♻️ CCE.Cash - Instant & Automatic Exchange ♻️ Fees 0.4 - 0.8%!

[Murat]

Hi,

We're integrated with the CCE OpenAPI and everything works except the order-status query. Hoping you can confirm whether the endpoint is down or whether we're calling it wrong.

Working endpoints (same API key, same nonce/timestamp/HMAC signing):

POST /openapi/order/calculate → code: 0, success
POST /openapi/order/place → code: 0, returns the order (no, query_code, deposit address)

Failing endpoint:

POST /openapi/order/query → HTTP 500, code: 2 ("Server abnormality", per your docs)
Tried the identifier as { "no": "<8-char order no>" } and as { "query_code": "<12-char code>" } — both return the same 500 / code 2.
Example order: no = G3MPF0L7, query_code = EMGCEY312D43 (placed successfully via order/place).

Since calculate and place succeed on the identical credentials and signing, this doesn't look like an auth issue (no 400009 / 701100 / 400002 errors — just the generic 500 / code 2).

Questions:

Is POST /openapi/order/query the correct endpoint to fetch an order's status? If not, what is the correct path?
What is the exact request body it expects (which field — no, query_code, or something else)?
Is the endpoint currently experiencing issues on your side?

Account / API key (public): <your X-Api-Key>

Thanks!

[CCECash]

Hi,

We're integrated with the CCE OpenAPI and everything works except the order-status query. Hoping you can confirm whether the endpoint is down or whether we're calling it wrong.

Working endpoints (same API key, same nonce/timestamp/HMAC signing):

POST /openapi/order/calculate → code: 0, success
POST /openapi/order/place → code: 0, returns the order (no, query_code, deposit address)

Failing endpoint:

POST /openapi/order/query → HTTP 500, code: 2 ("Server abnormality", per your docs)
Tried the identifier as { "no": "<8-char order no>" } and as { "query_code": "<12-char code>" } — both return the same 500 / code 2.
Example order: no = G3MPF0L7, query_code = EMGCEY312D43 (placed successfully via order/place).

Since calculate and place succeed on the identical credentials and signing, this doesn't look like an auth issue (no 400009 / 701100 / 400002 errors — just the generic 500 / code 2).

Questions:

Is POST /openapi/order/query the correct endpoint to fetch an order's status? If not, what is the correct path?
What is the exact request body it expects (which field — no, query_code, or something else)?
Is the endpoint currently experiencing issues on your side?

Account / API key (public): <your X-Api-Key>

Thanks!

Please confirm that the returned message is "Server error" and not "Internal server error".

For specific information, please contact our business team at business@cce.cash for assistance.

[SamReomo]

I was talking about the person whose ID would be stolen and used for this. That person could end up facing serious problems. There is no point in talking about the hacker because they already know they are taking a huge risk, and they commit these crimes for money while causing harm to other people.

Yes, the person whose details hackers might use for KYC can face issues from authorities, although that person is fully innocent but we all know the system doesn't understand that and the authorities will investigate the person whose KYC details were used if the crime was of high intensity.

That's why most of the times when someone doesn't share their KYC data, they're on safe end, but we all know these days completing KYC at many sites is almost mandatory, and a user has no other option than completing the KYC verification. You're right the hackers don't care about anyone else, they only want to steal money, they don't really care about anyone.

[CCECash]

We're happy to share another mini-report!

TRONSCAN data shows that the total number of TRON accounts has reached  390,318,566, officially surpassing 390 million. It is reported that the total number of accounts is the total number of activated account addresses on the TRON network. https://t.co/zbWxiU23WX

With best wishes, ♻️ CCE.Cash

[LUZUMYY]

CCECash, Will you be implementing DAI (ERC-20) on the exchange? I want to exchange BTC for DAI.

[Forsyth Jones]

I don't know, but it wouldn't be difficult for a hacker to create fake KYC data or to ask someone in one of those countries to complete the KYC process for $1,000 or $10,000. I know it sounds crazy, but it's a small thing compared to what these people are capable of.

I agree, for hackers it's not hard to create fake KYC data mostly these days when all of those things can be done using AI platforms and some prompts.

It's not that hard to edit someone's KYC data these days, but as @ZAINmalik75 said, it might create even more problems for the hackers if they try to fake KYC verification because it's not that easy to trick authorities.

I even read in some forums where they were teaching others how to create fake KYC data but I'm pretty sure most people won't take such type of risk and they'll never use the breached KYC data because they'll face legal issues by doing such a thing.

Nowadays it's very easy to get stolen IDs from forums or dark web stores to use in KYC processes at exhcnages/banks. I wonder what mechanisms they use to determine if KYC documents are genuine or fake. Besides that, to get pass video/selfie verification processes, these criminals use ai tools to create deepfakes (this was already common even before 2022). Deepfakes are widely used to bypass age verification on social medias.

That's why KYC doesn't always solve the fraud problem, criminals are always studying ways to bypass the system rules.

CCECash, Will you be implementing DAI (ERC-20) on the exchange? I want to exchange BTC for DAI.

Taking advantage of the hook, it would be interesting if they added support for the Liquid BTC network, the Liquid network, for example, is supported in the green wallet (and LN-BTC as well, why not)

[Pmalek]

CCECash, Will you be implementing DAI (ERC-20) on the exchange? I want to exchange BTC for DAI.

CCE.Cash supported DAI in the past on multiple chains. It was available on Ethereum, Polygon, and Binance Smart Chain. Someone correct me if I am wrong. For some reason it's not on the list right now. I couldn't find it on the website among the available assets. I also don't see a post by their forum representative in this thread that it was removed. Maybe it's just a temporary thing and it will be available again soon. 

[Faisal2202]

Nowadays it's very easy to get stolen IDs from forums or dark web stores to use in KYC processes at exhcnages/banks. I wonder what mechanisms they use to determine if KYC documents are genuine or fake. Besides that, to get pass video/selfie verification processes, these criminals use ai tools to create deepfakes (this was already common even before 2022). Deepfakes are widely used to bypass age verification on social medias.

That's why KYC doesn't always solve the fraud problem, criminals are always studying ways to bypass the system rules.

Deepfakes are really old and they work really well on old people especially because they could easily be scammed with spoofed audio calls alone. Then if they are talking with someone who looks exactly like a celebrity, their relative, or grandson, they would not hesitate for a second but would send the funds.

Hackers and scammers are ruthless, they only care about money.

Now speaking of stolen IDs, getting them online is also very easy. I am not a dark web user and have never been there, but I have seen people on Facebook offering IDs for verification processes. The risk of losing your ID is also very high, but what can we do if the government itself is the main reason for all these breaches, as their software was holding our information?

[CCECash]

CCECash, Will you be implementing DAI (ERC-20) on the exchange? I want to exchange BTC for DAI.

Hello. As part of MakerDAO’s transition to the Sky ecosystem, the DAI stablecoin has been successfully upgraded and rebranded as USDS (Sky Dollar), marking the evolution of the MakerDAO ecosystem into the Sky Protocol. While both are USD-pegged decentralized stablecoins, USDS offers enhanced multi-chain capabilities, higher yields, and institutional-grade compliance features.

Consequently, we have suspended exchanges for the original DAI, but we are launching an updated USDS exchange service—stay tuned!

[Faisal2202]

Hello. As part of MakerDAO’s transition to the Sky ecosystem, the DAI stablecoin has been successfully upgraded and rebranded as USDS (Sky Dollar), marking the evolution of the MakerDAO ecosystem into the Sky Protocol. While both are USD-pegged decentralized stablecoins, USDS offers enhanced multi-chain capabilities, higher yields, and institutional-grade compliance features.

Consequently, we have suspended exchanges for the original DAI, but we are launching an updated USDS exchange service—stay tuned!

The compliance features in USDS will surely give traditional financial partners the legal certainty they need because the old DAI was not as suitable for them. But the new DAI (USDS) does not seem appealing to many DAI supporters, as its institutional-level compliance is something not everyone wanted.

So far, it has no freezing option like USDT or USDC, but they do have the option to introduce that in the future. They are clearly targeting institutions. I am not going to discuss how it moves away from crypto's original censorship-resistant principles, but that is a fact.

Anyway, great work launching this one. Those who do not like USDS will probably prefer PureDAI.

[ZAINmalik75]

Yes, the person whose details hackers might use for KYC can face issues from authorities, although that person is fully innocent but we all know the system doesn't understand that and the authorities will investigate the person whose KYC details were used if the crime was of high intensity.

That's why most of the times when someone doesn't share their KYC data, they're on safe end, but we all know these days completing KYC at many sites is almost mandatory, and a user has no other option than completing the KYC verification. You're right the hackers don't care about anyone else, they only want to steal money, they don't really care about anyone.

Yeah, when we look at history and how our, or anyone's, ID is already out there on the dark web The biggest gateway has been these centralized platforms and institutions that asked for our IDs but failed to keep them safe. Now those IDs are available for scammers and hackers to misuse.

There is no way to track all of this.

Anyway, if the justice system is good, then innocent people are not going to pay much beyond dealing with some inconvenience. But in places where the justice system is weak, people are going to suffer far more than just a hard time. At the same time, IDs from countries with poor justice systems are often less valuable to these hackers. 

[examplens]

Hello. As part of MakerDAO’s transition to the Sky ecosystem, the DAI stablecoin has been successfully upgraded and rebranded as USDS (Sky Dollar), marking the evolution of the MakerDAO ecosystem into the Sky Protocol. While both are USD-pegged decentralized stablecoins, USDS offers enhanced multi-chain capabilities, higher yields, and institutional-grade compliance features.

Consequently, we have suspended exchanges for the original DAI, but we are launching an updated USDS exchange service—stay tuned!

The compliance features in USDS will surely give traditional financial partners the legal certainty they need because the old DAI was not as suitable for them. But the new DAI (USDS) does not seem appealing to many DAI supporters, as its institutional-level compliance is something not everyone wanted.

So far, it has no freezing option like USDT or USDC, but they do have the option to introduce that in the future. They are clearly targeting institutions. I am not going to discuss how it moves away from crypto's original censorship-resistant principles, but that is a fact.

Anyway, great work launching this one. Those who do not like USDS will probably prefer PureDAI.

There is no deadline by which DAI will exist, and it is possible to swap it 1:1 for USDS (and in the opposite direction), so for now I don't see any rush to exclude DAI as an option.
Honestly, I don't see the need to rush to delist DAI.

[SamReomo]

Besides that, to get pass video/selfie verification processes, these criminals use ai tools to create deepfakes (this was already common even before 2022). Deepfakes are widely used to bypass age verification on social medias.

That's why KYC doesn't always solve the fraud problem, criminals are always studying ways to bypass the system rules.

Deepfakes were a past thing I guess, now there're many models that can creative complete lookalike of a person without any training and those models are easily available on cloud and are used by criminals.

A few weeks ago when I was using TikTok, I found a channel where a TikToker used those models to covert himself into various actors/actresses and to be honest it was pretty hard to find any difference than that and the real ones.

Yeah, when we look at history and how our, or anyone's, ID is already out there on the dark web The biggest gateway has been these centralized platforms and institutions that asked for our IDs but failed to keep them safe. Now those IDs are available for scammers and hackers to misuse.

Yes, such data is mostly leaked when the platforms that we use require some kind of KYC verification and they can't protect our precious data that we submit in order to get our KYC completed. We should be thankful that we have platforms like CCE.Cash where we can swap our coins without going through KYC, as long as we check AML of coins before swapping, we might never face KYC issues on platform like CCE.Cash.

[inspace]

🎉 The series of events continues! The latest raffle has just started — hurry up and secure your slot!

♻️ CCE.Cash 🎁 FREE RAFFLE 🎁 $30 in BTC!

➥ Choose a slot to enter.
➥ The winner will receive a prize of $30 in BTC 🎁
➥ After selecting a block, we will use the BitList tool to determine the winner.



Stay tuned for the latest news.

[Forsyth Jones]

Another country regulating crypto and stablecoins in the most bizarre way possible, with a maximum penalty of 7 years imprisonment for violating the rules, this country is Taiwan: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2026/07/01/taiwan-s-sweeping-crypto-law-raises-the-bar-with-licensing-reserve-mandates-and-tough-penalties (coindesk, you get access to 02 free articles per month, an excellent topic for CCECash to cover).

In short, the legislation requires crypto exchanges to obtain explicit licensing to be within the law. These rules include: strengthening cybersecurity, keeping client funds separate from the company to strengthen internal governance and risk management.... I don't know what these last two mean, could someone explain them to me? Don't companies already have a whole team to take care of this?

Before, exchanges and other companies only needed to comply with AML prevention regulations in the country. In general, these regulations are very similar to what's happening in my country, but for now, here they don't threaten with prison yet.

All governments in the world are rushing to regulate the crypto market, instead of fostering innovation and attracting more and more investors...

[hugeblack]

These rules include: strengthening cybersecurity, keeping client funds separate from the company to strengthen internal governance and risk management.... I don't know what these last two mean, could someone explain them to me? Don't companies already have a whole team to take care of this?

This means that customer funds/deposits remain separate from the company's working capital, thus preventing the misuse of customer funds as happened with FTX and other platforms that treat customer deposits as part of their capital.

Generally, the problem is seeing such legislation in the Seychelles, the Cayman Islands, and other jurisdictions known for their lax regulations.

[NotATether]

These rules include: strengthening cybersecurity, keeping client funds separate from the company to strengthen internal governance and risk management.... I don't know what these last two mean, could someone explain them to me? Don't companies already have a whole team to take care of this?

This means that customer funds/deposits remain separate from the company's working capital, thus preventing the misuse of customer funds as happened with FTX and other platforms that treat customer deposits as part of their capital.

Generally, the problem is seeing such legislation in the Seychelles, the Cayman Islands, and other jurisdictions known for their lax regulations.

I mean to be honest, as long as users are not jailed for using crypto, I don't really mind any regulation.

I'm not an exchange owner so I'm not really affected by any of this, but it is to be expected that countries have strong laws to protect exchange users, don't you think?

[SamReomo]

I mean to be honest, as long as users are not jailed for using crypto, I don't really mind any regulation.

I'm not an exchange owner so I'm not really affected by any of this, but it is to be expected that countries have strong laws to protect exchange users, don't you think?

Those regulations are created mostly for tax purposes and some countries have created such strict regulations because they want to stop the hackers/scammers from stealing money of the traders/investors.

That's what they say, but I think they mostly want to know about the assets of everyone and that's why they're creating such regulations, and if an exchange doesn't accept such regulations then they ban such exchanges.

Although, users won't be jailed but they'll be monitored and that means they'll have no privacy whatsoever. I'm very sure tax isn't the only reason why they're adding such strict laws, and I'm sure they're not protecting users but they're doing their best to monitor everyone.

[Cointikka]

I mean to be honest, as long as users are not jailed for using crypto, I don't really mind any regulation.

I'm not an exchange owner so I'm not really affected by any of this, but it is to be expected that countries have strong laws to protect exchange users, don't you think?

Those regulations are created mostly for tax purposes and some countries have created such strict regulations because they want to stop the hackers/scammers from stealing money of the traders/investors.

LOL! This is the best exchange if you are someone who knows how to hide transactions. If not, then you should not question your tech abilities but your ability to comprehend how and why you need to hide transactions with every new tax amendment. If you think they, as in the government, are trying to protect you, then you're hallucinating without any instigator like alcohol or drugs. Every new rule is always meant to help the ruling government rather than you as an individual. That is why new tax laws are always coming up or being updated.

If it's not your issue, then why bother with a small tissue for an issue to wipe the ass with that same tissue? 

[Faisal2202]

I mean to be honest, as long as users are not jailed for using crypto, I don't really mind any regulation.

I'm not an exchange owner so I'm not really affected by any of this, but it is to be expected that countries have strong laws to protect exchange users, don't you think?

Haha, this is really funy, I mean segregated funds being a regulatory milestone in 2026! It really says a lot about how low the bar was to begin with. I always thought this might be a standard practice with most of the platforms. And if it is not then it should be.

FTX was not long ago, and still exchanges are being trusted on their word? No audits or anything! This is ridiculous. I think I should also follow your way, the way, how you think about the law.