orakool
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 11:20:41 AM |
|
Any chance that cpuminer will work with multicoin pools ?
|
|
|
|
garyang
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 11:46:55 AM |
|
Anybody use this firmware with moded(volt-mode) over-clocked (=/>1100mhz) gridseeds? Can you share your experience please?
I've tried to mine with volt-moded miner. It didn't work. Do you have same problem? I havent try yet. still waiting for 703n to delivere. did you try with un-moded one to make sure controller is working with pool...? Sure. I've done several time. un-moded miner shows 360K on 850Hz moded miner shows 96K on 1150hz....-.-;; moded miner with cgminer on win7 shows 485K on 1150Hz No problems here... 519 KH/s @ 1225 MHz Today I upgraded v3e. I got 409 KH/s @ 1200Mhz 430 KH/s @ 1225Mhz but miner got too many hw error @ 1225Mhz I just replaced r52 33K to 47K. Which mod did you apply? And Still doesn't work with multipool.us and wafflepool.com....
|
|
|
|
Ajeto
Member
Offline
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 11:51:28 AM |
|
I was referring to the pools that did work, and suddenly stopped accepting shares after some time. Those pool you have posted never worked in the first place.
Sandor, it actually worked fine first day on Waffle for me with version v3d. But only that day It never worked on Clevermining though. Unless if I use the original 1.0 version on LA TP-703n @orakool: try setting pass d=1024 on Waffle and let me know how it goes
|
|
|
|
dloganbill
|
|
April 21, 2014, 11:57:01 AM |
|
Thanks for the help Jinx. Is there a list of known working/non-working pools? A few posts back it looks like several of the big pools don't work.
|
|
|
|
|
Ajeto
Member
Offline
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 01:10:48 PM |
|
true, but the only accepted shares i received was when i used d=1024, maybe coincidence, maybe it disregarded it, idk, but i actually had accepted shares..
|
|
|
|
orakool
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 01:36:48 PM |
|
true, but the only accepted shares i received was when i used d=1024, maybe coincidence, maybe it disregarded it, idk, but i actually had accepted shares..
d=1024: [2014-04-21 13:29:33.484] New job_id: e38e Diff: 512 [2014-04-21 13:29:33.484] Dispatching new work to GC3355 threads [2014-04-21 13:29:33.806] API: Command: stats [2014-04-21 13:29:37.622] 7@0 1150MHz: Got nonce 00060f25, Hash <= Htarget! [2014-04-21 13:29:37.683] 7@0: accepted 3/3 (100.00%) 101.0/203.9/719.4 KH/s [2014-04-21 13:29:45.131] API: Command: stats [2014-04-21 13:29:53.475] 7@4 1150MHz: Got nonce ccea6f27, Hash <= Htarget! [2014-04-21 13:29:53.535] 7@4: accepted 4/4 (100.00%) 97.9/301.7/817.2 KH/s [2014-04-21 13:29:55.047] New job_id: e395 Diff: 512
Current mining coin - dogecoin. And shares accepted. If pool mine any hidden coin - reject.
|
|
|
|
sandor111 (OP)
|
|
April 21, 2014, 02:15:04 PM |
|
I have managed to fix the issue with rejected shares, all pools should be compatible in the next version.
|
|
|
|
garyang
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 02:22:24 PM |
|
I've found my problem on this firmware One of moded miner's chip doesn't work.(GC3355 #1) That's why, I got 410K @1200Mz I compared with win7(cgminer) on pool(ltc.ghash.io) side. win7 hash rate is 70K more. cgminer shows almost 490K @1150Mz v3e shows almost 390K @1150hz
Some has any idea? or recommend fix this problem
|
|
|
|
Kapz786
|
|
April 21, 2014, 02:39:13 PM |
|
Looking forward to testing the new version
|
|
|
|
Ajeto
Member
Offline
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 02:55:54 PM |
|
I have managed to fix the issue with rejected shares, all pools should be compatible in the next version. You are a rock star!
|
|
|
|
Mr. Jinx
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
April 21, 2014, 02:58:41 PM |
|
I have managed to fix the issue with rejected shares, all pools should be compatible in the next version. Great work! Can't wait to test this with p2pool. Hope you will share this on github soon.
|
|
|
|
poopypants
|
|
April 21, 2014, 03:07:05 PM |
|
Seems as thought something was tweaked in the auto-overclocking, more aggressive than before? I am getting more hwe with V3e than before.
|
|
|
|
sandor111 (OP)
|
|
April 21, 2014, 03:10:10 PM |
|
I have updated the git repo, fixed issue with 100% rejects on some pools. Seems as thought something was tweaked in the auto-overclocking, more aggressive than before? I am getting more hwe with V3e than before.
Yes, I will release another update in an hour or so, I have yet again changed the auto tuning algo.
|
|
|
|
orakool
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 03:40:31 PM |
|
I have managed to fix the issue with rejected shares, all pools should be compatible in the next version. Thanks ! Great job !
|
|
|
|
Xer0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 05:13:53 PM |
|
3e fixed the 0% issue for GMC Pool! thanks sandor
|
|
|
|
|
boozer
|
|
April 21, 2014, 05:31:15 PM |
|
I upgraded from 'd' to 'f' and it says I'm 'e', lol. I never downloaded 'e' so is it just a field you forgot to update on this version?
|
|
|
|
sandor111 (OP)
|
|
April 21, 2014, 06:17:16 PM |
|
Small issue with auto-tune fixed in v3g.
|
|
|
|
Xer0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 06:54:28 PM |
|
password fields missing for backup pools, intention or forgot?
|
|
|
|
|