes, the leadership class uses the accruals of the oil/ gas to subsidize the cost of agriculture, hence the affordability of both Cash and food crops by all social classes.

[AirtelBuzz]

Both agriculture and oil are very important to us because without either one we cannot survive. so there is no comparison between these two. no country can survive either of these two. Oil will be required for agricultural work and without agricultural products our daily food needs will not be met. so we cannot exclude any of these two from our life. So I don't think there are any users here who can prove that life will go on without one of these two.

Important in both agriculture and oil.Agriculture and oil play an immense role in keeping the economic wheels of a country moving.The use of oil has been gradually decreasing in recent times with agriculture as those living in South Asia will surely be aware that oil was once used in machines to irrigate paddy fields. With the recent increase in electricity supply, those irrigation machines now use electric motors instead of oil.

There are many countries in the world that export agricultural products produced in their country to earn foreign exchange which helps in the development of that country.Similarly, there are many countries in the world that are completely dependent on oil, such as Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and some other countries, they have managed to keep their economic wheels moving by exporting oil to different countries of the world. That is why oil and agriculture are closely related to the development of a country.

[coinerer]

Agriculture vs oil, which is the big deal when it comes to the economic strength of a country?

I think both agriculture and oil are important in the economic strength of a country. There are many countries in the world where most people depend on agriculture, such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, India and many countries in South Asia are dependent on agriculture. These countries earn dollar income by exporting the crops produced in their country abroad which plays a major role in the economic development or strength of their country. But nowadays agriculture is also heavily dependent on oil as power tillers and tractors to cultivate agricultural land require oil to run the machines. Oil is used in most of the machinery and equipment used in agriculture.

Both agriculture and oil are very important to us because without either one we cannot survive. so there is no comparison between these two. no country can survive either of these two. Oil will be required for agricultural work and without agricultural products our daily food needs will not be met. so we cannot exclude any of these two from our life. So I don't think there are any users here who can prove that life will go on without one of these two.

It is true that oil is very important in agriculture, but even if people can live without oil for a short period of time, people cannot live without agricultural products. didn't people live in ancient times when there was no oil or any advanced technology that needed to be driven? But even then agricultural products were needed and people lived by eating them. so if these two are voted, agriculture will be ahead. But in today's world modern technology machines must need oil to run, in this case there is no alternative to oil. so both are very important for us comparatively for present time

[shinratensei_]

There are people who say that the name black gold is called petroleum. people equate it with gold because the potential to make money is very large and a lot for countries that have large oil refineries. the same is the case with agriculture which is called green gold there is the name palm oil, forest wood and more.

yes basically its the same point with all of them, all of them are gold, just some are not truly renewable but there's definitely should be no undermining toward the vital role of these things for the advancement of human life.
i mean having plenty of oil is great, having bountiful harvest of agricultural sector is also great, but a country need these two for the economic to run normally, i will say that definitely as a country, invest in the betterment of both sector, if it happens that a country have so many oil deposits, thats gonna be great since it could mean that they could just mine it to invest into agriculture.
there's absolutely no point in debating whether oil or agriculture that strengthen economy because its like carriage, agriculture is the seat, oil is the wheel, a carriage without wheel, what it gonna do, just become a useless carriage deserted also a wheel without the carriage on top of it, absolutely have no point, the two is as vital for the strength of economy.

[Volimack]

Only agriculture can keep the country's economy moving. Whereas at the beginning of the Corona emergency it was thought that there would be a food shortage in the country, but if the level of productivity increased everything would be possible. The role of oil in agriculture is more important. The economy is heavily dependent on agricultural oil. All agricultural activities are related to oil agricultural machines are powered by oil.