It started from a post by someone who suggested that Newbie should not spam in the Beginners & Help board.
It sounded convincing, then I looked at his profile and it turned out that he had made
46 posts just today.
I would suggest to NOT fall into spamming of different sections for the sake of interaction.
This forum is a huge knowledge base, try to learn stuff and you will get to your dreams of higher members haha.
Not a single one of his posts received any Merit, which indicates that those posts have no value at all, in other words they are all garbage.
Here are some suspicious findings:
gibrab16His email was recently changed and he has just wokeup from 7 years of inactivity.

He made 46 posts today.
This person is originally from Indonesia but suddenly appeared on the India board.Presalenya akan berakhir 20 hari lagi.Diskon sangat besar ini 50%. Tapi pendapatan sementara tidak di cantumkan di websitenya. Apa nanti di akhir baru di publish kali ya?
https://ninjastic.space/post/48573086Wishing you a prosperous Diwali too. I’ve stopped waiting for govt validation tbh. Bitcoin does its thing regardless of policy. If taxes get better, great. If not, long-term HODL still makes sense. Kaju katli storage > soan papdi distribution 😄
https://ninjastic.space/post/66187112
Creating AI-generated postsRicardo Salinas’ stance is definitely interesting, especially because he’s not just talking — he’s backing it with serious capital. When someone like **Ricardo Salinas Pliego** publicly allocates such a large portion of his portfolio to Bitcoin, it sends a strong signal and naturally raises awareness.
That said, his situation also matters. He’s a billionaire with diversified businesses, access to top advisors, and the ability to stomach extreme volatility in a way most retail investors simply can’t. For him, Bitcoin is both a hedge against fiat debasement and a long-term asymmetric bet.
I agree that his consistency helps Bitcoin’s credibility, especially in discussions around inflation and monetary policy. But for average investors, copying a 70% allocation blindly would be risky. The takeaway isn’t “go all in,” but rather understanding *why* he believes in Bitcoin and then deciding what allocation fits one’s own risk tolerance and financial reality.
Originality= 100% Confident That's AI
Sapling= 100% Fake
Copyleaks= 100% AI Generated
undetectable= 99% AI Probability
ZeroGPT= 69.18% AI Generated
StealthWriter= 88% AI Generated
I agree with you, and COVID was the perfect reminder of this reality. Passive or alternative income isn’t just about luxury or extra comfort anymore, it’s about resilience. When a single income stream disappears, everything collapses with it. Having even a modest secondary source can be the difference between panic and stability.
That said, I think the goal shouldn’t be purely passive income, but diversified income. Many so-called passive incomes still require attention, skills, or timing (trading, marketing, freelancing). What matters is that they are independent of one employer or one system.
Your experience highlights an important lesson: income streams can change roles. What starts as “side income” can suddenly become the main lifeline. Because of that, building alternatives early is wise, even when things seem stable.
In short: yes, everyone should work toward at least one backup income source. Not out of greed, but out of preparedness. Life is unpredictable, and income flexibility is a form of financial insurance.
Sapling= 100% Fake
StealthWriter= 85% AI Generated
Copyleaks= 100% AI Generated
Originality= 100% Confident That's AI
This case reminds me of
lornadane, but this one was missed yesterday and only discovered now.