$1M Cash Airdrop ⭐ Razed.com ⭐ The Best Crypto Casino ♠♥♦♣

[cryptomaniac_xxx]

I'll try to explain.

I made $2,786 in deposits.
The first time I requested a withdrawal, they asked for level two verification. They asked for my passport and bank statement. I submitted the documents. My account was verified. And three days later, they paid me $360.
Then I immediately withdrew $500. They paid me instantly.
I played a little and withdrew $555. It arrived instantly.
I placed bets again and played limbo. I couldn't win anything. So I decided to withdraw everything and stop playing at this casino. I withdrew the remaining $815. And they didn't withdraw it. They asked me to go through level three verification.

https://talkimg.com/image/UMttN3

I sent them my credit card statement. They didn't accept it. I don't know what to send them now. They're asking for proof of business ownership. But I don't have a business. A proof of inheritance. But I didn't receive an inheritance. A lottery win. But I didn't win the lottery. Do they want me to lose all my money? I just don't understand this attitude.

So the deposits that you made to the casino (the $2,786) where did it come from?
From your bank account? Another casino? Crypto exchange?

I am just trying to understand. Maybe they want to see where the money comes from. For example, if it's from another exchange, you could just record while logging into your account, show them your trading history and withdrawal history justifying the source of funds)

Sometimes they really want it to be complicated. If they can explain it clearly where the money does come, maybe in business if they don't have work, or won from other casinos or just tell them the truth then everything will be fine.

But I guess it's going to be very hard for both parties to understand and who is telling the truth in this case.

[lolita80]

I'll try to explain.

I made $2,786 in deposits.
The first time I requested a withdrawal, they asked for level two verification. They asked for my passport and bank statement. I submitted the documents. My account was verified. And three days later, they paid me $360.
Then I immediately withdrew $500. They paid me instantly.
I played a little and withdrew $555. It arrived instantly.
I placed bets again and played limbo. I couldn't win anything. So I decided to withdraw everything and stop playing at this casino. I withdrew the remaining $815. And they didn't withdraw it. They asked me to go through level three verification.

https://talkimg.com/image/UMttN3

I sent them my credit card statement. They didn't accept it. I don't know what to send them now. They're asking for proof of business ownership. But I don't have a business. A proof of inheritance. But I didn't receive an inheritance. A lottery win. But I didn't win the lottery. Do they want me to lose all my money? I just don't understand this attitude.

So the deposits that you made to the casino (the $2,786) where did it come from?
From your bank account? Another casino? Crypto exchange?

I am just trying to understand. Maybe they want to see where the money comes from. For example, if it's from another exchange, you could just record while logging into your account, show them your trading history and withdrawal history justifying the source of funds)

I have savings on a cryptocurrency exchange. I made deposits at this casino in USDT.
https://talkimg.com/image/UMsN2m

[bitLeap]

I am just trying to understand. Maybe they want to see where the money comes from. For example, if it's from another exchange, you could just record while logging into your account, show them your trading history and withdrawal history justifying the source of funds)

Sometimes they really want it to be complicated. If they can explain it clearly where the money does come, maybe in business if they don't have work, or won from other casinos or just tell them the truth then everything will be fine.

But I guess it's going to be very hard for both parties to understand and who is telling the truth in this case.

Lack of transparency regarding the origin of user funds will always leave a gray area. In this case, most users will accuse the casino, even though everything is stated in the Terms of Service.

1.5 We reserve the right to block any funds we deem suspicious and report such funds to any relevant regulatory and/or prosecuting authority.
11.6 We reserve the right, under any circumstances, to request additional documentation verifying your identity, residence, and/or the source of any funds deposited with us.

I have savings on a cryptocurrency exchange. I made deposits at this casino in USDT.
https://talkimg.com/image/UMsN2m

Judging by the withdrawal times, you're clearly addicted to gambling. Your first problem is solved, but that doesn't stop you from realizing that your rapid deposit and withdrawal activity makes you look suspicious. Therefore, the casino will intercept your funds to ensure this activity doesn't indicate money laundering.
You already know you're losing frequently when gambling, but instead of taking a break, you keep playing. This unusual activity alerts the casino, so you're alerted to verify the funds are genuine.

It is no surprise that casinos are now under regulatory pressure, so even the slightest suspicious activity that users try to hide will be investigated.

Suspicious funds are any money that looks unusual or possibly comes from an illegal source. For example, if a deposit is much bigger than usual, comes from someone else’s account, or seems inconsistent with your normal activity, the system may flag it as suspicious. This is to protect both you and the platform and to comply with legal rules.

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/10/16/UMkbn9.png

[sunsilk]

I think it's a protocol for every casino that if there's an abused found from a user, they're going to block it. But I don't think that they're going to block a customer for no reason.

I've seen it from other casinos as well that these blockings of account are happening but before they do that, there's something that has happened that are against to the casino's rules and standards.

It's also good to show proof and evidence that they've blocked you like a simple screenshot.

In this context, when we do things that are in accordance with the ToS that applies on any site, we will definitely be safe, and in this situation, I just want to focus on myself and my experience. Until now, I have never had my account banned or even encountered any problems when playing in accordance with the applicable terms and conditions.

Perhaps in this case, what the OP or other users who have experienced the same thing feel is slightly different, and it doesn't mean that I am immediately accusing them of committing crimes or suspicious activities. It's just that when complaints arise, at least they explain with the evidence they have so that we can really determine where the mistake lies, whether it is on the part of the user or the site.
All such issues can be easily resolved if both parties communicate more intensely and consider the perspective of either the gambler or the site experiencing the problem.

That's always been the case, although there could be some false accusation but at most times the casinos are right with their basis and investigation against the users if they've been banned/blocked.

I didn't also experienced anything as this as I'm just a casual user and I know what to do so that I won't violate any rule that's within the TOS.

While there are users that are in continuous cooperation and communication, sometimes the verdict of the casinos of doing that to them are final.

[tbct_mt2]

That's always been the case, although there could be some false accusation but at most times the casinos are right with their basis and investigation against the users if they've been banned/blocked.

I didn't also experienced anything as this as I'm just a casual user and I know what to do so that I won't violate any rule that's within the TOS.

While there are users that are in continuous cooperation and communication, sometimes the verdict of the casinos of doing that to them are final.

Companies in general and gambling companies in particular, if are good companies, don't arbitrarily treat their customers harsly like banning accounts. They are aware of a business reputation and its importance on their business development.

Razed is a big casino, and I don't say it arbitrarily but base on actual data, so they have no reason to self destroy their reputation by banning customer accounts. If they took action, and did that severe decision, they would have had many reasons for doing this, so the user with a banned account almost has no chance of appealing that case successfully.

Chance of a big mistake from a casino is almost zero, consequently chance of successful appeal is nearly zero too.

[topbitcoin]

Companies in general and gambling companies in particular, if are good companies, don't arbitrarily treat their customers harsly like banning accounts. They are aware of a business reputation and its importance on their business development.

For treatment I think it depends on the players themselves in the end if indeed activities that look suspicious such as when depositing a large amount or when doing a series of things that seem suspicious then in the end a situation like this could be a problem at the end because indeed our account will be suspected of doing things that indicate cheating or outsmarting the system so that when a situation like this occurs there could be a special action even leading to a ban if indeed the gambler cannot show some aspects such as additional data for KYC.

But if we do gambling reasonably and without exaggeration, actually conditions like this can still be minimized and even conditions like this can never happen.

[bitLeap]

Perhaps in this case, what the OP or other users who have experienced the same thing feel is slightly different, and it doesn't mean that I am immediately accusing them of committing crimes or suspicious activities. It's just that when complaints arise, at least they explain with the evidence they have so that we can really determine where the mistake lies, whether it is on the part of the user or the site.
All such issues can be easily resolved if both parties communicate more intensely and consider the perspective of either the gambler or the site experiencing the problem.

That's always been the case, although there could be some false accusation but at most times the casinos are right with their basis and investigation against the users if they've been banned/blocked.

I didn't also experienced anything as this as I'm just a casual user and I know what to do so that I won't violate any rule that's within the TOS.

While there are users that are in continuous cooperation and communication, sometimes the verdict of the casinos of doing that to them are final.

Therefore, any suspicious activity detected can now be easily blocked. Throughout my gambling experience, I've never encountered any account issues at any casino.

Casinos don't simply punish users without justification. They operate according to standard operating procedures, and their employees even go through a rigorous selection process. Any service that deviates from the rules is easily detected and will result in dismissal.

[Raflesia]

In this context, when we do things that are in accordance with the ToS that applies on any site, we will definitely be safe, and in this situation, I just want to focus on myself and my experience. Until now, I have never had my account banned or even encountered any problems when playing in accordance with the applicable terms and conditions.

Perhaps in this case, what the OP or other users who have experienced the same thing feel is slightly different, and it doesn't mean that I am immediately accusing them of committing crimes or suspicious activities. It's just that when complaints arise, at least they explain with the evidence they have so that we can really determine where the mistake lies, whether it is on the part of the user or the site.
All such issues can be easily resolved if both parties communicate more intensely and consider the perspective of either the gambler or the site experiencing the problem.

That's always been the case, although there could be some false accusation but at most times the casinos are right with their basis and investigation against the users if they've been banned/blocked.

I didn't also experienced anything as this as I'm just a casual user and I know what to do so that I won't violate any rule that's within the TOS.

While there are users that are in continuous cooperation and communication, sometimes the verdict of the casinos of doing that to them are final.

It is actually a reasonable situation because after all when the bookmakers want to start this business they are certainly aware that possibilities like this will always exist especially when the competition is quite large, so this can also be utilized by some people who really indirectly want to show that the site is not really worth it to use but in the end, conditions like this will be very easy to overcome because indeed if they do a good job in maintaining the system or recording things like this will be very easy to detect.

If we are ordinary gamblers with reasonable deposits and do not do things that exceed the limits set by the site this condition will actually be very easy to avoid but sometimes for some complaints in the end not all complaints are the fault of the site because in some moments sometimes many gamblers try to outsmart which actually makes them actually get losses in the end.

[liuka]

It is actually a reasonable situation because after all when the bookmakers want to start this business they are certainly aware that possibilities like this will always exist especially when the competition is quite large, so this can also be utilized by some people who really indirectly want to show that the site is not really worth it to use but in the end, conditions like this will be very easy to overcome because indeed if they do a good job in maintaining the system or recording things like this will be very easy to detect.

If we are ordinary gamblers with reasonable deposits and do not do things that exceed the limits set by the site this condition will actually be very easy to avoid but sometimes for some complaints in the end not all complaints are the fault of the site because in some moments sometimes many gamblers try to outsmart which actually makes them actually get losses in the end.

Cases like this are simply because gamblers aren't playing safely, so it's perfectly normal for casinos to block their accounts after being caught trying to outwit them. In fact, if we gamble wisely, our accounts will always be safe.

However, if a casino blocks a gambler's account because they consistently win, it means the casino is dishonest, so it's important to choose a reputable casino. However, there are certainly many cases out there that we're not aware of, so for those of us who actively gamble, we can certainly conclude that the gambling business generates significant revenue, so don't try to interfere with it even in the slightest way, because the casino will block your account.

[moneystery]

Therefore, any suspicious activity detected can now be easily blocked. Throughout my gambling experience, I've never encountered any account issues at any casino.

Casinos don't simply punish users without justification. They operate according to standard operating procedures, and their employees even go through a rigorous selection process. Any service that deviates from the rules is easily detected and will result in dismissal.

That's what I think too... during my time playing on razed.com, I've never encountered any issues, and I don't know what these people did to cause them to experience these issues and accuse Razed of cheating them.

Razed acts professionally in handling its users. They have standard procedures that prevent unilateral action without a clear reason. If a user encounters a problem and is willing to contact the support team properly and provide complete information, the issue can usually be resolved successfully. but if they refuse to cooperate, it only makes matters worse, and they end up getting nothing.

[sunsilk]

Companies in general and gambling companies in particular, if are good companies, don't arbitrarily treat their customers harsly like banning accounts. They are aware of a business reputation and its importance on their business development.

Razed is a big casino, and I don't say it arbitrarily but base on actual data, so they have no reason to self destroy their reputation by banning customer accounts. If they took action, and did that severe decision, they would have had many reasons for doing this, so the user with a banned account almost has no chance of appealing that case successfully.

Chance of a big mistake from a casino is almost zero, consequently chance of successful appeal is nearly zero too.

If the offense is so terrible and that could make them feel that it's a threatening to their business, they'll have to do it even if it means pushing one customer away.

I guess the total wager is also going to make things differently if the user has got a lot of it already, that can alter decisions.

Therefore, any suspicious activity detected can now be easily blocked. Throughout my gambling experience, I've never encountered any account issues at any casino.

Casinos don't simply punish users without justification. They operate according to standard operating procedures, and their employees even go through a rigorous selection process. Any service that deviates from the rules is easily detected and will result in dismissal.

Yes, they don't decide randomly but there were cases not with razed that I've seen that there were some false accusations as well from a casino representative.

And that's when dispute happens from users.

It is actually a reasonable situation because after all when the bookmakers want to start this business they are certainly aware that possibilities like this will always exist especially when the competition is quite large, so this can also be utilized by some people who really indirectly want to show that the site is not really worth it to use but in the end, conditions like this will be very easy to overcome because indeed if they do a good job in maintaining the system or recording things like this will be very easy to detect.

If we are ordinary gamblers with reasonable deposits and do not do things that exceed the limits set by the site this condition will actually be very easy to avoid but sometimes for some complaints in the end not all complaints are the fault of the site because in some moments sometimes many gamblers try to outsmart which actually makes them actually get losses in the end.

That's true, in many cases that we are seeing. It's not the casino's fault when the users start to complain with a lot of things.

At most times, they're just frustrated gamblers trying to ask for a refund and can't accept defeat.

[bitLeap]

Razed acts professionally in handling its users. They have standard procedures that prevent unilateral action without a clear reason. If a user encounters a problem and is willing to contact the support team properly and provide complete information, the issue can usually be resolved successfully. but if they refuse to cooperate, it only makes matters worse, and they end up getting nothing.

In any company, official procedures will always be the main reference, and most of them stem from a lack of understanding of the ToS, when users unknowingly violate the policy and that's when the problem is often considered to come from the casino when in fact it doesn't.

Yes, they don't decide randomly but there were cases not with razed that I've seen that there were some false accusations as well from a casino representative.

And that's when dispute happens from users.

Actually, in the case of accusations, both parties only need to be open with each other, but unfortunately, there are often times when there is a lack of transparency, especially if the user tries to cover it up.

If we are ordinary gamblers with reasonable deposits and do not do things that exceed the limits set by the site this condition will actually be very easy to avoid but sometimes for some complaints in the end not all complaints are the fault of the site because in some moments sometimes many gamblers try to outsmart which actually makes them actually get losses in the end.

That's true, in many cases that we are seeing. It's not the casino's fault when the users start to complain with a lot of things.

At most times, they're just frustrated gamblers trying to ask for a refund and can't accept defeat.

Complaints like these are commonplace in casinos. Irresponsible players experience unbearable frustration, and instead of mentally healing themselves, they start attacking the casino. From the very beginning, users consciously control their funds, whether to gamble or not.

[gunhell16]

Judging by the withdrawal times, you're clearly addicted to gambling. Your first problem is solved, but that doesn't stop you from realizing that your rapid deposit and withdrawal activity makes you look suspicious. Therefore, the casino will intercept your funds to ensure this activity doesn't indicate money laundering.
You already know you're losing frequently when gambling, but instead of taking a break, you keep playing. This unusual activity alerts the casino, so you're alerted to verify the funds are genuine.

It is no surprise that casinos are now under regulatory pressure, so even the slightest suspicious activity that users try to hide will be investigated.

Suspicious funds are any money that looks unusual or possibly comes from an illegal source. For example, if a deposit is much bigger than usual, comes from someone else’s account, or seems inconsistent with your normal activity, the system may flag it as suspicious. This is to protect both you and the platform and to comply with legal rules.

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/10/16/UMkbn9.png

I want to state immediately that in what I am about to say, I am not defending anyone, dude. Given the fact that the complainant against this casino might be an addict because he deposited a large amount, was what he did depositing that amount wrong?

My second question is, according to the Razed support team, they already saw 'unusual activity' right from the complainant's initial deposit. Why didn't they immediately inform the complainant at the time he deposited that amount? Because it favors them? and they only speak up when the complainant attempts to withdraw? Isn't that's unfair to the complainant? Because if we look closely, I don't see anything wrong with the complainant depositing a large amount.

If that's the trend among online casinos that you deposit a small amount first, and then after a month you suddenly deposit a large amount, and you run into problems then it might be better to just deposit small amounts. Because in the end, it seems like the casino is just going to steal our large deposit amount by requesting documents that the user might not even possess. This is just my thought process on the matter.

[Raflesia]

It is actually a reasonable situation because after all when the bookmakers want to start this business they are certainly aware that possibilities like this will always exist especially when the competition is quite large, so this can also be utilized by some people who really indirectly want to show that the site is not really worth it to use but in the end, conditions like this will be very easy to overcome because indeed if they do a good job in maintaining the system or recording things like this will be very easy to detect.

If we are ordinary gamblers with reasonable deposits and do not do things that exceed the limits set by the site this condition will actually be very easy to avoid but sometimes for some complaints in the end not all complaints are the fault of the site because in some moments sometimes many gamblers try to outsmart which actually makes them actually get losses in the end.

That's true, in many cases that we are seeing. It's not the casino's fault when the users start to complain with a lot of things.

At most times, they're just frustrated gamblers trying to ask for a refund and can't accept defeat.

There will be a lot of gamblers who try to outsmart in several ways including outsmarting the existing ToS so that they can get more profit but the risk will be very large because not only will they lose their money (if proven guilty) they will also lose their account because after all in this case the site has full control when the situation indicates cheating then they can do a permanent ban including freezing the money in the account.

Nowadays we encounter many complaints that in the end the fault lies with the gambler himself not from the site that makes this actually a concern so that we are always within the rules if we really want to play comfortably.

[khaled0111]

..

You are right, but why doesn’t the official representative say this? Why do you need to say it on his behalf?
Let the OP (official representative) respond here, and let us hear what they have to say before we can make a fair judjment.
OP’s most recent activity dates back to a month ago (
His profile shows that his last activity dates back a month). So let’s give him some more time to respond!

[liuka]

There will be a lot of gamblers who try to outsmart in several ways including outsmarting the existing ToS so that they can get more profit but the risk will be very large because not only will they lose their money (if proven guilty) they will also lose their account because after all in this case the site has full control when the situation indicates cheating then they can do a permanent ban including freezing the money in the account.

Nowadays we encounter many complaints that in the end the fault lies with the gambler himself not from the site that makes this actually a concern so that we are always within the rules if we really want to play comfortably.

Gamblers who cheat casinos to win big are clearly breaking the rules, and casinos must act quickly by blocking their accounts to prevent losses from their cheating behavior. There are many out there who try to cheat casinos using unsavory methods.

Gamblers who break the rules are usually new players trying to get bonuses through underhanded means. Gamblers who have been betting on Razed for a long time will naturally play it safe because they don't want their accounts banned. Therefore, when gambling at the casino, play wisely and be prepared to accept losses and control your emotions.

Razed is the best platform for gambling, offering numerous bonuses if you actively play slots or bet on sports.

[moneystery]

...
At most times, they're just frustrated gamblers trying to ask for a refund and can't accept defeat.

I'm reminded of this case "Razed Failed to Enforce Self-Exclusion, Leading to 2,689.59 USDC Loss [Resolved]" where he wanted a refund because Razed failed to enforce self-exclusion on him... from the start, it was clear that the fault was his for not being able to control himself and stop gambling. but he shifted the blame onto the casino for not stopping him, and Razed handled the issue professionally and returned his money.

I see that the pattern is almost the same, there must be something that these people did that caused problems for themselves. We don't know for sure yet, but with how Razed handled the whole thing, I think they could have solved this problem easily.

[bitLeap]

...
At most times, they're just frustrated gamblers trying to ask for a refund and can't accept defeat.

I'm reminded of this case "Razed Failed to Enforce Self-Exclusion, Leading to 2,689.59 USDC Loss [Resolved]" where he wanted a refund because Razed failed to enforce self-exclusion on him... from the start, it was clear that the fault was his for not being able to control himself and stop gambling. but he shifted the blame onto the casino for not stopping him, and Razed handled the issue professionally and returned his money.

I see that the pattern is almost the same, there must be something that these people did that caused problems for themselves. We don't know for sure yet, but with how Razed handled the whole thing, I think they could have solved this problem easily.

While Razed can address any issue, we're more concerned about gamblers who initially intend to exploit this loophole to profit from refunds. It's as if they're repeating the same pattern, as Razed successfully addressed the first one. In this case, the casino will automatically tighten security by requiring documentation that meets the casino standards.

[tbct_mt2]

While Razed can address any issue, we're more concerned about gamblers who initially intend to exploit this loophole to profit from refunds. It's as if they're repeating the same pattern, as Razed successfully addressed the first one. In this case, the casino will automatically tighten security by requiring documentation that meets the casino standards.

They can succeed with first or even some cases but after all, the casino will be able win agains such exploitation. They have all data, tools to detect user activities including cheating so cheaters have no successful way to win against a casino in long term. Surely with a same cheating strategy for exploit the casino refund policy, they will not be able to succeed in a too long time.

This raises a fact that when they failed by cheating, then customer support ticket, complaints in scam accusation threads, they will try to harash and attack the casino with hope of damaging the business reputation. Eventually, it's predictable that the casino will win against cheaters and Razed will win against any attacks against their reputation.

[bitLeap]

They can succeed with first or even some cases but after all, the casino will be able win agains such exploitation. They have all data, tools to detect user activities including cheating so cheaters have no successful way to win against a casino in long term. Surely with a same cheating strategy for exploit the casino refund policy, they will not be able to succeed in a too long time.

This raises a fact that when they failed by cheating, then customer support ticket, complaints in scam accusation threads, they will try to harash and attack the casino with hope of damaging the business reputation. Eventually, it's predictable that the casino will win against cheaters and Razed will win against any attacks against their reputation.

For now, this is the pattern of gambling that gamblers are trying to employ, especially against Razed, but it's possible they could try the same strategy at other casinos. Essentially, as long as the casino has a system in place to detect suspicious activity and is able to stop it according to the rules, it should be fine.

And if we look at the accusations of similar patterns against other casinos, it's easy to conclude that there's a group of people trying to profit from this method.